HAPPENING TRUMP BELIEVES A NUCLEAR WAR IS WINNABLE!!!

THE FIRST TO STRIKE WINS!!!

Attached: 1554973304482.png (532x518, 239K)

Other urls found in this thread:

rt.com/news/455022-strike-preemptive-nuclear-pentagon/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Winnable

Yes, but not profitable.

Attached: 8642896539753073.jpg (1280x996, 271K)

we all lose and the elite win locked away in their bunkers

Well he's the President he'd have a better idea than us.

Where is trump mentioned?

Attached: 1490819260622.jpg (2650x1440, 802K)

Oh. So this is the ragnarok.

first strike has been winnable for as long as nukes have egsisted

Nuclear war soon

We need to determine if we can take large retaliatory strikes and still survive as a nation. I for one am willing to sacrifice all of California, New York City, Chicago, and the southern border if that's what it takes. It'll be super tough to bear that loss, but it may be necessary.

Immediately nuke China, Canada, Mexico, and the Middle East. Give western Europe a chance to repent and expel all "immigrants." If they refuse, nuke their cities. Actually it might be a good idea for us to preemptively nuke California too.

If you're from California you should die.

Attached: 1560572816661.gif (300x222, 1.9M)

rt.com/news/455022-strike-preemptive-nuclear-pentagon/

>US says it won't rule out nuclear first strike, because allies wouldn't trust it otherwise

What they're referring to is one particular ally, Israel. Their first strike policy is based around protecting Israel from being overrun. If arabs overran Israel, Putin wouldn't do shit if the US used nukes to bail them out because he is in the pocket of jews too.

This is not new. This is not about Trump. The military has always planned for fighting and winning a nuclear war. Presidents have always known this.

They have had plans in place for decades, not just for the war but for the aftermath. They know exactly what to do to immediately setup mass treatment medical facilities and restore electricity and water.

Bottom line: it'll be ugly but there will still be a future and still continuity of government.

You do realize the entire Midwest is a high priority target, right?

>bombs Europe, European Russia, China, Japan, Korea, the Mediterranean, Italy, the Balkans, European South America, Turkey, Central Asia, Persia, and India
>misses all of Africa
>nuclear winter makes all of Africa migrate to USA

BASED ZION DON

Attached: 13e.png (540x718, 382K)

During the strawman phase

Didn't we already win a nuclear war once? Why are they acting like it's impossible?

Awww shucks what a loss that will be

It is you retard. All that shit the hippies taught you about the whole world blowing up is fake and gay. Radiation is pretty much fake. Nuclear fallout is fake. And nuclear winter is totally fake. Nukes are air-burst 1000+ feet up to be effective, and therefore kick up minimum dirt,so minimal fallout. Up into the 80s they were popping off thousands of test nukes and no one got sick. No fake nuclear winter. The only reason we don't have nuclear war is because big cities will get hit and that's where kikes live.

Attached: 57481a2081cb7f3236813164b3a85ee25.gif (350x189, 2.45M)

Take all missile defense sites away from the coasts and move them to the Midwest. Prioritize the defense of the food producing areas middle America as a whole. Let large swathes of both coastal areas be incinerated and their inhabitants turned to ash.

>push all potential nuclear threats into a coalition against you
>pre-emptively nuke the hell out all of them (Iran, China, Russia) at the same time
>also hit India and Pakistan with a few hundred nukes by accident
If the planet somehow survives this then America is pretty much safe from any threat, people would be pissed off but as if Europeans would do anything about it.

>restore electricity and water.
You can forget that shit.

t. cockworshipping coastal turbofaggot

Shouldn't you be off guzzling onions and cum right now?

>True if Big
actually fits here?

Profitable.
Good lord.

Try not to get mad about it jfc

Ooooo...
Yeah...
So,
that wasn’t really a typing error, was it?

emptying a country of its inhabitants with a neutron bomb would be extremely profitable.

The 2000 warhead mark is the US getting striked first. The 500 is Russia second strike.

Attached: Nuke map.png (2312x1460, 4M)

Attached: 1545850031429.jpg (640x385, 25K)

>Awww shucks what a loss tha*starves to death*

I'm fucked

that's insane.

the nuclear winter would kill the rest of the people

it's not like you can nuke moscow and beijing and the rest of russia and china would be like oh..okay. we surrender.

so how do you take out EVERY fucking missile and silo. You can't.

first strike, nuke war winnable. I think they have not been in reality ville in a long while

There's a difference between starting expensive, worthless, regional proxy wars and obliterating your global rivals with nuclear fire. And the difference is the second one is a good thing.

wow! The ruskies really want to destroy our stargate.

This isn't new. It also wasn't Trump who thought this up. Ever hear of a guy named Curtis LeMay?

So excited.

Got one with AK and HI in it?

>live in Fredericksburg, VA

shit lmao

Attached: 54BF9B1F-5B5F-4B0F-AD7A-7C2A262F66FB.jpg (977x1125, 87K)

This says "US military", not Trump. Brainlet.

It can be, i'm rolling for total annihilation.

Attached: 1558562652553.jpg (633x1024, 57K)

i just figured out what the pentagon does when there is no war and lotsa downtime. Plays fall out new vegas.

It's the only explanation for this retarded hypothesis.

The pentagon would probably know better than you though. It seems like there's a lot of histrionics about nuclear war out there sometimes.

Nuclear bombs aren't real

Nuclwar war is now winnable because the US is, for all intents and purposes, ICBM proof.

nuke fallout is a meme. end of the world stuff is a meme. they made it all up to create the NWO

FUCK YES
BRING ON THE NUKES.
BURN IT ALL FUCKING DOWN

Attached: clownsaturated.png (680x680, 111K)

What is second strike capability?

strike first and intercept their missiles, boom you win
I'm a military mastermind

Attached: 1558013911497.jpg (1712x1704, 724K)

Nuclear winter will only happen if most of the bombs/weapons detonated on the ground. Which they don't do since its not very effective.

What if they nuke themselves, to the point the world is not a liveable place for our species?
You know, liberty or death.

>the nuclear winter would kill the rest of the people
That sounds like it would fix climate change, and over population
You just keep selling it

uhhh, if you have to nuke HALF a planet. I hate to put it to you this way. But there WILL BE a nuclear winter
For at least 3 years.
How do you survive that? How do you let your livestock survive that. How do you stop the massive radiation clouds and rain from coming over to your part of the world.
No...there is ZERO winning in a nuclear war, when half the world is nuked. I don't give a shit what the pentagon says.

>if you nuke your enemies who nuke you back, you win

Attached: 8132BFFC-EAAF-41D4-A787-140B0529073A.jpg (1242x744, 82K)

There is no such thing as nuclear winter. Carl Sagan lied. He even admitted that he lied.

and who is commander in chief of the US armed forces?

Attached: trump wallpaper1.jpg (2478x1421, 1.38M)

George C Scott was great in that role.

Oil is good for the economy

>The pentagon would probably know better
Could you glow more?

Winnable for whomst.

>triangle and dot on me

Attached: 33481015d04b3974f9ed7acf616592901b13507ebdabf48ee1d6d09d63acc2c4.png (1070x601, 507K)

>nuke the breadbasket of unironically most of the first world
>expect to survive
have fun starving to death or trying to take land from malnourished africans you care about so much retard

To whoever nukes first.

The reason why the Mid West is a big fat target is because that’s where Uncle Sam built all his missile silos and long-range bomber bases.

The onion movie was breddy gud

>slavs just aim purely for body count in a retaliation strike
unironically based

Attached: AK HI.jpg (1194x768, 143K)

Hell of a strawman with the whole "half the planet" supposition.

intercept them with what?

dude, it has been proven, with existing detonation tests.
And it does not matter if you explode above ground, dirt will rise into the air.
You guys know nothing.
Look at a fucking nuke strike, for fucks sakes. Now imagine 4000 of them at once, cause that's what it would take to "first strike and win" against russia and china.

there WILL BE a nuclear winter, and there WILL BE nuclear rain, that WILL drift over to your side of the fucking world and rain down rain so radioactive. It WILL kill everything.

that's a reality check ,

It's pointless to hit spent silos. So your only choice is to hurt them more.

>those clusters in 2k scenario in MT, CO and WY
>almost totally uninhabited areas of the country
Any explanation for this, user?

They probably just know more about it than randos on Jow Forums

>the us military thinks so
>that means trump thinks so

wtf im moving to hawaii now

>He thinks politics is real and politicians actually run things
>He thinks the people who run things actually care about which country they get their profits from

Attached: 1560900416396.png (680x680, 221K)

...

>tfw clear from initial blast and ensuing potential fallout

Attached: 2019-06-19 18.41.29.png (142x224, 4K)

>Putin is in the pocket of the jews.

Attached: 1560981759181.jpg (179x170, 10K)

There will be nothing apart from massive death.

Nuke silos.

Yeah the Big Island would be okay so long as you kept refugees out.

Niiiiiiiiicce
Innawooods! Represent!

Notice how when Russia strikes first they waste a shit ton of missiles on minuteman silos.

Shoot first, die second. There is no "winnable" nuclear war.

more nukes.

New pentagon document = Trump thinks
Id like to k kw the mental gymnastics in use for this, impressive would not do it justice

Look man, I don't want nuclear war at all. Even if just a few MIRVs get through to US soil, the devastation would be unprecedented. There's few realistic strategic goals we have that we can't accomplish in non-nuclear fashion. In an absolute worst case scenario, I favor neutron bombs. Kill the people. Leave the assets.

Of Israel at the very least. Come back to me when he does something about them bombing Russians at Syrian airbases and spoofing Syrian missiles into aircraft full of Russians.

Minuteman silos

Not really a waste though. The goal is to knock out a major second strike.

CHECKem and Africa gets nuked on April 19th, 2020.

Who is the fight promoter, Bob Arum? No one wants to see this bout. Well, almost no one.

Attached: 1548134484982.jpg (255x192, 10K)

>Prioritize the defense of the food producing areas middle America as a whole
Why? It's exactly where the nukes will fall. You think they will hit NYC?
They will let them eat new yorkers to survive, they will hit water food and forests, mines , they will with groundbursts to lift up radiocative soil & poison livestock. It's a piece of cake to nuke the US, just de-food it

Good hopefully kikes and sand niggers get the blasts.

>live in Florida
fugg :D :D :D

Missile bases and NORAD.

the US is the largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world

Can't kill us all

Considering Israel is within range of their Nukes and we arnt I’d say it’s a win win

Attached: D80FB406-4D05-4A17-A806-DE1A68253FD9.jpg (447x438, 16K)

Well, we probably won't have total war until we become an interplanetary species after all.