Where can I find the pure, unadulterated truth of how and why America was founded?
I don’t trust politicians and I don’t trust media. Where do you go for an unbiased account of historical events? Is history already lost?
Where can I find the pure, unadulterated truth of how and why America was founded?
Other urls found in this thread:
therightstuff.biz
youtube.com
biblegateway.com
redicecreations.com
archive.fo
jonathanwilliamslegionsofsatan1781.blogspot.com
unqualified-reservations.org
youtu.be
m.youtube.com
persistentenlightenment.com
yorkshirefilmarchive.com
fashthenation.com
thefederalistpapers.org
twitter.com
>Where can I find the pure, unadulterated truth of how and why America was founded?
lol. You have to look in the most unlikely of places. Also, they will never say it publicly. You must Feel the truth to understand it. I know the answer and it is the ultimate blackpill for this Green party supporter. The nihilism is strong now. I wish I never got the answer I was looking for.
Q's a good start, to bridge how we got here from where we came.
>Founding fathers were oligarchs creating a revolt for their own benefit
>Independence was supported by British parliament
Theres your real truth
This podcast, unironically
This was a great book. I’m gonna read it again soon.
sauce?
Book from the early 1900s. Latest I would go is the early 1960s, when the gov hijacked education.
Don’t read that David McCullough trash (I think that is what your pic is?)
The Bong is wrong. British parliament did not support independence. The French supported independence.
T. US history and government teacher.
Just sayin
it was founded by the honorable east india company
Nowhere. The best you can do is form an idea based upon the best available evidence.
>available evidence.
This guy told the truth one time about the justice system. It didn't end well.
Yep, and I have sourced for that. Dumb brit.
It's true, look into it. The revolution was only allowed to happen due to this.
The first half of this is true. Founding fathers were largely just greedy Jew funded criminals.
>trusting Jow Forums with your history lesson
Listen bud, David McCullough is a good place to start. You can also watch documentaries while reading.
To be clear, the parliament did not officially support independence in a public way. There were many within parliament that supported independence privately.
The burden of proof is on you. I remember Parliament being annoyed with how long the war was dragging on but nothing on them supporting independence.
Then you agree with me, i never said it was some kind of public declaration.
Here's one of the biggest redpills about the American Revolution.
Fair enough. God told them to support independence.
>redcoats
1.) The Declaration of Independence
2.) The Articles of Confederation
3.) The Federalist (Papers)
4.) The Constitution
5.) The Bill of Rights
Lexington - 1775.
No Berserk thirst of blood had they,
No battle-joy was theirs, who set
Against the alien bayonet
Their homespun breasts in that old day.
Their feet had trodden peaceful, ways;
They loved not strife, they dreaded pain;
They saw not, what to us is plain,
That God would make man's wrath his praise.
No seers were they, but simple men;
Its vast results the future hid
The meaning of the work they did
Was strange and dark and doubtful then.
Swift as their summons came they left
The plough mid-furrow standing still,
The half-ground corn grist in the mill,
The spade in earth, the axe in cleft.
They went where duty seemed to call,
They scarcely asked the reason why;
They only knew they could but die,
And death was not the worst of all!
Of man for man the sacrifice,
All that was theirs to give, they gave.
The flowers that blossomed from their grave
Have sown themselves beneath all skies.
Their death-shot shook the feudal tower,
And shattered slavery's chain as well;
On the sky's dome, as on a bell,
Its echo struck the world's great hour.
That fateful echo is not dumb
The nations listening to its sound
Wait, from a century's vantage-ground,
The holier triumphs yet to come,--
The bridal time of Law and Love,
The gladness of the world's release,
When, war-sick, at the feet of Peace
The hawk shall nestle with the dove!--
The golden age of brotherhood
Unknown to other rivalries
Than of the mild humanities,
And gracious interchange of good,
When closer strand shall lean to strand,
Till meet, beneath saluting flags,
The eagle of our mountain-crags,
The lion of our Motherland!
The top two items are not knives.
But kikes controlled the monarchy at that point and still do, right?
It is controlled by a dwarf in a robe.
just read the federalist papers, user.
The only good source in the lies you have learned
unqualified-reservations.org
Bp
ur mom lol
bullshit we were tired of Rothschild. if wanting self-determination and honest money makes them greedy well we could use a lot more greedy fuckers in this country.
Stop linking ankleyids
m.youtube.com
This guy does some good stuff
This story is 1621
This, except the founders were genuinely decent guys, especially Washington. One of the most solid guys in history at least as far as generals go. Still, most of the revolution was self serving. It'd be like if the big tech guys started a revolution, except they weren't a bunch of faggots.
>There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II. Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state known as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
>The City is not a part of England, just as Washington is not a part of the USA. The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually. When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
>The aforementioned Temple Bar is the juristic arm of the Crown and holds an exclusive monopoly on global legal fraud through their Bar Association franchises. The Temple Bar is comprised of four Inns of Court. They are; the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln's Inn and Gray's Inn. The entry point to these closed secret societies is only to be found when one is called to their Bar
cont:
>The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and pledge their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple.
>The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has license to steal from America. To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter 'S,' denotes a legal entity of the Crown.
>At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties were agents of the Crown. There is no lawful effect when a party signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown. Most Americans believe that they own their own land, but they have merely purchased real estate by contract. Upon fulfillment of the contract, control of the land is transferred by Warranty Deed. The Warranty Deed is only a 'color of title.' Color of Title is a semblance or appearance of title, but not title in fact or in law. The Warranty Deed cannot stand against the Land Patent.
>The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of England. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the Declaration of Independence was created to pacify the populace.
HAHAHAHAHA
Where to find?
Old books. Better hurry. The digital age makes it super easy for (((history))) to be rewritten every couple generations, especially with all these window-licking goldfish glued to their screens. Perfect time to fahrenheit 451 this bitch.
The American Revolution was a Celtic Uprising against a Turkish "Donmeh" controlled London. This information is so "redpilled" that even the most redpilled do not realize.
FUN GAME: Go find "Aremorica" on the map. Win a free redpill.
I want see “1776” and if it accurate. I’ve been meaning to for a while now.
How about the film?
HW Brand's Benjamin Franklin book is breddy gud
Your the same guy posting dumb shit about Barbary pirates been controlled by the British
In college I wrote a paper on the Battle of Long Island. Really interesting story about G. Washington getting his ass handed to him in Brooklyn Heights then fleeing across Long Island on the “secret road” now known as 25a on the Island’s North Shore under the cover of night, storms and fog. This would make for a great movie.
All I can say is this;
Anyone trying to convince you that the Crown owns the US is batshit. The Revolutionary War was not a false flag. Avoid schizo shit, I wasted a month researching that angle for nothing.
After the war Americans had no more rights than brits ,french. The elites located in America didn't want to pay taxes that the British we're already paying for kicking the French out of the America's.
You changed one ruling elites for another
Howard Zinn's The People's History of the United States
George Washington was incredibly based. Read his farewell address from 1796. Why is the Federalist party not around anymore?
I need info connecting kikes from the French Revolution to the Democratic Societies in america.
Freemason faggots are the link.
more specifically the "Crown" (not royal) and the Temple (Templar) Bar association
>George Washington was incredibly based.
yorkshirefilmarchive.com
Thank to bed ,enjoy nn
Respectfully, what a load of shit. Benjamin Fulford tier disinfo.
Guess I'll try /his/
>Don’t read that David McCullough trash (I think that is what your pic is?)
I understand what you say about most books being compromised after the 1960s, but what is the matter with David McCullough's book?
Fash the Nation did a deep dive into the founding of America. There's a lot of good info in it that you wouldn't get anywhere else
fashthenation.com
merica baby
I don't know much of American history, but the reason 'Tax without representation' is a little vague for me.
The same for my country, nor in primary school, secondary or university the gave a real reason to be an independent nation and go to war against Spain, not a single real reason.
>Q's a good start, to bridge how we got here from where we came.
history is a fairy tale to keep you asleep for harvest.
They own through the Federal Reserve, moron.
sad that a fucking leaf brings the truth, a memefaggot tried to misinform and none of you burgers know who controls you
this is why you're all called animals
Adam Smith for the why. Wealth of Nations was published in 1776 iirc
FTN is a pro-London / anti-American CIA honeypot connected to TRS (zionist disinformation program). Why would anyone get "American History" from London (donmeh turk) shills?
>Where can I find the pure, unadulterated truth of how and why America was founded?
Look I'll give you a hint, nigger cunt.
It was the Juden. They were up to their old tricks, plotting and scheming as per and the good white man he had to, only had no other choice other than, to create a new nation.
Fuck yeah.
OP: Take note of this idiot that responded to my post. These are the Turks that hate the truth about the American Revolution. They know the truth is a direct threat to their ruling "Ottoman Turk" power. The American Revolution was a Celtic European Uprising against the Turks in London. Nobody else posting ITT comes close to this level of deep understanding These posters are writing basic-tier unimportant mainstream non-sense and all-around gibberish. They are called the 90-105 IQ crowd. Basically, the people in society who are really loud and stupid as shit. If you want to make the Ottoman "Donmeh" Turks angry inside of London, England; post this meme about the American Celtic Uprising. Turks literally rage with hatred because it's true and challenges their "power" over America and England.
It is one of the biggest scams in European history how the Ottoman Turks took over England in 1648; ruling in power since..
Look at Pyke, look into ancient mystery school, listen to Kennedy's speech on secret societies. Realise America was by founded with the sole purpose of overthrowing the power of monarchies and paving the way for a new world order. One that is already almost complete.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Already 1:51 minutes into this pro-London propaganda and all the idiot is doing is pre-Apologizing to the audience for his obviously predictable "shitting on the founding fathers" podcast.
I hate you snakes to damn much. I live happy knowing I took part in destroying your fake anti-American (pro-London) operation these past few years. Every single one of your groups connected to TRS has been annihilated.
Turkish scum.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
These two homosexuals sound like they're about to cry the entire podcast.
fashthenation.com
God I hate (((pro-London))) Turkish faggots so damn much.
You are the product of an Illuminati Ritual
That's all you are and that's all you will ever be America.
Pawns in a Satanic Game.
Good luck.
I am reading this exact book now.
Well stop reading it you gullible idiot.
Everything you believe is a lie.
History is a retelling of what happened you retard.
There will be skews either accidental or intentional.
Shut up idiot. Stop talking.
You don't have a clue about anything.
I fucking HATE the west. It is the epitomitome of degeneracy. USA = SJW. Even the NAZI western scum can not come up with anything better than racemixing. The most radical FEMINIST is more adequate in a sane country. It was NOT da Juuz, it was YOU sick WASP dickheads. I DESPISE you and your faggot founding fathers that fucked each other in the ass at their Continental Gay Rightss Congress. I WISH DEATH to british nigger trans queen too. I would ally anyone to destroy your SODDOM. Better to be constantly killed and raped by MUZLIMS than to hear your disgusting propaganda.
So you're pro-London?
I am not pro anything
I hear you.
Nice cop out, you snake.
Huh... Also says CIA is here and to pray...
I assume the parentheticals are a different message form the brackets?
sinfull 1? Whatever. I'm sure someone else already pointed this out.
You're the moron
who doesn't realize your country is run by Satan
Go accept a microchip you stupid bastard
England had stopped giving a fuck about the colonies for a while so they became autonomous and got stuff set up running how they liked it and then a new english king came to power who wanted to meddle with it and he started sending officials over and changing how everything was ran and this pissed people off so they told them to get lost.
We can see the important characteristic of this compared to a standard revolution. In a normal revolution people spontaneously rise up against the established and entrenched authority usual as a result of great necessity. In americas case however, it was far more similar to two already established states being in conflict. In america what was desired, the society and autonomy the colonists want, was already had for many years due to english neglect, and so their motivation for conflict was not to overthrow a present system, but to maintain one. It was not to change society, but to keep it from being changed.
This goes to ilustrate how humans are less willing to lose something than they are to try and gain something. Revolutions occuring due to dissatisfaction with the status quo require great suffering on the peoples part before anything is done, whereas conflict to preserve a desired status quo can be started not out of pure necessity but through persuasion.
Your mind. You go to logic.
You sound retarded.
Most intelligent people know about the Federalist Papers, but there are also the Anti-Federalist responses to them.
thefederalistpapers.org
In Federalist #10, James Madison absolutely destroys the (((argument))) that diversity is a strength, and puts all his mind into considering how to manage the inevitable consequences of it (since some types of diversity, mostly economic, are unavoidable without sacrificing liberty) in order to effectively govern.