Why is Jow Forums so bad at political science? By pure odds you people should be right more often than you are...

Why is Jow Forums so bad at political science? By pure odds you people should be right more often than you are. It's statistically unlikely to be in the wrong as often as you people.

Is being wrong the goal?

Attached: Alignment.jpg (600x600, 39K)

Left good right bad

Image not wrong.

Yeah, pretty simple. Why is that so hard for you pale monkeys to grasp?

We hate you on /x/ we hate you on Jow Forums fuck off trip fag.

Not true, it depends who’s in charge of the authoritarian regime. Technically North Korea is top left, and I wouldn’t consider them good

((( )))
>taking rights from everyone instead of working for a common interest is good

Your hate fuels the rituals that siege Kekistan. Keep hating, you weak subhuman.

DPRK is doing fine. Stop listening to propaganda. The Juche Gang has everything under control.

Amazing. Every word you just said was wrong.

>claps

sage the namefag

Cry more

Socially, they hold the same views as the extreme far right. Anti-LGBTQ, Anti-Abortion, pro torture, pro prison.

>top left
>lawful good
This meme was made by NazBol Gang (TM)

>taking rights from everyone
Yes, you couldn't be more wrong.

The left believes freedom is for everyone, regardless of beliefs.
The right believes in freedom for everyone, as long as they share your same beliefs.

Which is more free?

Do nazbois accept trademarks?

The only possible way to be """right""" on (((political science))) is to lie on purpose or be utterly stupid.

KEK at this NPC bait

Where have you been in the last 10 years? Who is censoring and deplatforming?

>A namefag trying to tell us how things shake out.

>muh deplatforming
Private companies have been deplatforming due to hate speech and stochastic terrorism. You don't have to like it, no one cares about you.

Censoring and deplatforming?

Are we talking about the internet? Facebook/Twitter/etc.?

Those are free sites which are allowed to determine their own rules, correct? You break the rules of hate speech/violence/threats and you are subject to losing access.

Which political group is pushing for actual censorship and regulation of the internet? Which political group wants ISPs to be able to filter and control content on the internet?

Those on the right should support the right of the owners of individual sites to be able to decide their own rules rather than pushing for government regulation.

>>lawful good
>>LAWFUL GOOD

Attached: 1537832341147.png (244x326, 124K)

Lawful Good is ready, willing, and able to kill or reeducate those who threaten the peace.

Holy shit, this is so fucking low qualty bait that I can't believe so many idiots fell for it

>can't tell ironic shitposting from unironic shitposting

>I was only pretending to be baited

>Leftism
>Good
YOU HAVE TO BE 18 TO POST HERE, KID
You have been reported for underage posting.

Both fill the board with shit and shills

Any Nazbol post is a shitpost.

>left bad
Take your meds

Clearly communism as a concept is lawful good. Also clearly it never works in practice.

>tripfag
>left good right bad
>says Jow Forums is wrong very often

the most shameful thread on Jow Forums right now, outpacing /mlp/ and the Greek supremacist guy a few threads over.

>waaaaaaaaaaaaaah y u so mean to the right?