Economist here

Blake Campbell
Blake Campbell

I've noticed there is a lack of fundamental economic knowledge on Jow Forums. Much of the truth of right wing politics comes from a deep understanding of the supply and demand curve. I am here to answer any questions and explain in greater detail any of the economic processes/theories/policies around the world.

Attached: 1560397527064.jpg (120 KB, 544x768)

Other urls found in this thread:

pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5bc97ceb77c90
youtu.be/PQGMjDQ-TJ8?t=340
reddit.com/

Colton Reyes
Colton Reyes

i hate wholesome depictions of women
they're all sluts

Camden Morgan
Camden Morgan

Have sex

Nathan Perry
Nathan Perry

Kill all Jews; Save the World

Attached: 1543702110653.jpg (106 KB, 859x1024)

Jack Nguyen
Jack Nguyen

m-mummy

Samuel Sanders
Samuel Sanders

They're sluts until they find the right dick.
You're just not it, bro.

Jose Morales
Jose Morales

Is that an offer?

Ryder Bennett
Ryder Bennett

Explain the effect of immigration on the local job market, and the local economy.

Jeremiah Cooper
Jeremiah Cooper

Would this board like a supply and demand explanation of the sexual marketplace and the actions of the players within?

Attached: 1524248868360.jpg (176 KB, 1242x1223)

Christopher Gomez
Christopher Gomez

No, just dead Jews

Asher Kelly
Asher Kelly

Economics is indistinguishable from voodoo magicks

Levi James
Levi James

Fuck off Shlomo.

Julian Ramirez
Julian Ramirez

Babyfat is a megaslut

Henry Brown
Henry Brown

You hatred of the jews is rooted in their collective superior understanding of economics, thus enabling them to dominate finance - which touches every part of the world.

Daniel Wright
Daniel Wright

How do I jerk off?

Noah Sanchez
Noah Sanchez

Use your hands

Aaron Lee
Aaron Lee

Can you demonstrate?

Ryan Sanchez
Ryan Sanchez

Externalities are a lie.
Biophysical reality > economics.

Daniel Nelson
Daniel Nelson

wholesome
Tits hanging out, crotch only JUST out of view... You do realise this is just another "arty" porno photographer working in Eastern Europe, no?

Attached: Девушка-со-сливами-1473769076129476206.png (454 KB, 466x659)

Jonathan Miller
Jonathan Miller

Not really, I just like killing

Benjamin Nguyen
Benjamin Nguyen

That's due to you not understanding it. It's the furthest thing from voodoo magick.

boo hoo the jews dominate financial insitutions
boo hoo no i dont want to learn how to do so myself
i''d rather cry like a faggot and tell you to fuck off

retard

Economics explains the behavior of individuals within the biophysical reality.

Colton Phillips
Colton Phillips

What in the actual fuck, this place is almost as bad as /b/ with all these shit distractions.
Anywho
user brings up a great point, and his taste in modest women is much appreciated.
The ability to be able to fluently articulate your ideas into simplified sentences is a key to red-pilling normies and enlighting yourself.
I suggest every one acquire some literature about economics, preferably nothing anything from Karl Marx, at least until you're intellectually capable enough to weave your way through that den of snakes.

Attached: 1560514081511m.jpg (118 KB, 996x1024)

Ryan Mitchell
Ryan Mitchell

btw OP, I wouldn’t be such an ass if you would stop being such a fucking self absorbed freak that thinks he knows magnitudes more of information than everyone else, and insulting them in the process

Anthony Ramirez
Anthony Ramirez

Bro I know a fuckton about something and I'm here to teach you. Have some class and take advantage of the opportunity to learn from a master in the subject. Don't be a distracting little faggot. That costs us all precious time.

Aaron Young
Aaron Young

You can still put yourself on the same level as everyone else and offer mentorship. You don’t need to take the assumption everyone is a fucking retard except for you and make it public.

Wyatt Long
Wyatt Long

costs us all precious time.
why the fuck are you on Jow Forums if your time is so precious retard

Attached: 475293be987e8f82808da4ddb48af626.jpg (27 KB, 474x474)

Xavier Cruz
Xavier Cruz

But tell me OP, what do you think of a laissez-faire mixed market like in National Socialism?

Robert Foster
Robert Foster

Describe the derivative nature of economics from electricity.

Kevin Flores
Kevin Flores

I'm so fucking ignorant I don't even know what to ask. If I'm honest I would like to learn how to trade with a lot of money, I have been trading lately and after losing some I have started to learn the behaviors and I have recovered to the point of actually earning a couple of $ but I'm too much of a pussy to bet more money because I feel like other people will cash out as soon as I put mad cash. Its not that I don't have money I'm just too scared to lose it

Jayden Flores
Jayden Flores

With you?

Austin Price
Austin Price

i hate wholesome depictions of women
they're all sluts

But yourself a maga hat and a dildo.

John Campbell
John Campbell

You're arguing with shills, user.
Do not continue the conversation.
If they can't look paste their own ignorance and "muh feelings" then their obviously not worth the time.
You're original comment was not belitting of those lacking information on the subject.
Sidenote, didn't expand your pic before posting, she's definitely not in modest attire. Shame on you, we're supposed to mock and criticize thot behavior, not encourage it, only show your skin to your husband, would be a good motto.
P.s.s I'm talking about tits and upper thighs, not fucking sharia law.

Xavier Price
Xavier Price

hehe you fucking retards on Jow Forums sure wish you could have my economic prowess, don’t you?
I guess I’ll help teach you some things... *sigh*
Not pretentious or belittling at all.

Grayson Taylor
Grayson Taylor

#jessicababyfat is making me hnnnnnggghhh...

Ethan Gonzalez
Ethan Gonzalez

Jow Forums genuinely doesn't know anything about anything.

Grayson Robinson
Grayson Robinson

Also, he hasn’t answered anything yet.

Landon Ross
Landon Ross

I'm not going to continue this argument because you're a low I.Q mongrel.
If you want to join in the discussion on economics then you can stay, if not go back from wherever you came from.

Noah Williams
Noah Williams

Teach me senpai how to create a Network of companies to front and/or pay for a secret organization.

Dominic Richardson
Dominic Richardson

Just must be having a blast in bait threads

Attached: q5OL30Eh.jpg (7 KB, 250x174)

Robert Brooks
Robert Brooks

People have been asking questions and you haven’t answered a thing. I’ve asked you things too, faggot.

Nolan Wood
Nolan Wood

user, this is your thread, we're waiting for you to start us off. Just pick a specific subject. Speak no or forever be labelled a faggot.

Ryder Gutierrez
Ryder Gutierrez

You seem like a smug cunt.

Caleb Reed
Caleb Reed

I'm not the OP, faggot.
I'm the person who advocated everyone go out and research the subject themselves.
The most indepth I've read is from the negroid Thomas Soul.

Michael Martinez
Michael Martinez

Economist here
Economist, 10 a penny

Attached: Economist.jpg (78 KB, 800x800)

Ian King
Ian King

It's hopeless op, Jow Forums refuses to learn economics. That's why they'll always be slave to the jews

Jaxon Wright
Jaxon Wright

decrease in prices is the end point. Unless ofcourse you have welfare that they sit on... Then everything is fucked because they take without giving.

Samuel Morgan
Samuel Morgan

sup op. What do you think of new monetary theory? As I understand it, the idea is deficits are acceptable so long as it is held nationally since gov can print indefinitely.

BUT I look at places which have done this type of stuff (IE Japan) and it looks like a sluggish hellhole where surplus of capital has led to a bunch of zombie corps they can't get rid of. But maybe I don't understand the premises

Eli Miller
Eli Miller

believing this
bahaha you should see how your gf looks at other men

Anthony Wright
Anthony Wright

pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5bc97ceb77c90

Attached: jgiHKLW.jpg (25 KB, 275x1006)

Benjamin Turner
Benjamin Turner

I hate how (((Keynesian))) economists make the whole practice look bad to the uneducated. Just because they are doesn't mean all economists are. Some of us actually understand the first principles of economics.

Isaac Myers
Isaac Myers

No counter argument :(

Jeremiah Jenkins
Jeremiah Jenkins

Here's another diy concept, if the presented resources are available (near you).

Attached: corn-starch-water-fleshlight-4-after-it-solidifies-make-53329921.png (129 KB, 500x506)

Daniel Long
Daniel Long

What is your end goal? You might just be better of sticking the money in an index fund and getting your ~7% interest.

Justin Phillips
Justin Phillips

Attached: jGtli.jpg (92 KB, 900x661)

Kayden Perez
Kayden Perez

so far you've only replied to shitposting despite there being actual questions made

Jace Gonzalez
Jace Gonzalez

In economics, as in electricity, the capital or charge, respectively, seek to find the most efficient route forward possible.

Sorry but trading is not actually economics. Try to buy something for which the demand will grow faster than supply.

In a pure laissez-faire system the market would provide goods at the lowest possible price to the consumer and with the theoretically the fastest rate of economic growth. This economic approach has proven to be politically unacceptable. For example in laissez-faire child labor would be allowed, expanding the workforce greatly -good for the economy bad for humans. So people of the world have used their political power to establish the more-or-less regulated free-market system that we all share today.

In national socialism the effects on price are completely dependent on the policies. However it will have higher prices for the consumers. You would have to give examples of specific policies to see the higher prices in effect.

Checked

Attached: 1548205542705.jpg (60 KB, 614x642)

Jace Perry
Jace Perry

WHY ARE PEOPLE POSTING IN THIS THREAD?
THE ORIGINAL POSTER IS GONE.
IT WAS A BAIT THREAD.
YOU CAN LEAVE NOW.

Attached: 1560514753517.jpg (62 KB, 620x960)

Lincoln Hernandez
Lincoln Hernandez

economist here
mhmm so you're still in school?

Xavier Campbell
Xavier Campbell

deficits are acceptable so long as it is held nationally
Its a common trend emerging all social sciences that as long as no one can directly link a consequence to an action, some idiots think you can do the action and there is no consequence. Perpetual motion does not exist, no resevoir can expand without losing structural integrity, and every action has an opposite reaction, regardless of how long you delay the second event.

Anthony Young
Anthony Young

FUCK
I stand corrected
Sorry OP
You are not a faggot.

Attached: 1560509801480.png (272 KB, 640x997)

Isaiah Reed
Isaiah Reed

seriously, the most prominent people to bash economists are actually left-wing academic insiders looking to turn the whole thing into berniebro, inc

Gavin Walker
Gavin Walker

What is the Clinton Foundation really up to?

Evan Gomez
Evan Gomez

Do trickle down and Keynesian economics work / does one work better than the other?

Anthony Cox
Anthony Cox

Trickle down is a leftie spook. The actual term in politics is supply side economics. It's pretty good. Austrian school is best for theoretics. Not liked here because a lot of (((Them))) are involved with the school. Keynsianism is retarded:

If we make more money it fixes problems. Try throwing paper money to people stranded on a desert island.

They need shit to eat I.E. supply, not fucking monopoly money.

Jaxon Miller
Jaxon Miller

wasn't nazi germany 1933 to 1939 quite succesful economically? and didnt they have a lot of policies to keep workers happy? (this is coming from my british secondary education, not Jow Forums's sugar glazed memory)

checked

Cooper Allen
Cooper Allen

Worrying about economics is good when the ethnic situation is stable. Migration issues and cultural issues are the most important now, quibbling about economics is good for once those issues are solved, economics is a distraction at the moment.

Carson Young
Carson Young

Attached: dong.jpg (81 KB, 383x750)

Noah Stewart
Noah Stewart

only if you're able to include the role of honest/dishonest signals

Sebastian Lopez
Sebastian Lopez

Good thing we've all got donkey dicks amirite fellas?

Cameron Rodriguez
Cameron Rodriguez

Why yield curve is acting differently now?

Hunter Hall
Hunter Hall

Who're your favorite classic economists? Why?
Who're your favorite contemporary economists? Why?
Which economists do you think have had the greatest impact on history?
What is the most commonly misunderstood economic principle among uneducated people?
What are your thoughts on central banking?

Hunter Parker
Hunter Parker

The economics is why they are coming here in droves. Fix it and most of them will fuck off or starve.

Brody Torres
Brody Torres

If OP demanded 20 cocks to suck and there were only 10 available, what would OP do without those extra 10 cocks he so hungrily craved?

Nathan James
Nathan James

My youngest brother studied economics, your models are a joke compared to chemistry and physics and physics has cancer itself right now in the form of deeply entrenched incorrect assumptions backed up by the powers and principalities.

I am not saying Economics couldn't be a science, but the governments are going to have to die for that tree to be able to bloom.

I am interested in hearing your perspective though.

Tell me, what would the economic implications for a theoretically unbounded, arbitrarily large, supply?

What are the implications of demand calculations being an infinitestimal calculation, demand that still exists, but is more of a vector or angle calculation because it is unlikely for their to be demand for any one particular thing?

Attached: 89FE0177-AFD0-4488-928D-9313AAA43F55.jpg (161 KB, 780x777)

Hunter Perry
Hunter Perry

Sexist here.
that's a damn fine woman.

Gavin Smith
Gavin Smith

epic life hacks broooooooo B-)

Attached: after-school-snacks.jpg (98 KB, 679x680)

Jackson Bailey
Jackson Bailey

Imagine being a trickle down faggot :D It was quite extensively shown that easing tax burden on the capital class (people who solely live on outside investment) didn't help anybody and just accelerated capital accumulation.

Easing tax burden should be focused on people who own majority businesses ie family company and income tax.

Jayden Lopez
Jayden Lopez

I chose the supply and demand curve.

For this you would require an accountant.

You will have to expand your question. Do you mean illegal immigration in the USA? Do you mean the effect on prices? In economics anything that brings about more competition is good.

It's not a bad theory because what you are fundamentally doing is trading is trading Local Currency Units -which will eventually be worthless- for economic activity which yields real wealth in the form of economic development. Everyone wins as long as everyone's currency doesn't crash at the same time. And crashing the currency is a last resort because you can theoretically spend you way out if you are "conservative" with your printing in the good times. Your quesiton actually goes into the fundamental issue that exists within the EU. Countries like Greece could have just hyperinflated their currencies to pay back their debts and started over with something new. They couldn't due to being part of the euro. So that is a point of ongoing economic friction.

Trickle down has happened it just has not happened to the americans. Americans don't realize that they are usually already in the 1% globally. The pursuit by the coprorations of lower prices and laxer regulations has led them to the third world and china to build factories. Those places have seen enormous economic growth.

Pic related

Attached: 1.png (176 KB, 271x299)

Dominic Nelson
Dominic Nelson

Who're your favorite classic economists? Why?
Which economists do you think have had the greatest impact on history?
Adam smith. Despite his flaws in understanding value and how rent works. He helped significantly evolve our understanding of what we today call capitalism from mercantilism.

Who're your favorite contemporary economists? Why?

Peter Schiff. His book on why an economy grows and how it crashes is a great intro to economic first principles.

What is the most commonly misunderstood economic principle among uneducated people?

Subjective value. People don't understand that we value shit differently. Not just person to person but from time to time. So they try to put caps and floors on prices. These always fuck shit up.

What are your thoughts on central banking?

All the eggs in one basket is shit. Plus it helped pave the way for fractional reserve's dominance. Fractional reserve should be a choice not the default. Also helped establish fiat currency. Probably the biggest mistake of 1900's america was trusting the fed.

Robert Watson
Robert Watson

Imagine being a trickle down faggot

Just said trickle down is a leftie lie and here you are. Supply side retard. Try and focus.

just accelerated capital accumulation.

Where did they put the capital? Under their matresses? Or did they put it in to some kind of investments? Banks? Stocks? Real estate?

Joseph Rogers
Joseph Rogers

Before we continue, do you understand the accounting concept of working capital?

Landon Hernandez
Landon Hernandez

What is an economic shock test?

Carter Russell
Carter Russell

Expanding upon the similarity between electricity and economics, in relating to the "most effective route" aspect.
Just like how electricity mainly travels along the outside of the metal, inside the wires, the same logic could be said for businesses. The goal is to get the most benefits for their buck, provided these cheap measures don't effect them negatively in the wrong one, yet I'll end that subject with there's a difference between the shareholders and CEOs vs the logo of the company.
Another comparison we can make is comparing the amount of electricity available to the amount of workers available. As we seen in Germany recently, they have had periods of surplus and droughts of electricity, due to their method of acquiring said energy.
If there are more workers than the amount of jobs available, the cost of labor will be cheaper because individuals are fighting for employment and willing to low-ball compared to the other people. This is one of my only complaints with modern capitalism or as our less radicalized brethen call it, crony capitalism.
Cough Rothschilds Cough

Christian Clark
Christian Clark

This guy is better

Liam King
Liam King

As in you need to invest in some way to make more money. yes. Stop trying to use complex terms to sound smarter.

Zachary Gonzalez
Zachary Gonzalez

As a man who has never been too fond of numbers nor ever possessed a talent for juggling said numbers and equations I shall leave economics to more capable minds. Though pic related is what all men should know about economics.

Attached: 1553073537698.jpg (57 KB, 850x400)

Jackson Ortiz
Jackson Ortiz

Gib milk

Attached: 1529273154508.png (45 KB, 778x512)

Elijah Jones
Elijah Jones

Capitalism is just a system by which people who are better at shit do better and get more (Unless people make laws to fuck with it.). If you believe in your superior nature why are you afraid to show it? Out perform those africans like you did in the agricultural age all the way up until the industrial revolution and even a bit beyond.

Matthew Jackson
Matthew Jackson

Sure, you want a job nigger?

Cooper Cruz
Cooper Cruz

he conjures the metaphor economics is like electrical engineering

he says: whatever do you mean, voodoo economics?

Attached: 1517157622183.jpg (29 KB, 337x404)

Tyler Williams
Tyler Williams

Hello (((economist))) care to explain how the concept of consumer surplus is reflected in reality by using a real life example?

Benjamin Hall
Benjamin Hall

Capitalism sows distrust and unhealthy competition between countrymen. It leads to extreme poverty and extreme wealth and that extreme wealth in the hands of wrong individuals is what is causing the globohomo today. Fuck capitalism and marxist socialism.

Attached: marine.jpg (18 KB, 236x252)

Grayson White
Grayson White

That's really more of a history question. The history of national socialism in germany is just the climax of a repeating series of events where france, england, germany, and russia vie for domination of europe.

Peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice

Who're your favorite classic economists? Why?
Adam Smith. He discovered all of this and wrote it all down in one book.

Who're your favorite contemporary economists? Why?

They are all really smart and their theories have their ups and downs. I think at this point it's more of a social preference than a true incorrect situation. Bernanke and Geitner saved us all.

Which economists do you think have had the greatest impact on history?

Adam smith

What is the most commonly misunderstood economic principle among uneducated people?

That the supply and demand curve is one of the fundamental laws of the universe. It is inescapable and everpresent. You can use it to describe and analyze and define almost anything. It goes beyond humans and is beautiful.

central bank

It's working well enough for me so far, tbqh. I don't see a way around it except for Crypto which might be good for the economy but it might be bad for humans.

what would the economic implications for a theoretically unbounded, arbitrarily large, supply?

Supply of what? If the supply of something were infinite the price for it would be 0.

You are describing what is called elasticity in demand.

It's not a contest. Economics is like a book that goes in all directions. He may have seen parts of it have not. I'm reading his replies too.

Attached: 1523618746880.png (4 KB, 800x800)

Christian King
Christian King

Capitalism sows distrust and unhealthy competition between countrymen

Actually a great source of co-operation for consumer benefit. We call this co-operatition.

It leads to extreme poverty and extreme wealth

Only when the state is allowing companies to act the jackass via regulatory capture. That's corporatism like what the US has. If it's a free market the companies are beholden to consumers and also we know that even in shitty bastardized free markets most families have to go through the working cycle again if they don't provide value to others and just waste the money.

Luke Peterson
Luke Peterson

Nice bit on supply and demand. I'm stealing it because most people think supply and demand is optional.

Isaiah Howard
Isaiah Howard

I'm not doing anything clever dude. Try some schiff. If that's your thing Tom woods does some good lectures on economic history of the united states, also his bit on free market fallacies and facts is a big red pill. If you want dry academic shit there loads from hazlitt and rothbard. If you wanna throw a commie from a chopper read Hoppe's what must be done.

Jose Moore
Jose Moore

doesn't understand the path of least resistance being applicable in two different fields of study
probably uses the longer grocery line and pick the route with extra traffic for the drive
home too

concept of consumer surplus
Your use of the word "consumer" is putting a restiction on your question. Surplus is any value above or below the price. If you buy a house for $10,000 that you think is worth $15,000, that is your surplus. It could be argued that a candybar that you buy for $0.50 that you would have paid $1 for is your surplus. It could be argued that all nearly all exchange has a surplus of value for both sides or the exchange wouldn't occur. Since value is subjective who we define as the consumer really impacts your question.

Capitalism sows distrust between countrymen
Capitalism is at the heart of nationalism, because capitalism is rooted in the idea that you own yourself. The idea that we all own the nation together and are therefore responsible for it is identical to the idea that you own yourself and are responsible for yourself.

Attached: 1523510318096.jpg (27 KB, 330x330)

Sebastian Stewart
Sebastian Stewart

This question is more philosophic, so tackle it at your leisure.
Provided we live in a homogenous society were we aren't various tribal groups fighting over resources.
What are your opinions on risk vs reward in regards to shady business dealings like gambling and debt based usery through loans?
Should businesses be allowed to operate under the knowledge that they could cause people to go into massive debt, even though the individual at fault would be responsible for their actions?
Inb4 this question wouldn't need to be asked if we didn't have individuals on the back half of the bell curve and individuals who are just plain swindlers

Mason Morris
Mason Morris

In my opinion I think the local political will of the people is sufficient to regulate such activities. In the strictest economic sense, banning something does nothing to decrease the demand for said thing, usually leading to a lower supply to demand ratio and thus a higher price. In the case of gambling there were unregulated card rooms where anyone could be robbed or cheated as a result of the bans. Of course only those with a high enough demand to pay the correspondingly high price would partake, but that is a non-zero number. Even the threat of losing your whole life doesn't stop people from murdering each other.

Attached: 1538840689726.jpg (188 KB, 743x1200)

Jackson Russell
Jackson Russell

The other guy might think different but for me if a business wants to act shady they just get boycott. At the end of the day the way I see it is if you want to gamble your money you own the action. The risks and the rewards. You can hardly say I want to eat without first growing the food so how can you say you want to win without risking losing in a game.

Also without the risk of failure I think from a human perspective we would get so fucking bored as to blow our brains out. Without a quest of some kind to test you life is boring and we do weird shit. Some people make up imaginary Don Quixote style quests tiling at windmills (SJW's and the imaginary 'isms) and some like to challenge each other (Gamers and the like.)

Fundamentally we need something like private charity to support people with things like gambling addiction but there is no need for a ban.

Chase Taylor
Chase Taylor

That’s a bunch of juice speak. He who controls the energy sources controls the world.

Chase Hill
Chase Hill

Energy is a necessary part of all economic activity. However the supply and demand cuve and econ will tell you that when the price of one source becomes higher than the other source, people will switch. Also that there is a forever downwards pressure on the price of energy due to the ongoing competition. This machine is not stopping.

Austin Walker
Austin Walker

You spoke of currency going to the least resistance like electricity wich made me think of an essey or something like that that got leaked i guess called "silent wepons for quiet wars" that i read.
Are you familier with the theory and what do you think of it?

Levi Hughes
Levi Hughes

be elite
design a board game based on arbitrary rules that benefit you and punish the rest
pay underemployed intellectuals to study the board game and create formulas/graphs
call them economists and designate it an authoritative """science"""
enforce the rules of this board game upon society thru control of the judicial system
???
profit

economy is just a gay way of saying resource distribution- that's all it is!

you can distribute resources proportionally or you can distribute it disproportionately. capitalism is the latter, where most of the resources are artificially owned by a minority, while the majority engages in daily battles to obtain scraps thrown out from the oligarch table

capitalism is an attempt to legalize the crime of stealing resources from goyim, by creating a convoluted set of complex scams to hide the crimes beneath layers of bureaucracy, red-tape, lobbies...

all economics boils down to artificial social rules (the enforced legal code of society) that control the distribution of resources. it is similar to creating rules for a board game-- that favor the elite-- and then playing the board game and perpetually tuning the rules to favor the elite

you can study the board game, just like you can have a scientific field studing chess, as it applied in ancient times, but that does not rebuke the fact that the board game is made up of artificial rules to control the distribution of resources

the only real part of any economy is the distribution of resources, which is artificially controlled by the rules of the elite

economy is non-existent, it is an artificial result of judiciary laws and selective enforcement of those laws to benefit the elite. economics is a product of those artificial legal codes.

economics is like creating a bogus field to study a board game created by the elites

Elijah Butler
Elijah Butler

he cant. thats the deal

Christian Sullivan
Christian Sullivan

When were ya born?

Attached: Max-Hardcore-Steiner-at-2007-AVN-Awards.jpg (125 KB, 739x554)

Zachary Foster
Zachary Foster

More tiddies plz

Attached: 1558576919504.jpg (46 KB, 778x512)

Luke Clark
Luke Clark

I've not read the essay but based on the title I can give an analysis. This is a good example of how to apply economic supply and demand thinking to other areas.

Since the vietnam war, War itself has become less and less popular a political concept. This is an uncounted cost in the conduct of war. It makes war more expensive. Therefore, the demand for weapons which do not attract attention has risen. In order to meet this new demand weapons are designed which are "silent".

Asher Jones
Asher Jones

You dont need economy if you have chickens.

Austin Phillips
Austin Phillips

there's no such thing as """"economy"""". there's nothing scientific or natural about the economy

it's an abstract fake term created to confuse goyim with political jargon, convoluted policies, fake formulas/theories, beauracracy.... all to justify the crime of the elite who steal resources and disproportionally distribute the resources to the cronies

economics is a bogus field normalized by salaried academic intellectuals, who are paid and bought by the oligarchs

Blake Perry
Blake Perry

Do you think your University Press books are telling anyone something they don't already know, besides teenaged shitposters I mean?

Silent weapons for quiet wars? Electronics theory as occult economics? Eh?

Christopher King
Christopher King

Amateur hour, forever.

Leo Ross
Leo Ross

Maybe (((Keynsianism))) is. They are all about using lots of BS number games to try to explain why it's okay for someone to take my shit when I tell them no. However the basics of actual economics can be reached from logical first principles, ergo I think all this is just you not liking what you have been told is capitalism

Something like the current US right? The rich get richer and the poor stay poor?

See when we talk about capitalism we are talking about a free market where shit companies can't just change the rules by whining to the govt. A place where you cannot just roll up on someone hold out a badge and a gun and take their shit because you are the police owned and run by the rich and corrupt politicians.

Adam James
Adam James

be retarded
can only process economics through analogies to a childrens game
probably #resists drumpf because drumpf is voldemort

economy is just a gay way of saying resource distribution- that's all it is!

Yeah no shit you stupid fuck it's the study of that very concept

you can distribute resources proportionally or you can distribute it disproportionately.
Proportionately to what?

control the distribution of resources

Actually force controls the distribution of resources and those rules aren't created by anyone. Hence why if you steal something we send in the big bad armed guards to come get you, and if you resist with enough force they kill you. If you don't like it just fight back, coward.

the elites steal
the distribution should be different
therefore the study of the distribution is a trick on the uneducated

rofl this is the left guys. You see why it's so crucial to be able to shit on their silly little ideas? They are mad because their morals don't match up with how the world actually works. Pic related

Attached: fats.jpg (153 KB, 640x427)

Jack Bailey
Jack Bailey

Hi there op, i have an undergrad in economics. One thing i'd like your opinion on is money velocity, should we be concerned at its ever decreasing rate?

Secondly, I'd like your opinion on the phillips curve, do you think its a worthy enough model to be found in macroeconomic text books?

Attached: Money-Gets-spent-once-and-sent-into-a-hole-to-die.png (46 KB, 1161x434)

Ethan Rogers
Ethan Rogers

Bullshit. They are sluts until the cost is too high. For awhile this is a boyfriend. But they still fuck on the side if they can get away from it.

Jeremiah Foster
Jeremiah Foster

Actually applies economics to gender dynamics.

Based and crimson red pilled.

Jayden Green
Jayden Green

Economics are fake and gay

Oliver Watson
Oliver Watson

OP next time start with a crash course followed by questions. You need to bring these people to a baseline as opposed to scratching the surface of 100 different economic theories

Dylan Stewart
Dylan Stewart

No U.

Ayden White
Ayden White

Economics is the study of scarcity, studying scarcity is not 'fake and gay'. The narrow over-ton window that is taught in classrooms, and it being treated as science instead of a humanity does make it fake and gay though. Economics education is a cult indoctrination, much like church school.

Ethan Russell
Ethan Russell

They aren't exonomic geniuses. They are thieves, hucksters and are nepotistic to a degree that even puts indians and the chinese to shame. It ain't that hard to figure out. When whites demonstrated in-group preference and worked as a collective, they succeeded over Jews by sheer numbers.

Leo Long
Leo Long

Okay, you have my attention. This is true.

Christian Gonzalez
Christian Gonzalez

Okay, tell me if this is wrong.
Women gets the vote to double the workforce and pay half the people ( the men needs half what he got before )
women gets more and more pwoer
women refuse to submit
women divorces rates skyrockets
men gets scared to be turned into a slave
men don't marry their women anymore
marriage rates fall
population shorgates
need to import people from other cultures
government gets bigget into redistribution to attrract more people and to give them money
return to the start till the original etnic population falls under 50% then continue
said people eventually rise up, and destroy the host country
multiculturalism ends

Easton Russell
Easton Russell

Hispanic girls have the best feet.

Attached: Megan-Salinas-Latina-Feet-Censored.jpg (680 KB, 3000x2000)

Jeremiah Stewart
Jeremiah Stewart

Anons, your arguments are valid. The subject of economics and our view of it has been heavily altered by the Rothschilds family influence in global affairs throught out the last 300 years.
Same could me said about Jews in England who normalised Usery in the 15th century.
Or even all the way back to Jebus whipping the Pharisee money-changers out of the temple.
For the most part we've always had the influence of an elite oligarch hovering over us, in one way or another or by different groups.
Yet it is that knowledge that sets us apart from the phony professers who still preach Keynsiains economic drivel.
Clearly focusing on economics shouldn't be our main issue, yet dabbling upon the subject and being able to refute inferior information and offering a better example would benefit our cause.
I've found that economics is a great way to introduce normies to politics, because it heavily focuses on their income, a.k.a their comfort, which they hold above all else.
pic semi-related

Attached: 1560508405101.png (236 KB, 1680x1998)

Connor Evans
Connor Evans

Well in any case you can google it.
Its out there freely available if you are interested.

Isaiah Nguyen
Isaiah Nguyen

Nigger, didn't keyensians get BTFO a few years ago when UMass idiot students found an Excel spreadsheet error in the data that Harvard Kennedy School economists had used to justify US foreign policy for decades?

Lurk for 2 years and post when your field is less of a joke. And not even a funny joke. A joke about Hitler. That's your entire field. Unlike Hitler's economic policy, which made the rest of the world the joke.

I'd tell you to gas yourself, but all the hot air that comprises your field already did.

- t. engineer who actually builds real hardware and doesn't just shit out Excel typos for (((grant money)))

- inb4 source: Carmen Reinhart and Ken Rogoff Excel typo

Attached: 1560489953533.gif (864 KB, 321x512)

Christopher Sullivan
Christopher Sullivan

You hit the nail on the head user.

Attached: 1560494885776.jpg (113 KB, 500x376)

Jose Kelly
Jose Kelly

Master user, what's your opinion of Keynes? Is he shilling or not?

Nathaniel Garcia
Nathaniel Garcia

Those last 5 arrows happened in Texas and Hawaii.

Brandon Perry
Brandon Perry

there´s a lack of fundamental economics knowledge amongst economists. The subversion within the economics profession is, imo, as bad as the subversion within psychology. Economists today are a bunch of maths nerds many of whom know nothing about business or real life economics. The true sell-outs of the academic world.

ECONOMICS at 99.9% of the University faculties has become and subject completely detached from reality. It´s all self-contained mathematical models, mental masturbation.

Attached: 1560370359447.png (451 KB, 700x700)

Brody Moore
Brody Moore

Keynes is shit. Got a source on that sheet? Would love to troll with that shit. Me and OP seem to both be Austrian. A school pushed out because they don't think the govt is god. Just because the main stream is shit doesn't mean you throw the whole thing out. Most modern biologists are saying shit like "race don't real and gender don't real too" are we throwing out germ theory of disease for that shit?

Asher Price
Asher Price

I can confirm this. Almost all of my professors are like that.

Nicholas Price
Nicholas Price

Thx, It's been a hard research to determine Hitlers allegiances to the banking houses

Thomas Ramirez
Thomas Ramirez

kill yourself spic lover

Xavier Powell
Xavier Powell

Can confirm as well

Juan Young
Juan Young

This. They call it the dismal science because the people in it today are retarded

"Let's bury money and pay people to dig it back up that'll make us richer"

levels of dumb.

Blake Price
Blake Price

where can i see this chicks pussy?

Connor Reyes
Connor Reyes

You'd be surprised how much informational content one can find on the half Jow Forums Jow Forums humor threads.

Attached: 1560507834058m.jpg (62 KB, 1024x875)

Elijah Morales
Elijah Morales

I just noticed that that bitch has hairy arms.

Attached: pepe---hitman.jpg (265 KB, 3508x2334)

Lincoln Rogers
Lincoln Rogers

not loving latinas
faggot

Carson Perry
Carson Perry

I've paid women to worship their feet before.

Attached: 20171027-ceci-feet.jpg (104 KB, 720x889)

Noah Martin
Noah Martin

Back in my day at Oxford E&M I had one professor present an """open economy model""", pure maths, no inputs from reality what so ever. She got to the end of the presentation and said "as the graph clearly shows, immigration is always a good thing for economies. She works at ECB btw.

Attached: legodick.png (288 KB, 500x648)

Henry Morris
Henry Morris

what happens when libertarians are in high supply and low demand?
we get annoying cucks posting on the board who like to down play peoples intelligence as a personal oversight.
hahahahahahaha
get the votes libertarians.

Jace Cooper
Jace Cooper

Latinas can be sexy as hell.

Attached: Sexy-Latina-School-Girl-Ass-Legs.png (2.04 MB, 1440x1782)

Luis Thomas
Luis Thomas

Kek at your image, good question I'd like answered as well.

Jayden Taylor
Jayden Taylor

Why is the shrinking markets problem false? I don't get what's wrong with it

Ian James
Ian James

Dirty technocrats

Brayden Gray
Brayden Gray

If you don't know what it the problem is explained here in about 2 minutes

youtu.be/PQGMjDQ-TJ8?t=340

Juan Campbell
Juan Campbell

Economic professors today are leftist priests which main goal is to spread propaganda

People which practice it in real life act absolutely different from propaganda-theories.

Just look at Trump - he and his team as practitioner economists use protectionism, professors and leftists without touch to reality yell about free trade lol

Grayson Robinson
Grayson Robinson

That's how they work.
First they get the idea they want to push and then they construct all the (((logic))) around it. The purpose of their teaching is not to give you truth, but to confuse you.

Attached: What+the+is+happening+doesnt+isreal+have+a+large+-b29c0b9ce7095ea847f4601ed9b4c148.jpg (149 KB, 682x768)

Luke Scott
Luke Scott

Should start at 5:40

Logan Lewis
Logan Lewis

Why is it good to make local goods more expensive for consumers? Also lefties aren't about free trade. They want subsides, bannings and tariffs too just on different shit.

Brody Wilson
Brody Wilson

are you able to apply your economic voodoo without depending on the judicial system?

or does your economics actually require judicial system to enforce artificial rules?

if economics requires a judicial system, then economics is an artificial product of politics

therefore, economics is not real or natural. economics is a creation of political interests and is a subset of politics

Logan Bell
Logan Bell

fucking lol

Attached: Screen-Shot-2019-06-14-at-2.57.51-PM.jpg (170 KB, 1544x908)

Caleb Smith
Caleb Smith

What should be done when the market starts to fail like we see today with e.g. Amazon. Smaller competitors just can't compete anymore. Another example is companies like Tesla or Uber staying afloat with unprofitable buisness models by collecting fresh capital.

Ayden Murphy
Ayden Murphy

ya youre right

economics is a jewish trick we somehow lost all our money to let's be sure to not study anything about it

Economics doesn't even require humans to be alive. You are talking about the human elements of life and death which really have nothing to do with economics.

For a human being on the one planet we have in the one set of times we know of it has taken "artificial" rules to enforce anything, including property rights or freedom of exchange.

You can apply the study of supply and demand to things which are unrelated to humans. For example there is a demand for a fitter mate in reproduction.

Companies eating each other up is not the market failing that's the market succeeding. Consider the evolutionary parrallel. Only the fittest companies survive.

As far as profitable vs unprofitable no unprofitable business will last forever.

Attached: 1549543606888.jpg (73 KB, 630x630)

Jason Perry
Jason Perry

are you able to apply your economic voodoo without depending on the judicial system?

It would require lots of people with guns defending there land in a very time inefficent way but it is possible however having a court to air differences is really good because it doesn't make corpses where there is no need.

or does your economics actually require judicial system to enforce artificial rules?

How do you define artifical rules? If one can define them from logical first principles are they still considered artifical because you don't like them?

therefore, economics is not real or natural.

Define real in the context of an idea please. Also trade is very natural to humans. Regardless being natural =/= good. Unless Flesh eating bacteria and urethra snakes are good. Maybe giving you one or the other would be.

Julian Morris
Julian Morris

The best thing you can explain to me is why the "zero sum game" analysis is incorrect.

Xavier James
Xavier James

economics is bullshit
No one has any fucking clue whats going on because of the fed

Connor Fisher
Connor Fisher

not saying you shouldnt learn about it
learn about economics and then learn why we hate the fucking jews

Luke Bennett
Luke Bennett

answer any questions
where did you get that pic of the she-slut?

Jayden Garcia
Jayden Garcia

Why is it good to make local goods more expensive for consumers?
to fuck foreign competitors to become richer
to get more money lol

Also lefties aren't about free trade. They want subsides, bannings and tariffs too just on different shit.
subsidies are directly related to foreign trade

leftists want free trade because they do not care who will be their master.
people who sell the most have the money to buy their left ass and leftists are ready to abandon any market for promise of GIBS, like slaves

Luke Price
Luke Price

Because human innovation has always made more capital. From the first rocks banged together we made useful axes from useless rocks. Therefore humans make more value from taking useless trash and making it fulfill other humans needs.

Basically more shit gets made so people can both win.

Evan Morgan
Evan Morgan

ALL deterministic economics, traditional political economics, and 'supply and demand' are pure bullshit on par of the shittiest psychonalisis. The only legit economics subject is econometrics. Game theory is almost close. Everything else is bullshit. Fight me plebs.

Ian Taylor
Ian Taylor

can you grasp the fact that economics is a product of political interests who create artificial rules?

economics has no basis in the natural world. there is no hayek or mises or keynes or adam smith of a bee society. bees distribute resources optimally and equally without the hogwash of economic theories.

economics without a judicial system, would not exist. economics is a subject of the judicial system. the judicial system is not an absolute, but is a subjective system based relative to the interests of the elite.

economics is therefore a product of arbitrary social rules-- much like a boardgame. this boardgame is setup to favor the elite-- perpetually tuning the rules to favor the elite.

Kevin Young
Kevin Young

economics is a jewish trick we somehow lost all our money to let's be sure to not study anything about it
Illiterate retard trying to give advise. Just kill yourself you disgusting peasant.

Nicholas Powell
Nicholas Powell

To my knowledge Amazon never actually made a profit with their online book sales. Anyway companies eating each other up stops being good if not enough competitors are left. Monopolies are bad - at least that's what they thought me in school.

Luis Russell
Luis Russell

to fuck foreign competitors to become richer

What? No this makes the goods used in local processes either worse or more expensive. For example if we imported leather and were making shoes with it. If the leather is 0.15 dollars per shoe and we add a tarrif to make it 0.30 that means the shoes have to rise in price to re-coup the losses making american consumers poorer.

not care who will be their master.

Trading doesn't make someone your master. Trade is an exchange of stuff you find less valuable for stuff you find more valuable.

Kevin Roberts
Kevin Roberts

Either the monopoly gives shit people want or not. If it gives people shit they want it can stay a monopoly. If no other people suddenly have an incentive to provide for the gap in the market.

Only govt enforced monopolies are bad.

Connor Ward
Connor Ward

judicial systems are based upon economic rules, you idiot.

Colton Phillips
Colton Phillips

this is correct

Gabriel Jones
Gabriel Jones

based

they're all sluts when not under the supervision and strong pimp hand of a male

Matthew Brown
Matthew Brown

The rules aren't artificial dipshit they are created by humans. There's nothing ariticial about an ongoing agreement.

economics has no basis in the natural world.

Would you rather fuck a pretty girl or an ugly girl if you could only choose one? The demand for pretty girls is higher than the demand for ugly girls. The supply of ugly girls is higher than the demand for pretty girls. Therefore the value placed on pretty girls is higher than on ugly girls. And that's just taking into account your own preferences. There is nothing artificial or unnatural about individuals having preferences, and that is the study of supply vs demand.

Illiterate retard trying to give advise.
Illiterate
advise

the memes write themselves

Hudson Morris
Hudson Morris

economics without a judicial system, would not exist. economics is a subject of the judicial system.

Economics is the study of scare resouce usage and allocation. This line you made tells me all I need to know.

the judicial system is not an absolute, but is a subjective system based relative to the interests of the elite.

The current justice system is corrupt? I think that what you said I just can't read word soup. Good point. Politcal influence in justice is really bad. If only we got rid of it.

economics is therefore a product of arbitrary social rules--

Again if I can show the basics of property rights from logical first principles which are the corners stone of our economic school does that still make them arbitrary because you don't like them?

Cooper Williams
Cooper Williams

I see the logic in that somewhat but there is still the problem that if the sole company providing this service goes down we are facing a really difficult transition. Sure new companies would step up in time to fill the gap but that might not be fast enough if we are talking about vital services.

Jace Cooper
Jace Cooper

Such as?

I honestly have a hard time thinking of a vital service that is free market and a single point of failure that also cannot be given at a basic level by just one guy.

If you have something that hits all those markers I would love to hear it.

Anthony Thompson
Anthony Thompson

m-mummy

Attached: mummy2.jpg (102 KB, 600x600)

Eli Gonzalez
Eli Gonzalez

For example during the financial crisis governments felt the need to save banks because they were perceived as being "too big to fail"

Asher Rivera
Asher Rivera

I didn't know those existed
buy something for which the demand will grow faster than supply.
Like? gold?

James Torres
James Torres

economics isnt not a science, but is a study of artificial social rules that control the distribution of resources.

if economics was an absolute, then it would not require a judicial system of artificial laws to enforce economic rule

Jace King
Jace King

Q on her dress
Well well well...

Henry Gonzalez
Henry Gonzalez

Why aren’t you too wealthy to be posting on this trash, then?
t. Virgin
White women have the best feet, just like they have the prettiest faces. Latinas also smell bad.

Owen Lee
Owen Lee

Yeah the government subsidized the bad decision to begin with (Sub prime mortgages). Also Banks can be operated at a low level fairly easily. It's not as good but not crippling.

Austin Allen
Austin Allen

if i dont like the source of the rules they are artificial
anything deemed artificial is inherently meaningless

lol

who says i'm not wealthy enough to have the free time to do this all day?

Camden Morales
Camden Morales

economics isnt not a science, but is a study of artificial social rules that control the distribution of resources.

Asssertion with no actual argument or evidence flying in the face of the stated goal. The only response I need here is "Nu uh". It's about as substantive as your point. Probably more so to be fair.

if economics was an absolute, then it would not require a judicial system of artificial laws to enforce economic rule

It doesn't ergo it's an absolute. Really shitty syllogism. now fuck off.

Brandon Sanders
Brandon Sanders

Much of the truth of right wing politics comes from a deep understanding of the supply and demand curve
No it fucking doesn't it comes from slavishly devoting every bit of policy towards serving the donor class, and conditioning the base into mindless servitude through the repetition of simplistic propaganda.
In the real world, every western market has been heavily curated.

Isaiah Brown
Isaiah Brown

reddit.com/

You have to go back.

David Lewis
David Lewis

okay, professor gaysburgstein, where in nature do your economic theories actually apply in practice?

if economics was an absolute, then it could be applied outside of human society onto any collection of organisms that consume resources. economics cant even be applied to complex non-human societies such as ant society, eusocial insects, and multicellular organisms

economics is a farce and a sham

Gabriel Mitchell
Gabriel Mitchell

Of course smaller banks exist but they can only do so much. A collapse of the banking system is surely not desireable in conclusion banking monopolies should be avoided as much as possible.

Dylan Stewart
Dylan Stewart

there is a lack of fundamental economic knowledge on Jow Forums
on Jow Forums
ignoring the masses
pretending educating Jow Forums will affect the masses
SAGE

Nathan Reyes
Nathan Reyes

because i dont like what my politicians do for money all of economics is bullshit!
there is no such thing as the supply and demand curve its brainwashing
we curate goods anyway no we can't explain how or why what do we look like economists?

if economics was an absolute, then it could be applied outside of human society onto any collection of organisms that consume resources.

To use your example of an ant-colony: If an ant colony is has too high a supply of workers, and too low a supply of food, there will be food shortages. Those who will get the least amount of food are the ones least able to compete for it and will eventually die out. Likewise, if you introduced an oversupply of food, the size of the colony would grow until the food and population were in harmony. That is simple supply and demand logic applied to ants for you.

Andrew Miller
Andrew Miller

monkeybrains

see this

economics is artificial and based on jewdicial politics

for example, Neoliberalism, a Hayek thing, is, like all other economic theories, is entirely about politics rather than economics. Hayek also taught or tutored many other LSE students, including David Rockefeller.... guess who his neoliberal boardgame system benefits?

Organized primarily by economist Friedrich Hayek, the more than one thousand economists, journalists, policy makers, and other thinkers who eventually gathered under the MPS umbrella formed what Philip Mirowski has called a “Neoliberal Thought Collective”—an intellectual/political intervention that eventually defined a the modern era of capitalism

James Garcia
James Garcia

No. It's the wrong conclusion. The government backed these banks to the failure... without the government some would have taken the subprime market and some would not. The ones that did are considered high risk high reward and so only people with that risk appetite enter. the others wouldn't and so they are safer banks with lower rates. the conclusion is that state interference in the economy is bad. People always want a multitude of risk levels and will make the institutions they need for this.

Hudson Torres
Hudson Torres

wholesome
in what fucking world is this soft-pornography considered "wholesome"?

Gavin Clark
Gavin Clark

The other guy is already doing a perfectly fine job of pasting you to the wall. Stop being a retard.

Eli Mitchell
Eli Mitchell

Holy shit op you got fucking owned here, kek

Nicholas Wilson
Nicholas Wilson

go ask your mother. She demanded a thick cum load on her face and I supplied it. How's that for nature?

Attached: 1556342662561.png (323 KB, 646x595)

Ian Howard
Ian Howard

doesnt understand ant colonies
what a fuckin retard

your idiotic statement totally ignores the system of distribution utilized by ants

try to apply neoliberal or any other economic voodoo theory onto bee societies without conflating human business interests

Ryan Mitchell
Ryan Mitchell

I know all chinks look the same, but if that thot has a mole on her left ear; I definitely fucked her.

Aiden Hall
Aiden Hall

Economist here
muh *isms
Uh, no sweetie, all the *isms that you so eagerly treat as "natural law" are only doctrines of preferred human behaviour thought of by humans.
muh debt creation can't go on forever
Uh, no sweetie, it's just your lack of understanding that money is created ex nihilo, debt does not matter and that you never default if you print the money (bonus if you have a nuclear arsenal, too)
muh mathematics and how one can't escape them
Uh, no sweetie, math is not natural law. Math is a human made aide to convey abstract thought. It's very akin to a language, hence it is neither finished, complete or finite.
The things that math describe are completely independent from math itself in their potential of existence.
muh general this can't go on forever because muh book I've read said so
Uh, no sweetie, economics are a man made and completely made up synthetic entity. It's rules, limits and workings can be changed on a whim.

Nolan Miller
Nolan Miller

this where leftists professors and practitioners disagree

leftist professors operate with abstract models which suit their vision of reality (propaganda economy like communism lol)

business operates with model to maximize profit in certain conditions (real economy)

----

everything is simle
if people sell more than they buy then they get richer.
this is math
if i have 1000 dollars, sell m.g and services equal to 1000 and buy nothing then i have 2000 lol, i am richer
because 2000>1000 lol

freetraders inside own states just want to cheat with market, they buy cheaper abroad and sell at home with higher profit, which forces producers in home to reduce quality and workers to get same profit or rentability. freetraders reduce quality of their goods even more because market is smaller now lol and cicle continues untill collapse

Trading doesn't make someone your master
it makes

i person sold you 1 000 000 000 worth of goods then he can come with that money, buy land from under your feet and force you to pay rent, now you are slave lol.

if you have no money to cover deficit then you increase debt, then state increases taxes for "commoners" to pay % for person which sells them material goods lol

Camden Jackson
Camden Jackson

One thing the Left gets massively wrong is how an economy grows/ what is productive

One way to look at it is the efficiency of spending money by ownership. Your own money on yourself will be least wasted in quality and value. If you spend your own money on others you watch the value but dont care as much about quality. If you end up in a situation where you spend other peoples money on yourself, like a company card, then you dont care as much about cost but quality will be higher. If you are in a situation where you have other peoples money and you spend it for others you care least about quality and value. The last one is main flaw of government over private spending that adds up over time.

Another way to look at spending is Government spending, Private investment and, consumption. The left seems to think that low income consumption is greater than high income consumption when they are the same, both providing jobs. The Government can spend money and it can look like its doing a good job for a while if it gets into the private sector but it ALWAYS leads to rationing because of mismanagement and or running out of money. Just look at PEMEX the Mexican oil company, or the UK health service. Wealthy people invest and push things forward better than the government does and it is completely neglected by the left. Also they seem to think if money is put in a bank or invested by a rich person its not being used, which people that think that are retarded. Living standards would be much worse for middle class without rich people putting their money in banks. They would all be renting homes rather than owning one and gaining asset value. Also way less cars.

Attached: 1519092386485.gif (1.37 MB, 720x480)

Caleb Miller
Caleb Miller

that money is created ex nihilo, debt does not matter and that you never default if you print the money (bonus if you have a nuclear arsenal, too)
I literally wrote all of this in a post faggot read the thread

math is not natural law.
Lol this is who we are fighting against guys. People who say that math is not a natural law. It's all a human made up joke! Like when you say you're six feet tall, if we redefine six or feet your physical size actually changes! These are the same people that believe in feminine penises.

Attached: 1521303453274.gif (1.76 MB, 400x206)

Luke Butler
Luke Butler

Austrian
theoretics
From the economists that say they can never predict anything.

Why does the classical production functions create "product" without energy?
How come things that happen in the real world, like bubbles and crashes, can't be explained by classical economics?
What happens when you try to maximize the utility of a set of purchases instead of just one? Describe what the theory says and what several statistical studies showed happening with real people
Also
defend linear equilibrium dynamics when anyone can see the economy is a chaotic system

Connor Morales
Connor Morales

I'll bite. What is it that I don't understand about Kike magic? I'm a fisherman with a shitty tax history.

Thomas Barnes
Thomas Barnes

serb fucks his own mother up the ćevapi-filled asshole
and these inbred serbian faggots wonder why they got bombed by based Clinton

Jacob Gonzalez
Jacob Gonzalez

ITT: commies and neetsoc derail the thread because they want you talking about sex and race

Attached: merchant.jpg (13 KB, 350x350)

Sebastian Ortiz
Sebastian Ortiz

I bunked with an economics student and developed a deep disdain for the field. 3 years of his BSc in economics boiled down to making regression curves and doing high-school-level accounting. These people pretend the bell curve is complicated math.

I hold that economics should be an expanding course for a veteran of a field who's upgrading to management positions. But then again, in my engineering program, we had to have at least 1 "soft skill" per semester and our management teacher literally told us "A manager does not have to be an expert in the field of industry he's managing - it may even be a detriment"

Always

Alexander Flores
Alexander Flores

In theory that might be true. But sometimes the best economic solution is just politcally not viable. Would you really argue that the increased regulations that where introduced after the financial crises where uncalled for?

Nathaniel Turner
Nathaniel Turner

The price of a good is a product of the supply of said good vs the demand for said good. If you increase the supply and the demand stays the same, price goes down. If you increase the demand and the supply stays the same, price goes up. It's why people would pay more per lb for fresh fish than days old fish. The demand is higher for fresh fish than for the same fish days later.

Levi Moore
Levi Moore

they buy cheaper abroad and sell at home with higher profit

In other words they provide a cheaper good to consumers of equal or greater value... This is called comparative advantage. if that individual decides he values the stuff more than the money what is your issue?

i person sold you 1 000 000 000 worth of goods then he can come with that money, buy land from under your feet and force you to pay rent, now you are slave lol.

Often trade is done internationally for stuff because people don't value each others currency. The big reason the US could do that was because they politically underpinned people with their dollars post ww2 and it became standard in fiat to run on debt. That's bad.... Like for anyone.... Politics and economics don't mix.

if you have no money to cover deficit then you increase debt, then state increases taxes for "commoners" to pay % for person which sells them material goods lol

Why buying shit you can't afford is bad for you... Who would have though.

Caleb Watson
Caleb Watson

Totally ignore the system of distribution
If there isn't enough food, by distributing the food in the supposedly distribution system of ants, there'll be a lack of nutrients in their body, which will lead to even more scarcity of food, since they won't have the same predisposition to work as they would in a healthy diet, this will lead ultimately to the survival of the ones who acquire more food for themselves by even exploiting others or by getting it through the use of force.

Landon King
Landon King

Yes, because Monika Lewinsky sucked his cock and he had to create some major decoy news.
Also, USA bombed us while we were removing kebab, which makes you Muslim supporter. Be ashamed.

Attached: pepe-really-sad.png (136 KB, 363x296)

Owen Scott
Owen Scott

There is also the time aspect that collectivists dont seem to understand. Japan had swords and kimonos in 1860s then had battle ships a few decades later as a world power. Turned into dust then became #2 world Economy in the 80s. Hong Kong was a shit hole island in the 50s and is now more wealthy per capita than the US. South Korea was one of the poorest nations to Join the UN in the 50s and is now in the G20. All from Capitalism and rule of law which speeds growth up.

Sweden was one of the most wealthy in Europe and the Socialism they embraced slowed things down and led to people leaving, minus the recent immigration push.

Venezuela was doing good till they ran out of money and the corruption and shortages that their system pushes boiled over.

Difference between Sweden and Venezuela is Sweden was already wealthy and they have strong rule of law so they just lost steam and quality of life improvements slowed down. Venezuela was unsustainable but they wanted it to continue so they printed money, which is why they have over 1 million % inflation.

Attached: 1519181143046.jpg (15 KB, 480x480)

Nathan Anderson
Nathan Anderson

How do I explain this. The government cause the issue. The banks were doing fine before it. The problem therefore is the government and IT needs to be restricted more/

Zachary Walker
Zachary Walker

You want to converse with people that think Jews run a global conspiracy

Elijah Russell
Elijah Russell

Fuck the economy. Fuck money.

Attached: ted.png (772 KB, 601x703)

Nicholas Garcia
Nicholas Garcia

Always good fun chasing after the wind.

Adrian Anderson
Adrian Anderson

economics is a creation of political interests and is a subset of politics
That's why this thread is on Jow Forums.
Everything checks out.

Christian Myers
Christian Myers

People read they don't just post. For every faggot I point out 10 people agree with me.

Easton Sanders
Easton Sanders

Theres just so many fucking retards posting.

Noah Sullivan
Noah Sullivan

why did Americans support muzzies over inbred servians
cuz your mother had a dirty, hairy asshole and never should have farted while i was ramming her asshole, in the first place

you and your butt buddy bf here still failed to answer

Leo Watson
Leo Watson

I will not fight economists on anything else, but keep the word 'math' out of your dirty econofag sewer you call a mouth.

Math IS natural law, but the math you are using is applying linear (or quadratic, at worst) coefficients to a regression curve and making predictions based on linearisations of statistics. Economists do not actually dabble in real math, you dabble in proportions and trend lines.

Gabriel Lee
Gabriel Lee

I'm under no obligation to answer shit dumb ass. If I feel someone has already done a good job or there is nothing to be gained from replying I just won't. I value my time too much for that level of folly. The enjoyment just isn't there dealing with some strains of retard.

Brody Howard
Brody Howard

Less inbreed than you, though...

Attached: Globalcolourlarge.jpg (274 KB, 1755x1240)

Michael Fisher
Michael Fisher

Bee hives are located near areas with enough pollen to support their honey production. Does that work for you? The inefficiency of locating the beehive far from the honey drives the bees closer. Honey bee hives that are too far from the pollen, i.e. pay too high a price in energy per unit of pollen collected, will eventually run at an energy deficit and die.

Aaron Turner
Aaron Turner

thanks for confirming your retardation. you can go back and suck your dogs cock now

Levi Morris
Levi Morris

no, this is called "Arbitrage"

"comparative advantage" exist in only memetic economy books (unlreal), real economy operates with complex industrial automatics, logistics, taxes and profit, only thing which matters is profit and who gets money (real economy)

freetraders allow foreign business to exploit market in exchnage of share of profit
it reduces employment and quality of goods, also it reduces life of the market (because middle classes lose wealth)

a lot of ((jews)) live in terms of real economy, majority of goys live in memetic propagands economy which you see on normie tv

Often trade is done internationally
USA or EURO are used as reserve currecny due to economical reasons lol
if you had USD or EURO government promised that you can buy assets with such currency that will save your wealth (after gold standarts was abolished). it has nothing to do with "politics".

Why buying shit you can't afford is bad for you... Who would have though.
80% of people are stupid and buy shit which they cant afford
then top 0.1% forces 20% to pay taxes for debts which were made by giving gibs to 80%

Attached: henry-ford-banking-system.jpg (115 KB, 1200x630)

Bentley Brown
Bentley Brown

totally oblivious to the basics of natural resource distribution
cant even explain basic systems in nature

just kys fgt

bees survived hundreds of millions of years. humans, with their complex economic theories? not so much..

theres no need to overengineer and convolute a very simple process of resource distrubution.

in nature, resources are distributed equally and proportional to the members of eusocial communities, ie: ants, bees, termites multicellular organisms...

however, thru the mental gymnastics of economics, resources are distributed disproportionately, where most of the resources are artificially owned by a minority, while the majority engages in daily battles to obtain scraps thrown out from the oligarch table.

capitalism is an attempt to legalize the crime of stealing resources from goyim, by creating a convoluted set of complex scams to hide the crimes beneath layers of bureaucracy, red-tape, lobbies...

this is not natural, since eusocial economic systems are based on equal and proportional distribution of resources, ie: bees, ants, termites multicellular organisms...

Hudson Bailey
Hudson Bailey

In this case the government may very well have caused the crisis, that might be true. But if you argue like this you seem to imply that a comparable bubble could not happen if the government just stopped to back failing banks. But is that really the truth? What about the student loan bubble for example. We already have like 5 million creditors failing payments.

Charles Rivera
Charles Rivera

"comparative advantage" exist in only memetic economy books

Brain dead. Different countries specialize in different shit. They get better at it and make more of it with less waste. Happens on person levels within the economy too. Not a meme.

Ethan Mitchell
Ethan Mitchell

Their have been more laissez-faire economic policies enacted during the last four decades than any other time in human history. Markets are larger and freer everyday. However, the west is increasingly degenerate and everyone wants to kill themselves, Whats up with that?

Lincoln Cox
Lincoln Cox

You have shifted the goal posts. The claim was never it cannot happen without government that one or more banks fail. This why even before the fed there were lenders of last reserve (or resort can't recall the right word.).

In this case people value education in shit topics too much and cannot pay back. The places that gave loans for shit courses go bottom up and the places that loan for good one stay. If you do retarded shit in the market you get retarded results.

Austin Reed
Austin Reed

Whats up with that?
Because the globohomo have been trying to destroy capitalism and the west so that their precious chinese communism can work.

Easton Davis
Easton Davis

Even if I buy into the claim correlation =/= causation.

However the claim is BS. More and more we see business getting the state to pass BS laws that are cookie cutter'ed around them. This pushes out smaller business that cannot compete. We see civil forfiture laws from the government. Massive corn subsidies, sugar too. Tariffs on foreign trade. Don't piss on me and tell me it's raining.

Oliver Russell
Oliver Russell

Different countries specialize in different shit.
bullshit
only cost price and profit matter

situation can change over 1 years, just look at russia, europe and their sanctions. russia banned european agricultural goods from own market, created industry and now it has "comparative advantage" over europe

look at germany, it is neomercantislistic state (not even protectionistic lol), it has thing which you call "comparative advantage" because they destroyed industry in many surrounding european states

leftists like you operate with words, not with numbers

Caleb Anderson
Caleb Anderson

Well I sure wouldn't mind banks giving out loans for gender studies going down. Hopefully they just don't take too much else down with them.

Isaiah Gray
Isaiah Gray

Even if we accepted your claim that resources within the colony are equally divided it doesn't address how colonies themselves are sized and located. That is all explained by economics. Even the idea of proportional division of resources is an economic idea, which according to you makes it an artificial one. Equality is a math concept, remember? You said those were all human constructs lul

The student loan bubble is backed by the banks who were legislated into terms that are essentially unloseable for them as they are backed by the government. That's the same thing that happened with the subprime mortgage crisis. There was political will for loans to be made to people who could not afford houses, so the government underwrote all the loans and ended up with a massive bill.

Attached: 1526453591997.gif (90 KB, 914x1091)

William Brown
William Brown

Where on earth did I put anything like that in this comment.
Maybe if you would have checked the id's and posts before you posted you'd realise I was advocating people study economics.
Also, why can't people be woke on the JQ and still study economics?
Anyone who claims you can't is absolutely retarded

Gavin Allen
Gavin Allen

There are many anons in this thread claiming that the entire study of economics itself is a jewish trick and that economics doesn't exist retard

Austin Sullivan
Austin Sullivan

only cost price and profit matter

Which is why specialization is so important. That's the fucking thing we get from comparative advantage.

situation can change over 1 years

Good for you.

created industry and now it has "comparative advantage"

They changed their industry... So what are those people in agriculture not doing anymore? Making shoes? If so shoe prices rise and either more people get into making shoes in russia (Thus something else drops) or they import.

it has thing which you call "comparative advantage" because they destroyed industry in many surrounding european states

No brainlet. Killing and raping isn't comparative advantage. It's just being king of a barren wasteland.

leftists like you operate with words, not with numbers

leftists

That word has a specific definition retard. Just because your economics suck... that doesn't make me a lefty.

Jordan Bailey
Jordan Bailey

Why do people allow private central banks to run their economy? What is the official reason?

Noah Gray
Noah Gray

in nature civilizations (eusocial bees, ants, termites, multicellular cells...) only have one type of resource distrubution system: equal and communistic

your entire argument is trying to justify your superfluous career and mental gymnastics as a requirement for civilization/society, which it is not

flush yourself, prof yidsterstein

Grayson Brown
Grayson Brown

Most modern biologists are saying shit like "race don't real and gender don't real too"

no, they don’t. certain scientists get funding to publish papers stating these ‘facts’

Dylan Price
Dylan Price

explain in greater detail any of the economic processes/theories/policies around the world

have the biggest army in the world
have the Fed hit Ctrl-P and enlarge money supply to infinity
have a nation of kike financial advisors informing everyone to buy and hold stawks for the long run

Summed it up in 3 sentences faggot OP

Jason Allen
Jason Allen

why? she is cute

Asher Diaz
Asher Diaz

Would you disagree that there is some truth behind all this "it's da jewz" on Jow Forums? I thought it's well established that nepotism can be bad.

Nathaniel Price
Nathaniel Price

Fair enough. My main point being that just because some in the practice are shit we don't throw the whole thing out.

Zachary Evans
Zachary Evans

what's the point of great shields in dark souls? they can't even parry and the bash is useless

Carter Cruz
Carter Cruz

Ok but the study of a distribution system at all is the study of economics. Scarcity applies to all animals just as it does to humans. For bees to have been analyzed and found to practice communism is still an study in economics: The economics of bees.

Nepotism is bad. The jews are doing well because they are all educated conservatives who understand money.

demand exists for big shields

Easton Long
Easton Long

You spelled "kike" wrong.

Ian White
Ian White

I understand economics-
Supply me with more pictures of her, I demand it.

Brody Robinson
Brody Robinson

The confounding paradox of bubbles is that their size is inversely proportional to the number of people who believe they exist. Their formation is predicated on misallocation of wealth driven by misperception of risk. Until that misperception becomes all pervasive, bubbles are prohibited from forming. I suspect this bubble may eventually prove to be worse than the previous because so few people believe it exists. The psychological reversal will be more dramatic as the incredulous masses become stunned to realize they got suckered again. At least, in the last bubble, there were a few lonely voices allowed to speak on MSNBC to sound the alarm. But folks like Peter Schiff have long since been banned from voicing their opinions in the main stream media. To borrow and repurpose a phrase from Gil Scott Heron “the bubble will not be televised”. The most reliable indicator of a bubble peaking and popping may well be the obligatory swelling chorus of experts who reassure the public that there is nothing to be concerned about.

Be slave. Master gives you enough shelter and food to live
Be wage slave. Master gives you enough money to buy shelter and food to live

How do we break free?

in technological society, there wont be catastrophic starvation when a speculative economy crashes (since the wealth was artificially created)

the supply of food, labor, and shelter is a constant in industrial society

whether there is a crash or not, there will always be food, labor, and shelter for the entire population. the only thing that denies people access to this are laws and financial policies based on speculation and artificial risk allocation- thus creating "crash"/depression conditions

It's wild when you step back and take a look at the reality of the world. Humanity by and large has implemented a schizophrenic prison for itself of games they play upon each other..

Juan Robinson
Juan Robinson

Usuary is not economics you kike. Jews charging Jamal and Juan 21% for payday cash advances is not sound economics. Its usuary.

Isaac Edwards
Isaac Edwards

jimmy's father is the smartest person in this thread

David Ortiz
David Ortiz

USA was built on enslaving the goyim. Money is just a proxy they use for enslavement

The slavemaster gives you symbolic money that you are then forced to use to continue slaving and cover the inflated costs of private transportation, shelter, food, healthcare, education... that the slavemaster extorts from you

The capitalist economy is a closed loop system where all the money lavished upon the slave ends up returning back to the slavemaster

This is the real redpill here along with the bootlickers rabidly defending this exploitative system because slaveowners made them beleive, that they surely are next in line to become the one abusing the very same extortion system while in reality, it's just 300 million crabs fighting each other or ganging up on anyone, who even dares to propose a change for the better

Finance is merely a proxy for commands that the slaves accept in exchange for paper that can be redeemed to supply the slave with living needs such as food, clothing, shelter etc.

It is now clear that financial crises are not discrete events but are linked phenomena that have been unleashed on the globe ever since offshoring White industries starting in the 70s. By transferring industries overseas, the West propped its dead real economy with a financialization-based ponzi economy, with financial markets liberalized during the Reagan-Thatcher era in the early 1980s

To take just the 3 most prominent crashes, surplus capital that could not find profitable domestic outlets after the Japanese bubble burst in the late 1980s found its way as speculative capital into Southeast Asia, where it contributed to the Asian financial crisis in 1997-98. The Asian crisis, in turn, helped generate Wall Street’s Tech crash in 2000 and implosion in 2008, owing to the Asian countries’ channeling the financial reserves they had accumulated to protect them from a repeat of 1997 into the US — where they helped fuel the subprime real estate boom.

Ian Lee
Ian Lee

you are braindead, it is impossible to argue with leftists

cost price consists of expenditures
expenditures can be controlled (you buy goods from your own businesses, money stay inside)
or uncontrolled (from anybody)

it includes all from depreciation to salaries and fuel

if you devalue currency or if you subsidize something you will get "comparative advantage" lol

you can get "comparative advantage" by reducing safety and working conditions
this can be controlled centralised way thanks to modern Enterprise software

in addition you have taxes + corruption

They changed their industry...
no, EU banned russians goods by high tariffs not to lose JOBS lol

No brainlet. Killing and raping isn't comparative advantage.
lol, tell it to germans.

You do not have ANY real life experience and listens too much to leftists propaganda which is not connected to reality

Jackson Morris
Jackson Morris

crapitalists artificially allocate risk by creating laws that deprive others of access to necessities when no real or natural barriers exist

a crapitalist sees a potato on a field and will create laws to prevent starving person from obtaining the potato. the person is now at risk of getting imprisoned if he violates these artificial laws that allocate risk where non exist.

Globalists offshored White industries and replaced our productive economy with a phony debt-based economy of financialization ponzi schemes

Few goyim realize that the ’87 crash was a direct result of the impact from outsourcing US industry, for instance, in 1984 with Intel. The lost legitimate income had a grand effect on the inflows to the US Stock Market

offshoring White industries was the critical factor contributing to the ruin of the West. offshoring realized lower costs. But the failure is at the macro-economic level, since the USEconomy lost its Hegemony, military dominance, White population, and a large chunk of its legitimate income

The economic outcome of deindustrialization was the creation of Superpower China and the multi-$trillion bank derivatives to serve as phony foundation for the entire Western banking system

These derivatives are blowing up, which will require bailouts and a replacement in the Gold Standard. Instead, expect the derivatives to ramp up further with greater leverage up to the assured catastrophe. The fallout will be great.

Entire global economy is a product of the American military

If the US military withdrew, closed down all foreign bases, stopped all foreign meddling, and returned their forces to the US, then Globalism would be DEAD

crashes are artificial and happen when the oligarchs decide its time. no modern technological society can stop the supply of food or labor, but certain trade and financial policies and laws can make people unemployed, homeless, starving like much of the US

Cooper Long
Cooper Long

Debt based monetary system a pyramid scheme, yay, or nay?

Logan Roberts
Logan Roberts

tell that to Bush/Soros. the elite live of of welfare payments from the work of slaves. the (((profit)) is a tax paid by the slave for their own work

the issue with crapitalism is the crapitalist is preoccupied with offloading the burden of enslavement onto the next goy. the entire society is built on a pyramid of offloading enslavement onto someone else

instead of having stable shelter with no risk, the crapitalist allocates risk into living necessities (shelter, food, etc) that is burdened onto the renter. the entire system is preoccupied by transferring risk to others

the communist model does not allocate risk into living necessities (shelter etc..) and guarantees a stable shelter, food, and frees the population from preoccupation of risk and fear

with the emancipation from preoccupation of risk allocation of the crapitalist system, the loving population focuses on solving space colonisation and real world issues, instead of the basic shelter issues

abolish the Fed and stock market
the Fed was created to address speculationary panics of the stockmarket

The speculative ponzi panics of the stockmarket begets the Federal Reserve, which is the central manager of stockmarket panics

the Fed is simply a reaction to managing ponzi stockmarket cycles

you cant have one without the other. either ban them both (Iron Curtain style), or continue getting enslaved.

the financial system itself doesn't serve humanity's best interests. It's a con game that you've helped perpetuate and perfect, but it's still a con game (and even you've been conned), and it's still going to come crashing down as technology advances

The actual currencies in our universe are:
Material resources
Energy
Labor

Within our solar system both material resources and energy are so abundant, they might as well be free.

Liam Williams
Liam Williams

From the economists that say they can never predict anything.
No, from the economists who say that you can not predict human behaviour like you can predict water boiling at 100 degrees.
Austrians use teleological methods over the scientific method, because economy is a human phenomenon.

Attached: 1559257259357.jpg (22 KB, 540x495)

Samuel Lewis
Samuel Lewis

Kys commie retard

Brody Green
Brody Green

you are a slave to your own hunger, user. We all are. So we work together to feed ourselves, clothe ourselves, and some tell the others what to do. It's not a slavery situation like what you describe, because even if you existed alone you'd still be in the same predicament just with less help.

Usury is sound economics. You just don't like the morality of it faggot.

The new shill word is "artificial" as though somehow that means anything.

not a pyramid scheme its borrowing from the future which is a smart thing to do.

Landon Rodriguez
Landon Rodriguez

thanks

Grayson Long
Grayson Long

Finance and “Fictitious Capital”

Banks make a business out of debt, specializing in borrowing and lending money for profit. The rise of capitalism made that business central to agriculture, industry, and commerce, which came to depend on the currency and credit that banks controlled. That is why struggles over capitalism have so often focused on the “money power” of bankers and other professional financiers, who were the first to be called (by their critics) “capitalists.” Rarely has that power loomed larger than in the past twenty-five years

Debt has become a big business in its own right, making finance arguably the leading “industry” of twenty-first-century capitalism. As the overall level of debt in the U.S. has grown much faster than the production of commodities since the 1970’s, bankers and bondholders have gained unprecedented economic power. ll but the richest households have struggled to make up for stagnant or declining real incomes by racking up credit cards, car loans, student loans, and home loans.

The two great props of the deathly-sick US economy - housing and cars - are gone forever, and can no longer be used to cover up the rapidly worsening fundamentals. Indeed, many are recognizing that these two alone - especially artificially low mortgage rates - have postponed a deep crash which should have occurred 2 or 3 years ago. Sadly, this extension has not been helpful, but has served a very useful purpose for the money elite, namely, greatly deepening private and corporate debt loads, exploding red ink in state and local budgets to dangerous levels, emptying pensions, creating a fatally large and exploding US budget and trade deficit, moving millions of jobs thousands of miles away, and expanding the dollar and derivatives mountain to ensure a global panic. This has been carefully coordinated worldwide from the headquarters of all world central banks, in Basel, Switzerland.

Zachary Edwards
Zachary Edwards

the secret is "debt", in capitalism you can virtually create infinite money without being detected as hyper inflation. more debt creates more money, more money creates more spending, more spending creates more income, more income creates more spending and so forth, of course it doesn't work like that forever, when the ponzi scheme is discovered it's called the end of a business cycle but sooner or later we pretend nothing happened and start another cycle and so forth

The Global Policy Panic argument held that, in a world with no business cycle and just a credit cycle in its place, a slowdown or an equity market selloff would be met with more credit and a pause from the Federal Reserve.

Since the global financial crisis, the business cycle has been suspended, and replaced by only a credit cycle . Credit, credit and more credit crowded out productivity and inflated asset prices while doing little for the real economy and driving the worst inequality in generations . The mis-pricing of money and credit has also driven a terrible misallocation of capital and kept unproductive zombie debtors alive for too long

I prefer the implementation of debt slavery over the old-fashioned type of slavery in that debt slavery involves the powers of persuasion and not the powers of coercion

Using coersion is a pain in the ass because this type of slave is always struggling to become free, physically free. Slavery through persuasion results in the slave always struggling to become financially free, which means he will WILLINGLY work for money and then will WILLINGLY pass on huge chunks of this money onto whomever it is that financially owns him.

When not being burdened by debt or artificially allocated risk, innovation spurs, as does consumption, savings and economic growth spikes up without any long-term risks borrowing entails

Oliver Miller
Oliver Miller

you're not supposed to look at the woman in the picture and think she's wholesome the same way you don't look at an actor and think he's the character

Asher Lee
Asher Lee

The actual currencies in our universe are: m aterial resources Energy Labor

You forgot time. Once you add in time nothing is infinite. We only have 24 hours per day to produce things.

Landon Hernandez
Landon Hernandez

bubbles can only be generated by fictitious capital aka fake wealth

publicly traded securities are "fictitious capital"
There's a huge build-up of fictitious capital during bubbles like dot-com, the great credit boom of 2002-7, and the current Everything Bubble

Fictitious capital contrasts with real capital, which is capital actually invested in physical means of production and workers, and "money capital", which is actual funds being held. The market value of fictitious capital assets (such as stocks and securities) is dependent on easy credit (QE, low interest, ZIRP, loose monetary policies) and mood (hype/mania/hysteria/propaganda)

fictitious capital is entirely speculative and a development of the credit system and the joint-stock (ownership) system

Profit can be made purely from speculative trading in a variety of financial claims existing only on paper. This is an extreme form of the fetishism of commodities in which the underlying source of surplus-value in exploitation of labour power is disguised. Indeed, profit can be made by using only borrowed capital to engage in (speculative) trade, not backed up by any tangible asset

With the development of interest-bearing capital and the credit system, all capital seems to double itself, and sometimes treble itself, by the various modes in which the same capital, or perhaps even the same claim on a debt, appears in different forms in different hands. The greater portion of this 'money-capital' is purely fictitious. All the deposits, with the exception of the reserve fund, are merely claims on the banker, which, however, never exist as deposits

In periods of Capitalist crisis, the capitalist class appears to have a choice between devaluing money or commodities, between inflation or depression. In the event that monetary policy is dedicated to avoiding both, it will merely end up incurring both

Blake Sanchez
Blake Sanchez

maybe if i list ways people are losing money to other people it means economics no longer explains it all!

Noah Long
Noah Long

Globalists sent White industries overseas and destroyed the West
The US has the largest current-account imbalance in the world. It has recorded a deficit for all but one year since 1982

America’s debt-slavery mindset is deeply embedded in its globalist ponzi economy

During the 2000-2017 period, the US amassed $9.1 trillion in cumulative trade deficits

the US is doing the 3rd world a huge favor by running chronic trade deficits – namely, supporting, industrializing, modernizing, enriching, militarizing, the overopopulated, large surplus 3rd world countries-- while at the same time deindustrializing, impoverishing, and destroying the West and genociding Whites

with the w̶e̶a̶l̶t̶h̶ death effects from a profusion of recent asset bubbles-- aided and abetted by the Federal Reserve’s über-accommodation since the late 1990s, there was no stopping the interplay between America’s asset-dependent ponzi economy and an equally pernicious leverage cycle underwritten by bubble-inflated collateral. Why save out of income when frothy asset markets can do the job? The preference for asset-based saving over income-based saving is central to America’s current-account deficit

The surplus countries have been delighted to go along for the ride. It didn’t matter that the US consumption binge was built on a foundation of quicksand. Excess export growth in the large surplus economies enabled the excesses of the world’s largest consumer.

i lived thru both systems, the capitalist system is a paranoid schizophrenic system that artificially creates risk and fear where none exist. this artificial risk and fear enslaves the masses, who are eternally raped by the megalomaniacal schizophrenic oligarchs

for all its faults, the USSR was a sane and stable society

Leo Miller
Leo Miller

crapitalists artificially allocate risk by creating laws that deprive others of access to necessities when no real or natural barriers exist
This is the ultimate truth no capitalist will ever face. Without government violence to keep the people from natural resource, capitalism couldn't exist. There is no time in history where capitalism didn't evolve with a tyrannical government enclosure plan.

Robert Gray
Robert Gray

The jews are doing well because they are all educated conservatives who understand money.
You mean they save instead of wasting their money on consumables. Imagine if everyone took that approach to life. The demand and the economy would instantly collapse.

Jacob Diaz
Jacob Diaz

The destruction of the West is a result of globalists sending our industries to locusts in Asia and the tropics
Once a nation no longer produce essential goods and services, it becomes vulnerable to collapse

US has been effectively de-industrialized

US is imploding not because of hyper-inflation, but as a result of de-industrialization policies that led to hyper-inflation: policies that generate perverse incentives, disincentives to produce goods and services and incentives to depend on cheap money government subsidies

But a funny thing happens when a nation loses its capacity to produce real goods in the real world: when the currency and trade policies that made importing everything financially sensible blow up, there's nobody left to actually make essential goods, grow food or maintain critical infrastructure. Productive Whites get genocided and replaced with billions of parasitical leeches from Asia and the tropics

De-industrialization is a gradual and genocidal process. The loss of key industries is gradual; the loss of supply chains is gradual; the loss of local suppliers and jobbers is gradual; the loss of skilled workers is gradual; the decline of local capital is gradual; the loss of the willingness to get out there and take risks to make real goods in the real world is gradual. The loss of industries results in the loss of lives and replacement of Whites with millions of migrants

Once a nation no longer produces essential goods and services, and depends on financial games or commodities to pay for industrial goods and food produced elsewhere, it becomes vulnerable to a collapse in the financial games and the commodity markets that made it all too easy to succumb to de-industrialization.

Blake Robinson
Blake Robinson

saving money does nothing for you but lose. Investing money in growing projects is what the jews do.

Anthony Perez
Anthony Perez

no, EU banned russians goods by high tariffs not to lose JOBS lol

Not the claim. those people were doing other stuff then they were working agriculture. Now they are doing that instead of it.

lol, tell it to germans.

I don't get the point you are making... It is literally not the point of the economic term dickhead.

You do not have ANY real life experience and listens too much to leftists propaganda which is not connected to reality

Again leftist is a specific term. You are doing the same shit SJW's do when they say someone isn't on their side because they disagree on something.

Levi Rogers
Levi Rogers

I like the middle way, a total right wing politic will lead to an inefficient monopoly or an oligopoly at best in the end and that's why we have regulations, to keep the economy in a competitive state so it is as efficient as possible.

The other end, communism, -ism, leads to the same thing, an inefficient monopoly or oligopoly.

I embrace the middle way, regulations, free healthcare, education and social services for those in dire need.

Gabriel Perry
Gabriel Perry

no real barriers exist
there is no real barrier to feeding a human it doesnt take any resources or work at all
if only the capitalists would get out of the way everyone could just ???

Liam Robinson
Liam Robinson

business cycle

no such thing. the ""business cycle"" is the classic ponzi bubble and bust movement of the stock market

the actual term should be the "ponzi cycle" or "speculation cycle". the ponzi cycle follows the mathematics concerning exponential growth, until the speculation frenzy dies due higher interest rates

For a ponzi cycle of the stock market to make money for everyone who enrolls in it, it would have to expand indefinitely. This is not possible because the population of Earth is finite

When the stock market inevitably runs out of new investors, lacking easy credit (interest rates increase), it collapses

ponzi cycle works as long as asset prices are rising. But once the bubble is pricked, the debtor is left with declining asset values that preclude the rollover of their obligations

ponzi speculation cycles are consequence of a fraud, hype, mania, and excessive growth in bank credit due to artificially low interest rates set by a central bank or fractional reserve banks

The scary reality is that the ""business cycle" is just one manifestation of our whole economic system as a Ponzi scheme

It is predicated on the notion that we can borrow today to fund our wants and needs, with the expectation that the future will pay off those debts

Like any good Ponzi scheme, we need to borrow from future payers just slowly enough to maintain the fiction of responsibility

When you abolish the Fed and the stock market, then the ponzi cycle no longer exists

The Iron Curtain did not have ponzi cycles of depressions, recessions, or bubbles, since it abolished stock markets and interest rates (usury, the Fed)

Luis Brown
Luis Brown

SLOPPY

Andrew Robinson
Andrew Robinson

What do you think about Ayn Rand?
What do you think about America's current monetary policy and how the fed creates money?

Adrian Sanders
Adrian Sanders

no more milk

Attached: 1558729639498.jpg (54 KB, 793x786)

Josiah Wood
Josiah Wood

tell me why usury and selling something you don't still have shouldn't be considered the devil

Levi Smith
Levi Smith

demand exists for big shields
by the way, that is a really teacher joke to make
you might actually be an economics teacher

Hunter Walker
Hunter Walker

Supply of what? If the supply of something were infinite the price for it would be 0.

wow. i hope you are not an actual economist

bees survived hundreds of millions of years. humans, with their complex economic theories? not so much..

holy shit, this thread is full of geniuses

Nicholas Young
Nicholas Young

you are missing the point. bees/ants/multicellular organisms/eusocials all create society and distribute resources equally with absolutley ZERO economic theorists. they have no hayek/mises/keynes/rockefeller to manipulate, exploit, and enslave them thru abstract theories based on mental gymnastics

Gavin Jenkins
Gavin Jenkins

I know buit the point remains. Investments only work out when there's demand for the product being invested in. If everyone stopped buying consumables and started investing more, the economy would crash.

Kayden Hernandez
Kayden Hernandez

(((Economy))) is pseudoscience.

Ryder Nelson
Ryder Nelson

What's your research specialization? Seems like you don't have too much formalized training, so your either an older guy or some shmuck who read some books. Maybe a excited undergrad?

Adam Smith wasn't even an economist in the modern sense.

Josiah Taylor
Josiah Taylor

what about "Niggeronomics"?

Tyler Jenkins
Tyler Jenkins

If the supply is infinite, the supply graph is either a horizontal or vertical line, depending on the elasticity of supply. Therefore, if supply is infinite and demand is high, equilibrium quantity supplied and demanded is ~0.

Angel Bell
Angel Bell

They do not have an extraordinary knowledge or fundamental understanding of economics, but rather a more short-term profit mindset that allows them cause to extort, cheat, and manipulate whatever they can. Dismissed.

Hudson Perez
Hudson Perez

Nepotism is bad. The jews are doing well because they are all educated conservatives who understand money.
That might be part of their success. But based on what facts are you making that claim? It seems very unreasonable to think that there would be no jewish nepotism going on. The real question is how much of their success is due to nepotism and how much due to sound socioeconomic effects?

Angel Wright
Angel Wright

this

Oliver Reed
Oliver Reed

Nepotism is bad. The jews are doing well because they are all educated conservatives who understand money
You went from being a rational conservative to being a blind fool real quick pal.
pic related
"Muh other people said something so I'm pointing the finger at you."
Hey, how about you scroll up for a seconds and look AT MY FUCKING POSTS!
We went from being on the same page to you burning the bridge of probably the only NatSoc on this thread that actually agrees the study of economics is a good thing.
We were on the same side not an hour ago, what the hell happened?
The fact you ignored my stances on the Rothschilds and Usery shows you don't actually care about economics at all.
You probably think the Federal Reserve and the International Momentary Fund are good too, after all, their run by "conservative jews".

Attached: 1560509679404.jpg (299 KB, 880x1024)

Grayson Edwards
Grayson Edwards

Thanks for this thread. Economic understanding is essential for politics and social discussion. I feel if there wouldn't be so many distraction threads in Jow Forums, there would be more threads about specific sectors of economics, which could lead to more knowledge and unmasking of the jew everywhere.

Kevin Hall
Kevin Hall

Show me an infinite supply function.

Dylan Gonzalez
Dylan Gonzalez

Nah. Every economist looks bad because predicting economies is much harder than predicting the weather and many economists are turbo autists.

Dylan Cook
Dylan Cook

Predicting economies is harder than predicting the weather.
I am an economist, but meteorologists easily have the harder job.

Thomas Rivera
Thomas Rivera

Infinite supply doesn't exist so it needs to be approximated. The shape of the approximation depends on the elasticity of supply. 9 times out of 10 it would be a vertical line. Since the supply is infinite, the only thing that can change supply and thus price is if a relevant variable not listen on either axis changes.

Justin Cooper
Justin Cooper

You don't understand economics. You're some guy who hasn't even finished the econ classes for business. All your answers show you to be retarded.

Attached: 1536817084408.jpg (67 KB, 445x467)

Andrew Roberts
Andrew Roberts

* I meant horizontal, not vertical.

Justin Morales
Justin Morales

bUt ShEs iTaLiAnNn

Justin Bennett
Justin Bennett

Show me an infinite supply function. Not in real life. Just show me a mathematical expression representing an infinite supply function.

Easton Reed
Easton Reed

It would look like a supply curve that's perfectly elastic, because the only thing that can change it is a relevant variable not listed on either axis changing. See pic related

Attached: horizontal-supply-curve.jpg (11 KB, 251x240)

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit