Jozef Tiso was a Slovak Catholic priest and was a National Socialist sympathizing politician. He was also a friend of Hitler. In this link, you can find a picture of him shaking hands with Hitler: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jozef_Tiso
Hitler granted independence to the Slovak Republic under Jozef Tiso. He did the same thing with Croatia, another Slavic country. Why would he do that if he had goals to exterminate Slavs?
>Democratic court historians, especially in post-war Germany, attribute the Russian campaign to Hitler's ambition to gain Lebensraum, or living space, in the East. The theory rests on a tenuous assumption: Namely, that deadlocked in the fight against Britain and practically at war with the United States, Hitler launched a colonial expedition against one of the world's most powerful empires, the principle supplier of natural resources vital to Germany's wartime economy, in order to secure surplus land for future German settlers. In truth, the Reich was short a million laborers in 1939, and the government offered incentives to foreign workers, especially Czechs, to migrate to Germany to fill vacancies in industry. After conquering Poland, Hitler told Mussolini that newly recovered German provinces like Posen would require 40-50 years to resettle and fully integrate into the economy. Where would Hitler find colonists to export to Russia? -Hitler's Revolution by Richard Tedor, pages 155-156
How do you natsocs explain that your ideologie relies on traditionalism (Volk, Culture, Country, Family) but also heavily on industry and advancing technology? Aren‘t they exclusive to each other, as for example Ernst Jünger describes it. Pls answer seriously, I dont mean to bait
> Pls answer seriously, I dont mean to bait lol i dont think you're a shill for asking a question, dont worry. >How do you natsocs explain that your ideologie relies on traditionalism (Volk, Culture, Country, Family) but also heavily on industry and advancing technology? The basis of national socialism is doing what is best for your people. This can be applied to any and all peoples, but only by said peoples themselves. Humans have a natural need for order, values, family and belonging. But also a basic need to survive. This basic need to survive requires any people who wishes to, to make technological advancements that allow them survive against any conflict with nature or other peoples that may try to destroy them. However left unchecked this drive towards technological supremacy will crush man under his own machinery. You are currently seeing this in capitalism with the now common parlance idea that "machines will one day make us errelevent" Under a national socialist system this could not happen. As the position of the state, and more importantly the society and the culture as a whole would be to do what is in the best interest of the "volk." This is why you could have a country like national socialist germany that revolutionized weaponry, medicine and aviation but still didnt degenerate into the sort of cyber punk nihlistic, hedonistic society you have today. And you work from the perspective of what is best for your people, instead of what fits your ideological beliefs it is amazing what you can accomplish. Might sound common sense But this understanding is the basis of National Socialism.
I keep getting (((connection error))) trying to bump this thread
Colton Nguyen
I'd like to see a National Socialist state take charge in off planet colonization. I believe in the long term it is in the white man's best interest to take to the stars and ensure survival of our people.
Asher Garcia
Same. Ive never had this problem before now
Ayden Perez
i got it on other threads to i think (((someone))) just realized they fucked up forcing r/thedonald in and is doing damage controll.
Now I have a new issue where my photos are all corrupted
Anthony James
Problems with democracy: 1. It costs a lot of money. It is inevitably taken over by corporate interests.
2. It divides the people. People become left/right instead of unified for their common good. It divides families where a man is right wing and a woman left wing, and friendships. It blinds peoples to the fact that their unity is the common good.
3. It reduces people to a single vote. Why should a person whos family has been living in a country for thousands of years have the same vote as a migrant who has lived there for 2? In European countries, the whites have thousands of years of ancestors in the ground, who fought, bled, sweated, and died for their country. To give a migrant the same voting privilages as a descendant of these people is an insult.
4.It is impossible to accomplish aims in democracy. Whatever is done by one party, will be undone by the next.
5. Democracy is incapable of authority. It lacks the power of sanction. A party, for fear of losing its supporters, does not apply sanctions against those who live through scandalous business deals running into the millions, through thievery or embezzlement; nor does it apply any sanctions against political adversaries lest they expose its own shady deals and incorrectitudes.