So Jow Forums considers Asians alright because they had good civilisations too ?But you do realise so did a lot of other people right? Middle east had the first civilisations and has been stage to most of them and India also had civilisation before east Asians, hell most of Asian civilisation is even based off India because of Buddhism, meditation, architecture and stuff
So Jow Forums considers Asians alright because they had good civilisations too ?But...
India also had civilisation before east Asians, hell most of Asian civilisation is even based off India because of Buddhism,
My people are glorified librarians who've forgotten the true meaning of the knowledge they propagate. They merely recite without understanding. Those who discovered the truths of the universe branched out and the ones who were glorified storage devices remained in India.
Our Aryan blood has long fallen asleep.
weebcelism is due to anime and JAV porn, which are eastern degeneracy, but function as eastern propaganda in the west for virginal manchildren
Middle East had civilizations when it was white. Then the entire region got shitted up with subhuman Arab/negroid genes
ehhhh not exactly.... It was never white, less arab yea but never white
is even based off India because of Buddhism
Buddhism was massively influenced by Platonic philosophy and the Indo-Greek people. Specifically the "Yona" who are in fact Ionians who colonized the indo-greek kingdoms, which existed for 400-600 years in the region during the development of buddhism.
Buddhism is not a creation of india, it is a syncretism of Greek and East Asian Philosophy, which the Emperor Ashoka adopted and forced on the indians who themselves had no great affinity for it before the Greek-influenced emperor forced it onto everyone.
Literally Ashoka sent a greek buddhist monk to spread buddhism to India. Unfortunately people like to think of Buddhism as this exotic foreign religion, when really its the syncretism of Ancient Greek and East Asian philosophy.
Buddha was Aryan not some Pajeet
As was Ashoka, and most of the monks who he sent to spread buddhism.
We wuz Buddha and shit
Jow Forums has a number of views on this ranging from saying that no other place actually had good civilizations and were all savages to saying that all the places that did undeniably have good civilizations were secretly white people, we wuz mohammeds we wuz shahs we wuz buddhas we wuz brahmans, we wuz even kikes, we wuz even incas
"Bro Ashoka and the Mauryan Empire were totally pajeets, that's why their capital palace was built using Greco-Persian designs common to the region at the time of Alexander"
Imagine not knowing anything about what Europeans were doing East of the Euphrates during the time of Rome.
we wuz even incas
I knew it
absolute retard dont talk to me
Yes, ignore the fact that all mainstream history acknowledges that ancient Greeks played a major role in the development and spread of Buddhism, and of the Mauryan Empire. Instead cling to bullshit 1960s hippy narratives of Buddhism as a total foreign exotic eastern tradition with no syncretisms with western philosophy and religion, architecture etc etc...
This isn't some fringe website, mainstream pozzed wiki even acknowledges (as do all experts on the matter) that Greeks and Greek philosophy, art, etc... played a major role in buddhisms development and spread.
Yeah, I guess some white people must have just replaced all the REAL ruins at Pataliputra with ones that had Greek architectural elements.
coping this hard.
keep it hush hush we don't want to embarrass the natives even further
Chill out nerd
Don't trust mainstream speculations on these matters. A lot is completely fictionalized. The "official" narrative was forced down our throats during the age of "colonial" expansion. There were civilizations around the globe going back before the main landmass even split apart to form the continents we observe today. That's how we have legends about a time before there was a moon. Because there was a time when people were alive before we even had our moon.
Saying that this or that place is the "origin" of one myth or another isn't accurate, mainly because of a false timeline that is being referenced. These accounts were a shared experience by people around the globe, because the cataclysms were that catastrophic.
they literally did some art had nothing else to do with Buddhism than that and buddas time was before them
The Middle East has been killing off intellectuals and inbreeding generation after generation under the tutelage of Islam. They aren’t what they were.
Middle east had the first civilisations
Buddhism was a totally new tradition for its time
India gave buddhism not just to East asia, the entire subcontinent of asia, till Iran. You can see swastika in certain mosques. It became shit after mongol invasions and its rape babies born
most of Asian civilisation is even based off India because of Buddhism
buddism came from hinduism
and most south asian architecture is post greek invasion