Was allowing gays to get married a mistake?
Was allowing gays to get married a mistake?
Benjamin Lee
Other urls found in this thread:
Mason Ward
Yes... except these 2. They make a sexy couple.
Cooper Bell
Gays can't get married
Camden Ortiz
Imagine them making out and the dude on the right sneaks his tongue through the other guys gap and tongue taps him.
Tyler Evans
Guy on the left is like
>hue-hue-hue, I wash mah self wit a rag on a stick.
Owen Sanchez
Totally okay with me
Evan White
this is deemed normal and brave by the faggot left
Grayson Nguyen
it's up to the churches if they will marry someone.
christianity btfo 2015
you're just witnessing the death throws of western civilization. try the clown pill for the pain.
Brayden Myers
yes. next question please
Matthew Collins
it was a mistake allowing them to breathe, this whole tranny/lgbt shit happened because we let them live
Thomas Turner
Doubt a very high percentage of gays get married anyways.
Levi Moore
WHY THE HELL WOULD I IMAGINE THAT
Oliver Morris
Glad to see Rich from ReviewTechUSA finally found love
Daniel Miller
These guys are literally Jow Forums incarnate anyways, there’s no way they don’t browse here
Gabriel Ross
“Gays” (let’s not validate their false identification with their perversion) are only married if they marry persons of the opposite sex in a church.
The real question is, at what voltage will a “gay,” be cured of his delusion?
Caleb Brown
where’s adam
Wyatt Morris
>KUALA LUMPUR--For Tacaquito Usui to marry his partner, Japanese law first requires him to undergo sterilization surgery and be diagnosed with a mental disorder because he is transgender.
Based!
Chase Torres
Nah, gays were just pawns used to push an agenda, just like the nigs before them and the trannies after them. Find a vocal minority that can be painted as "oppressed" because of some arbitrary issue not in their favor, give them a media megaphone, press the issue until the goyim cave, repeat until civilization is destroyed.
Camden Brooks
Logan Hall
Sorry - what is Crowder doing in bed with Meathead.
Jeremiah Johnson
Go to bed Nick your podcast sucks
Ryan Perry
Yes it is. It allows those who are gay to function in a more normative sense in society.
It has also made the concept of marriage, which is important to a stable society, more of a basic universal. That's a good thing, especially from a conservative perspective.
Landon Roberts
>Was allowing gays a mistake?
fixt
Isaac Hughes
Yes because without babies we need infinity Mexicans to clean our toilets. So have a family and after that you can mastuerbate into another man’s asshole on your own time.
Nicholas Harris
yes
Colton Ramirez
Allowing gays to stay together will hopefully make it, so they stop breeding, thus reducing the number of people that are genetically gay.
Nolan Richardson
Based
Connor Davis
letting them live is the mistake
Samuel Baker
Judging by Stav's retarded political takes I can assure you his ass is not.
Charles Davis
Gimme some podcast reqs boys
Robert Myers
Fine, just nick then
Christopher Ross
sucking off the bull
Carter Peterson
Though we stand always in need of the kindness and goodness of God, yet is this specially the case at this time, when in various ways we have provoked him to anger on account of the multitude of our sins. And although he has warned us, and has shown us clearly what we deserve because of our offenses, yet he has acted mercifully towards us, and, awaiting our penitence has reserved his wrath for other times — for he “ has no pleasure in the death of wicked ; but that the wicked turn from his way an live. ” Wherefore it is not right that we should all despise God's abundant goodness, forbearance, and long-suffering kindness and, hardening our hearts and turning away from penitence, should heap upon ourselves wrath in the day of wrath. Rather, we ought to abstain from all base concerns and acts — and especially does this apply to such as have gone to decay through that abominable and impious conduct deservedly hated by God. We speak of the defilement of males (de stupro masculorum) which some men sacrilegiously and impiously dare to attempt, perpetrating vile acts with other men.
Joseph Perez
Like Cum Town or any?
Mason Perry
Child rape will make plenty of new gays
Daniel Gonzalez
Fuck you leaf
Luke Price
Nick definitely. Adam dabbles. Stav is honestly too sensitive for it.
Benjamin Baker
Fuck you cum boy
Landon Scott
>allowing gays to live a mistake?
yes
judgement day is coming
John Powell
Stavs fucking gay
Brody Lee
Without a doubt.
Gavin Sanders
Adam is a full fledged commie. Stav is a uninformed Bernie bro. Nick is a socialist but is possibly actually antisemitic and probably lurks pol.
Jaxson Powell
Of course not
Hudson Moore
*loud NYEHEHEHEHEHEHE intensifies*
Brayden Brown
How long until chapo trap house is forced to disavow cumtown for being too racist?
Brody Nguyen
Have you heard early CTH?
They were much worse
Nathaniel Reed
what difference does it make? We'll be dead within a few years anyway.s
Dominic Myers
Zachary Fisher
politically incorrect but it's spelled polelickally intherect
Connor Brooks
Legal unions for fags are ok but should be called something other than marriage. Like farriage or something. ‘Hey, are you fags farried, or happy?’
Liam Brooks
How about /pole/ but it’s just for the fellas?
Liam Wilson
No they weren't. And even if that was true the pc left will eventually try to purify them.
Thomas Thompson
They were pretty bad user
Jose Perry
I never listened to that garbage but I somehow can't believe that that when they left fucking Nick Fuentes of all people trigger their faggot asses.
Lincoln Bell
That time the pod save dudes had Felix guest on a live episode of Lovett or leave it and they had to cut out 90% of what he said because he repeatedly kept saying Iran should have nukes
Gabriel Sanders
That's not racist. Not all edgy humor will incite the pc mob, just racist and anti Semitic humor. Chapo stays within that boundary and cumtown doesn't.
Adrian Campbell
>Was allowing gays to get married a mistake?
It was fucking weird is what it was.
Why?
The purpose of marriage is ration pussy.
-> Gays
Fucking weird cargo cult society we live in. Nobody knows why they're doing the things they do.
Aiden Martinez
The only time chapo has/will ever have nick on was this past Christmas when he came on and half sarcastically said how everyone knows that their two shows are fundamentally linked and in a way chapo is responsible for every racist thing he says
Carter Sanders
Crowded with Crowder?
Brandon Green
The mistake was letting them out of the closet.
Robert Gonzalez
>Hello darkness my old friend...
youtu.be
Alexander Young
Marriage doesn't really matter to fags they still sleep around and spread diseases like wild fire.
Liam Cooper
Adam is a hilldawg poster
Jose Anderson
Pretty sure he’s next on the Clinton hit list for calling Chelsea Clinton ugly on twitter like a month back. So off base and wrong of him
Samuel Hill
That would be kind of hard seeing that they keep having stav on their show
Austin Torres
yes
because it degraded marriage. Marriage issuuposed to be a very serious life long bond with the goal to raise healthy children and create a "dynasty". With gays this won't work.
They should have an organisation that takes care of their paperwork when they want to committ to someone officially but it should not be called marriage.
In Germany they called the agenda "Marriage for all". What does for all mean? Tomorrow polygaists could demand to marry too or people who want to marry animals etc.
it devalues the institution of marriage.
I have no problem with gays in general though.
Nathan Thomas
id go gay for nick anyday, while he pounds my ass he can give great bits
Oliver Bennett
Yes it was. A man and woman form a breeding pair. Two men just end up prolapsing each others anus and getting poop everywhere.
Samuel Nguyen
It was pointless. How many of them even get married? I have gay friends and none of them are married. None of their gay friends either
Nathaniel Gutierrez
Adam is a Jew
FTFY
Blake Nelson
Conservatives were absolutely right in their predictions that this would only be the beginning,that trans-insanity and further degredation of values you invariably follow this.
Say whatever you want, but they were entirely vindicated. I was a social liberal and lifelong libertarian. I didn't support gay marriage because there's nothing "libertarian" about it. It's literally the opposite of "libertarian" it's a restrictive contract with the government. And it's centered around the inequal biology of men and women. It's a contract designed to protect the women in childbirth.
So because of all that, I didn't support it. Called racist, bigoted, homophobe blah blah blah. Whatever. Those were my reasons. Anyway I sort of thought the conservatives had a point back then when they said "slippery slope" but naturally we all hear "that's a fallacy!" everytime its said and then it turns out not to be a fallacy at all.
David Gomez
>Anyway I sort of thought the conservatives had a point back then when they said "slippery slope" but naturally we all hear "that's a fallacy!" everytime its said and then it turns out not to be a fallacy at all.
And I mean, I admit I really never expected the degeneracy to come as fast as it did even if it was gonna come. I mean gay marriage was a watershed moment. After this it's true everything went insane. All of the progressive social authoritarianism started after that.
Fast forward now and this former social liberal who had nothing against gays has come to believe they are an absolute poison to our society. A danger and a menace. Mentally ill people who harbor a deep and perpetually misunderstood metaphysical evil.