There we have a Wikipedia page about Kogal, yet it gets it entirely wrong. The page there basically is claiming that Kogal are not real school girls and that it's just a random fashion based on school uniforms that older women like to wear as part of fashion.
Who writes this shit? They even used pictures they found on the internet of actual schoolgirls and are trying to claim they aren't schoolgirls.
Why is Wikipedia so stupid?
I have literally been to Japan and know young people there, you see hordes of these high school girls wearing these mini skirts, they are very common there.
These aren't women larping as schoolgirls, geez. Why the fuck is Wikipedia predictably always full of shit like the page was written by an autist in his bedroom?
According to wiki autists, those girls are also fake and that's a fake classroom.......sigh.
Seriously Wikipedia is about as educational as reading the random imagination of a reddit user.
Caleb Moore
THE MONOPLY MAN HAS NO MONICAL
Elijah Myers
What? That has nothing to do with anything.
I am talking about autists on Wikipedia claiming actual Japanese school girls are old women trying to larp as schoolgirls and implying that short skirts are against the rules in Japanese schools.
I don't know if the people who write the wiki pages have an agenda, or are just ignorant motherfuckers. But among Japanese high school girls who usually are the prettier group of girls in the class, they do indeed wear short skirts and Kogal culture is about literal high school girls.
What are you talking about. Literally the first sentence: Kogal is a Japanese fashion culture that involves schoolgirls wearing an outfit
Leo Thomas
There is no hard enforced rules in Japanese school about uniforms, that's why Kogal even came to exist (as it was allowed).
Even the Japanese transfer student here to the UK showed me pictures of her and her group of friends in class, they wore super short skirts. This is a culture in Japan's schools and among school aged high school girls (who to be frank, appear to basically be sluts).
But it's just really stupid how some clueless autist on wiki is trying to claim these are older women walking around pretending to be schoolgirls, and that walking around < like that is a fashion there. That isn't, those are literally just schoolgirls that came from school. sigh
That is saying it isn't uniform, that it's some type of fashion based off actual school uniform.
>not necessarily, enrolled students. Clearly again trying to imply that it's some kind of fashion for women, not actual schoolgirls.
Jack Bell
I wish I was a japanese schoolgirl
Jacob Howard
This isn't some fashion sense based on school uniforms. This literally is a subculture within Japanese schools that falls within the allowance of the uniforms.
The uniform rules in most Japanese schools are not enforced, that's why Kogal came to exist (the sluts basically dress like that in school).
Jace Jackson
Why? What good would it be to be one of them? What would you do with yourself?
Daniel Peterson
Woke teachers will give their students credits for making woke wikipedia edits. They've been doing this since around 2012 or so, and wikipedia is fine with this since they got taken over by dangerhair wamen and trannies. Look at the Talk tab of "controversial" pages and see for yourself the level of dishonesty and fake academic rigor. The one about Jared Taylor was amazing, Jared popped in to refute some of the claims made about him and they wouldn't let him.
Jose Butler
>MUH PURE ASIAN WAIFUS
Landon Lee
Even that is how Japanese schoolgirls dress for their school sporting events. < Which I am sure some dumb wiki page likely is going to claim they don't and claim that's some kind of fetish fashion or some nonsense.
At my school you cant use wikipedia as a source or reference on any papers lol. Its considered extremely inaccurate.
Ryan Carter
be gone pedo!
Carson Anderson
>It's almost as if many Wikipedia pages are written by people who have no idea what they are talking about, like random nobodies. That's EXACTLY who writes wikipedia.
Hudson Sanchez
I saw a video of scientist Neil deGrasse Tyson who found his own wiki page and it listed him as an atheist.
Yet he himself doesn't identify as that, and identifies as an agnostic. He made an edit to the page, then they reverted his edit and told him that he is wrong.
So literally Wikipedia and it's idiots think they can even tell a person what they identify as against what the actual person says they are.
Total insanity, Wikipedia should be closed down. It isn't educational, it's like getting a random emotional reddit kid and letting him just make up shit.
Samuel Reyes
I reported this post for being off-topic btw
Jeremiah Baker
wikipedia is the best and most accurate encyclopaedia the world has ever know it's maintained by scholarly and wise people
Colton Davis
I bet a tenner that OP can't do this entire first half of PPP 2.
I remember also our school did that as well. That's because a good 50% of the claims on Wikipedia simply have not reference, it's literally just the random opinion of the person who wrote it (and many times the people writing are just on par with some autistic reddit kid).
Then I have seen some other parts which do have a source, and a few times the source is something joke worthy like the daily mail etc.
Bentley Robinson
>So literally Wikipedia and it's idiots think they can even tell a person No. It's not idiocy, it's activism, agenda driven malevolence by neets or students rewarded by their grievance study professors for doing it or going out and protest huwhite people.
Tyler Kelly
There are even wiki pages trying to claim that being male or female isn't determines by genes, but that it's entirely a mental choice.
There are wiki pages claiming that the crime of black people is entirely the fault of oppression etc.
Kevin Miller
>50% of the claims on Wikipedia simply have not reference Those are the amateurs. Activists will often spam sources from woke authors and articles, that's the fake academic rigor part. The academic feedback loop of shitty opinion is a huge part of their game.
Andrew Taylor
Making an encyclopaedia where the pages are edited and changed every few months and where literal random nobodies on the internet (without even having to register) can make edits to pages........................that is never going to create a good end product.
Calling Wikipedia an encyclopaedia is a bit of a stretch, I would rather say it's akin to a conglomerate of pages written by entirely different idiots on the internet, which are then edited all the time by other idiots who don't agree with the opinions on the page.
Wikipedia should have a disclaimer straight away when people go there "These pages and sections are not the result of qualified or educated peoples, these are the creations of random nobodies on the internet."
Benjamin Bailey
Wikipedia is garbage, I once made an edit deleting a link that went to an expired domain (godaddy parked) and put an updated link. Within 24 hours my link was removed and the expired domain reinstated.
Lincoln Clark
Just let them believe the lies. Better they don't know than to make it popular.
Adrian Walker
It isn't entirely useless, it's a pretty good starting point for historical and technical entries, you just need to be aware it's brigaded by activists and anything controversial will not be fairly represented.
Mason Ross
Why are you all talking as if you've only just found out what Wikipedia is? Is it 2006?
Mason Morales
thinly veiled racemixing thread from the UK again of course
Oliver Smith
lol, not surprised.
Brandon Phillips
History is not objective at all, it's up to huge interpretation and skewing of stories etc. Using Wikipedia to learn about history isn't good at all.
Isaiah Powell
No racemixing here buddy, when did I ever say I would fuck these women? Not once. Stop projecting.
Carson Moore
its a real fucking thing though, not just in japan, but china and korea as well
Adam Lopez
Wikipedia even censors video game console pages. It's apparently not PC to state that the SEGA Genesis's CPU ran at 7.6 mhz and that the SNES ran at 3.6mhz.
Elijah Cook
>posting scantily clad japanese women simulating sex acts in OP >hurr durr its not a racemixing thread kill yourself you jewish faggot
Landon Perez
checked and wrecked
Evan Lewis
It's always been like this, ever since the very beginning. The only articles that are good are: 1. Niche 2. With a (relatively) high barrier to entry to even know about it So Wikipedia is a fairly okay source if you just want to idly read about the Seleucid Empire or something but it's fucking terrible if you want to look up something common (see: the corn vs maize shitstorm) or if you want to look up something that's niche but only a loser would know or care about it like this kogal bullshit. Some autist probably checks that page every day to make sure his 3d anime is real waifus aren't having their honor besmirched.
Wyatt Williams
Wikipedia is just a place for autists to pretend to be authorities on topics they find interesting. It's pathetic. Even if you add something useful and put in a citation one of these autists will delete it for some inane reason. You can make an article about some obscure book and it will be untouched for years, but edit the Harry Potter page and these jackals will eat you alive.
It really is the perfect study for echo Chambers and bias.
Hunter Butler
No it isn't dumbass, I know hordes of Japanese people and have been there many times. Kogal is among actual schoolgirls who are in high school, it isn't some conspiracy of old women hanging out in schools and with groups of young people pretending to be a schoolgirl. Grow up darling.
Jaxson Cook
That is strange, I didn't expect them to go that far.
Liam Williams
This entire thread is so autistic it hurts.
Landon Russell
>Implying that a shirt skirt means you have to find the woman sexually attractive.
The only person here who got their dick hard is you buddy, you are an actual race mixer if those images turned you on. fail
William Cook
>giving a fuck about what Japanese kids do Fuck off, nonce.
Dylan Wright
If you really think about it, everything is written by random nobodies
The page for "Moors" is really telling how retarded it is to learn about some subjects from Wikipedia.
>bunch of white people literally any of the related links on the subject shows nothing but blacks or the occasional arab.
Matthew Jackson
its not old women, it is in women in their 20s holy fuck you are autistic, try going living in some of those countries first, like me
Gabriel Thompson
I noticed that also, literally edit a page and remove some dumb claim which cites something like the daily mail. And add a correct piece of information and instead cite a valid source like national library of medicine.
And what happens? The kid who made the original page gets offended and just reverts it back to his little page.
There is no authority on wiki, so basically the retards who are willing to waste their own time and wanting the page to be how they like it are the ones where most of these pages spring from.
lol, I think I saw a wiki page once showing a picture that looked like some Scandinavian man and claiming that was a historically accurate portrayal of Jesus.
I couldn't believe the shit I was reading.
Isaiah Clark
This is becoming tediously protracted. Post more Jap QTs, Dave.
Joseph Foster
They're small-minded and petty.
Adrian Price
I have been there retard, many times. I know actual schoolgirls, and that's where I learned about Kogal originally from.
And no, they don't continue to wear their school uniform after they finish school. It's a sub-culture of high school students. Not a sub-culture of adult women.
