Friend just showed me this, I don't normally use this board but I think I'd get banned if I posted it anywhere else.
Why are humans not divided into subspecies? Am I a disgusting racist for even asking?
Friend just showed me this, I don't normally use this board but I think I'd get banned if I posted it anywhere else.
Why are humans not divided into subspecies? Am I a disgusting racist for even asking?
Other urls found in this thread:
We are. It's just bad if you point it out.
It’s 100% true but don’t you dare say it out loud ever
when every person that looks a little different from the norm is a new race
Why do you post this exact same shit every day?
WTF THOSE EYES YOU FUCKING FAGGOT
It's 100% the truth. Although there is one bagel loving subspecies that is noticeably missing.
>pic related
You've taken the race realism pill.
Congratulations.
Also, welcome to Jow Forums you will be here forever.
Your answer OP.
post new human races
>Dey just look different n sheeit
bump for redpills on race
We let women have a say in what is deemed appropriate for society. We've been in a downward spiral ever since.
there is a new species here
Shut up Jew
Amazing you were convinced after one image of the extremes of human phenotypes and fake Kpop star?
this man was very accomplished so by law his birth certificate was changed to state he was a white man
a new species, a rare breed. the black white man.
Wh*toids should be extinct.
Compared to the crows it seems pretty reasonable.
Race is analogous to subspecies. Subspecies are the same species, just separated by geographic location.
What is your point in stating this obvious fact? Is it something the left preaches (that we all belong to one race)?
We all belong to the same species tho - Homo sapiens.
here is another race of man
some think he is a wild animal but that is not true, his temperment is quite tame.
Leaf, have you ever heard of genetics. I know it doesn't fit your ideology and everyone on Tumblr told you race doesn't exist but genetics is real and genetic patterns can be identified between groups of people.
Kill yourself summer
Evolution is a fake pseudoscientific theory!
All that roo-rah about genus, venus, specis, philo and whatever else made up words those morons use can be ignored 100%.
This goes for Humans and animals alike.
Since we are all descending from Adam and eve there is no point in being racist, you are just hating your (very distant) relatives in the end.
We have completely different and contradictory rules for animals and humans when it comes to categorising them.
Take the example of the ruddy duck in the uk. An invasive species from America. A handful escaped from private collections into the wild in the 1950s and by the early 2000s numbered in the tens of thousands.
They didn't not drive other birds out or push any other species to extinct by competing with them. But numbers of a very similar bird - white tailed duck - did indeed seem to be going down as the ruddy duck numbers went up. The problem? The ruddy duck was sexually compatible with the white tailed duck and produced perfectly fertile offspring. They were also much more agressive and sexually promiscuous than the white tailed duck. This meant the white tailed duck essentially was being bred out of existence by this new invasive species. They were literally cucking the native ducks.
Did the wildlife experts say this was simply a case of evolution or an example of the new more connected era of life? No they shot tens of thousands of ruddy ducks to bits and reduced the 'invasive' birds back to a handful found and contained in one lake. It was vital to 'save the native population'.
I wonder what their thoughts on mass migration are.
>Am I a disgusting racist for even asking?
You're a disgusting racist for not using the African American-inclusive term "aksing" instead of the white privileged, eurocentric term "asking".
My point is that if we continue to perpetuate the lie that race is a social construct, we do so at our own peril.
>Am I a disgusting racist for even asking?
Only if you're white. Wear the badge proudly.
Problem is we shouldn't use a special term for subspecies in humans such as 'race' we should call it as it is, subspecies, the left doesn't even acknowledge the existence of race and say stuff like this, taken from the ironically named """rationalwiki"""
>Of course genetic correlations exist which can pinpoint someone's geographical ancestry, but as Marks asks: "What is unclear is what this has to do with race"
are you really trying to act smart while pretending there are only 4 main groups?
That memeflag post is severely retarded. SEVERELY.
What the fuck
Machado has white admixture, blacks can't grow beards like that
Got me with them eyes. lol
>subspecies
Different species.
I don't like this new species. HANS!
>Different species
I stand corrected. Nasty typo there, I must still need more coffee this morning.
This picture is stupid. All those people would look the same for a bird. As a child i couldn watch asian movies becouse actors look same for me, but now i can see differences and personalities in asian faces.
Good analogy
De iq he racist !!! me boi smart
Is this bait?
Humans were divided into subspecies until jews got chased out of Europe and invaded US where they invaded sciences trough nepotism.
I literally don’t understand posts like this. Humans are not crows. They’ve very little to no genetic resemblance. It’s intellectually dishonest to compare two things on face value when they’re in fact profoundly different.
Can someone explain to me why OPs picture isn’t the most cringe pseudoscientific bait ever?
Those are the whitest niggers I’ve ever seen
Because you're retarded and a stupid mutt, literally blind from a lifetime of brainwashing and shitty mutt genes
the legendary fusion between three distinct races, behold
you style beards you damn idiot.
there are even fertile mule offspring when you cross a donkey and a horse. what kind of argument is that
Irish Traveller, I guess.
Holy shit, xmen is real.
They were until communism became mainstream post war. Now we are all equal or some bullshit.
I just found a true aryan not like soulless europeans
you're damn right it's real
they were only for less than a century when it became bunk science, and today it's made a comeback to combat the hippie ideologies of unity among man, which cannot be in a world that enforces slavery. it's still bunk science though if we want to segregate races what about people of the skinwalker tribe? REPRESENT
The vast majority of mules are sterile dum dum
>that pic
Reminds me of pic related x-files episode.
I'm surprised it ain't bigger. Any place where I can find more about the FST between different populations?
Distant relations
Scalable
Thanks for showing you know nothing about taxonomy.
Reminder that the closest relatives to the (white/yellow) Japanese Ainu people are the (black) inhabitants of the Sentinelese.
Subspecies do exist, but they have little to do with skin color. One black group can be closer genetically to a white group, not through admixture, but through adaptation, than to another black group. Therefore, we must classify by genes, and not by skin color.
Feel it in the bones...
This thread is a perfect example of why leafs should be range banned. This idiot thought of the most retarded non-sense ''argument'' possible and he thinks he is so clever he has to spam the same non-argument over and over. This creature thinks that it is clever. It thinks it has made a point.
It thinks that comparing weird looking people to clearly distinct races means...something. You can't tell a person belongs to the nigger race because some niggers have albanism and just look like pale niggers. You can't tell someone is white because they have more hair than normal. That's the ''argument'' the eternal leaf is so proud of that he is going to post the same post for the next few hours. The non-argument is so retarded that a sane person can't even make sense of it.
>a new species, a rare breed. the black white man.
otherwise known as "blacks after 2 generations of extreme eugenics"
Uhhh ...
Because DAS RAYCISS MFUGGA GIBS ME WELFARE N DEM PROGRAMZ N SHEEEIT
the weak should fear the strong
I have to live with these creatures.
here we clearly DO consider different races separate sub species
for example niggers
its bestiality if you have intercourse with one
then there are kikes
they are children of the devil
and there are all sorts of shitskins like the sand niggers and the streetshitters
each group exhibits behavior patterns that distinguish it from the others, its not just skin color of facial features
Jews are a hybrid between neanderthals and humans. We humans used to hunt and eradicate neanderthals from the dawn of time till 1945, but then suddenly stopped.
We can't categorize humans into subspecies because inevitably questions will arise which species is more social, which one is more aggressive or intelligent and so on. That's probably why they are using the term race as a broad distinction.
because they happen to have uneven chromosome numbers. other crosses with even numbers produce normal fertile offspring
Destroy this photo immediately please
if the destruction of european races is not the goal then can anyone explain why every single white country is being flooded with non whites?
its as if there is a plan (kalergi plan) to destroy the minority
Retard, see A group such as "Afroid" is totally meaningless because Africa is an entire continent. Same with "Euroid". There are subspecies, but not along continental lines.
The biggest issue is where do you draw the line? Easiest to do with Africans vs everyone else, but the other races are sort of on a continuum and blend into each other (heck, even Abos are closer genetically to everyone than Africans)
*blocks your path*
well if the skulls are to scale this means that the German is the one with the biggest skull and thus the biggest brain
Mmmyeah ... OK ... That's fine ...
Can you point me to examples of fertile mules? Because horses have 64 chromosomes and donkeys 62, and the resulting offspring, Mules, have 63 and cannot reproduce.
What about an African tribe which is closer to Europeans (not through admixture, but purely ancestrally) than to another African tribe? Under this system of classification this tribe will still be in an Afroid group simply because of geographic location.
Europeans literally have more neantherdal dna than jews/middle-easterns, what are you talking about.
>talking out your ass
All male mules are sterile. The vast majority of females are sterile. In fact, in 500 years, there are only 60 documented cases of female mules successfully having children. So 99.999999% of mules are sterile dum dum
Pygmies prove my point! Compare them to the Nilotes and you'll see that an Afroid group makes no sense, since these two groups are as different as Swedes and Chinamen.
si si si si si
>questions will arise which species is more social, which one is more aggressive or intelligent and so on
We already know the answers
>repeating my post
okay user. you now posted that mules have UNEVEN chromosome numbers like i wrote IN MY POST. again.
gg
Take THIS ...
do you want to explain how bone marrow transplants occur in nature? or when they occur at all?
>long dong quan initimidates manlet
jesus christ the influx of retard niggers. man man man
Well, I just call them African because they primarily live there you autists
Then they get grouped with Europeans, simple
Drawing a line is never an issue. It's only an issue when people with an agenda want to make it an issue.
Where's the line between a puddle an a lake? Where's the line between a tree and a forest? Where's the line between a fetus and a baby? Where's the line between yellow and green visible light?
Just because there's something inbetween doesn't make it hard to make a distinction between the two. You don't need to map the entire human genotype to see with your own eyes that someone from Africa is african or someone from Asia is asian. If they're some kind of a mutt mix then they're a mutt. There is nothing complicated about this.