Why do you think Republicans are so hellbent on fundamentally changing the constitution of the United States of America?
>By contrast, the US Department of Justice argues that "there is no right to 'a climate system capable of sustaining human life'" - as the Juliana plaintiffs assert.
Essentially, Republicans want to take the right to life out of the constitution. If you thought repealing the 2nd amendment was bad, think of the tyranny that's possible if the citizens don't even have a right to life! If you value your freedom, this should piss you off.
In 2020, are you going to vote for Republicans, or are you going to use your civil responsibility to vote for people who uphold the US constitutional LAW that states that US citizens have the right to LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?
>US Supreme Court allows historic kids’ climate lawsuit to go forward
article from nature
>Government argues for halt to youth climate lawsuit, saying there is no constitutional right to a stable climate
I would go so far to say that, if you are against abortion, then you are implicitly agreeing with me on this point. The right to life SHOULD NOT BE INFRINGED
Ryder Stewart
Youre argument is baseless conjecture and you have zero understanding of the constitution or rights of Americans, as you are the moron clueless mass that still Believes on Monarchs granting rites, which is not, at all, what the constitution does or did. At all. The constitution is a living documentation of the SPECIFIC LIMITATION OF POWER GRANTED TO ANY GOVERNING BODY. period. The kid Was WRONG! If This kid wasn't stupided by his parents in their stupidity, he would have know his only option WAS PRIVATE INDUSTRY . which is why america IS AWESOME! IF HE WANTS TO FIX CLIMATE CHANGE, HE CAN BUILD HIS OWN CORPORATION. Except its against MY RIGHTS TO HAVE CLIMATE CHANGE. I WANT FUCKING GLOBAL WARMING. IT WILL WORK TO REFOREST THE WoRLD. So, if said child tries, i will sue him for violating my rights to cleaner air through reforestation by co2 emissions. Al gore is a con man.
>Disagree with a unanimous scientific consensus comprised of opinions both domestic and abroad
Not that you care about opinions coming from abroad. Anyway, these rights are INALIENABLE and endowed by the person's creator. The Republicans are trying to violate these rights. A member of the republic shouldn't need to go through the market to STOP THEIR RIGHTS FROM BEING VIOLATED. If someone invades your home with the express intent to murder me, I don't need to advertise that I'm about to be killed. In the same way, if someone is trying to make the climate unsuitable for human life, I don't need to make a company to stop them. I can use the state apparatus.
If you want to preserve your right to life, then you should vote for someone who will do it. You should call your senator and tell them that you think it's disgusting that Republicans are trying to take away your rights.
Seriously this fucking stupidity is why I support Climate Change. I'll be DAMNED if a bunch of fucking zoomer idiots are going to inherit a better world from me.
youtube.com/watch?v=TSJlZvQ3XgE Fuck every last one of you soundcloud rap listening, nigger loving, face tattoed socialist faggots.
Aiden Smith
>le 98% of scientists agree That's a made up statistic.
Juan Diaz
When you fucking die of exposure because you wandered off into the woods chasing after fucking pokemon and got lost, your constitutional rights are not being violated.
Benjamin Flores
>Oh yes, master! >I LOVE IT when you violate my rights >Please violate everyone's rights! It's the only way I can cuuuuuummmmmmm
If the climate cannot sustain human life, then you don't have any quality of life, you just die. You lose the right to life WHEN THE CLIMATE NO LONGER SUPPORTS LIFE. Are you intentionally being this obtuse? Are the Koch brothers paying you?
Ethan Richardson
You don't have a right to comfort.
Benjamin Garcia
>the right to life There is no such thing as this. If a man dies of old age, and supposedly has a right to life, obviously it was violated. By what? By whom? You can't answer that because there is no such thing as a right to life, nigger-devoid of critical thinking.
Colton Jackson
Violation of constitutional rights: If someone holds a plastic bag over your head cause you to suffocate
Not violation of constitutional rights: If someone causes the climate to no longer sustain life, causing everyone to suffocate
>If someone holds a plastic bag over your head cause you to suffocate That is correct, you don't have a constitutional right not to be suffocated with a plastic bag.
Xavier Morales
If a white husband is murdered by his white wife after he walks in on her and her black bull fucking, does she get in trouble with the law? Yes? Why? It's not like the husband had a right to life.
>Article [V] (Amendment 5 - Rights of Persons) >No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, *****nor be deprived of life******, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
You're trolling or you're hard throwing
Jackson Hall
>the baby murdering crowd lectures others about the right to life
You do not have a right to life. You have a right to due process and not to be charged and executed unjustly for a crime you did not commit.
Jayden Carter
I don't see anything in there about it being unconstitutional to suffocate you with a plastic bag.
John Bailey
>*Technically, a “consensus” is a general agreement of opinion, but the scientific method steers us away from this to an objective framework. In science, facts or observations are explained by a hypothesis (a statement of a possible explanation for some natural phenomenon), which can then be tested and retested until it is refuted (or disproved).
The citation from the 97% stat on the NASA website. Just tell me that you agree with some random Forbes contributor over:
So is abortion illegal? Also you dont have a right to force the government to take peoples money and fail to stop the climate from changing.
Angel Sanders
I don't see anybody in this thread who encouraged being pro choice. Could you please point them out so I can report them for being off topic, please?
Jaxon Brooks
Just tell me that you believe that being suffocated with a plastic bag doesn't count as being deprived of life, please.
Andrew Hernandez
You have no right to life. Just to seek happiness. Same thing as when they tried this with healthcare. You have a right to seek your happiness not enslave others to that end.
Jose Adams
You can be against something that isn't illegal you drooling retard
Nicholas Gonzalez
a room full of people agree shit tastes great and now you got shit breath, great. dumb faggot.
William Cox
I don't see anything in there about it being unconstitutional to deprive you of life either, zoomer.
Nathaniel Kelly
Why are you changing your flag every other post faggot?
Aiden Hughes
>memeflaggots angry about other memeflaggots
Isaiah Fisher
>One author whose entire identity revolves around how wonderful fossil fuels are is more equipped than every governmental and scientific institution in the US
>Why do you think Republicans are so hellbent on fundamentally changing the constitution of the United States of America? Which Article are they changing?
Leo Barnes
It got me one extra post. I think this point needs to get out there so everybody that values their individual freedoms can rise up and vote in their own interests. They should also be encouraged to speak to their senator about how they value the right to life and how Republicans are trying to violate their rights.
Aiden Wood
5 and 14
Anthony Morris
Fossil fuels are fucking awesome, and your whole fucking world would collapse instantly without them.
Nathan White
>newfag is too new to remember Israeli and JIDF posting
Logan Anderson
The Washington Post is the baby murdering crowd along with any "youth" who is a party to a climate lawsuit. It's literally 100%.
Aaron Wright
Could someone remind me about how this works, please? Does he get bonus points if I have to explain something? Is he just setting up for a 1 liner to own the libs?
Lmao, unless climate change causes death rays to shoot from the sky and vaporize you you are not being deprived of life. Survive, you weak zoomer faggot
Alexander Lewis
What about the Nature article reporting on the same lawsuit?
Colton Brown
yeah you are one of them
Aiden Martin
This isn't a fucking game faggot. This is fucking Jow Forums, and we're playing for keeps.
We could start with adapting the US justice system to ENFORCE ITS FUCKING LAWS that prevent people from trying to cause the climate to be lethal.
That would probably be easier. I think trying to try to biologically adapt to doomsday climate conditions would be similar to trying to adapt to having a large, gaping knife wound - difficult and inefficient.
You must be some sort of retarded. This is key to understanding what rights are, coupled with responsibilities. You don't have the right to life, however you have the right not to be murdered, and likewise you have a responsibility not to murder. Your scenario furthers my point. There is no responsibility involved in "right to life". Remove meme flag nigger.
Tyler Ortiz
This is dangerously stupid
Robert Thomas
LOL thinking we have the power to control or alter the climate. Being this dumb.