I don't mean to make the most retarded post of the year...

I don't mean to make the most retarded post of the year, but if nuclear weapons exist why have no terrorists ever used them?

Attached: 1555023389926.png (209x203, 54K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Psxktpxkc6o
youtube.com/watch?v=YuKFnAztieE
youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY
youtube.com/watch?v=SQCfOjhguO0&t
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because most terrorists are retards

Because the terror is in the nukes existing in the first place.

Attached: 1553326122205.png (512x512, 81K)

It's a $500 fine if you get caught with a nuke.

What with the 2nd amendment and all.

I do not think it is that hard to build an atomic bomb. Infact why wouldn't north korea or anyone just nuke anyone who tried invade them if they supposedly had nukes.

Attached: 1558217723226.jpg (960x633, 56K)

Becouse its extremly expensive to build them and it requires a lot of specialists and a lot extremly expensive, hard to get equipment. You also have to have huge amount of very qualified work force and place from wich you can launch the rocket

Surely some terrorist orginisation could atleast try make an atom bomb. What about hiroshima nagasaki literally no residual radiation people live there.

They did
American terrorists used them on japan

Attached: IMG_1658.gif (1000x1000, 1.47M)

Beats me. You think a few million in the right hands would afford you a nuke. Seems like some of this stuff might be bs

I dont know any terrorist organistion with that much resources

underrated

radioactive materials. Remember in back to the future when the Doc tells marty he got plutonium from terrorists? then you start wondering "like how the fuck did he do it?", so that is why they immediately kill Doc and marty gets into the delorean, so you dont keep on wondering how ridiculous that plot hole was.

Israel

Even a small atomic bomb isn't that simpler? Maybe you are right but if they can afford millions in guns surely this is not too mucha stretch
Underrated. 0.2 sheckles have been deposited in your account.

Terrorists are generally lacking in expertise to handle a nuclear device

The actual bomb construction isn't terribly complex. There are some tricky things to do electrically, but its a hell of a lot easier in with transistors and solid-state circuits than it was in 1945 with tubes and relays.

The tricky part is getting HEU and or plutonium.

>why have no terrorists ever used them
They have, twice

JUST POINT A GUN AT A SCIENTIST NIGGA

>Infact why wouldn't north korea or anyone just nuke anyone who tried invade them if they supposedly had nukes.
who needs nukes when you have enough morter/artillery/ballistic short and medium range to flatten seoul and the west coast of japan. besides, if north korea was going to be easy, it would have been taken out long ago. also, it really is a vassel/bitch state of china. they really don't care how bat shit crazy kim is.

Because you can't make weapons grade urnioum or plotonium from camel shit

Oy vey

Attached: 1557151423950.jpg (1020x680, 140K)

Coincidence.

Attached: 17 minutes.png (698x216, 20K)

Israel is a terrorist state supported by USA. Its level higher than terrorist organistion

I wonder this too, my dude. Imagine a world where terrorists all had icbms. Woulda been interesting desu.

Fallout lied.
Nukes are mostly ok as long as you don't ingest radioactive stuff

Let me guess. You're bitter that one of our Predators killed your girlfriend in the goat pen with a Hellfire missile?

All they would need is old x-ray or CAT scan machines and use the cobalt (or whatever it uses) to make a dirty bomb.

Mutually Assured Destruction

I think terrorists would be okay with that.

Short answer is because it is not necessary and is way too much of a fuck around. Terrorism is a misnomer in terms of casualties. The goal is not to pose an existential threat but to strike fear and intimidation. You can do that with a cell phone and a few propane canisters. There is no need to go through the extremely expensive and complicated process of acquiring and successfully detonating a fucking nuke. Plus terrorists are retards and not Bond villains so wouldn't be able to do it no matter how hard they tried (and have tried).

It's about calculated destruction, not indiscriminate

Dirty bomb is a bigger threat. I support any efforts to keep radioactive material out of terrorists hands.

in all honesty, was likely a sidewinder

>complete savage

Attached: It'sOkayToBeADickNotATotalAsshole.jpg (324x500, 35K)

Technologically complex to make
The info for making one is well guarded
It's illegal to own personally
Uranium is regulated and we'll tracked
It would be hard to hide if you had one or were working on it

>The info for making one is well guarded

I thought some kid made one but lacked the weapons-grade uranium and heavy water.

Because the puppet master wants his groups to fight continuously, not get completely wiped out. That’s why Germany and Japan got straight back in the saddle after the war was over. It’s exhausting and time consuming to continually create credible puppet groups willing to slaughter each other so each one needs to be kept in the game even after defeat

If history has shown us anything is that you don't sell the Indians the guns that you also use. You let them use their bows and tomahawks.

They're expensive, hard to get, usually strapped to intercontinental rocketry.

Also because inter dimensional visitors vibrating in another plane of existence next to our get mad about it and come and stop us doing it. They get super mad when we test shit.

Also there's a cool conspiracy where nukes don't actually exist.

Also Jews did it probably

Some high school kid was collecting smoke detectors to build a home made nuke. It spurred a couple of movies here in the USA. There was another high school kid that built a nuke minus the obvious illegal stuff like high explosive and nuclear material. Also, in the USSR, lots of fissal material went missing. Turns out that there is acceptable loss due to "evaporation". A few scientists were busted selling the material for some extra money for food and living expenses.

there are no terrorists, only freedomfighters and cia coup d'état plots, red herrings and falsflags.

i actually am considdering starting up a brown bar again and call it falsflag..
hmmm.... yea.. my bartenderfingers are all tingly lately..

>why have no terrorists ever used them?
9/11?

911 wasn't nukes and it was israel

>hard to get
and thats why Saddam was able to steal some off an air force base in NM?

that was a big project a lot of people made money on, check seismograph readings for confirmed nuke activities

>Implying dirty arabs are able to build nukes

Attached: 1551977802954.jpg (750x563, 81K)

>implying it has to be mounted in a missile
>implying ex ussr wasnt selling them left and right after the cold war
and it's not like it has to be a military grade bomb that's going to destroy an entire city, even some low yield assembled by a bunch of towels would still be 10 times more effective than anything they've done until now
but we all know who the 'terrorists' work for

>Also because inter dimensional visitors vibrating in another plane of existence next to our get mad about it and come and stop us doing it. They get super mad when we test shit.
They actually need us alive and well right? just suffering enough so they can feed from the electromagnetic trace of our emotions.
>MFW we were the equivalent of milk cows

Attached: ArchonsJustFuckedMyShitUp.png (300x250, 37K)

>if aircraft carriers exist then why have no terrorists ever used them

i did the same thing just for lolz between my AI project.
you can't believe how easy it was even as a young teenager to find all you need in hardwarestores, catalogues and pre google internet and nobody asking questions, unless it got obvious what you where doing.
i got eyed on by some secret police for a while in my country though.. but that didn't last long. maybe because i desided to leave a map on my desk hiding my actual project in a end of the year schoolproject to build a dud example of an actual device.

This. The fuel is tightly controlled as I'd the right centrifuge speed.

You can fake seismograph readings. North Korea did this by filling a train with explosives and detonating inside a mountain. North Korea does not have nukes or didn't when they did this. It bought them some time.

Did you irradiate yourself?

Neeto. How hard was it and how much did it cost?

oh, and this was before the wall fel in 1986 and i ended up as using that thing as an actual end of the year schoolproject lecture thing about nuclear weapons.
teacher got impressed and i had 45/50 points on that ^^

still, anybody can build anything. The tricky part is getting your hands on radioactive material, and actually keeping it and being able to manipulate it. They can trace radioactive emanations from space. I bet a scramble alert activates every time there is a sudden appearance of radioactive emmanations. Imagine all the weight and fury of special intelligence forces coming for you while you almost literally glow.

lol, your teacher didn't give you those 5 points because you didn't have plutonium. Try harder next time.

Because the "terrorists" are actually organizations which have been created and funded by the U.S. government, Israel, Mossad, and the CIA. These groups only do what the deep state tells them to do. Thus far there has been to reason to use a nuke as a false flag.

it was a working device disguesed as a dud, so no radioactive material nor explosive matirial for the primer, just playdo plasticine i had collored in the collors of those materials, because it looked silly

i don't remember, most of it was alluminium, scrap steel and except for the paint i had alot of that at home anyway.
my research was mostly chematics and my understanding of materials and how to use them
i think it costed roughly around 40.000 belgian franks at the time, wich was alot at the time

Yeah then there's this. We, as in most 1st world countries, have satellites that can see concentrations of radioactive material. If you don't die from radiation poisoning, they'll dick you to death from literally every law enforcement agency from mall police to agencies that dont even exist.

during the attack on the USS Liberty the israhelli terrorists were flying nukes to Cairo and were going to drop them on the city if the US retaliated against the planes attacking the ship.

hahahahahaha...
could've been lol

I remember finding drawings and directions to build a nuke on the internet back in the 90s. Obviously getting the plutonium was the hardest part.

Fpbp

I'm sorry but what is the twin pines clock? If it from that Lynch film or back to the future then I understand.

Aren't they really hard to detonate?

Ok sherlok
>if I mix truth with lies maybe they'll let me get away with it

Why so? I had no idea.

Nah. You just need some high explosive like c4. You just need to pick between fission or fusion

0:17
youtube.com/watch?v=Psxktpxkc6o

thanks guys.. i know what i'm going to watch with the marble cake waiting for me in my oven ^^

I have a nuclear mirv warhead I took off an old SS-18 in Russia. I'm going to sell them to Israel.

youtube.com/watch?v=YuKFnAztieE

No terribly hard to do. In the old days you detonated tnt that surrounded the ball of plutonium. the only caveat was that it had to explode evenly and at the same time around the plutonium ball to start the fission process. This is why if a nuke just fell and hits the floor before being armed and the tnt explodes nothing will likely happen. the explosion wouldn’t be equal all away around the plutonium and the fission process would fail to start. I’m sure modern nukes have a better way to start this process.

Literally fucking everyone on Jow Forums knows Mossad did 9/11 you hook nosed weasel.

Basicly they will just blow themselfes up

Attached: Dancing Israelis.jpg (496x487, 41K)

that scene made me actually buy me a crap car at the scrapyard for one use only off road and i went to the hobby shop for servo equipment, damned that was fun, a year later i got me some camera equipment and had a screen to watch trough when fooling around with it.
when i had my first excavator i did the same with it after i was done with it, where i originally wanted to build a locomotive with the engine and track motors.
i hope i can do the same thing with my kids or grandkids one day ^^

i think he ment, push that button or not push that button

Exactly this, hell they even had a muriel of a plane hitting the twin towers on the side of their van. Very ritualistic.

They're not even the Mossad agents who planned it, just the B team sent to document the event. Kikes are retarded and they fucked up because they couldn't hold in their joy at killing goys.

Attached: D6TwS3kU0AAvw8X.png (708x517, 491K)

hmm.. how about a core of c4 capsulated in plutonium and that capsulated in c4 with a carbonsteel capsule around it or better yet, water. so you push and compress the plutonium in both directions.

They could try but they’re more likely to all die from radiation exposure from improperly handling the materials.

Thank you for suggesting Omar the idea...

I don't believe he was speaking in a moral connotation as in thinking that one should not glass a city but in the technical aspect of creating fission.

Do you really think chernobyl was a mistake? That 9/11 wasn't a nuclear test run? (why do you think they ran the wmd story?)
That nuclear micro-weapons weren't used during the serbian separatist conflict to eradicate the bloodlines of the survivors? (A victory so subtle that they enemy doesn't even know they've been beated.)

Nuclear weapons aren't for large attacks. They're for negative interest on future victory.

Agreed, they had to laugh and and old granny saw them. Hell they even had explosives in the van I don't know if they were spares from stockpiling them in the towers or if they were gonna blow something else up but they were there yet they were returned to Israel. You'd think they would of been a bit more secretive with the biggest event in modern history, it was of such ritual importance to them. The third temple and all that.

>"You'll understand in 30 years Marty"

youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY

Were did they drop the nukes? subterranean nukes?

Attached: reigenPonders.jpg (180x280, 11K)

you have to get it into an as-small-as-possible sphere to make the nuclear explosion, not just to compress it. make the neutrons hit each other more and more, and if they're spread out in a hollowed ball it won't work like that

hence never forget the golden rules about stealing technology.
when stealing technology, never forget to steal the manual too
youtube.com/watch?v=SQCfOjhguO0&t

by scrolling up again and rereading, yes the mechanical part, thanks for clearing that up :)
not my first language.

(((Everyone))) knows huh? Sounds like normies accepting the mainstream ‘it was terrorists’ narrative to me.

US and many other gubmints happy to sell them guns, it's good for the business of political destabilization and the consequent economic imperialism. Nukes have much more likelihood of blowback

>SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

oh it will, you'll get a bigger bang for your buck and you could add some graphite in that thing to make it dirtier too.

Because they are extremely capital intensive to produce. And existing nukes are heavily guarded. And even if someone got access to them, they would also need launch codes.

You need expensive Labs, a team of engineers & scientists to make a Nuke.
Rogue states as North Korea & Iran are capable to make nukes.

A terrorist group could steal a Nuke from a military base.
But just knowing how the technology works is a challenge by itself.

Attached: Megumin | KonoSuba .png (414x459, 263K)

Nuclear Weapons aren't necessarily hard to manufacture, especially in this day and age as others have said, the hard part is obtaining enough fuel substance, either Uranium with an isotope number of 235, that is 92 protons and 143 neutrons in its nucleus Or plutonium with an isotope number of 239, that is 94 protons and 145 neutrons.

Uranium 235 is very difficult to mass produce, because it is hard to separate the same chemical element with different number of neutrons because they all act mostly similar chemically.

Plutonium 239 on the other hand is not very difficult to mass produce, but it is very difficult to obtain if you don't have the right equipment. For example you would need a fast breeder reactor that bombards Uranium 238, which is non-fuel Uranium you can normally find anywhere with neutrons, these neutrons have a chance to trans-mutate the Uranium 238 into Plutonium 239. It would be very difficult to covertly do this, especially since breeder reactor technology is still very much primitive, and there's almost no one officially using breeder reactors for power generation.

So simply put, Uranium bomb = very hard to get the fuel, easy to make the bomb itself

Plutonium bomb = very hard to make the necessary technology required to easily make the fuel, easy to make the bomb itself.

Also, the reason why Plutonium is even more so a controlled substance is because it takes far less of plutonium to make a working bomb than a Uranium bomb. It takes roughly 50 kilograms of Uranium 235 to form critical mass, that is the mass required for neutrons to cause a chain reaction and produce more neutrons (aka supercriticality)

But for Plutonium, it only takes 10 kilograms of Pu239. Hence, why the existence of suitcase nuclear devices have been known to exist, and that some went missing when the Soviet Union collapsed.

Attached: 1554218158422.jpg (651x663, 43K)

Fucking government taking muh nuke rights

Attached: 1491670330235.png (900x762, 270K)

probably gonna happen soon

>Because they are extremely capital intensive to produce.
This

Attached: Megumin KonoSuba Explosion.jpg (1024x577, 46K)