Remember what they did

Attached: 7747c0e7-105e-4392-9141-2e5d949a8f71.jpg (660x495, 169K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=sWKCMuyst-8
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 110K)

Look at all those jews

Jesus tried to subvert Jewish culture and religion. He tried to destroy the 2000 year old history and customs of a people.

He deserved to be killed.

remember what the christians did back

christcûckism is a lost cause. that's what it was designed as after all
1000 years of suffering before the rabbi yeshua the messiah will come back to earth. this is why christcucks embrace the faggotry, the degeneracy, the suicidal universialist policies

Attached: cuckstianity is the cause, not the redemption.jpg (1347x1017, 443K)

It was prophesied that he would be rejected & killed, He was supposed to die.

Sin killed Jesus, Jews/heathen Rome were merely the mechanism.

Attached: 1531387867438.jpg (882x1374, 871K)

Hello rabbi. Just know that Israel will cease to exist in a century and all you hooked nose demons will be dead

Jesus wasn't even a real person, you Jewish cocksuckers

>pic related

Attached: jesus.jpg (333x499, 28K)

Or maybe they've just been lied to like most people have in the great re-write of western history since WWII.

good

How ironic that Israel is doing the very same thing to the Palestinians?

Just like anons on 4chans deserve to be killed because they want to convince people off different things in a peaceful manner arguing on a forum?

Jesus was not violent, Socrates was not violent. Why the fuck should they die? Are you against free speech?

If Judaism is so wonderful, no matter what Jesus told them should make them question their faith, right?

But naah, a peaceful guy with a different perspective, who criticizes the old religion, let's get rid of him.

Is that the world you want to live in?

Attached: 1547340929140.jpg (600x394, 76K)

he deserved it and he knew it

this
hating jesus is like hating leftist SJW libtards today

Don't care about Israel just as little as I care about North Sentinel Island but if some nigger on that island started preaching the destruction of their culture, way of life and that the Island is for everyone now(come on in missionaries) then they should put a few arrows into him.
>imagine being right-wing and approving of what Jesus did
yikes big guy
>Is that the world you want to live in?
Yes. Just like the Christians in the Roman Empire that actively sought to destroy the Roman culture, way of life, the ancient rituals and spirituality of its people deserved to be thrown to the lions.
>hating jesus is like hating leftist SJW libtards today
true

Attached: 1551632314156.png (2602x1354, 322K)

Niggers in Sentinel island don't even have a culture except running around and hunting. They're behind even the Aboriginal Australians and they weren't considered human.
>>hating jesus is like hating leftist SJW libtards today
>true
Your true colours seem to be white and blue here.

>Niggers in Sentinel island don't even have a culture except running around and hunting.
Nonsense. They are culturally almost identical to other tribes living in the area, even down to their language. Their preference for isolation is a relatively recent thing (a century or maybe two old, probably)

>Niggers in Sentinel island don't even have a culture except running around and hunting. They're behind even the Aboriginal Australians and they weren't considered human.
The Christian fears the native cultures.
>>hating jesus is like hating leftist SJW libtards today
>refusing to take part in the communal acts that aims to keep the communities together
>pacifists
>hates the native culture
>hates the native religion
>thinks performing the duties of the state is gay, stupid and fascist
>refuses to recite the pledge of allegiance
>pushes social justice
>thinks the ancient rituals are pointless
Reminds you of anyone? Yeap that is right, i'm talking about the early Christians... Or modern SJWs, whatever.

Attached: 1505918912585.png (1600x1385, 2.05M)

Attached: circ1.png (3000x5000, 2.94M)

>controls SJWs' ideology
>equates Jesus with SJWs
wew lads, for a second there I thought that we had an honest jew over here

This is peak Judaism

hating Jesus is also like hating Palestinians today.

Ummmmmmmmm

Not All of Israel is Israel tardo.
A remnant...?

You deserve death, as do we all. Best part is, you'll get it.

>Not All of Israel is Israel tardo.
No? How do you figure that?
>A remnant...?
I have no idea what you're talking about.
>You deserve death, as do we all. Best part is, you'll get it.
Death is certain.

>...yet Jews follow a false prophet 100 years later that gets btfo so hard by based Hadrian the religion goes extinct. Coming back 100's of years later with talmud judiasm. A religion based on subverting the old testament

the Jews are trying to subvert 2000 years of Christians and the West, time to kill the Jews I guess, they deserve it.

Yeah it's funny how the subverted became the subvertees.

Doesn't change the facts about Christians though

Attached: 1505920614464.jpg (850x400, 78K)

HURR DURR PONTIUS WASHED HIS HANDS THAT MEANS ROME ISNT TO BLAME AT ALL!!!!

Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. Luke 23:34 l KJV

Yeah, no. The Brits tried to conquer north Sentinel Island, and they were the isolated people as they are today, related to but isolated from the other people around the Andaman islands.
>>refusing to take part in the communal acts that aims to keep the communities together
?
>>pacifists
Then why were there early Christians in the military if they were pacifist? Actual pacifists wouldn't want to kill anyone at all.
>>hates the native culture
>>hates the native religion
Let alone the fact that they're false, literal baby-sacrifice cults like the Canaanite religion and faggoty fables Greco-Roman religion aren't automatically good because "le ancestahs practiced it".
>>thinks performing the duties of the state is gay
It's literally true though, just not in the the way SJWs did. By your logic, there's honour in dying for Shlomo today because it's "the duties of the state".
>>refuses to recite the pledge of allegiance
Again, same as the last one. Hating the Caesar and hating the president, same shit. There's no shame in that the early Christians thought of Rome the same way that we think of the USA and/or EU today.
>>pushes social justice
"Social justice" in different ways. If you see tight family bonds and anti-degeneracy as "social justice", then yes.
>>thinks the ancient rituals are pointless
Falls into the criteria of "muh ancestors".

The swede cries out in pain as the BVLL fucks his wife.

Attached: 1513887462214.png (1387x857, 1.43M)

Pilate killed Jesus for the jews. There.

Attached: REMEMBER.png (1920x1080, 1M)

>temple was destroyed
Didn't matter anyway. Judaism stopped existing in 70ad

>Pilate killed Jesus for the jews. There.
Jesus wasn't a real person. Haven't you been paying attention?

They fulfilled the entire purpose for Jesus to exist on Earth, which was to suffer and be humiliated and die and therefore buy out the cost of human sin. This is why we should love the Jews just like Jesus said to love your enemies.

Nah just kidding, I remember what they did.

Attached: 1553730655225.png (1681x2802, 246K)

>Jesus wasn't a real person
Well "Jesus" wasn't but Yeshua definitely was.
The person named Yeshua is known nowadays as Jesus.

>Well "Jesus" wasn't but Yeshua definitely was.
Neither Jesus nor Yeshua were real people, you schmuck.

No, I don't pay attention to the same post you spam on every thread.
Now, even without regarding the gospels, it's pretty undeniable that Jesus existed when Tacitus alone refers to a "Christus" who preached in Judea and was crucified by Pontius Pilate. He would've known about events throughout the empire at the time he wrote it because he was served as the governor of Asia by the time it was written. Unless of course you believe that literally all ancient texts are lies.
Or Thallus referring to an "eclipse" (that lasted longer than actual eclipses do) and earthquake happening at around the same time Jesus was crucified, matching the one described in Luke.

Yeah, fuck Romans

Someones watched the latest Easter special i see
Jews are the good guys goyim, we dindu nuffin
REPENT NOW FOR YOU ARE FORSAKEN!

Attached: Repent now you godless scabs.jpg (1600x1066, 107K)

see

>it's pretty undeniable that Jesus existed when Tacitus alone refers to a "Christus" who preached in Judea and was crucified by Pontius Pilate.
Unfortunately Tacitus was writing about someone completely different. Some Christian scribe scratched out the original name and wrote Jesus over the top, not realising that later generations would invent x-ray machines that could detect the original ink.

>Or Thallus referring to an "eclipse"
But he doesn't say anything about Jesus.

>?
Ceremonies and the like.
>Then why were there early Christians in the military if they were pacifist? Actual pacifists wouldn't want to kill anyone at all.
Stop pretending pacifism wasn't a major part in early Christianity. There were massive debates among the Christians about it. And the Christians were well-known to be major submissive cucks by the pagans.
>Let alone the fact that they're false, literal baby-sacrifice cults like the Canaanite religion and faggoty fables Greco-Roman religion aren't automatically good because "le ancestahs practiced it".
Dumb christcuck lies.
>By your logic, there's honour in dying for Shlomo today because it's "the duties of the state".
imagine comparing the duties in the Roman Empire with the modernist US christcuck state.
>Again, same as the last one. Hating the Caesar and hating the president, same shit. There's no shame in that the early Christians thought of Rome the same way that we think of the USA and/or EU today.
Again. Imagine comparing the Roman emperors with the likes of Merkel.

Very vile, these Christians! Hates European greatness.
>"Social justice" in different ways. If you see tight family bonds and anti-degeneracy as "social justice", then yes.
And gibs for poorfags and minorities, washing the feet of niggers and fighting inequalities.

lel Jesus came to divide families, so don't bring that muh Christian family values nonsense.
>Falls into the criteria of "muh ancestors".
the Christian hates his ancestors.

Very vile, these Christians!
Jesus subverted the pre-70s Judaism so that is irrelevant.

Attached: 147153389787.jpg (832x331, 68K)

Attached: 1549662305108.png (1292x8757, 3.91M)

Ashkenazis are these jews on steroids.

was Marcus Aurelius real?

Attached: They will pay .jpg (259x194, 7K)

are you the same swede that always type out some very nasty about my Lord and Savior

For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

1 Corinthians 1:18 NIV

Weirdo

>Unfortunately Tacitus was writing about someone completely different. Some Christian scribe scratched out the original name and wrote Jesus over the top, not realising that later generations would invent x-ray machines that could detect the original ink.
Even if the name wasn't "Christus", it talks about somebody who preached in Judea, founded a religion that would spread throughout the Roman empire, and was crucified by Pontius Pilate.
>But he doesn't say anything about Jesus.
Yes, because Thallus likely didn't know what was going on in Judea at the time. Since he was unaware, he just wrote it off as an eclipse.
It's pretty weird though that there would be an eclipse lasting hours (while most actual eclipses last for a few minutes), and in around the same time (fourth year of the 202nd Olympiad).

>was Marcus Aurelius real?
We have contemporary accounts, as well as archeological/numismatic evidence for Marcus Aurelius

None of those things for Jesus, it goes without saying

>flag
I hope Sweden burns in hellfire.

Don't think so
>for non-christcucks the cross is foolishness but for us christcucks it is the power of God
So deep!

Attached: 1501951409950.jpg (1800x900, 296K)

>Even if the name wasn't "Christus", it talks about somebody who preached in Judea, founded a religion that would spread throughout the Roman empire, and was crucified by Pontius Pilate.
1. It doesn't say anything about founding a religion. Have you even read the text, you numbskull?
2. Even if it's a misspelling of Christ, there were literally hundreds of people wandering around the holy land, claiming to be a Messiah. Tacitus could be referring to any one of them
3. Even if Tacitus is actually writing about OUR Jesus, he's just quoting what Christians told him, which is what those Christians would have read in the Gospels. So it still doesn't count as evidence for a historical Jesus

>It's pretty weird though that there would be an eclipse lasting hours (while most actual eclipses last for a few minutes), and in around the same time (fourth year of the 202nd Olympiad).
WTF are you talking about? Have you ever seen an eclipse? They do last for a couple of hours.

There is no Judaism post 70AD anyway

but Socrates was a real guy.

you gucking morons always act like they had data preservation and info management like we do now thousands of years ago.

hes just mad he has to sit to pee

>you gucking morons always act like they had data preservation and info management like we do now thousands of years ago.
You could make that argument if it were not for the Pauline epistles, Galatians in particular, in which St Paul says he gets all of his information about Jesus from dreams

This is fantastically implausible if Jesus had been alive just a few years earlier. Therefore Jesus didn't exist, QED.

lol evidence jim, evidence...

ohhh you have none because your whole story is based on jewish bullshit.... GOOOO Figure

but im sure you are smart with your undergraduate degree
oh nvm they give thoes to brown people and women now... you are a joke

absolutely no concept of how ubiquitous nad taken for granted information is in our time or how standards have changed over time. bronze aged people domesticated animals and crops with no "scientific method," and no gene theory, etc. They still practiced "science" in pre-science times. it's self-evident to anyone whos fedora isn't way too tight and edgy.

>Stop pretending pacifism wasn't a major part in early Christianity. There were massive debates among the Christians about it. And the Christians were well-known to be major submissive cucks by the pagans.
Doesn't address my point.
>Dumb christcuck lies.
We have actual graves pointing to regular child sacrifice to Baal in Carthage.
>imagine comparing the duties in the Roman Empire with the modernist US christcuck state.
>Again. Imagine comparing the Roman emperors with the likes of Merkel.
Yes. The "glorious classical civilisation" of Rome was degenerate and you know it. Homosexuals, women acting like whores, the mystery schools that many emperors were initiated to inspired freemasonry and all the shit pushed today. Let alone ancient Greece. Also the entire system of a republic is what's standard today, pioneered by Greece and Rome.
>And gibs for poorfags and minorities
Stopped reading there. Early Christians endured poverty.
>lel Jesus came to divide families, so don't bring that muh Christian family values nonsense.
Why do you think the Christians actually survived as a minority within the Roman empire while the emperors did all they could to destroy it?
>the Christian hates his ancestors.
What I said is that "muh ancestors" doesn't equal that it's good.
>1. It doesn't say anything about founding a religion. Have you even read the text, you numbskull?
He implies that because he goes on about Christ after mentioning Nero's actions against the Christians, and right after that mentions how the "superstition" spread to Rome.
>2. Even if it's a misspelling of Christ, there were literally hundreds of people wandering around the holy land, claiming to be a Messiah. Tacitus could be referring to any one of them
Who was crucified by Ponitus Pilate and who gathered a following throughout the empire?

Attached: gensericsackingrome.jpg (2660x1977, 879K)

>lol evidence jim, evidence...
Here's the evidence you're looking for. It's an ultra-violet scan of the oldest surviving manuscript.

Attached: chrestus.png (404x129, 43K)

>Who was crucified by Ponitus Pilate and who gathered a following throughout the empire?
Presumably you haven't read Antiquities of the Jews by Josephus, because if you had you would already know the answer to that question.

If you're gonna post a quote , at least post the whole thing

>And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
> But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
>But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
>Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.
>But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.
>And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.
>Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.

This passage is meant to help Christians understand that even when everything seems lost, and even if you feel like God doesn't hear you, you need to keep persevering and keep your faith, because he enjoys seeing how faithful you are, and he will respond.

Attached: 1553360068686.jpg (634x355, 18K)

Except SJWs use violent means (the state, doxxing, threatening, basically anything they can) to achieve their goals.

>kikes killed some other kike
Why should I care if Jews kill each other?

>3. Even if Tacitus is actually writing about OUR Jesus, he's just quoting what Christians told him, which is what those Christians would have read in the Gospels. So it still doesn't count as evidence for a historical Jesus
That's a dumb excuse, because that would imply Tacitus believed in the historicity of the gospels. Keep in mind by the time he wrote this, he already served as the governor of Asia, and would've known a lot about events in the Roman empire throughout the 1st century. He was also the member of the Quindecimviri sacris faciundis, who were specifically dedicated to analysing other religions. So it's a very weak argument that Tacitus just took what the gospels said as fact even if it didn't actually happen.
>WTF are you talking about? Have you ever seen an eclipse? They do last for a couple of hours.
Very rarely, and they're not associated with earthquakes, which is what both Thallus and the gospels describe.

It helped goyim to understand that only AND ONLY if goyim prostrate at the feet of the Jew and accepts his dog status in humiliation then the Jew will be benevolent.

Attached: greatest ally.webm (574x382, 1.24M)

>dog status
A gross misinterpretation if you actually look into the Greek and Aramaic.

God I love this image.

Indeed you do, as it praises the jew-lover Celsus (who unironically believed the tale in the Talmud that Jesus was a son of Mary and a Roman soldier named Panthera).

>Early Christians endured poverty.
Early christians were kikes and deserved to be exterminated

>muh pup translation meme
kill yourself

serious question... why do you jewbros preach tollerance, progressivism and cultural relativity across the entire world while doing the exact opposide when it comes to your own people?

Saying Yeshu had to be killed for that, you directly contradict everything you've ever said in the western public domain. Not hating, genuinly interested in your awnser.

Attached: 1551308986574.png (660x574, 72K)

There's no passage , nor nothing that states you have to worship anyone except God through Jesus Christ.


>Revelation 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

Attached: 1555287385940.jpg (1600x1509, 245K)

I was referring to Christians being crucified, burned and fed to big cats. Gonna have to look up what you said about Celsius, I suspect him being a Jew lover is something you pulled out of your own ass since the early Christians were Jews.

>That's a dumb excuse, because that would imply Tacitus believed in the historicity of the gospels.
It doesn't matter whether Tacitus read the Gospels personally, or whether he took them as fact. The important thing is that the Gospels are his only source of information on Jesus, directly or indirectly. Therefore Tacitus' account of Jesus (if we accept it as an account of Jesus) doesn't count as evidence for a historical Jesus because it is not independent of the gospels.
>Very rarely, and they're not associated with earthquakes, which is what both Thallus and the gospels describe.
Wow! So both Luke and Thallus remember that there was once an eclipse at the same time as an earthquake. Therefore Jesus exists!

Great argument you've got there, fren.

Celsus*

Talmud wasn't written until hundreds of years later, low IQ retard.

Perhaps it explains Pontius crucifying this other Messiah, but it doesn't explain it spreading all throughout Rome and becoming a minority religion there if it was just some little Messiah claimant in Judea.

>Early christians were kikes and deserved to be exterminated
They WERE eliminated. In the Jewish revolt of 68-71AD.

See those Jews walking around New York? None of them are descendants of Jews living in Judea in 67AD. Not a single one of them.

>jews killing a jew

who fucking cares...

>Jesus tried to subvert Jewish culture and religion. He tried to destroy the 2000 year old history and customs of a people.
>He deserved to be killed.

based and redpilled

this is exactly what he did, he tried bringing multiculturalism, universalism, one race bullshit

Jesus was a jew

>Perhaps it explains Pontius crucifying this other Messiah, but it doesn't explain it spreading all throughout Rome and becoming a minority religion there if it was just some little Messiah claimant in Judea.
Nonsense. We don't need an explanation for why Christianity became popular in the Roman world. There were thousands of competing sects. One of them was bound to defeat the others, sooner or later. The winner happened to be Christianity, but it might just as easily have been Mithraism.

If you liked that then you'll like this video
>youtube.com/watch?v=sWKCMuyst-8

It's really /comfy/

The Talmud wasn't WRITTEN, but the Talmud is a the written Pharisaic oral law, which existed long before Celsus was even born. The Talmudic tale of Jesus was likely oral tradition among the jews.

Thanks fren

Attached: 8u3qCoZ.png (866x764, 755K)

They killed an innocent man, and the civilization started accepting wrong as right

Romans are degenerates

Based Romans

Christfaggotry became popular because it is a religion for cowards and subhumans, which the majority of people are. It's like crack for cowards, same way islam is crack for retarded brown people

I'm talking about how it spread from Judea in the first century. Also, Mithraism was a cult that still fell under the sphere of classical paganism. Manichaeism would be a better example of a "competitor religion".

Cowards fear death.

>the Talmud is a the written Pharisaic oral law
Lol, a Christkike just uncritically repeating Jewish claims. Imagine my shock

>Christians thrown to the lions in a Roman ampitheatre
Literally never happened, you filthy Christian liar

Which is why they ate up the saccharine afterlife shit.

Jesus was a Jew too, stupid. Also it was the Romans that killed him. By that logic you should hate Italians.