You know it's true

You know it's true.

Attached: 64415994_3099904630097219_260906636028149760_n.jpg (960x960, 72K)

Other urls found in this thread:

greyenlightenment.com/debunking-the-90-eisenhower-income-tax-myth/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_in_the_United_States
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Nigger

Attached: 1558647350464.jpg (620x767, 90K)

I don't want to starve to death while witnessing immigrants getting thousands of dollars a month in freebies. The politicians need to start dialing it back if they don't want a civil war.

Yeah because it would so terrible if these "people" starved.

Attached: 1559082118839.jpg (1214x1080, 267K)

*Today's political arguments in a nutshell*
Liberal: We should be tolerant of LGBT
Liberal: We should be tolerant of all religions, including ones that hate LGBT
Liberal: Homophobe
Liberal: Racist

What a garbage thread you've created.

Attached: polshill.png (363x244, 8K)

The 'left' have no souls and therefore cannot meme.

CONSERVATIVES: maybe rights and amenities should only be reserved for people born in america

LIBERALS: no way every yakistabi, german naxi and north korean crazy deserves the right to live in america and shit on our customs and values

>Implying that only minorities are starving.
You just keep telling yourself that.

Even dog food.
Imagine if africans were willing to survive off of even the lowest quality pet food.
Would shipping it to them for free be considered “good” in the long run? Think about it:
>rampant population growth
>disconnection from reality of supply and demand
>more population means more people to feed and therefore creating a worse problem
>leads to vulnerabilities in supply chain that many lives depend on
>doesnt really solve anything
But as the same time, it doesnt feel right just letting them starve, maybe some type of food for work projects instead.

>no way every yakistabi, german naxi and north korean crazy deserves the right to live in america and shit on our customs and values
Is anyone seriously arguing that immigrants have the right to break the law? Are you confusing immigration with diplomatic immunity?

1 POST BY ID

Imagine if all the faggots pushing to force other people to do work for the poor just spent that time actually caring for the poor?
You didn't take medical classes and you don't grow food
>because you're not serious in the slightest about helping anyone with these things you say other people should do for your conscience.

I find it odd how Jow Forums thinks that "welfare bums" are the only ones eating up all the money.

Have you seen the US military budget? Have you seen how business taxes have dropped since the 1950s? When the business taxes are dropped, the government has to raise taxes on everyone else.

... and yet every thread regarding economics on Jow Forums devolves into "muh welfare bums".

HA! More like
>I don't want people to starve to death
>Start your own business and give your food away
>Fuck you literal Hitler I should lock your kids up so you can watch them starve!

They're both as dumb as each other.

Attached: download-12.png (900x506, 496K)

Of whites are hungry they need to get involved in their local church/community. Whites don’t let each other go hungry but you have to come out of your house to meet people. GO TO CHURCH. I’m an atheist and I go to church all the time. Also donate money to both churches in my community. Church is a great place for wholesome networking.

>health care is a human right
but the world GDP per capita is lower than the cost of health care

leftists literally want to claim that you have a right to an impossibility. if you can't recognize leftism as mental illness, you're nuts too

Yeah ... let's perpetuate this system in which the middle class is expected to take care of the lower class and the upper class is expected to do fucking nothing except rig elections and manipulate foreign policy.

Person 1: Why does the upper class get so many tax breaks? Amazon paid zero income taxes last year!
Person 2: Don't like it? Shut up and join a soup kitchen! The upper class doesn't have to do jackshit! Hail the business gods!

>Start your own business and give your food away
I love how Jow Forums thinks that starting and maintaining a business is as easy as taking a piss.

Correction

Liberal: I think the government should take people's money and give it to the poor

Conservative: Consider donating to a charitable organization. Don't be generous with other people's money.

>Soros is the godfather of the left.
No he isn't. Fuck off.
Jean-Baptiste Robert Lindet was a revolutionary leftist long before Soros. Don't you forget it.

poor people literally get food stamps and welfare checks already, anyone that wants more than that is no longer a socialist but a full blown commie.

I don't believe people should be starving to death.
We should be actively poisoning them instead.

>Whites don’t let each other go hungry
The entirety of European history says you are full of shit.

The rest of your post is just you assuming that your personal experiences matter more than the big picture.

>Have you seen the US military budget
Yes
66% of the federal budget is redistributionary policies. Medicare, medicaid, social security
Military budget is more like 7%
>Have you seen how business taxes have dropped since the 1950s? When the business taxes are dropped, the government has to raise taxes on everyone else.
Why do businesses need to be taxed, at all?
If you own a chain of car washes, and make a million dollars a year, why does the car wash chain as an entity have to pay a tax, and when you collect the earnings as income, there is another tax?
Why not just tax the million dollars you earn at the end of the year?

Attached: total_spending_pie,__2015_enacted.png (1003x915, 146K)

Todays political arguments are literally just memes and unhinged screaming from people who aren't really sure what they're even screaming about, and in the background of day to day reality are the people seething silently who do everything in their power to keep themselves from just coming fucking unglued who no longer care or participate in politics.

Why are why are the left so retarded?

Oh ... look. Another Jow Forums poster who considers himself an expert on communism but has no idea what it even is.

Define your terms.
In the image I have attached. Who is the middle lass taking care of the lower class. Who is the upper class doing nothing?

Attached: tax burden.jpg (720x384, 54K)

He's too old to be the godfather. Wouldn't he be like a great great great and so on grand godfather or something?

That's exactly the point leaf

>is anyone seriously arguing immigrants have the right to break the law
Yes, everyone on the left is

>Why do businesses need to be taxed, at all?
During the "glorious" 1950s, business taxes were 90%. Are you gong to start claiming that 1950s America was communist?

You know it's true.

Attached: 1458716498423.jpg (1633x2030, 671K)

You’re just a lefty beta male with no principles so the idea of spending money on defence is evil whereas parasites leeching is fine because they’re not using up as much money as the military

Implying dog food is worse than the what Americans choose to eat.

In the 1950s there were so many loopholes and exceptions to the rule that people paid virtually none of those taxes.

You are forgetting the fact that Amazon paid zero in income taxes last year. There is an elite class of companies that pay zero income taxes now.

another faggot leaf

During the 1950's, we were the only economy that had not been bombed, so there was nowhere for money to run to.
If you want 90% taxes ever again, you'll have to just start WW3, kill millions, and bomb every other country again.

The Left focus on what should be.
The Right focuses on what is.

>it doesn’t feel right just letting them starve
It totally does. Its no one’s problem but the Africans that they can’t feed themselves without constant aid.

Gay and retarded?
Quite the combination OP.

No, the top corporate rate was 50% but there were no payroll taxes for every little thing like they are now.

This board is for the discussion of news, world events, political issues, and other related topics.

Off-topic and /b/-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist). Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts, the following are some examples of off-topic and/or /b/-tier threads:

>Red pill me on X. (with no extra content or input of your own)
>Are X white?
>Is X degeneracy?
>How come X girls love Y guys so much?
>If X is true, then how come Y? Checkmate Z.

The variety of threads allowed here are very flexible and we believe in freedom of speech, but we expect a high level of discourse befitting of the board. Attempts to disrupt the board will not be tolerated, nor will calls to disrupt other boards and sites.

If you want a place to discuss topics not related to news, world events, or politics, please try Jow Forums - International/Random,

That's a myth
Effectively nobody paid that rate
>In 1958, out of 45.6 million tax filers, only about 10,000 reported incomes subject to the 81% rate or above. This means only .02% of filers had any income taxed at the 81% rate, let alone the 91% rate! (note: the 81% bracket was from $140,000-$400,000)

>Reliable data concerning what top income earners actually paid in taxes during the 50’s is hard to come by, but ironically, Thomas Piketty (who is best known as the French economist promoting progressive tax rates) compiled data estimating tax rates in 1960, when the top rate was still 91%. According to his data, shown in the chart below, the top .01% of income earners paid an effective 31% income tax rate in 1960, compared with a rate of 25% in 2004. While slightly higher, it’s fairly similar considering the huge variation in marginal rates (91% vs 36%). Piketty does claim the rich were more affected by corporate tax rates in the 50’s, as shown on the chart, but the Manhattan Institute has a good rebuttal to that finding in this paper.

greyenlightenment.com/debunking-the-90-eisenhower-income-tax-myth/
You're pushing a lie

Good point. Literally no one is starving in the US, kike.
Now... in Leafland...

Lol. No.

>You’re just a lefty beta male
The only real "alphas" are the ones who rig elections and control the military-industrial complex. What makes you think you are an alpha?

>so the idea of spending money on defence is evil
What is "defensive" about attacking a bunch of countries that had nothing to do with 9/11 while supporting the country that did 9/11? Pic related.

>whereas parasites leeching
You mean corporate subsidies?

Attached: Trump Loves Islamism.jpg (1200x630, 103K)

The main reason Amazon as a corporate entity does not pay much in taxes is because the company so vigorously reinvests its profit. The resulting expensing provisions lower their tax liabilities, in some cases down to zero or near-zero. That is in fact the kind of incentive our tax system is supposed to create, and does so only imperfectly, noting that many economists have suggested moving to full expensing.

(NB: You can’t hate both share buybacks and profit reinvestment!)

Amazon pays plenty in terms of payroll taxes and also state and local taxes. Nor should you forget the taxes paid by Amazon’s employees on their wages. Not only is that direct revenue to various levels of government, but the incidence of those taxes falls somewhat on Amazon, which now must pay higher wages to offset the tax burden faced by their employees. Not everyone wants to live in NYC or Queens! (Do you agree with Paul Krugman’s charge that the Trump tax cuts are mainly a giveaway to capital? If so, you probably also should believe that the wage taxes paid by Amazon employees fall largely on capital.)

>let's perpetuate this system in which the middle class is expected to take care of the lower class
Verbatim what you are proposing, kike.

Today's political arguments in a nutshell
>left: I'm a brainwashed drone and I believe everything the media tells me
>right: I'm a brainwashed drone and I believe everything the rest of the media tells me
>the wealthy/Jews: good thing those retards are all busy wanting to kill each other over what our media puppets tell them so we can keep taking all the money and power!

... and yet they fought for tax breaks.
The fact that they fought for tax breaks is proof that they were paying taxes.

I'm not a faggot. I like BIG boobies.

Attached: wonder_why_they_called_ya_that____by_theycallhimcake_dbyk6en-fullview.jpg (1024x1080, 96K)

Spread the word

Attached: Ronald.jpg (640x965, 218K)

Okay.
So again.
Why do businesses need to be taxed, at all?
If you own a chain of car washes, and make a million dollars a year, why does the car wash chain as an entity have to pay a tax, and when you collect the earnings as income, there is another tax?
Why not just tax the million dollars you earn at the end of the year?

These downs syndrome level boomer posts are fucking low energy

How come we have a thriving and expanding middle class in norway, while you have a shrinking one in usa?

>there were no payroll taxes for every little thing like they are now.
This is pretty significant, give that payroll taxes include deductions from the wages of workers.

Liberal: MIGA
Conservative: MAGA

Checkem

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_in_the_United_States

I don't see why this site constantly states that Canada's economy is doing poorly with no evidence.

i think it would be cheaper to pay for caviar and lobster daily than pay for the massive govt and industrial political complex that is supposed to fix poverty but just gives jobs and easy money to sociology majors while trampling my freedom

>Poverty in the united states is defined by obesity, not starvation
Bugged food mechanics

How many people are starving to death in murica?

>1 post by this ID
sage

>Implying that forcing billionaires to pay taxes is impossible.
Why even bother talking about politics anyway then? As long as billionaires run the show, everything will be shit.

Attached: nothing.jpg (480x270, 58K)

>Liberal vs. Conservative
no, this is communist vs capitalist (aka idealist vs realist)

Because your country understand economics.

Does ANYONE on this site even know what communism is?

Today’s political arguments in a nutshell: leftists being incredibly unfair to anyone to the right of Marx

What right do you have to their money?
>Jeff Bezos creates company, starts by selling books out of his garage, he's raised by a single Mom, puts out a service people use and allows hundreds of thousands if not millions of people to have jobs that wouldn't otherwise exist
>People like it, it becomes popular
>Goes public, groups like Pensions, banks, private citizens, all want a piece of Amazon, there's a limited supply of stocks so they drive up the price and let all kinds of people get a little piece of something they consider to have a big future.
>Since Bezos owned the company he created, his shares are valuable and he has a high net worth.
Why do you have a right to his money?

pushing for unlimited third world immigration leading to overpopulation will fighting carbon dioxide, which is literally fucking crucial to grow crop, will talking about starvation
liberals never cease to amuse me with their seemingly limitless levels of stupidity
yet they complain about allegedly stupid people voting for the orange man
literally fucking wew lad

Attached: 1aba.7.jpg (1280x720, 229K)

Post the in store prices

enslavement of the goyim on a national scale keeping them starving and impoverished

This image sums up the difference between liberals and conservatives. Aside from the 20 foot tall strawman, as a general rule,cat least in the past, conservatives just assumed liberals were well intentioned but miss guided. Liberals believed conservatives were intentionally evil. Recent events have changed that t a large degree. Liberals continue to believe conservatives are evilz, in the same way a three year old being told they can't have their pudding if they don't eat their meat thinks their parents are Evil. The assumption of Goodwill on the part of liberals by conservatives has been pretty thoroughly shattered, though. The almost stunned realization by traditional conservatives like Lindsey Graham during the Bret Kavanaugh hearings that the Democrats were willing to do anything, and utterly destroy anyone who threatened their hold on power indicates that conservatives no longer view the goals of liberalism as well meaning if I'll advised. The age of conservatives complimenting their liberal opponent as nice, but ill informed while the liberal paints his opponents as Literally Hitler are over. And that's part of the reason the libs are losing their shit. Conservatives are hitting back, and they don't like it.

>meanwhile at OPs

Attached: 1492046885102.png (640x480, 15K)

Conservatives: I don't think white people are the source of all evil in the world.

Liberals: OMG it's another Holocaust!

I AM SILLY

Socialists are only philanthropic with other people's money.

You know it's true.

No

Sorry, I don't argue with straw-men

>Liberal: I don't think people should starve to death
Ok and?

The "M" can stand for "master race*

Attached: 6-11-2019 9-52-41 PM.jpg (1948x1320, 577K)

Liberals: I want to keep on expanding the scope of government at every opportunity to keep creating laws and programs that I was sold on due to them sounding really good, but in reality are often deeply flawed or exacerbate the problems they were meant to solve.

Conservatives: This is how it is deeply flawed and will exacerbate the problem. Let's not do that.

liberals: Nazi