How would a truly redpilled society handle cases of rape?

Whatever we did in the 19th century -- that is what we should do now.

I'd vote for you

you are like 200 iq. too smart for a retarded burger

Rape is the same as grand theft.
Fast Trial and Death Penalty.

Institute polygamy and let the man keep the victim as his sex toy.

Of course, if she isn't already reserved by another man, in which case the rapist should pay the owner a sum for using his property.

Hangings. Public hangings.

Ignore it?

Based societies have a robust and functional criminal justice system, which means that death penalties would be rare and wouldn't be handed out to appease a retarded mob

You dumb fuckers really need to go outside and deal with our stupid cops. Might make you reconsider your stupid urge to kill everyone who is accused of anything

>Should the rape of a virgin receive a harsher punishment?
Compared to what. To a married woman? No.
To some prostitute? probably.
Problem is that rape is not that easy to prove. Most of the times is done when only 2 people are present, and then it's one's word against the other's.

If you rape a virgin you should be given a medal

stop eating nightshades

Attached: 65DB8087-7508-40B7-821C-F1F188A7317A.jpg (647x1080, 617K)

Let’s kill this guy. Let niggers rape him. Then kill them too.

stop eating

Attached: 1565414199500.jpg (1024x1541, 145K)

>bootlicker detected

Gay virtue signalling faggotry.

>Pour some oil on them, then turn up the heat and fap on them.

You have to fap on them first, THEN apply heat. Otherwise the cum will flash boil and shoot hot oil onto your peepee.

Death by hanging. Read up on your history

Name when a mob killing someone actually turned out bad for the interests of the group that did it please. If it’s that bad give multiple examples of this. Your fefes alone matter for nothing.

if I was a judge I'd hand out a harsher sentence to a guy that violently raped a prostitute than I would to a guy that gently date-raped a virgin.

People get obsessed about the penetration part of a rape, but the severe ass-kicking is not a detail to ignore

The deep psychology of it:

Yes.

Innocence is the most important and valuable concept in all of our creation.

On judgement day, god judges everyone, and we are god, so we will be judged by our victims and the onlookers.

The punishment allowed for any transgression is an equal or lesser punishment.
A range of "Eye for eye" to "forgiveness"

Since the rape of a virgin permanently disrupts that soul's intended journey, and because it cannot be restored, the punishment allowed is...

whatever the victim wants.

That means eternal torture or eternal annihilation, turning that perpetrator into a personal toilet, whatever their twisted mind can imagine, because it was twisted by the perp. and it's social enablers in the first place.

If you were "born of a virgin" as the old testament calls it, you would have already thought about all of this.

The people who made the Jesus story didn't even know the symbolism they were working off of to forge the extension of the religion.

And they still don't.

No matter who you are, whatever you have done, your victims are gonna get a shot at you.
Better hope they were simple minded christians who believe in forgiveness.

Attached: fingers.jpg (474x266, 13K)

You can't rape white women since they come from a position of power and you can't rape non-whites because they aren't people so there is no such thing as rape.

Breakfast is such serious business that we even named our country after it.

But if we lived in a "red pilled" society there would be much fewer incidences of unaccompanied females in the presence of men

We have other ways of figuring how who the father is, so there's no reason to have to rely on women's control of each other's sexuality to give assurances of paternity to they can convince a man to support her and her children.

There's no longer a valid reason for rape to be viewed as a distinct crime from other types of assault or battery. I mean, hell, a woman's body is literally designed to take dick. A couple dozen ours of community service, maybe?

solitary confinement for a year would be enough
you know your way around the kitchen

True, but almost any accusation of rape would still refer to such a situation, thus making a decision would still be hard.

Rape should be handled the way it was handled for nearly all of recorded history: as a property crime.

Rape means to take something without permission, specifically, having sex with a woman without her father's or husband's permission; it wasn't until the 20th century that it came to mean having sex with a woman without her consent.

We merely have to return to traditional values and definitions:

>sex outside of marriage is forbidden; girls remain virgins until marriage
>man has sex with an unmarried woman with her consent = he has to marry her and pay her father damages, because he sure as hell can't marry her off to anyone respectable now that she's considered a whore
>man has sex with an unmarried woman without her consent, ie forcefully = the man is executed and his goods/property sold off and the money given to the girl's father so he can have a large enough dowry someone will still marry her even though she isn't a virgin
>married woman has consensual sex with someone who isn't her husband = they're both executed, and the man's property is sold and the money given to the cuckolded husband so he can find a new wife
>married woman has sex with someone who isn't her husband, against her will = the rapist is executed

That's how it was handled from the bronze age all the way up to the modern era, and it really only varied in the degree of punishment for the man fucking another man's woman. A man could decide to quietly divorce his disgraced wife if she cheated on him, rather than make a big deal out of it and have them both punished, but back then even being a divorcee carried a stigma of shame. It wasn't until the 'free love' movement of the 1960's where promiscuity and degeneracy were celebrated, followed by the legalization of no-fault divorce and the court-ordained plundering of men by women that we came to the sorry state of affairs we have now..

Attached: 1535302666285.jpg (686x650, 416K)

So a guy sticking it in your ass is no different from punching you in the face when you're both angry?

Obviously.

breakfast is done, lads. I'd show it but my phone is a nigger. I made sure to put hot sauce on my eggs like a onions

cooking is 90% timing. Just keep at it and you'll learn to stagger your shit as you make it. if you want your bacon warm, put your oven on like 150*C to keep it warm while your hash browns finish up.

Rape and most other crimes should be punishable by death. Why should taxpayer money be used to feed and shelter "people" who not only contribute nothing to society but actively harm it aswell?

Premarital sex has existed since the bronze age

let's be very honest here:

punishment for rape is much more justice for the husband or the father of the girl, because it is he who has his honor deeply offended and ruined by this act. essentially the rapist completely cucked his lineage by the act, his wife/daughter is a whore now

also, notice women secretly FANTASIZE about being raped. think about it, wouldn't you? the equivalent of the strong, tall, overpowering, masculine rapist, for a man would be a beautiful, dainty, caring woman. I'd love to be "raped" by such a woman.

And it's the perfect excuse to vent out their sexual desires without, at least on a surface level, ruining their honor or impression of purity for the broader community.

there is a reason why berber rapists cut a scar into the leg of the women they rape, as a branding for any man that has the intention of taking her as a wife in the future. The men in that community know that a raped woman is a whore, because she will remember that day of intense sexual satisfaction to the rest of her days,. It's actually an act of compassion for his fellow men.

>the equivalent of the strong, tall, overpowering, masculine rapist, for a man would be a beautiful, dainty, caring woman.
what about the equivalent of the sewer dweller, aids ridden, schytzophrenic and physically deformed man?

Women were never the gatekeepers of reproductive success until the 20th century.

>your daughter is your genetic legacy; it is in your interests to marry her off to a man who will be successful enough to pass your genes into the future with grandchildren, so you select a husband for her that is genetically fit, socially respectable (ie, not a drunk, bum, gadfly, or otherwise unrespectable), and financially secure enough to support your daughter and any children they have
>you may also marry her off to someone who's wealthy or powerful, such as a noble, businessman, etc. both to ensure prosperity for her and her children, and to secure an alliance between your families

Thus, it was always in a father's interest to safeguard his daughter's virginity and only marry her off to a man he approved. His daughter had little to no say in who she married, though obviously most fathers took their daughter's opinions into account when selecting her husband.

Until she was married, a woman was her father's property, more or less. Fathers were the gatekeepers of reproduction, not women; you only got to fuck a girl and put a baby in her if her father thought you were good enough. The reason you have the Chad vs Beta problem today, along with women riding the cock carousel instead of getting married and having children, is precisely because, for the first time in human history, women are now the gatekeepers of reproduction, and they're totally fucking retarded at the task. They're nothing more than overgrown children, and like children given freedom to do whatever they want, they make the dumbest fucking choices possible.

Attached: 1567111494583.jpg (750x1084, 450K)

again, let's be honest here: few rapists are actually like that, and men that are that diseased like you describe rarely would have the self confidence to rape a woman.

look at you, you most likely can't leave your room if you know somebody is in the house, imagine going outside and forcefully grabbing a woman.

The punishment would be so Swift and severe that it would rarely happen. Also, simply removing niggers from white society would immediately reduce the majority of rape.

Attached: 1555249620201.png (1614x2283, 932K)

but user, when a black man "rapes" it's not rape, it's just a sexual emergency, stop being such a racist

We should also consider the eugenic aspect and kill off any kids the rapist may have had, and also maybe neuter his siblings.

No one cares about the bakabhazhi boys, or actual pedo rapists like Marion Zimmer Bradley. People only care about if a woman has sex with a man that they think shouldn't be having sex with her.
The redpilled society will have
* the husband has a right to kill a man who touches his wife, if the man knew she was married, and she wasn't acting like a slut, and also has the right to kill his wife for cheating, i.e., OJ did nothing wrong
* a father has the right to force a man who touches his daughter to marry her if possible, otherwise pay him 50 shekels of silver, as specified in the Bible

>few rapists are actually like that
Most rapists are like that.
The man you described, however, does not rape anyone ever, because he gets all the pussy he wants.

As for a man seeking a wife, she is, again, her property. She is, after all, the vessel in which he will produce children, pass on his genes, and secure his legacy.

He wants an unspoiled virgin; a virgin bride is a loyal bride, the more men a woman has sex with, the greater the odds she will cheat on her husband or leave him. Even premarital sex with her future husband increases the odds of cheating and divorce, according to every study on the subject. So of course a man wants to marry a girl whose virginity is guaranteed by her father.

Another reason for wanting a virgin is so he knows any children she has are his; if you marry a woman you know was sleeping around beforehand, and nine months after the wedding she pops out a baby, did you knock her up on the wedding night, or did Chad knock her up before the wedding? If she's a virgin until her wedding night, you know for a fact that baby is yours.

A man will, of course, defend his wife from other men. She is the mother of his children and his sexual property, after all. If she has sex with another man willingly, she is a whore who cannot be trusted; her children may not be her husband's children, she may bring disease home to her husband, and he is shamed by her infidelity and being cuckolded. Nothing can destroy a man more than discovering the children he's invested so much of his life in raising aren't even his.

If his wife is raped by another man, in the modern sense that she was unwilling and did not consent to it, only the other man has dishonored her husband, but she is still tainted. Any child she bears in the next nine months could be the rapist's, not her husband's. She could be infected with disease by the rapist. She may be more inclined to seek out other men after being raped, for the excitement or simply for a new and different experience.

It is, in any case, in a man's interest to fend off or kill any other man who comes sniffing around his wife.

Attached: 102b79d793415c17d7cb2b56788cac8cb79b9e7552ebf0f91b0a86ef0e2b79a0.png (1041x782, 524K)

If women were property all of these questions would be so much easier to answer.

Rape is almost nonexistent in the west.

Well obviously

Also mandatory abortion. Don't forget the eugenic effect of allowing or not allowing rape as a reproductive strategy.

Finally someone making sense around here!

I suppose in our current hypergamous, hedonistic society what you're saying is much more true.

In traditional societies it definitely isn't, as people get married not because they look good, but because they have the capacity of producing a successful family, that's why ugly rich men will be much more "attractive" over the good-looking poor guy.

this hedonistic society will die off though, because it is simply dysgenic. the mongrels born out of all these interracial, violent, abusive couples won't be able to suffer through the next societal hardship, whether it's war, disease or famine.

Actually the death penalty can have a strong enough eugenic effect to shape the populace.

Fpbp

not if you allow the bastard to be born

Death penalty

Someone who could get themselve to carry out a rape is capable of a lot of other evil

t. someone in old family was raped into pregnancy daily and then poisoned and killed,
Actually people associated with it should also be murdered,
Again because the kind of deformity that allows someone to carry out rape cannot be fixed with punishment

Unless we start handing out harsh consequences the 'mercy' will only be used as a mean to get away and criminals won't learn, and punishment should be without hesitation, that is, assume criminal will do it second time for sure given the chance, words shouldn't be taken into account, actions should, and actions have shown that they do. So death penalty it is.

Thus, it is in man's interest to reduce women to the status of overgrown children or the property of her husband/father. It is in a woman's interest to have the same status, because this ensures her the greatest safety and stability in any society to date, and ensures that she and her children are loved and provided for.

It is also in society's interest to return women to their traditional status. Prior to allowing women to vote, families voted as a unit, with the wife and husband discussing the issue and coming to an agreement on who to vote for, with the husband/father of the family casting the vote for his family. With women's suffrage, now men and women can cancel each other's votes out, disagree on issues/candidates, and women can now be courted by parties who prey on their immaturity and childish stupidity with appeals to emotion and free goodies, rather than using reason and logic to appeal to men. It wasn't until women got the vote that we had the massive welfare state of today, and it wasn't until women got the vote that we got no-fault divorce, alimony, child support, and basically allowed women to replace husbands with the state; why stay married to a loyal, loving husband when you can just leave him, get half his money anyway, and have the state take care of you and your children from three different men?

Prior to the mid-20th century, a man could support a family on a single income. My father had a wife, children, bought a house and a car, on a single income, while my mother stayed at home and raised her children. Now both husband and wife have to work to make ends meet, houses are increasingly priced out of their reach, and having multiple children is increasingly a burden. Kick women out of the workforce and keep them at home, and men's wages will return to what they once were, and children will be more safely raised by their mothers instead of foisted off to some stranger at a daycare center (which you also have to pay for).

Attached: 1564934070028.png (1808x3731, 609K)

A redpilled society won't have any rape because all citizens have ascended.

fpbp

make executions great again

Death by snu snu.

Sex isn't evil though and being uninitiated doesn't make people more nobel.

The innocence lost is more valuable than any amount of punishment can give.

Death, swift and just, is the only solution.

If we end those who cannot control their animal urges, we can raise ourselves above the ape.

Attached: 59435668_869984203350905_5037952442994524160_n.jpg (640x960, 56K)

>petty larceny, punishable by a 50 dollar fine.
FTFY
You guys are a bunch of bootlicking beta statists. Her pussy is monetary, and rape is theft of value NOTHING more. Fucking summer is over, go.back.to.school.

Rapists should wing by the rope. Child rapists should have their tackle cut off with a rusty bread knife and then thrown into general population in a rough prison with a tattoo branding them a nonce on their foreheads

The fertility crisis is a direct result of putting girls on birth control and allowing them to abort their babies, spending their most fertile years wasting their time on pointless degrees like Women's Studies, and then focusing on their 'careers' (in which they will never measure up to what a man in the same position would be capable of) instead of having children. The overwhelming majority of women either aren't reproducing at all or are only having one child, late in their lives when they feel menopause approaching. It's scientifically proven that the later in life a woman has children, the more likely they are to be defective. Starting at age 21, the risk of giving birth to a child with a defect like autism increases yearly, and at age 30 it's doubled, only going up more and more each year until her eggs finally dry up. Thus, from the perspective of reproductive fitness, it is in a woman's interest to have children in her teens or early 20's.

From a financial and social standpoint, it is in everyone's interests for a woman to get married young, to a man of the same age or older (preferably older, so he's financially secure enough to support a wife and children), and keep her in the house raising children rather than working. And for the love of all that is holy, keep women the fuck away from politics if you value your civilization. Literally every civilization that allowed women to participate in politics has collapsed as a direct result.

Attached: 1557630151956.jpg (590x824, 238K)

Attached: ed5f01794cbd28547958fffe0dc04b8d3b52c8fd509ba4ef8fddaf9998e0b446.jpg (666x692, 73K)

Attached: 1566919685656.png (798x782, 487K)

>he doesn't value the innocence of childhood
>he doesn't value the purity of motherhood
>he doesn't value the natural holiness of marriage

There is honor in standing for something beyond the animalistic urge to fuck. Each generation is charged with raising the next to be better than the last.

Attached: warcrimes.jpg (872x960, 74K)

Learn to read

The more educated a woman is, the less fertile she is. Not because "hurr durr, you're scared of a smart, educated woman who's strong, independent, and don't need no man!" No, because she is again wasting her most fertile years going to school instead of having children.

Ideally, women would be married in their mid to late teens, and high school education for girls would consist of home ec courses teaching them how to cook, clean, do laundry, take care of a baby, balance a checkbook and handle family finances, and otherwise run a household while her husband works to support the family financially. College education for women is an utter waste, only serving to waste more of her most fertile years on an unnecessary degree so she can get a job that she will focus on instead of having a family.

Attached: 1564933608901.png (708x427, 67K)

Attached: 1564933635490.png (1382x850, 224K)

Since the first sexual organism but yeah.

Didn’t think anybody else knew about this.

Castration and allowed torture from her loved ones too nigga

And look at modern feminists. Do any of them seem happy to you? They're thoroughly miserable, because they're not living as women should. When they see a woman who is feminine, a housewife, spending her time cooking, cleaning, caring for her children, and having a loving husband care for her, they screech in jealous rage. Why? Because they know she's happy, and they know they've ruined any possibility of obtaining that same happiness for themselves.

Women were happiest before they entered the workplace, before 'free love', before they were expected to go to college, before they were tricked into believing they didn't need men to feel happy, before they were lied to and told they didn't need children to feel fulfilled, before they were convinced they had to participate in civics and politics. They were happier when their world was smaller, focused on the home and family, and raising children for the future instead of wasting their lives on a pointless career to make money for someone else.

And when modern women see a traditional woman who is happy, fulfilled, and loved, they seeth inside because they want that for themselves, and they know they've ruined any chance of ever having it by being toxic harpies and worthless whores.

Attached: 1556503633556.jpg (1719x1024, 1.01M)

Attached: 1564933524628.jpg (744x1024, 148K)

Attached: b49d1efcd2b8f6c5be1354bf0c005dee1ea21d01409b8f982c836605de3845f1.jpg (800x1242, 173K)

Attached: b95e579d39a699e98fcc1a7c7a8ed4474d2f2f98b4065a5ccd3c519e988a4376.jpg (500x500, 60K)

Attached: 1559497266726.jpg (1333x1000, 448K)

Attached: 1567442177494.jpg (1080x1350, 151K)

Rape-rape? Like defense wounds and struggling rape? Death.

I had second thoughts a week later? GTFO.

Fuck them hard, friction will cook them.

wtf is that Tesla deathray device on the left of the photo?

Kill the rapist and then burn the victim over his grave.

This is how they did it in Dacia

Shit, I thought American cars were badass.

Attached: dacia-sandero-stepway.jpg (2400x1600, 356K)

And all of this, the so-called 'liberation' of women so they can waste their most fertile years, endure decades of stress at pointless jobs instead of staying comfortably at home, riding the cock carousel instead of finding a loving husband, getting into politics and ruining the economy and society as a result, and murdering their unborn children or simply not having them in the first place, is intentional. It is deliberate. It is the planned destruction of our civilization and our race.

Look at who's responsible for the 'free love' movement. Jews. Look at who's responsible for the feminist movement. Jews. Look at who's responsible for all the sexual degeneracy, such as the trans movement, gay movement, etc. Jews. Look at who's responsible for the breakdown of the family with easy divorce, child custody, alimony, etc. Jews. Look at who's responsible for all the socialist programs women vote for. Jews. Look at who's responsible for the erosion of Christianity into a weak, watered-down, shadow of itself, and the resulting loss of morals in society. Jews. Look at who's responsible for mass immigration of people from hostile cultures who want to destroy ours and replace it with theirs, hostile religions who want to destroy ours and replace it with theirs, and foreign races who will destroy our genetic legacy by mixing with it. Jews.

This is all deliberate. We have to safeguard our women by keeping them away from the influence of evil Jews.

Attached: 1565395747868.jpg (640x960, 59K)

Attached: 727eff84241ddca1c658ba6c0806cf69c18ddfecedb30e1a311af492f4072f2d.jpg (1080x1350, 175K)

Anyway, rant over. Feel free to put it all in a cap for the next redpill thread.

Attached: a005adb6f936e57d79b6718534ead5c6fa26dd68d3735ea94834899db55c1b96.jpg (720x626, 55K)

This. You’d hope a redpilled society wouldn’t go around raping innocent vulnerable women

Attached: 5ed44043938d2d7e38910a046683f5f19ccb4c124a4e2bf85b2c7413a26227ba.jpg (1024x1015, 237K)

Don't take cooking lessions from a leaf.

the virtue of family, of community, of legacy and purity is huge. However our society does NOT value such things currently, and putting pussy on a pedestal is not the way forward.

it must be stripped down, home and social order restored, and THEN when fathers protection of virtue, of marriage rights, or feminism death, when those things happen - you may punish rape with burning at the stake. But today, now, a hole has no value except for her desire to be a man, and if she wants to be a man, she will be treated like it.
Theft, plain and simple.