Who would command EU aircraft carrier groups?

We have 450 military aircraft, yes. We have used them against Serbia, in Afghanistan, Syria, Chad etc.

A German tank unit was forced to use broomsticks as mock weapons during a 2015 Nato exercise lol

I fucking hate Merkel. P.S.-

>Greeks
>straight

No, ramps are a British invention. The idea is to build successor carriers to the nuclear powered French Charles de Gaulle, which uses steam catapults like America’s carriers.

Attached: 6C38EFEC-1031-41EA-A4DB-60594ACBFAA2.jpg (1660x935, 600K)

Yes, because there is paperwork to fill out to get weapons with ammo shipped through Europe. And the NATO exercise didn’t require live action firing. The sticks were mounted as a joke, but it made the news.

The sticks weren’t used because the light army vehicles didn’t have MGs.

probably not
frogs use catobar

Gotta admit as a displaced bong the ramp is fucking weak

Couldnt we curb a few fatimas weekly bennie to make a cool one

>The EU Commission president?

The steady hand of Commissar Merkel

Post the link dude

>OPs never change

>joint aircraft carrier

Yeah, that's not going to work.

Attached: really.png (287x327, 175K)

You aren't allowed a military krautnigger.

probably UK Naval officers considering the only other naval power in europe is italy and lol

Nah my man. France is rising again to Napoleanic heights, and they will curtail any cuck German ambitions. And that doesnt even touch on Russia, which is desperately trying to stave off its destructions in its twilight years.

ukdefencejournal.org.uk/germany-proposes-european-aircraft-carrier/

>UK
UK wont even be a anything but a glorified US puppet once Brexit is done. Of course it can rise again (and untethered to the shitshow that is the EU it will). But in the short run it is a joke.

Norway

without GB, it would probably italy or france

Why does that car have two brake pedals?

What is the general consensus on the german military on Germany, hanz? Do people still try to label them as nazis or dangerous? Or is there general pride in it?

Why isn't Europe an official protectorate of the US yet?

We can have a very large, nuke and carrier military by using the EU as a front. Our lawyers cleared this.

nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/08/why-germany-is-talking-about-getting-its-own-nuclear-weapons.html

And it’s an option which can move ahead without Washington. Remarkably absent from the German nuclear debate were voices saying this is all overblown, Trump will be gone, the Americans will be back, everything is fine. Americans are still telling each other that, including very prominent senators from both parties. But our European allies are not. The cumulative weight of bad faith and bad policy has collapsed trust that, while imperfect all around, had lasted seven decades. “Germany can no longer rely on the protection of the United States,” says the introduction to the English-language version of Hacke’s article. How stunning is it that no one has even tried to argue the point?

“We Europeans have to look out for ourselves more,” said the German foreign minister last week, echoing his boss the German chancellor as well as his neighbors in Brussels and Paris. While dreams of strategic independence are on the rise among European intellectuals, plain old anti-Americanism is on the rise among European peoples. Six months ago, more than two-thirds of Americans said relations with Germany were good, but more than half of Germans begged to differ. And that was before Trump imposed economic sanctions, dressed Merkel down at a NATO breakfast, and reportedly threw Starburst candy at her in a G-7 economic forum. That’s not usually how you treat a leader whose country is thinking about getting its own nuclear weapon.

Attached: 0382A342-96E3-46D2-BBEA-20D51D4B15C5.jpg (1463x1463, 414K)

why not germany?
theyre the ones paying for it most likely

One is for the small breaking and the other is for the big breaking.

Paid for by Germany, no doubt.
I'd like to bantz you about our carriers but ours are just auxiliaries for the US Navy.

>EU military
hahahahahahahaha

Germans have no opinions. We have a military because it is our duty to have one. We raise our military spending because it is our NATO duty.

>shell out billions for aircraft carriers
>skimp out on catapult
>skimp out on nuclear reactor
>only 2 carriers, maintenance schedules is going to fuck operational availability
talk about hamstringing yourself

Attached: 1546416977425.jpg (581x767, 92K)

Good. Pay your own Bills and defend your own borders and trade routes.

because their navy is smaller

Why would a supposed defensive Army need aircraft carriers?

Attached: 318E080F-319D-40D8-8AF5-93EECB3CF9D8.gif (295x211, 1.73M)

against ebul ruskies ofc

I think it is kind of what they are proposing. If we spend 1.5% of GDP on the military that’s 70 billion dollars. It is a lot of money. It has to go somewhere.

Larger refugee capacity

>defensive army

come again?

Attached: 64A02FAB-58CA-4ACF-A3BD-7776C8F124BD.png (700x394, 262K)

Carriers are swimming deathtraps and as obsolete as battleships were in the 40's.

Only good for bullying sandpeople and you don't need a 5 billion penis enlargement for that.

As I've said, they are designed as support for the US Navy.

Attached: SmartSelect_20190714-222120_Chrome.jpg (916x1493, 425K)

would make sense to have operational aircraft's first
i am no politician tho

Attached: abf81e13d0002f8c14741a6952390b49.jpg (356x942, 77K)

No

Germany is banned by the Versailles treaty from possessing Aircraft carriers. It's obvious what a "European" aircraft carrier would mean. This must not be allowed to happen.

>Only good for bullying sandpeople and you don't need a 5 billion penis enlargement for that.

There are 3 reasons for a military

1. Stuff at home, lowering unemployment, supporting heavy industry, helpin case of catastrophies

2. run off the mill war deployments, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya etc. - meddling just because you want to project power and gain influence

3. real adversary psychology - showing them they can!t fuck with you in your sphere of influence

Aircraft carriers are important mostly for 2. but also for 3.

Absolute BS. The only applicable restriction for us is the 4 plus 2 agreement from 1991 which restricts our active troop numbers to 475,000.

Does anyone ever complain about all the territory that was stolen from you?

>NATO duty
You refuse to meet the standard of which you agreed upon when entering the UN. kys

You aren't allowed to do that.

Are the public privately annoyed about it at all?

Israel of course. We gotta protect six million criminals, I mean Jews.

You have maybe 10 that can get airborne and fight right now tops.

Holy shit. This is like a sad and boring game of Civ 4 where you know every other nation has already lost yet still they are trying to 'build' shit to challenge you.

Please world NEVER allow for the germany to arm again on this planet or any other planet...think of the jews

Attached: 1560455431910.jpg (1490x990, 189K)

With all due respect, UKanon, I think the best support for the US Navy would be at least ONE carrier with the same capabilities as a US carrier from 50 years ago.

we can resurrect Erich Raeder and have him get the German surface fleet sunk again

Because only carrier groups counter other carrier groups and the eternal ZOG aggressor has 10 of them, so it is in the best interest of every major power to have a few just in case one day civilians and children start getting gassed by their own government for no logical reason

It would only be used to ferry migrants into Europe and bully member states that don't take them, so probably under a leadership of a French nigger or arabic German

Attached: 52508204_2085120398269970_6479422595945904038_n.jpg (923x713, 57K)

There we go. It's going to be France isn't it, because only France and UK have this kind of strength. Only France has the nuclear capability as well because Merkel stopped nuclear in Germany after Japan so... France.

All I know is what's in my image.

Any carrier capable?

Ultimately, the US navy.

I propose we partition and de-industrialize Germany once and for all

Merkel herself

Isn’t it obvious who the captain would be?

Attached: 8DC92563-376F-4061-83B3-2C564A658ABF.gif (335x234, 1.75M)

Your own nukes ? You mean french nukes, right ? And the french seat at the United Nations Security Council.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aachen_Treaty#Critique

Attached: 1563103702506.jpg (2048x1365, 442K)

> March 11, 2019

We already said no, french people are the only europeans allowed to have a carrier

>shit tier anime
so sad seeing shit anime being market so hard

Because France has land all over the globe

Well done Pierre, seems like we're all finding our power again. Put the Hun back in his box.

A diverse group of women.

Yes. Here is a pic of one of their newest prototypes.

Attached: rooftop.jpg (800x445, 103K)

The more you push against the German people the sooner we get another Hitler.

How often does the world need to learn this before it strikes against globalists instead of their puppets?

Attached: OMF.jpg (228x250, 29K)

Don't forget France and Germany are going to develop the first gen 6 fighter... *kof**kof*

So you did try to do one thing, but failed at that. And now instead of fixing that. You take pride in meme ramp.

Get fucked, Muhammad. We're not going to allow a Muslim country like Germany to get nukes and start WW3.

Attached: images (5)(1).jpg (272x185, 6K)

Reminder us Serbs fought the Clintons directly before it was cool.

I'm pretty sure that Pol wants another Hitler in Germany. If only for the bants. Weren't some Nazi Mages on X trying to open up a etheric portal last month to bring back Hitler from the Guf. Just saying.

>Who would command EU aircraft carrier groups?

How is this not obvious to everyone here

Alle heil Großadmiral Kemp
Großadmiral der Roastflotte
Was sind unsere Befehle?
Zu mehr Flüchtlinge nach Europa schicken!
Jawohl Großadmiral!

Attached: captain_pia_klemp_0.jpg (955x500, 74K)

Who is that nebulous real adversary?

Admiral Abdul

Serbian niggers should be exterminated for causing this entire mess in the first place

imagine being so poor that you have to timeshare an aircraft carrier.

Attached: America compensating.png (757x545, 217K)

Serbs are just a scapegoat for the globalist elite you bluepilled potato faggot

This.
Carriers are pointless since 1950s .massive waste of money

You.

Imagine how many mudslims can fit on that shit. hundreds square meters platform with jets to look fro drowning nigger on mediterranean sea

"And with this single aircraft carrier we will dule tgese seas once more! Take that you filthy Yanks!

Attached: 20190714_171522.jpg (2543x1060, 511K)

Will it have a ramp?

Only bouncy csatle

*Castle

Merkel cant die soon enough

Who would command EU aircraft carrier groups?
>The EU Commission president?
No, Greece.

We have super carriers. I think your carriers technically count as super carriers but operationally they’re more like our amphibious assault ships. You and the French will be the only European countries to be able to project any level of conventional naval power.