Climate deniers are /x/ tier

>he thinks it's a strawman
>he thinks people don't LITERALLY believe this
oh, you sweet summer child.

>there's a secret global cabal of thousands of politicians and scientists whose goal is to fuck you in the ass with taxes and import niggers
>source: dude trust me
it was great considering there were 250 replies and literally 0 sources were post.

>thus there is a secret global cabal of thousands of politicians and scientists whose goal is to fuck you in the ass with taxes and import niggers

>I’ve flown here today on my private jet to warn you all about the terrible risks that CO2 emissions pose to our planet

okey-dokey

there is no increase in extreme weather, like hurricans ....

Attached: frequency_12months_2018-09-30_with_trendlines.png (2409x1241, 295K)

there is no increase in world wide drought ...

Attached: Fraction_of_the_Globe_in_Drought_1982-2012_fig5c.png (1260x735, 492K)

>there's a secret global cabal of thousands of politicians and scientists whose goal is to fuck you in the ass with taxes and import niggers
>source: dude trust me

Climate change believers are proof that most of the world is stupid and easy prey to propaganda
The day will come when you will deny you believed this shit

youtube.com/watch?v=oYhCQv5tNsQ

>science is a democracy
>most (((scientists))) agree, so it must be true

Attached: asdf.png (300x330, 14K)

>there's a secret global cabal of thousands of politicians and scientists whose goal is to fuck you in the ass with taxes and import niggers
>source: dude trust me

>they think these posts actually count as a rebuttal to this
>they will never, ever provide a source

learn about the actual, non propagandized climate science here:

All about sea level rise
sealevel.info

Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), Publishes large and comprehensive reports that challenge those by the “IPCC”:
climatechangereconsidered.org/

The world’s most viewed blog on climate science, “Watts Up With That”, by Anthony Watts:
wattsupwiththat.com/

A very good collection of 100’s of skeptic papers:
notrickszone.com/

Studies on the medieval warm period:
researchgate.net/project/Mapping-the-Medieval-Climate-Anomaly

A comprehensive and neutral collection of climate data:
climate4you.com/

David MacKay, “Reality check on renewables” :
www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0W1ZZYIV8o

R. Lindzen, No alarmism is justified:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONT53TlXv5A

Patrick Moore, “Greenpeace co-founder: CO2 is wholly beneficial” :
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCrkqLaYjnc

Roy Spencer, Alarmist Gavin Schmidt is scared of a debate:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYKggC5VOzA

Will Happer, Technical details on how CO2 IR absorption works:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebYAbhr7J38

Nir Shaviv, How the sun and cosmic rays influence climate 1:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yI49suiDLEg

Henrik Svensmark, How the sun and cosmic rays influence climate 2:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AdAV3Va9Mg

Murry Salby, a different view of the CO2 cycle, even controversial among skeptics, but astonishing if correct:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCya4LilBZ8

Attached: somthing_something_climatechange.jpg (623x394, 52K)

Stop making these threads noone cares

Also this guy is right

>secret global cabal
>a straw man argument in the first sentence
/thread

then provide a source dumbfuck and i will

>there's a secret global cabal
It isn't even that secret anymore.

>he thinks it's a strawman
>he thinks people don't LITERALLY believe this
oh, you sweet summer child.

Remember when the "Hole in the Ozone layer" was gonna burn us up like ants under a Microscope?

Good times.

just posted multiple ones
Do you just hide every reply that doesnt jerk your doomsday boner?

case in point: is it still a strawman now, dumbass?

none of these """sources""" actually give any evidence of scientists falsifying data at the behest of politicians you utter dumbfuck. you cant just link anything remotely climate related and say it's a source.

>being fucked in the ass with taxes and imported niggers is affecting all western nations at the same time by coincidence

No one denies the climate is changing
>strawmanning this hard

We just had this thread 4 hours ago.

see and you will continue to have it for as long as people hold this moronic, flat earth tier belief.

>this doesnt confirm that i am right therefore this is not legit
>also there is no legit evidence for your claims therefore i am right

Go off yourself
But maybe look up Climategate and how the hockeystick graph came into being before you do

>therefore there's a secret global cabal of thousands of politicians and scientists whose goal is to fuck you in the ass with taxes and import niggers
>it just like, makes sense, man

The spam continues

let's take a look at some of the """sources""" that you are claiming actually show scientists purposefully falsified data.

>Studies on the medieval warm period
>A comprehensive and neutral collection of climate data
>David MacKay, “Reality check on renewables”

yeah you are one disingenuous motherfucker

>haha there are no conspiracies
All that you have is an argument from incredulity. Here's another one for you. Pretty much everything you see in media is a hoax. Climate change is just one of those hoaxes.

the failure to ever post a source continues

See what? When's the last time you saw someone on Jow Forums deny the climate is changing? How is this not a strawman?

There doesnt have to be a secret cabal you fucking mongoloid
Just look at the opposing sides and their arguments and theorys and tell me anything is settled here
Its being politicised and falsly represented and thats a fact
There does not need to be a big conspiracy around it

false. there are obviously conspiracies. how do I know? because evidence of them exists

show me the evidence of this conspiracy. there fucking is none. you're literally guilty of argument from incredulity yourself, except for the inverse argument.

>haha, only ridiculous people think there are NO conspiracies
1. i didn't say that
2. you're a hypocritical retard who believes things without evidence

quote the post i made where i ever accused people of saying the climate wasn't changing you fucking retard

Holy shit, he can read.

>Shilling for government and corporate control continues
This nigger infested planet can die before you receive a cent in carbon tax or gain control via "climate legislation". Your hysterics continue

>There doesnt have to be a secret cabal you fucking mongoloid
>There does not need to be a big conspiracy around it
when did i say there NEEDS to be a conspiracy? no fucking shit there doesn't NEED to be a conspiracy why are you telling ME this? go tell the people who actually believe in the conspiracy you retard

The first two words in the title of your thread you troglodyte.
>climate deniers

quote the post where i ever said i wanted that.

I wish it was a secret cabal. It's just an excuse to raise taxes and keep you from questioning where the money go (pro tip not climate change fight)

bitchute.com/video/5850CtO17oob/

youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

Jesus fucking christ you just keep moving the goalposts until people get tired and leave the discussion

Just keep sperging out on Jow Forums about this for a few more days until you find the next shit to obsess sbout
Autists are fucking tireing

>climate denier means you think the climate isn't changing
disingenuous reaching. nice try kike

didnt move the goalpost at all. spewing random logical fallacies that don't apply at all does not make you sound smart

post a source or fuck off

right back at you

yes.
are you low IQ or coping?

>no u
>this is the level of discourse deniers are on

Attached: download.jpg (231x218, 12K)

MOOOODS
delete these useless shit threads

Whether or not man-made climate change is real is largely irrelevant. The (((elites))) do not care about the climate. It's just another tool for white genocide. By telling white people do not have children and to make them feel guilty for existing, while they bring in dark migrants by the bucket-load because of "low birth rates". White people are literally the only industrialized people on the planet who have demonstrated a will to preserve the environment. India and China pollute far, far more and nobody cares.

the two options - mass delusion and conspiracy - do not exclude each other, in the case of the climate hysteria, they complement each other.
the majority of people and contemporary scientists have been wrong before:

Children’s Crusade
Donation of Constantin
Kopernikus
Bruno Giordano
Galileo
Semmelweis
Bloodletting
Darwinism / Evolution
Tongue map
Food Pyramid
all forms of Religion

and there were plenty of real, now exposed conspiracies:

“Kids for cash” scandal 2008
Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis
“Church of Scientology” was found guilty of “criminal conspiracy”
VW emissions “scandal” (technically also a conspiracy)
Elite pedophile networks. (“Marc Dutroux”, “Jimmy Savile”, Epstein )

us government conspiracies:
Operation Paperclip
Operation Ajax
Project MKUltra
Operation Northwoods
Gulf of Tonkin incident
Phoenix Program
COINTELPRO
Iran Contra Affair
The “incubator lie”
Saddam WMDs
Snowden

>MOOOODS SAVE ME I CANT PROVIDE A SOURCE TO JUSTIFY MY SHIT BELIEFS
HAHAAHAHAH

Attached: 2ec.png (600x580, 572K)

>there is no conspiracy haha retards
No there doesnt need to be
>bb-but im still right you dont post sorces haha
Thai dude posts like 15 sorces with alternatives to the CO2 theory
>omg you are so stupid there is no conspiracy or secret cabal
There does not need to be
>omg you are so dumb post sorces

Repeat until forever

>didnt move goalposts at all

40 years of sky is falling tier "the world is going to melt" or "the world is going to freeze" and 20 years of increasing pressure from political powers to "do something about this" in the form of paying taxes. You don't have to catch people red handed to realize that something is a conspiracy. Global Cooling/Global Warming/Climate Change are just an excuse to get the end result that they have been talking about with shit like Agenda 21 for decades.

There is also no proof that temperatures have gone up or down. I don't even use the medieval warm period or any of that ice core pseudo science other "deniers" rely on. There is no way to measure the temperatures or to measure the composition of the atmosphere accurately for the entire earth. You are all brainwashed to believe in science fiction tier magic. How do you believe that they can measure the CO2 in the entire atmosphere? How do you believe that a chunk of ice tells you anything about the atmosphere millions of years ago? Yet you want to act like someone is crazy for not believing such bullshit.

great. what do any of these have to do scientists allegedly falsifying data at the behest of politicians?

shit thread
here is a source
sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/07/190703121407.htm
rt.com/news/464051-finnish-study-no-evidence-warming/
an israeli group made similar research

how many times do i have to say it?

>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
>no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted
no sources of scientists falsifying data have been posted

did it get through your thick skull yet?

What kind of person would have fun doing this?

see >there's a secret global cabal of thousands of politicians and scientists whose goal is to fuck you in the ass with taxes and import niggers
>source: dude trust me

>quote the post where i ever said i wanted that.
"climate deniers are /x/ tier"

You are attempting to push the same hysteria driven end of the world cult agenda of which every major piece of "global warming" legislation leads to greater government and corporate control. You might be a goddamn moron who has bought into the hysteria but not everyone is going to pass your motives off as well meaning care for the environment. KYS you goddamn nigger

climategate
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy

>quote the post where i ever said i wanted that.
>"climate deniers are /x/ tier"
>reaching this hard
disingenuous kike.

You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

>Eight committees investigated the allegations and published reports, finding no evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct.[15]
great source. really proves your position.

How manienth thread is this with the exact same text and topic?

>Patrick Moore, “Greenpeace co-founder

LOL. Did you know he was a shady piece of shit who later found a way to utilize his title to spread literal propaganda?

youtube.com/watch?v=7jWyrbP0TJQ

Here he says glyphosate is safe to drink and gets fucking called out on it.

Gotta love how fucktards like you gather these long and professional looking lists of fucking retards and nobody has the energy to disprove it unless they know better.

>source: dude trust me

a paid shill, an israeli one by the tone of it

THERE DOES NOT NEED TO BE CONSPIRACY AROUND IT
IT MIGHT JUST BE A BIG CIRCLEJERK BETWEEN SCIENTISTS AND POLITICIANS
NOONE HAS TO FALSIFY ANYTHING FOR THAT YOU JUST HAVE TO SUPRESS OPPOSING VIEWS

PLEASE
GET
HELP

how a about you post a source that convincingly proofs there is "catastrophic man-made global warming" ... and do not bring the IPCC reports, they are biased and refuted, in the sources posted here
... I will make it easy for you: name 1 single climate alarmist prediction that has come true!

Attached: greenland_5000.png (1130x927, 155K)

How do you force compliance on China and India?

the eight committees were from the institute itself. Kikepedia is a source something happened, not what is the truth. Take a look at the leaks itself: globalwarming.org/2009/11/25/the-heart-of-climategate–the-“fudge-factor”/

the best part is:
yrloc=[1400,findgen(19)*5.+1904]
valadj=[0.,0.,0.,0.,0.,-0.1,-0.25,-0.3,0.,-0.1,0.3,0.8,1.2,1.7,2.5,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6]*0.75 ; fudge factor

it's in the source code and literally applies negative correction to the temperature data for 1400-1904 and extreme positive adjustment from 1909 to current year.

>autistic refusal to tackle reality
Hi Greta

>Did you know he was a shady piece of shit
that may or may not be so...
but his arguments on climate change are valid, if you disagree, be specific

here you can find plenty of examples of doctored "data": realclimatescience.com

>links a source
>discredits his own source
you can't honestly be this dumb

Attached: 1522629482513s.jpg (247x250, 6K)

Why don't you show me how they determine how much CO2 is in the atmosphere. Why don't you show me how they determine the temperatures for the entire earth. What equipment is used? How does that equipment function? Go ahead and bring that information so that I may laugh.

if scientists aren't falsifying anything then why do so many retards disagree with it?

Attached: bestCorby1 2.png (684x775, 449K)

What do you think happens to climate hucksters who've banked their life on it, if the music stops?

>how a about you post a source that convincingly proofs there is "catastrophic man-made global warming"
quote the post where i ever said this

quote the post where i said anything about compliance from india and china

>there's a secret global cabal of thousands of politicians and scientists whose goal is to fuck you in the ass with taxes and import niggers
>source: dude trust me
>accuses others of denying reality
>has 0 evidence for his beliefs

>therefore there's a secret global cabal of thousands of politicians and scientists whose goal is to fuck you in the ass with taxes and import niggers

how much are they paying you, shill? Hope you didn't use your real name when you signed up for shareblue or you will be trial and sentenced on the day of the rope

>there's a secret global cabal of thousands of politicians and scientists whose goal is to fuck you in the ass with taxes and import niggers
>source: dude trust me

zine be ayn kelba ben zonna

Because climatealarmism is about them saying that something *might* happen
And then a politician picks it up and says it WILL happen
And then a fucking Greta picks it up and says it will happen 10 times worse and we need to pay up and surrender individual rights

Climate science isnt settled and if you would acutally read the links we post you would understand this

You dont tho
You just repeat the same three things for like 3 threads now

why would i need to get paid? im still laughing at how you discredited your own source. deniers are on a completely new level of stupidity.

So you can't provide that. Just double down on argument from incredulity. "how dare you question the scientists and politicians! they good boys!"

>trust career academics and politicians brah, don't be naive

that doesn't explain why people disagree with the scientists. the classical explanation is that the scientists are purposefully falsifying the data cause muh grant money. congratulations if you don't believe that--you're slightly less retarded than the rest of them.

>You just repeat the same three things for like 3 threads now
I'm repeating the same line because I keep seeing the repeating pattern of posts that lack sources.

why would I need to provide a source for a claim I never made and don't believe? no, really. i want to know the answer to this question.

quote the post where i ever said this