If violence is never the answer why does it work so well?

If violence is never the answer why does it work so well?

Attached: 1552669670969.jpg (744x605, 116K)

first think i asked myselfe afterwards

Attached: 1555165589129.jpg (320x320, 21K)

Shut up, goy, violence is a state monopoly. Just pay your taxes or die.

Sometimes people have to go full Islam

a single act of violence is a tragedy
a mass act of violence is how history is made

sloppy job mossad

>Violence is never the answer

This is just a bluepill they sell to the masses because low-level disruptive social violence is generally unhelpful to the state. In reality, violence is the ultimate and final arbiter of all problems. If used brutally and effectively on a state level it is a permanent solution. If you kill your enemies, you win.

He fucked up though you're not supposed to let them take you alive at the end then the movement is on trial

it didn't he's a fuckin idiot all he did was make his victims into "heroes" and get weapons banned from NZ. He inspired tolerance and forced police in NZ to confront white supremacist trash

Attached: 1553739515435.jpg (3523x8191, 2.8M)

Because the state has to maintain stability.
Meanwhile domestic terrorism is how we got shit like labor rights and women's suffrage, however you may feel about those.

wrong

>If you kill your enemies, you win
GERMANY NO!

Every major event in our planets history is predicated by violence. So who ever told you that is full of shit.

violence works seriously

with yellow vest during first weeks people were protesting and no ones would give a fuck.First time after they got "violent" the government was like "ok we put statut quo on raising the tax and we gonna hear what you have to say".
violence is the only thing that works with them.
Front of the banker you have only one thing : The gun.

WWII did not work well unless you were an industrialist...hmmm...

>Front of the banker you have only one thing : The gun.

Attached: mousey dung.jpg (615x409, 33K)

Ur stupid it doesn't solve anything it just forces something to happen because people have no other choice... Big Difference. ..

Attached: 238.jpg (420x315, 10K)

Hitler..... is that you? Senpai... please save us.

It has major side-effects and is situational. You need to wait for the right time and place. For a lot of groups and institutions, they will be waiting forever because the effects are overwhelmingly negative if it can be attributed to them in any way. Bigger institutions are just waiting for you to step out of line so they can slap you down, but if you're looking at the well-being of other people rather than just yourself or your organization, this may become beneficial and put violence back on the table.

Government or minority violence can be downplayed to an extent by the media. The media will blow up opposition violence, which gives it a certain amount of power. It is a useful tool depending on the narrative you are trying to create, which I think is recognized by just about everyone with some kind of institutional power. This means you should expect it to be used when the right opportunity or enemy presents itself, and every incident needs to be scrutinized as a possible false flag.

The fact that Tarrant had such an impact is why people immediately call false flag. It's hard to judge motivation because there's no direct evidence and no source is credible, you only have bodies whose strategic impact can only be understood in retrospect. On the other hand, he could just be a normal person who understood how this worked, found an appropriate time and place and audience, and threw his life away. Violence is very effective when utilized correctly, so it's most definitely always the answer if you can swing it. It's not hard to imagine a bleeding heart Jow Forumsack doing this.

How can you say that it worked well? his country immediately went full cuck, and pushed normies worldwide to the left

Unless you mean that he was a mossad agent, then you could say that what he did worked well

Attached: 1553153192916.jpg (433x475, 52K)

Attached: nz hoax swap.jpg (547x375, 50K)

nazi fan boy detected.

Attached: honk for gun control.png (1423x1566, 665K)

Violence is the most direct form of power, which is the ultimate decider of all things

Attached: unnamed (2).jpg (1200x820, 272K)

Btw violence is of course absolutely vital, but this form of massacre of unsuspecting and relatively innocent civilians is the opposite of effective

Violence should be used as political assassinations and paramilitary activity, think of the Japanese dude that stabbed the Marxist, or those Americans from the south that took over their city briefly when corrupt pro-nigger government was pulling some shenanigans

>not reading the manifesto
>not knowing he knew/wanted that to happen to NZ
>not knowing he is actually an Aussie IRL shitposting in NZ
Good God, if you are going to shill at least know what you are shilling against.

You caught me, I haven’t read the manifesto, but i didn’t hear anything about him being an Aussie purposely trying to fuck over New Zealand, that doesn’t make much sense to me

Either way though I don’t see how what he did benefits us in any way

Nope he will be free in 27 years or less like Nelson Mandela.

Attached: Mandela_Brand_Necklacing_Kits.png (600x600, 52K)

I-is /x/s attempt at reviving Hitler working?

He has already been reincarnated friend. We are only waiting on nationalism to kick back up and the current german cunt to leave office.

History is power, power is violence.
History is the history of violence

Read the manifesto. He wanted to accelerate the situation. By killing muzzies he wanted muzzies to retaliate.
By using fire arms he wanted liberals to crack down on guns in all nations. Forcing gun owners to actually defend their rights or to puss out and give up.

The point is none of what happens benefits us. Its forcing whites further into the corner. To force whites to either fight or die, because the status quo of voting for (((rightwing))) political parties has done nothing but further the boiling frog scenario.

All power comes from violence or the implied threat there of.

it does?

Attached: holocaust3.webm (850x476, 2.91M)

based and violencePilled

Attached: attention.png (1000x960, 140K)

manifesto

The people telling you it's not the answer are trying to stop your progress

Attached: 1547277493286.gif (336x252, 1.35M)

Steel isn't strong boy, flesh is stronger.