Was there ever a communist country with good gun rights? It seems every communist nation, on top of being a shithole...

Yeah sure
Go ahead and post your AKM, Canuck

All communist countries were also authoritarian, so of course they all had shit gun rights.

It was pretty easy to get a hunting rifle in the USSR, my gramps had a toz-66

>grandparents are Lithuanian
>escaped to America in the fifties
>despise communism and grandpa armed himself very well
>bitch hippie aunt destroyed his Tommy gun in the 70s
>carpet layer with a family to feed so he couldn't afford another one
He is in his late 90s now and he made sure I knew the horrors of communism. He didn't hate the nazis as much because they were better than the commies and got rid of jews.

In Albania, everyone was armed.

Attached: alba.jpg (694x681, 151K)

The US might end up being one for a while. Communism is coming. Gun rights will be shit but you'll be able to own them until they abolish 2A.

I don't think so. We've got the unique opportunity
> suffer under all the problems of communism
> still experience every single problem with capatalism

Every country controlled by communists or their ilk has taken quite a lot of influences from the local culture. In Russia things went on in a somewhat similar flavour as during the Tsar. East Germany had a twist much like the most of unified Germany. Cuba is Cuba, China is China, etc.
2A is a pretty fucking defining part of America, so I doubt it would go anywhere. I bet they would fiddle with the definitions and put more weight on the "a well-regulated militia" part, or something, but wouldn't go as far as abolishing it.

>Muslim shithole
>Had gun laws, just not enforced due to societal breakdown

Next

>corporate bootlicking

Practically every block was fortified, and the block was supplied with arms and ammunition. They were paranoid of both NATO and the WP, so they prepared to defend against anyone and everyone.

Attached: Albania_Bunkers_2012_P1940345.jpg (900x675, 153K)

>2A is a pretty fucking defining part of America, so I doubt it would go anywhere
You couldn't be more wrong. Have you even looked at what they're teaching to our kids? HS kids all over the US are protesting the NRA in pretty big numbers.

End of 2A is maybe 15 years away, at the soonest, and maybe 25 years away at the longest.

Communism/socialism is extremely popular with women and non-whites. It's definitely coming too.

Attached: 1540666409480.jpg (1608x2000, 940K)

no but anarchist communes knew to keep their guns
some ancoms fought back against the statists with their guns

Why not just join the Socialist organizations and undermine their anti-gun position from the inside?

no. communism thrives on coercion and enslavement of the unwashed masses. why in teh fuck would they allow private ownership of weaponry which would threaten their elitist autocratic regime

>winkler
>wuertenberg

uhhhh guys,ever get the feeling something strange is going on?

no. capitalism thrives on coercion and enslavement of the unwashed masses. why in teh fuck would they allow private ownership of weaponry which would threaten their elitist autocratic regime
:^)

not commie but eastern european
youtube.com/watch?v=Q9km2Ux2fZc

Attached: 98a67bbea10f00a955ea7d57858c9315.png (693x183, 17K)

iirc Yugoslavia was basically Europe-tier
not really anywhere near "good" gun rights but definitely better than nothing

What the fuck does that even mean retard
Compared English and Czech gun rights
Also Yugoslavia, and the former Yugoslav states are in Europe and are European, so they're obviously Europe tier

>Implying the dem president isn't doing this because the corps funding him didn't demand it
America ceased being ran by real people decades ago, probably after Nixon tanked the credibility of being a president

>communism and capitalism both enslave the working classes for the benefit of an unaccountable globalist elite
>the last time a group of european countries adopted an alternative system, communist and capitalist countries both united to destroy them
It's almost as if the conflict is entirely manufactured.

for blue states sure but not for the entire country

its too big of an issue to spend the massive amount of effort forcing compliance on rural areas

ultimately states/regions will gain more autonomy as cities become more socialist, this is the only way to ensure the economy remains stable and faith in government doesn't entirely collapse

no, there will be no boog (maybe some troublesish limited insurgency) but the entirety of the US won't be an orwelian diverse (tm) hellhole either

acquire land now, learn to be as self sufficient as possible and live near people you trust

Czech Republic

Yeah, but then they also decided to just start killing a whole bunch of people based on some pretty arbitrary rules, so they were also sort of authoritarian dicks.

You just can't seem to win these days.

Ever notice how all these countries the Left hold up as good examples don't exist anymore?

Kinda tips their hand on the future they want for America.

Just like how the Bolsheviks never went after rural Russians.

Reminder your faggot nazi party is the reason white powerful Europe is dead
Good job filling England with pakis, France with north Africans and Germany with Turks, good job killing millions upon millions of young white men in conflict, good job specifically targeting and genociding white European natives

>Facism
>Sort of authoritarian
You having a laugh, they are as authoritarian as you can get

>modern left holds up East Germany as a good example

this is your mind on echo chamber politics

>the people who opposed ____ are responsible for ____ because the people who supported ____ did ____ after they killed the people who opposed ____
Yeah, that makes sense.

He is half right. They do hold up countries that "dont exist" in the sense that they have changed so much.

Example:
>Name a good socialist country
>SWEDEN!
Sweden was socialist in the 60's and 70's but it destroyed their economy and they implemented "right wing" economic reforms that Americans could only dream of (I can tell you more if you want). So when they say Sweden they mean a Sweden that ceased to exist 30 years ago.

>You just can't seem to win these days.
You can tho.

Attached: augusto-pinochet-hero.jpg (768x432, 43K)

Thats the caucuses though. They have always done whatever the fuck they want.

You thick cunt
Nazis were pro Germanic, so they genocides inferior white people's, started huge amounts of wars that killed so many people that the only option post war industrial nations had to maintain was to import foreign labour from their colonies
Yes you stupid fucking cunt, the Nazis genocides whites and it's the Nazis fault Europe is full of shitskins, it's the Nazis fault Europe lost their empires and it's the Nazis fault they lost their influence, they are only just now capable of dragging themselves back a bit
Fuck off to stormfront you deluded fucking spastic nigger, and go fuck more Muslims like pappy Hitler loved you shitskin cunt

>Sweden was socialist in the 60's and 70's
Please elaborate.

fucking REEEEEEEEE
catholics rise up

Cuba is pro gun rights and demonstrated it works after the Bay of Pigs.

This post is pure fantasy. There is no overlap between the commie faggots and the old America that supports the constitution.

Fag

Read history beyond your high school textbook

>Muh Nazis
Go jack off to white genocide and Muslims you stupid boot licking cock sucking jizz gargling cunt

You lying faggot you can only get a bolt action rifle in Cuba

>for blue states sure but not for the entire country
Texas is about to turn blue forever so there won’t be any validity in your red state blue state distinction. The rest of your post is wishful thinking.

Based and redpilled.

Kek this post is nonsense

Come up with arguments that make sense Pablo

Sweden went full socialist during that period. It absolutely tanked their economy. By the start of the 80's they had 90% debt, zero nett job growth for the last 15 years. household disposable income remained stagnant for decades. They were the sick man in Europe and decided to change things.
Some changes include:
>scrapping inheritance tax
>scrapping wealth tax
>school voucher system
>privatizing pensions
>complete tax reform, where those who use the most services pay the most taxes, instead of the rich paying for everything.
>massive reductions in corporate tax
>massive reductions in corporate regulations.
>many many more of the same vein.

This started a massive economic recovery from about 1995 onward. Republicans in the US could only ever dream about doing most of these things, and socialists in America will never admit that modern swedish "socialism" only works because of the substantive free-market reforms they put in place in the 1990's - no they will tell you Sweden is great because of socialism alone.

>Texas turning red.

Lol no. Exit pols tell us 40% of hispanics in Texas vote Republican. The state has a purple hint these days because Cruz is a broken candidate, not because there is a political shift. Consider for a second that Abbott won in an absolute landslide.

Strawman more you stupid spastic

My English not being good doesn't make your opinion any less of that of a Muslim loving nigger retard

American 56% loving the Nazis is great, it just shows how fucking retarded you dumb cunts are
As I say, carry in supporting a group that genocides whites, hates Christianity and saw many strong connections and parallels with shitskin Islamists, the group that destroyed Europe, made it a crippled joke that had to rely on imported foreign labour because her own sons had died because of autistic kraut ambitions of killing white people

zoomers are breddy based tho
have you seen the polls

Oy vey, stop noticing things, goy!

I was literally not criticizing your English. Learn to organize your thoughts.

Learn about the subject on which you speak ignorant fuck

>who cares about demographics? Family values don’t stop at the Rio Grande! We need to refresh America with new blood, white Americans just don’t want to work

Attached: 0B950A5F-9414-41E1-83DD-74AC55F887F2.jpg (750x322, 50K)

Yugoslavia had OK rights. Not good, but OK. You could easily own SKS/AK and at least half of licenses issued were carry licenses. But all rights that aren't awesome rights are shit rights.

Attached: 0000f628_medium[1].jpg (639x426, 74K)

>Literally not at all what I said
Jow Forums please.

Anybody who can provide everything you want has the ability to take away everything you have.

Communism and capitalism are both about the rule of a small financial class, attained through different means.
They pretend to be ennemies (see above as to why) until somebody comes with an alternative and then they show their true face.

Cousin?

Yugoslavia was also communist mostly in name. Like every other semi successful commie country, they were only as successful as they were willing to stray from communist doctrine.

>Communism and capitalism are both about the rule of a small financial class
Communism is about the means of production being owned by those who produce. Capitalism is about the means of production being owned by those who provide capital.

One of these works.

Works until the final stage, then you’ll wonder which of the two you’re living in.

Not that guy, but bolt rifles are restricted depending on caliber, you can also get shotguns, handguns, and revolvers. You also can't modify anything, which I believe includes putting a scope on your rifle. Calling Cuba a pro gun rights country is laughable.
t. actual cuban

Kill Castro's son. You may have to travel to Canada.

Meh, I don't hate Castro, nor his family. Most Cuban leaders before him were worse, and for what it is worth he did stabilize Cuba. What I really hate are fake Cubans going basically going "we wuz kangs", acting as if Castro ruined that shit for them, but paradoxically voting blue. One could make the case that Castro intended to make Cuba socialist, but was pushed into communism by allying with the USSR, which he had to do because the USA was giving him mean looks over taking down their puppet government, but most Cubans and those of Cuban descent disagree with the basic principles of this nation, like the 2nd, and there is no defense for that.

Good assessment

>2A is a pretty fucking defining part of America, so I doubt it would go anywhere.
I'm from Maryland and I can tell you personally that you'd be fucking shocked to see how quickly most people will turn around and gobble down the boot the absolute femtosecond the government decides that something is illegal for whatever reason.

Attached: 1494627806408.jpg (406x364, 118K)

Are you retarded
Go ahead and tell me right now what USSR stands for
Do you spastics not actually know what communism and socialism are?

And the People's Republic of China, is most certainly a Republic, and popular with it's peoples. The USSR was a one party nation, just like Cuba, that party being the communist party. Are you such a child that you believe things are what they are called, always?

>And the People's Republic of China, is most certainly a Republic, and popular with it's peoples.

Attached: 1560768333449.png (363x276, 9K)

Did you read the rest of the post? That was clearly sarcasm.

And you think the Communist party is so because it is called communist
Look up the definitions of the words you utterly retarded sprog, the means of production was owned by the state, and the division between the state and the populace of said state was still clear, ergo, they are SOCIALIST
Have you even bothered to read their dire philosophies, or do you get your information from the knife and spork board on a Korean basket weaving forum?

>the means of production was owned by the state, and the division between the state and the populace of said state was still clear, ergo, they are SOCIALIST
wat

They lack private property, but the stop gap before communism is socialism, they never claim to have achieved communism, which is why all power goes to the state itself, not everyone was a party member, and the party members themselves were far from equal
Therefore it is socialist, communism is just a fucking retarded fantasy ideal

Thats a pretty semantic and theoretical argument that you are making.

It is the technical and objective overview of the definitions
Just because the words have been raped to death through misuse (see liberal) doesn't mean the people using it wrong are suddenly correct, it just means a lot of people use the words wrong

Perhaps I should sate your autism and say "authoritarian-socialist nations that are ruled by professed communists" instead of communist nations. There, are you happy now? Btw my captcha just said to pick out the palm trees, perhaps you should talk to whoever names that because palm TREES are not actual trees, they are plants.

The way I see it is that you are saying "Its not Cancer X, its actually Cancer Y".

Either way its cancer.

>Fucking autists using the language correctly!!!

>ha! You arent obsessed with semantics!

Actually HIV and AIDs would have been a better comparison
Not sure why it's gotten everyones panties in a twist, what's wrong with actually understanding what the fuck you're talking about

>Ha! You understand the words you use!

>what's wrong with actually understanding what the fuck you're talking about
Because its minutiae that doesnt add anything to the substantive conversation.

Language evolves, if you want to be autistic about it go to France or something, they have a literal organization that regulates their language. Why slow down communication when you are being understood clearly, either way?

Good to know there are more Huezilians on the board.
And yeah... After the election I've even picked the pistol I wanted to purchase. Fuck those religious bastards at the goverment.

Except you could fucking easily Google the definitions yourselves right now rather than having a bitch fit at me and excusing a lack of understanding of the words you use
If you want I'll start calling liberal western democratic governments facist even though they're obviously not, because language evolves!

>liberal western democratic governments
>democratic
Don't you fucking dare, you know damn well the only true democracy died with the ancient greeks, there will be a special place in hell for you if you follow the common lingo and call whatever country a democracy!!

Attached: 20170115_114621.jpg (3024x3024, 3.19M)

There's many different types of democracy, the only notable direct democracy that comes to mind would be ancient Athens yes, but that is a direct democracy where all eligible citizens (very important as this also plays in to most democracies through history) had equal political power
That doesn't mean other democracies aren't democratic though friend, they are just no direct (which is a no brainer as how the fuck would that work outside of a city state from an era with a tiny population and large portions of the populace being restricted from voting?)

>Just because the words have been raped to death through misuse (see liberal) doesn't mean the people using it wrong are suddenly correct, it just means a lot of people use the words wrong
This is correct.

Attached: 863c0e8429e89313070e5e10d77d1c45e9cf63ee3309efed44cb2a9e8fe73f2b.jpg (1200x640, 128K)

Direct democracy is also the first and only true democracy. All "democracies" that came after aren't true democracies and I implore you to specify exactly what kind of democracy they are when talking about any country. You gain nothing by being overly semantic, if I was like this I would waste so much time by having to call Cuba a democratic nation, and then having to explain to people that yes, it is democratic because you can vote for most of your leaders in Cuba (although those leaders are all part of the same party). Life is too short. In the same sense, I do not care to waste time on explaining that it is not true communism just because it differs slightly from Marx's ideal. Are they really crosswalks if they are not crossed? Should they not be called acrosswalks, since you use them to walk across a street? Fucking captcha.