He did it boys. He did it

>youtube.com/watch?v=2quCgvqeZrY

Attached: Screenshot 2019-06-26 at 04.11.26.png (1496x854, 1.68M)

Other urls found in this thread:

cnn.com/2019/05/26/us/gillette-ad-transgender-man-trnd/index.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

imagine having to squint because you never see daylight.

based chabad lubavitcher!

Attached: cucker carlson kabbalah bracelet.png (1104x745, 1.06M)

he is in japan idiot, he just wants to fit in..

I kinda hate they way they always call Google the most powerful company in the world.

Cause lets be honest, it's Microsoft they could single handedly destroy the planet.

I thought Amazon was the biggest

>it's Microsoft they could single handedly destroy the planet.
except, microsoft employees are autistic programmers for the most part who care about software, not SJW's.

and the most popular OS is android by far, not Windows.

japanese don't squint, chinese do.
you can't even racist right.

Microsoft only has to push an forced unskippable update (Which they have the ability to do) and wipe everything.

It would literally kill everything.

Tucker's disgusted face is always great

He should watch what he eats though, he looks like he's putting on weight

>he doesn't know that the most powerful company is really general electric
nukes.

it's the beer.

>Republican angry because a company that gained power and wealth through lack of regulation and favourable taxation laws has too much power

He's a hypocrite, but I'm glad he's redpilling Republicans away from sucking off billionaires, Israel, and the muh deregulation meme. Maybe before I die I'll see some Teddy Roosevelt Republicans actually take their party and their country back.

>It would literally kill everything
except servers because servers run on linux and unix.

>BRUH THIS GUY IS BASICALLY NATSOC AND CALLS OUT CORPORATIONS AND NEOCONS
>BUT HE DOESN'T 100% HATE JEWS SO THEREFORE HE'S A KIKE

You realize your retarded shilling isn't going to distract us from jewgle right, faggot?

All of silicon valley is an asset of the deep state to extract resources from the federal government and invest it in new power centers 3000 miles from the federal government

Those aren't the important ones, higher level systems predominantly run windows system, all major routes would be killed because it's the backbone behind the everything.

nope.
all major servers for all internet traffic infrastructure run linux.
all of them.

Of Course he did. He's setting himself up to be the GOP Nominee in 2024 and will be the guy that brings third position politics to the mainstream.

Attached: 1555633211540.jpg (1024x576, 68K)

Getting us primed

Attached: cnngoogle.png (1371x677, 485K)

That would be incredible, but even by 2020 the demographics will ensure that no GOP nominee has a chance. Texas is about to go blue.

what about Donald Trump Jr? His dad could advice and help him in his first years.

But Tucker would be great too.

Nope, Trumps are boomers compared to Tuck. Tuck is literal NatSoc.A Tucker/Hawley ticket in 2024 WILL WIN . Screencap it.

Google needs to be broken up. The 2020 election determines that outcome.

Attached: 1561373705482m.jpg (685x1024, 143K)

No actually Google will be in the middle of their antitrust case before the elections.

>segment has "hack 2020 election" running on fox about google
Oh fuck her we go. This fucking timeline.

Attached: 1561340139338.jpg (170x126, 3K)

can't cuck the tuck NXIVM coverage when?

Ho-Lee Fuk. Dewete this.

Trump family are huge cucks, Tucker is bordering on full natsoc

He has blue eyes. Very sensitive to light. We squint all the time, even indoors.

Breaking up google into smaller companies isn't going to deal with the fact that these companies have a right to control their platforms. Even if they were being biased against the president or whoever, you couldn't stop them.

This is more dumb shit to get Trumps base riled up.

Sadly this

buchanan/carlson 2024.

slant eye cope

HAIL TUCKER

I would kill and die for this man

Attached: 1553912498770.jpg (406x406, 35K)

Checkt and rekt

On point my dude

Big Tech is going to be SHATTERED. Deal with it.

I see Amazon prime orders for rope going up exponentially soon.

>platforms have the right to be publishers and platforms

Attached: download (2).jpg (586x800, 37K)

>Accuse your enemy of that what you are guilty

Just get bulk 100' extension cords from Harbor Freight and cut them to length.

Attached: 1539704929045.png (680x352, 359K)

>huge cucks

You are a zoomer. I know this because you're so retarded you think reducing immigration is merely a matter of saying "immigration go down" when in reality Trump is struggling against people who have become a part of the bureaucracy and have made their entire careers out of giving visas to shitskins so corporations can have cheap labor, as well as a billion categories of immigrant that need to be each individually slashed.

While it is vitally important that the 2024 Republican should not be a cuck, anything they do will only be possible because Trump has spent the past 2 years (and next 6) struggling and winning against 50 years of pro-shitskin immigration policies.

Attached: visas down by 1 million.jpg (1079x986, 428K)

It's not going to affect my access to or use of the internet either way, I totally don't give a shit.

>platforms have the right to be publishers and platforms

I didn't say that. I said that breaking it into smaller companies won't address the issue. If you split Google into multiple smaller entities, how does that affect the question of publisher/platform?

Answer is that it doesn't.

Garbage-tier blackpilling, get a better narrative.

It addresses that because the people who run the fucking video streaming site won't be trying to shape humanity by altering searches and results using AI.

no different then the phone company not letting faggots or nazis place calls

Why not though? We're talking about breaking a company into smaller parts. How does that prevent any of the smaller parts from carrying on with the same sorts of policies as Google does or using the same kinds of technologies? It doesn't.

If Google wanted to keep doing exactly what it is doing now, all they'd have to do is share their tools among the new smaller entities.

>BRUH WHAT DO YOU HAVE AGAINST TRILLION-DOLLAR MEGACORPORATIONS, WHAT DID THEY EVER DO TO YOU

The absolute state of shills

Because all your unit 8200 assets are gonna be killed and all the influence coming from Israel will end and all those R&D divisions will shut down. Sloppy job mossad.

>I said that breaking it into smaller companies won't address the issue. If you split Google into multiple smaller entities, how does that affect the question of publisher/platform?

they loose their monopoly position and new companies can come in to take their market share?

they should be split up, or their platform status needs to be revoked.

They would be fined and everyone involved would go to jail if they did that retard.

amazon is the richest but Google has the most impact and resources and means

Yeah, imagine that

Attached: 1548365452079.png (482x852, 81K)

Okay so let me explain where I'm coming from. Your issue is with what Google is doing, right?

So imagine you have a group of people who are doing something you don't like, and you respond by splitting that group of people into smaller groups. It's still the same kinds of people and they're still doing the same kinds of things.

Splitting up google doesn't change the culture of the group, the policy preferences of the group, etc. Anti-Trust action simply doesn't address the thing you're upset about. Anti-trust stuff doesn't have anything to do with publisher v. platform.

>they loose their monopoly position and new companies can come in to take their market share?

So what part of this anti-trust effort stops any of them, whether or not they are related to Google, from acting like Google?

Ask yourself WHY Google acts the way it does. It's because Big Tech is full of liberals. Breaking up a company isn't going to change that, we're talking about separate issues here.

>they should be split up, or their platform status needs to be revoked.

If you want to address what you're complaining about, you'd need to deal with their STATUS, not their SIZE. Dealing with their size might upset them but it won't change behavior moving forward.

I'm not going to address bullshit.

underrated

Tucker just sanitizes shit we've been saying here for years. Is he here among us?

not Monsanto?

Kek

Attached: 5a56ac939362c.jpg (540x540, 69K)

It'll change the culture of the group because the culture of a single corporation is dictated by an even smaller group of people than would exist under multiple corporations. Your argument literally flies in the face of 100 years of capitalist study.

>Anti-trust stuff doesn't have anything to do with publisher v. platform.
yes, but it would incentivise competition and new players could step in.

For example, pornhub could create a youtube alternative with monetisation options. Right now, google bleeds money on youtube, just to prevent any competition real competition getting into this business.

>if you say bitchute, I am going to slap you.
also, if bitchute were to become somehow relevenat, they would be bought by google.

He has a tan, fag ass

Why haven't they shut down Tucker? I'm surprised someone like his is even allowed a platform. I'm glad, just surprised.

No bitchute link?

sheeeeeit

>It'll change the culture of the group because the culture of a single corporation is dictated by an even smaller group of people than would exist under multiple corporations.

So we're talking about the same kinds of people with the same kinds of beliefs, but somehow they're all going to act totally different than the company they were split off from and NOT use algorithms to affect searches?

Why would they do that?

>yes, but it would incentivise competition and new players could step in.

And why would THEY not pander to liberal types and do similar control of search results? Nothing about breaking these companies up or allowing for more competition is going to affect whether or not they affect search results to suit their agendas.

How do we file a complaint with the US fed gov to investigate Google based on this latest development?

>Teddy Roosevelt republicans
Hate to break it to you user, but they don't exist anymore. Teddy would called a liberal in today's political climate

He's the most watched news program behind Hannity. Has his own news org as well so getting rid of his show doesn't shut him up completely. Can't really do anything to him unless there's a strong scandal, and even then he'll just take his presence to the internet.

It's not like they haven't tried. They attacked his advertisers and Antifa has gone to his house twice now. The only reason (((Fox))) keeps him is that he's the most watched news anchor on TV. They would drop him in a second if Jews weren't too greedy for their own good.

fucking kek

They JFK’d tucker

Attached: C0D25CAA-AB58-4C39-8D04-DFEA5E0E14E5.jpg (1125x707, 134K)

>And why would THEY not pander to liberal types and do similar control of search results?
they could, but then people would switch between those two platforms (and the CEO's would compete for the republicans, forcing them to become more neutral in the longterm).

Right now, Google/Youtube can do whatever they want, since there is nowhere else you can go.

If they just split Google and youtube into 2 different companies that would be big, since youtube cant survive on its own.

I still can't believe Fox has the only media personality I don't completely detest.

I love my local Chabadnik, he has me and my waifu over every Saturday for shabbos lunch. Great guy, and his wife's cooking is top notch. Both are fairly young, and they have 4 kids in a degeneracy-free household. It's inspiring.

He's probably jet lagged

Attached: 1516766666808.jpg (585x704, 55K)

That is funny; but she should have said Denver.

Attached: 1557008805437.gif (375x251, 500K)

>they could, but then people would switch between those two platforms (and the CEO's would compete for the republicans, forcing them to become more neutral in the longterm).

So imagine this. Imagine you run any of these companies and you don't really give a shit about politics, you just like money. On one hand you have a bunch of liberals who want to be pandered to and they'll boycott your shit. On the other hand you have conservatives who want to be pandered to or they'll boycott your shit.

Which group do you choose to pander to? The larger one. Which is the larger group in the U.S. by population?

>Right now, Google/Youtube can do whatever they want, since there is nowhere else you can go.

There are other places though, those platforms just aren't as popular.

>On one hand you have a bunch of liberals who want to be pandered to and they'll boycott your shit.

Should read "OR they'll boycott your shit", typo

.squinting
Tucker only been in japan a day and he's already turning Japanese. I wonder how many soaplands he's been to.

>making a problem better won’t fix the problem so don’t even try

Shill

It's not a platform if they're determining what's allowed on it and what isn't. At that point it becomes a publisher like the New York Times, Fox News, or CNN. Are they a news outlet or are they a platform for free expression. Tech kikes can't have it both ways.

That's cause faggots like you are glued to your idiot box to get your daily "feels". It's faggots like you who keep MSM relevant because the outside world is a scary place for you. Kill your television and beginto live life. Otherwise, stay in your dark cave and be spoonfed your daily "feels" like all the rest of the sheep.

That isn't what I said. I said that the approach being advocated here does not address the issue whatsoever. The issue is fairness to differing viewpoints, right?

Making a big company into smaller companies doesn't affect the culture within the industry. This is like a liberal advocating for the breakup of Exxon Mobil in the hopes that it will change their opinions on climate change.

>Which group do you choose to pander to? The larger one. Which is the larger group in the U.S. by population?
competition would balance it out, and in the end most companies would remain neutral.

for example, I doubt Gilette would try more of those SJW ads anytime soon, since dollar shave club exists. But if Gilette was the only company selling blades, well guess what kind of ads you'd see from them daily...

Well, they'll stop having one big collective money pile to draw from. So a boondoggle like google+ would fail and bankrupt whichever googlette tried it.
That dunmore guy would have an easier time finding the centrist-rightwing googlettes, and working on stuff for that chunk of the electorate. Cheap as we may be, you can sell us trucks, grills, camping gear and other sports stuff.
Tech is left wing is propaganda. Most of the engineers are not liberal faggots.
And it's presuming they'll only get broken in half. Google owns a lot of different shit now.
While you're saying nothing would change, a whole bunch of things would change.

Google fears being anything less than Oz behind the curtain. As they should. Smaller companies would face heavily armed opposition.

>"Hack" doesn't mean anything anymore

I don't even blame Tucker he's not the one who destroyed it's meaning... the left did. Just like they destroyed the meaning of

>rape
>concentration camps
>male
>female
>Nazi

And it goes on and on. I could be "hacking" the U.S. election AT THIS VERY MOMENT by shitposting on Jow Forums. Maybe I'm secretly a Russian posing as an American to push pro-Trump rhetoric and influence people's minds (only the MSM is allowed to do that).

COME AT ME CIA GLOWNIGGERS.

Attached: John_Allen_Campbell.jpg (250x350, 12K)

>for example, I doubt Gilette would try more of those SJW ads anytime soon

Like this? cnn.com/2019/05/26/us/gillette-ad-transgender-man-trnd/index.html

>This Gillette ad shows a man teaching his transgender son to shave

Just do a quick search online with terms like "Gillette gay ad" or "Gillette trans ad" and you'll see that the dollar shave club isn't really affecting Gillettes attitudes on SJW shit.

Any other Russian LEET NEET HACKERS here?

>heavily armed opposition.

I don't doubt there'd be competition, but competition for what? For the biggest slice of the market. What's the biggest slice of the market? Is it conservatives or is it SJW liberals?

>that gained power and wealth through lack of regulation and favourable taxation laws
You know tech companies got subsidies right? And are constantly abusing publisher laws(every anti-free market) to protect them from allegations right?

A Mega-Corp loves big government, because it's the only ones big enough to deal with big government.

It would only kill dumb social media attention seeking women. Tru men dont need windumbs.

>higher level systems predominantly run windows system

Attached: deport.jpg (353x353, 15K)

I don't watch television. I'm interested in what Tucker says because I know he speaks to the boomers, and the boomers decide the elections.

Bumperino for minecraft happenings

blatant!

God bless good old Tuck

I mean that companies smaller than Google acting like Google does now will see actual violent reprisals with bombs or bullets. The momentum of Google getting trust-busted will engender and unite the disparate and disaffected against common foes that no longer seem invincible and omniscient.

>reeeeeee gewgles a cancer
>i kno! lez brekitup
>cuz lil cancers r bedder den big cancers

Attached: tapatalk_1547000467869.jpg (1350x1012, 256K)