Good guys vs. Bad guys
What does it mean to be a "good guy". How can somebody claim to be good while hating those that they've never even met?
Is it possible to deafeat the evils of this world without using their own tools against them? Whether it be hate, cold-heartedness or deception?
Evil actions do not bring true victory, no matter how justified you may feel to be able to accomplish a so called greater good.
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.org
gutenberg.org
twitter.com
The root of morality is ethnocentrism. The good guys are the national socialists, the bad guys are the race traitors
To tolerate evil is to become evil. The problem with Christianity is that is says the next life we will enjoy in this we must suffer. Never to punish evil. What if there is no next life? Why not make a heaven on Earth? If you care not for your earthly conditions as the bible has instructed you give to all your possessions and you will be rich in your lords land. You will not. What is a Christian, but a worm that chooses and picks parts of their religion. Either follow your book entirely or throw it in a bin. In this life the meek shall inherit nothing. Those who will not fight in this world of strife deserve all that come their way.
No one is good but God alone.
You don’t have to know someone personally and hate them to know they’re a net negative to have around. Also seriously, all these pro-immigration people need to put up or shut up by allowing brown people to move into their homes rent free.
you can stone someone to death not out of hatred to him, but out of love for others he threatens and even the stoned one as letting him continue his deeds will just make himself, his soul, more and more miserable.
True love means you keep the person from sinning as it leads to his own destruction which you obviously wouldnt want if you love him.
>10Our fathers disciplined us for a short time as they thought best, but God disciplines us for our good, so that we may share in His holiness. 11No discipline seems enjoyable at the time, but painful. Later on, however, it yields a peaceful harvest of righteousness to those who have been trained by it.
it does not mean you let him do whatever he wants onto you or others, but that every punishment you do put onto someone comes from a point of love and compassion.
>5And whoever welcomes a little child like this in My name welcomes Me. 6But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.
>would be better for him
If there is noone in the world willing to forgive and forget, we will endlessly carry on feuds and fights in form of revenge for all eternety. Its only when someone starts to forgive that this Cycle can be broken. And as Gods Chosen we are meant to go forth as a good example and make the first step. We are not meant to ignore and tolerate evil, but meant to overcome our hate, and give up what we can spare in an effort to break that cycle, but step up where its necessary even for our own disadventages.
Naruto understood this
>How can somebody claim to be good while hating those that they've never even met?
Because we have met (((them)))
There is no good nor bad in human society; only right and wrong, prosperity and decay, survival and extinction.
The only "good" is Christian morality, God's holy words.
Everything else is just a life technicality
what the bible actually says is that this world is ruled by evil, by satan, thus if we are good we will suffer because of the ruleship of evil, meaning if we get punished and persecuted we are doing something right, and if we put up with this we will be rewarded greatly in heaven. It does not say we must suffer, as this would mean we could just torture ourselves and be saved, but that if we are doing things right that we will.
Also this partially
Well said, I forgive you for WW11
black = bad
white = good
it isnt so hard user O_O
Hol up where are WW3-10?
Since the Jews have flipped everything upside down, what used to be evil and demonic is now being taught to children, and what was considered pure and righteous is now labeled as hate filled madness.
So, if being good in an evil world means being called evil by the evildoers themselves, then so be it.
>Implying America has the right of ever being an ethnic state
America isn't your by right it's yours by conquest. Don't get mad that the spawns want to take their home back. Europeans have a right to be angry that their native land is being invaded, but you on the other hand do not.
This is true. I have learned the highest good on earth is gardening.
Show flag
Soooooo no niggers in America, since they’re African?
No one is righteous for all have sinned and fall short
Sure makes sense. I mean unless they were forcefully imported by Jews and lazy southerners.
Deuteronomy 13
Gud says it's ok to kill non believers that means it is good Gud has spoken
See
The saints and angel's in heaven, are also good.
Evil is the bourgeoise. They make lower classes suffer planned scarcity and mental anguish and sickness. The bourgeoise spoils their kids with whatever they want, so the way they see G-D (or science or society etc.) is like a parent that will give them whatever they want, and that's essentially why the world is satanic and a reversal of nature in all things.
funnily communism itself is saturnian which is satanic
^
Communism did the same thing modern leftism did. People who noticed class warfare and the bourgeoise made too much so they made a bullshit response to it called communism which empowers the bourgeoise. It gives them complete power to have planned scarcity and free money for liars and "good" people.
Left-wing people made too much sense in the 70s and 60s so they dildoed them up to where people felt they had to choose the alternative.
>National Socialism is ethnocentric
Race=/=Folk=/=Ethnicity
National Socialism is folkish, which implies that it is racial, but says nothing regarding ethnicity.
Race is the result of people uniting under common purpose, toward common destiny, forming a folk, achieving biogenetic distinctness through generations.
A folk is a group with a common purpose and destiny, but it may be comprised of any number of races (each of which formed in a similar way to what I am describing). However, over time, due to shared purpose, culture, and selection, a folk becomes distinct, forming it's own race.
An ethnicity is a group with a common origin, and in modern times it is conflated with race. An ethnicity is not a race because a race implies commonality in thought patterns, beliefs, and traits; race means to think in a certain way, whereas ethnicity holds no such connotation. Ethnic groups are disintegrated racial groups. To regenerate a race, advance the purpose which generated it in the first place, not the preservation of the disintegrated components.
See archive.org
“Race, with a capital letter, no longer exists in this darkest time of the earth. It is something that once was, and to which one claims to return as to an ideal. As with Greek statues, whose models were never present. But it is a duty to aim at this perfection and this transmutation. This and nothing else was what Hitler taught us.” – Miguel Serrano
To me it means what ever you want it to mean. Unless you’re religious, there is no such thing as morality.
You're a massive vagina and should never be in charge of anything.
I didn't make the thread
>What does it mean to be a "good guy". How can somebody claim to be good while hating those that they've never even met?
Evil doesn't exist. To meet 'true evil', is to rather meet what is not truly good.
If you are good, what is not "you" (metaphorical sense, but perhaps literal in the context of a metaphysical absolute good) is therefore 'evil', in so many parts that it either does not resemble you, or at least your good purpose for it.
>Is it possible to deafeat the evils of this world without using their own tools against them? Whether it be hate, cold-heartedness or deception?
Hate is not exclusive to evil. On the contrary, hating what is evil, what disparages, or harms good, is itself good - since the natural consequence of good/evil dichotomy is not one of competing forces, but rather the negation of the only one to actually exist (good). Cold-heartedness is also not exclusive to 'evil' in this context, since evil is not an object in and of itself. Therefore, being indifferent to evil itself is to simply regard it for what it is - nothing. Worthless. Even less than trash.
It is in this capacity we must regard the following
>Evil actions do not bring true victory, no matter how justified you may feel to be able to accomplish a so called greater good.
Correct. And for such notions to be applicable we have to know what "good" is. What is evil then becomes an emergent property of its absence or negation. I am of the understanding that in pragmatic terms for ourselves, "good" is fulfilling our purpose. In this sense, 'doing good' is rather doing what has been set out for us to do, but a "so called greater good".
Perhaps contrary to the typical notion of "the greater good" however, I do not mean a consensus. I mean THE absolute authority. Goodness itself.
Start anywhere else and at best we meander in circles.
To answer your question OP, which is related to my post here a "good guy" is one whose goal is optimization of the world through love and fury. Someone who is "good" does not hate, but they do have fury, a desire to purify the world. One can have fury towards someone they haven't met if that person has goals contrary to optimization.
To win through deception is no victory. The more one uses deception, the more occluded the purpose for fighting becomes. See Socrates' and Alcibiades' discussion on the distinction between "noble" (just) and "expedient" goods.
gutenberg.org
The solution is ultimately a selection in favor of noble good, and against expedient "good" and evil, which, as mentioned in my other post, is a racial problem; a problem with thought patterns and decision making in a moment of crisis.