Law abiding citizens should have the right to possess the same level of weapons as, at the very least...

Law abiding citizens should have the right to possess the same level of weapons as, at the very least, their police forces, if not their military.

Attached: españa-1.jpg (4137x2758, 1.06M)

>law abiding
Gun-law abiding.
Ftfy
Don’t anoint citizens as saints simply because they want guns. Gun owners are not law-abiding, they are gun law-abiding. People who don’t own guns are also law abiding but the gun laws don’t apply to them until start trying to own guns.

And the second they break the law they will of course put them down and not use them.... really?

So no husband will ever commit murder suicide with his entire family ever again because he is law abiding. No drunk idiot will shoot ha brother in law over a card game. No anti democracy ancap or antics or neonazis will ever use weapons to try to overthrow democratic governments.

Are you naive or just need a gun to feel like a man?

>GEI
what a faggot police

Attached: ha.gif (350x193, 3.01M)

I have always believed the citizens of a country should have the tools/weapons available to kill every member of the government. Government should fear the people. Only those who look to use the power of government to control the people fear the people having the weapons necessary to end the governments tyranny.

Attached: 9872364876234.jpg (3000x3527, 2.51M)

Based

Theyre Catalan so ye they are fags

They are saints. They are defending rights for everyone.

>Law abiding citizens
Even mentally deranged people are law abiding citizens until they snap and shoot up a school or mosque (per orders of Mossad).

Cops are typically screened for such things before they’re allowed to become gun toting officers, on mental health and personality/characters spectrums. So are soldiers, who are rarely allowed to carry firearms outside of war zones and training exercises.

Gun nuts fail to realize it’s easier for a literal *who* to get a gun than a trained police officer.

And people we don’t know shit about shouldn’t be allowed access to something that can significantly impact multiple people’s mortality within a matter of seconds.

They do have that right.

Kys

You did not break the law until you break it. I don’t want another Christchurch fucker

>I don’t want another Christchurch fucker
Of course you don't Ahmed. Now get the fuck out of France.

You forgot the LAW ABIDING GOVERNMENT !

Any and all gun control laws are tyranny

>it’s not a right until you’re actively enjoying that right.
>if you are not actively enjoying that right, it’s not YOUR right.
>Subject to approved behavior, maybe more.

Leave.

Attached: 84CACFBA-704D-4801-B234-BF763BA3F1E7.jpg (1200x1800, 405K)

>Cops are typically screened for such things before they’re allowed to become gun toting officers, on mental health and personality/characters spectrums. So are soldiers, who are rarely allowed to carry firearms outside of war zones and training exercises.
And the military / police have killed more innocent people with firearms than private citizens have across history. They should thus be subject to stricter control and restrictions than private citizens before being allowed to carry firearms.

>And the military / police have killed more innocent people with firearms than private citizens have across history.

Disgustingly blatant lie.

Every bad thing you labeled happens without guns anyways. Murder suicides happen, disputes turn violent.

The only time that governments have been violently overturned has been when the citizenry is disarmed and cannot fight against the attempted take over. See Cuba, Chile, Weimar Germany (and the civil war they had immediately before the gun laws were implemented and the citizens fought to determine their fate), and Soviet Russia for examples. Their strict gun laws made it easier for violent actors to take over and for abuse to happen once they had.

correct.

ONIONS GEI

that's a pretty expensive gun that guy got, 5K with attachments at least. Can any Jow Forums confirm?

I agree but why not military level? Why is this arbitrary amount of gun control okay, but any more or less than that is ridiculous?

Not all countries have a military, but all have a police force.