What are your thoughts on monarchy?

What are your thoughts on monarchy?

Attached: monarchy.jpg (1545x1723, 2.42M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/H5y4vQbjK_U
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Idk, I like it desu. Traitors and disloyal subjects can be dealt with in a matter of minutes. No need for deep bureaucracy.

The only thing that puts me off is the high nosed nobility, but then again perhaps that's for the best.

i liek

Attached: Hitler-Spear-of-Destiny-Holy-Lance.jpg (2396x2417, 558K)

Extreme poverty for the rest all property go.nobility and king, slavery for the workers a king.is a protection racket king pin.

I like the idea, but hate it in practice.
At least if kings ruled, a good one would come along every now and then (as opposed to politicians)
However, our royal family is actually french/german, not Swedish, which sort of defeats the point.

Church and King is how European land should be ruled under Feudalism
Id rather have family that rules me with 1000 year experience in doing so than some jew banker with 200

This. Good in theory, shit in practice and probably wouldn’t work out well in current year. National socialism is far superior

Its been the normal for nearly all of history. Everything else usually collapses after a short period of time.

Even if you don’t like monarchy, we are going to get them again anyway.

Here’s a good lecture on the Orthodox view of Church + State:
youtu.be/H5y4vQbjK_U

Attached: A3B0DC4B-CBE2-4E4C-8492-C8E6EEF2961C.jpg (610x458, 42K)

Rediculious but since the fuckwits seem to turn every federal and democratic government they have into a quasi-dictatorship over time its kind of obvious that they want monarchies so they know where the buck stops and a clear chain of command.

>National socialism is far superior

There is no way you can know that for sure considering the vast differences in the length of time both systems have been tried and proofed for. We have no real world example yet of how Natsocs would deal with a succession crisis, for example.

Fuck you Russian. We got business to deal with soon. Namely money owed or your prince gets thrown out the air lock

>we will get them again
All men are born equal no kings no.nobility.

Attached: Louis_guillotine-700x390.jpg (700x390, 110K)

Best way to manage a multi ethnic society.

>medieval serfs had more days off than this man
Every good thing you think is attributable to democracy is the result of the scientific revolution, which sprang from the same source as the current democracy fetish, but is in no way dependent on it.

Mideval serfs were exploited and had no political power.

>imagine actually believing this.

Inevitable regardless of what political system is put in place
>Republic, democracy, oligarchy, monarchy
The cycle never ends

..

>beeing a slave to some royal cucks

Like it. Love it. Gotta have it.

the greatest of all modes of government.

Monarchy is just another form of rule by (((them))).

just welfare leachers

Are you implying they have now?

constitutional monarchy is chad tier. its been the most resistant institution to (((them))) although it occasionally shows cracks now. monarchs are the symbols of the nation and can be invaluable.

Attached: monarchist chad.png (1065x573, 245K)

>parrots socialist ideas
>uses the biggest example of kikery of all time as an example

Most fascist state were monarchies. Fascism works.

Exactly right.
Won't you say the same thing for modern democratic societies though?
>Extreme poverty
That's only true because everyone in the world was relatively poor compared to today's standard of living. As time evolves, the rich get richer and the poor get richer. Inequality is actually the mark of civilization. Every major milestone humanity has reached has added an additional class. We began with hunter gatherers which could only be rated in terms of the performance of their duties and their genes but essentially one class. Farming and domesticating animals lead to a dual class. Industries and mass farms often employing slaves created an upper class, and merchants around that time had more product to peddle. In the industrial revolution we saw the lower class gain agency through industry work, creating a working class between the middle and lower classes. A century later the middle-upper class and the far upper classes emerged just out of how much wealth was being spread and generated.

>soon
Russian Chinese relations have been pretty good lately

WeWuz™ level of political concord. As a serf (and you'll be one) you wont, nor any of your familiy member, be a part of a bigger picture than hardcore localism.

>As a serf (and you'll be one)
That doesn't make any sense. All of the major emancipation movements happened in the 19th century, and almost every single one occurred under the auspices of a monarch. The Russians freed their serfs two years before America freed it's slaves. In other words, an absolute monarchy freed it's indentured servants two years before a liberal democracy, and the liberal democracy had to fight a war to do it. Meanwhile Britain had already begun it's crusade to end slavery throughout the world back in 1833.

Just results in wars between egoistic spergs, and the next war will glass the planet, so fuck it, I want the extra decades.

It worked... until women got the vote and fucked everything up.

Its shit. Death to all "royalty".
Except the cute princesses, they should be cloned and put in petting zoos for all to enjoy.

Attached: Princess-Leonor-Infanta-Sofí-2012.jpg (682x1024, 128K)

They are planning to betray the chinese at the first opportunity. Just like the rest of their allies theyve previously worked with. Its why i dont do business with them, much easier if you havent got theives looting your business and thats all the russians know how to do. Its such a dump of a nation in my travels to and from there on business prior.

Moronarchy.

What use are they now except as some crappy type of celebrity entertainment?
when they have nothing else to offer.

It hurts to see this post and flag related.

It's a good point. How to consider the emancipation movements ? What are the causes ? I think that industrial revolutions broke the monarchies.

Maybe. I've noticed a trend looking the opinions of monarchs and their advisers in that they figured people were going to become increasingly restless. England has had charters and constitutionalism for a long time compared to others, partly for this reason. Many of the monarchs seemed ready to leave their offices. I'm fully convinced some were never assassinated or died altogether, and merely used it as a cover up for a graceful exit. A lot of people see their positions as power, but it's a lot of responsibility and things have to be done carefully from the minute details to century long strategic planning and it only takes one crazy to get through security and to ones family. I don't think there's anything that "broke" them, but many seemed content to leave the old social contracts behind.