sked about the detentions at a Tuesday morning news conference, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador acknowledged that the government is not letting migrants simply go wherever they please. He denied taking a hard line, saying controls are for migrants’ security because human traffickers are allegedly infiltrated among the caravans.
“We don’t want for them to just have free passage, not just out of legal concerns but for questions of safety,” López Obrador said.
His immigration chief, Tonatiuh Guillén, said later that Monday’s incident was “regrettable,” particularly in the case of the children who were frightened.
He said it was not something he wanted to repeat. But he also maintained it was a normal migration enforcement action.
Guillén said Mexico has deported 11,800 migrants so far this month and is being more selective in who is given a humanitarian visa, which allows a migrant to remain in the country and work.
Constitutionalists would have also locked up several thousand politicians by now. (((Tillman))) isn't really making a good case for anything she holds dear. Then again... >Jew >holding anything deal
Jack Reed
I still want that greentext about your pozzed Catholic family, user.
Central American migrants hoping to reach the U.S. are finding a much tougher trek than those in previous caravans, meeting unwelcoming townsfolk and a surprise raid by Mexican police and immigration agents who detained hundreds in Mexico's south.
While their compatriots were been taken into custody Monday, hundreds of other migrants scrambled away into the brush along the highway in Chiapas state to elude authorities.
Many had already learned they would not be received in towns with the same hospitality that greeted previous caravans, and now they know they won't be safe walking along the rural highway either
Christian Cook
>sked about the detentions at a Tuesday morning news conference, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador acknowledged that the government is not letting migrants simply go wherever they please. He denied taking a hard line, saying controls are for migrants’ security because human traffickers are allegedly infiltrated among the caravans. >“We don’t want for them to just have free passage, not just out of legal concerns but for questions of safety,” López Obrador said. a classic duck and dodge >His immigration chief, Tonatiuh Guillén, said later that Monday’s incident was “regrettable,” particularly in the case of the children who were frightened. >He said it was not something he wanted to repeat. But he also maintained it was a normal migration enforcement action. Translation: fuck you >Guillén said Mexico has deported 11,800 migrants so far this month and is being more selective in who is given a humanitarian visa, which allows a migrant to remain in the country and work. read: "zombg pls no close borders, Trump"
I M A G I N E just how fucking uncomfortable dinner must be in their household. If Georgie boy doesn't settle down he's going to lose his wife to the big Don.
>American values >like open borders, votes for illegals, illegals in government, tranny 9 year olds, gay marriage, destroying historical statues, and denigrating every ancestor that built the country as a sexist racist white male
I live in the Rio Grande Valley. Just giving a heads up that they're desperate for new personnel to sign up, and if you reach out to them they will probably be happy to take you.
t. vet that keeps getting pestered by them to join even though I tell them to fuck off
Reminder that the patrician choice of morning news is Varney and Company on Fox Business. Three hours of that beautiful brit turned american shitting on the left
What world do these "people" live in? How do they see the world so differently than I do? How is it possible for two people to view the same event and make polar opposite conclusions?
>a 6 month long lawsuit to determine if a power that's been recognized as of the Florida Governorship in the state Constitution for 175 fucking years is real or not There's just no such thing as anything existing without the Court's approval is there
That was before SCOTUS looked like they were going to allow the citizenship question. That would make the 2020 census a death knell for the Democratic Party... and so she has no choice.
Kayden Rodriguez
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Brody Campbell
>anything existing without the Court's approval It's honestly pathetic believing that the judicial branch is the highest source of authority in this country...
Yes, as well as Steny Hoyer. See, the thing so many in Jow Forums do not understand is that Pelosi does not have control over her caucus. Her grasp on the Speaker's Gavel is tenuous at best. Nancy Pelosi isn't in charge. The faaaaaaaar left commies in her party are. She's trying to walk the fine line between destroying the Democrat Party (impeaching Trump would do this) and avoiding angering the fragile coalition of brownies they've spent the last 40 years cobbling together (not impeaching Trump does this). She has no winning move. She just has to figure out which option minimizes damage.
It's fucking beautiful.
Josiah Howard
i was thinking that same thing
i am strong supporter of the first amendment but i agree that there are cases like 'inciting a riot' or 'causing a panic' when you shouldn't be able to intentionally harm people with speech.
i always assumed i would be the target if i were to ever accidentally incite a riot during a speech at a protest or something- but i never imagined that the newspapers and television media would be trying to start riots with the normies
what will we do when they start openly calling for assasssin@tions?
Colton Parker
what makes people born afterward not a dumbass?
Thomas Ramirez
This
Ethan Rivera
>everyone born prior to 1990 is a dumbass Shut up child, the adults are talking.
Jacob Mitchell
DeSantis 2024
Ryan Thomas
If we shot people on site, migration rates would drop to 0%!