Bwahahaha!!! You're next, Jow Forums. Lying has consequences:
>Parents of murdered Democratic staffer Seth Rich can sue Fox News: U.S. court
>A federal appeals court on Friday revived a lawsuit against Fox News Network over its reporting on Seth Rich, a former Democratic National Committee employee whose unsolved murder sparked uncorroborated right-wing conspiracy theories.
>The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said Rich’s parents, Joel and Mary Rich, could sue Fox News for causing emotional distress by publishing a May 16, 2017, article claiming their son had leaked DNC emails to WikiLeaks, implying that the leaks were related to his death.
>Fox News, a unit of Fox Corp, retracted the article a week later, saying it fell short of its standards, but some leading conservatives and on-air guests discussed it for months.
>Circuit Judge Guido Calabresi wrote that the Riches “sufficiently pleaded extreme and outrageous conduct” by the defendants, including reporter Malia Zimmerman, who wrote the retracted article, and Fox News guest Ed Butowsky.
>Seth Rich, 27, was shot and killed in July 2016 near his Washington home, in what police there consider a botched robbery. The Riches claimed to suffer symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder and social anxiety disorder, and Mary Rich said she no longer feels comfortable in public.
where was the proof that he leaked DNC emails? whose hearsay was this based on? I know you niggers didn't have solid proof of that shit, you bought what verbal diarrhea someone spat out, I wanna know who
Liam King
If any of the shit about a "Clinton crime syndicate" were true, then why hasn't Trump's Department of Justice indicted ANYONE for it? Are you saying that TRUMP is also part of the "cover-up"? That's the implication. If this shit actually exists, and Trump refuses to prosecute any of it, then he is complicit.
The saner answer is that there is no "Clinton crime syndicate." Jow Forums cannot refute this logic.
Levi Martin
>botched robbery >nothing was stolen from him
imagine how big of a shill you'd have to be to even write something like this
>Are you saying that TRUMP is also part of the "cover-up"? Obviously, retard
Noah Kelly
>Jow Forums cannot refute this logic. Literally one day after the election several countries that had been contributing to the Clinton Foundation announced they would no longer do so. That week all but a handful of foundation employees were laid off. Bears investigating wouldn't you agree?
Julian Jones
How do you legally insert evidence into public record? A lawsuit.
Easton Nguyen
Trump doesn't control the DoJ. The deep state bureaucracy is basically a fourth branch of government not accountable to or controlled by any elected official.
Gavin Kelly
And what about that DOJ plane load (literally) of evidence taken out of Arkansas?
Adrian Long
Next for what? Getting sued? Wtf is wrong with you, stupid? Take too many dildos to your dome? You can't sue a bunch of anonymous shitposters. What an imbecile! Lol.
Nathan Ward
Sure, and presumably Trump's DOJ has looked into it and found nothing suspicious. Hence, no prosecutions or indictments related to the Clinton Foundation. Again, Republicans control the executive branch. Republicans have spent the past 30 years ATTACKING the Clintons. If there were prosecutable offenses, they'd be getting prosecuted. Think a bit.
Jeremiah Diaz
Under the US Constitution, the President has broad authority to hire and fire the leaders of executive branch agencies.
Juan Jones
>Republicans The uniparty doesn't prosecute itself. Notice Obama didn't prosecute any Bush officials.
Caleb Garcia
Career officials can't be fired without cause, and political appointees have to be Senate confirmed. That effectively gatekeeps the President from appointing anyone who would disrupt the system.
Cooper Walker
Firing a bureaucrat from an agency is an administrative procedure. Firing a bureaucrat from a specific leadership position inside of an agency is not; the president can simply do it. It doesn't necessarily terminate the federal employment of the person removed from the post, but it doesn't need to do so, either. Also, acting directors do not require Senate confirmation.
There's no need to be coherent considering that DC courts vote dem no matter the argument.
Jason Howard
>OIG hands Report to DoJ >This happens
Fucking glowing
Juan Morgan
If it wasn't a botched robbery, then who killed him? If it were a political hitjob, then Trump's DOJ would have taken over the case and made arrests by now. Anything that crosses state lines can be turned into a federal case. What Trump's DOJ is saying is that the case was local to DC, and didn't cross out of DC. Ie, it was probably done by local thugs.
Easton Peterson
the DNC emails came from russian hackers (for real) wikileaks offered a reward for info about seth rich's murder and fanned the flames on the conspiracy theory that seth rich had leaked the emails
Robert Watson
Hope this goes through actually. Imagine what their find in discovery once the parents are deposed.
Michael Martin
If I recall, something about parts of the information was downloaded onto a flash drive in a time that was too quick for it to happen online so was likely plugged into Hillary's computer directly.
Owen James
oh right I forgot, thanks
Andrew Jones
Constitution also says >shall not infringe How has that worked out? No one in government gives a shit what the Constitution says anymore.
Aaron Smith
Trump does
Luke Lewis
>Parents of murdered Democratic staffer Seth Rich can sue Fox News: U.S. court
They are just looking for a pay day since Seth isn't around to gibs them monies.
Carson King
Seth Rich won't go away. There is no proof that the DNC emails were hacked. If we could resolve that one issue, the whole of the last three years would be more clear. There's one man at least, that knows the answer. He strongly implied it was Rich.
How fucking dumb and delusional are you about how the world works? >hurr durr one of the most elite political families in the world isn't prosecuted therefore no crimes were ever committed
Hudson Stewart
There's Kim dot com's statements as well as the quick media attention given to this story in an uncanny amount of time. Anyone who follows this story knows the Russians did not hack the emails. It was Seth Rich, a DNC staffer.
Lincoln Watson
I work standards and practices for a major movie studio you've all heard of (named after two parents Max and Mira) and a good rule of thumb (it'd be nice to be allowed to say that phrase in public) is the below video. The creator of this video cannot be sued for getting Anthony Bourdain and Jeffrey Epstein confused because they BOTH David Carradined themselves and they both have the same white people head and body. Also, they may have both sucked Barack Obama's penis on a yacht, if the rumors are true. youtu.be/Hc54gFmBANY
Eli Powell
not only that but if you inspect the DNC emails themselves, the metadata on wikileaks, it shows that it came from a flash drive. Russian hackers having direct physical access to the emails is unlikely.
Eli Morales
"conspiracy theories", they mean like the entire Russia narrative?
Lincoln Parker
>Circuit Judge Guido Calabresi Appointed by Clinton, what a shocker
Parker Stewart
>be me >be robber >gon shoot some guy and take his stuff >reparations, whitey >find some guy walking home at night >shoot him in the back >oh wait no I didn't mean to shoot anyone oh no wait what I don't know what I'm doing >run awaaayyyy >he can keep his wallet But an ASSASSINATION, why, that would just be crazy.
Jose Wright
Seth Rich's parents are kikes. I'll shitpost in their favor when they leak secret documents.
Are you talking about Guccifer when you say that? The only evidence anyone ever brought forward was that the hacker's Word program had its default language as Cyrillic. As far as I know that's their only justification for calling it Russian hacking.
Hudson Ramirez
And look how well that's turned out. Every time Trump exercises those authorities he's accused of treason.
Eli Taylor
CNN reports >Fox News can be sued for fake news yaaaayyy You sure you want to open that can?
William Brown
The same dudes who said that it's illegal for people to read the leaked emails is now celebrating about Fox getting sued over Seth Rich.
Caleb Perez
>You're next We were the only ones who called the system on their shit, user.
Anthony Wood
He's saying that to provide lip service. If he cared, the fed would be cucked or nonexistent
I thought Assange not denying Seth Rich provided the info was proof enough. Why would the parents be complaining? It was the only good thing Fox Jews did this decade. Has the parents' spying for Israel been interrupted?
Mason Ramirez
If they win against FOX but the MAGA Teen can't sue CNN, then there is no justice in the US anymore.
Logan Bell
You can get away with anything by calling it "entertainment". Which is how a lot of tv shows and movies cover A51 as a topic against the government's wishes before they admitted it was real. Jesse Ventura even put out a show about conspiracy theories but by the end he focuses on more worldly problems that called out the A51 as a scheme that hides government spending and actual elected congressmen fucking demanded that show be taken off air over that. Alien conspiracies? Sure, but call out that the government is doing something illegal with money? Gotta shut that shit down.
He got out of litigation through the very method of saying his show is for entertainment purposes, not education. Though 2013 proved him right later down the line.
Robert Ortiz
Are those the same emails that crowdstrike determined were hacked by Russia despite the FBI never looking at the server and just taking the left wing groups word for it?
Gabriel Myers
thanks
Jeremiah Cruz
How’d that go when he fired James Comey who everyone agreed should be fired? Oh ya they launched a coup against him to get him impeached for exercising his legal constitutional right.
This. Every time he rattles the cage, the kikes strike him with a hundred fucking lawsuits. He's one man working against an entire system.
Brandon Green
>also, acting directors do not require senate confirmation
And therefore don’t have the same legitimacy someone approved by the senate does. Imagine if the “acting AG” went after Trumps political opponents. Even if they were guilty (they are) it would be seen as political persecution by many who wouldn’t vote for his re-election. Presidents always do their most controversial stuff in their second term for a reason.
Daniel Sanders
>thinking the 100 year old foundation of our current financial system can just be destroyed overnight with an executive order
The fed is unconstitutional and should be eliminated but try not to be so stupid about how it can be done.
Dylan Clark
>getting sued for telling the truth these fucking kikes will all be gasses
Hudson Watson
cant wait to read what evidence is brought forth to say this was fake news
Levi Myers
This just makes me think he really may have been the guy that leaked/stolen the DNCs emails.
Dominic Cooper
No they didnt
Alexander Young
reminder that trump was involved in 9/11
hires guiliani as head lawyer hires Bolton as his NSA hires Pompeo friends with Silverstein friends with Bibi Lewis Eisenberg was his best man (melania wedding) friends with Charles Kushner friends with Dick Cheney campaign manager Michael glassner (gave control of WTC to Silverstein) friends with Adnan Kashoggi (bought the flight school) real estate king of NYC his financial building rebecame the tallest in lower manhattan
WikiLeaks never stated that it was Seth Rich. The only reason people believe that it was him was because of a subtle nod from Julian Assange when was asked if it was Seth Rich. What those people failed to realize is that Julian could have easily been nodding as an acknowledgement of the question. WikiLeaks do not reveal their sources.
>DOJ would have taken over the case and made arrests by now. really? fbi panicked and reported that the guns used were "stolen" from an agents car parked nearby
Hudson Miller
now show the countries he's king of. lol
Dominic Robinson
>causing emotional distress interesting how the kids who were standing while some indian protester hit a drum in their face cant sue CNN for emotional distress after they ran national news headlines calling them white supremacists and called for their physical assault
Tyler Richardson
Hi, Bret Hart. I forgive what you did in 1997. I know it was only a larp. Can’t wait for Alberta to join the union!
pic related. apparently their lawsuit was not allowed by a federal judge. so its interesting that this seth rich lawsuit is allowed, for something so trivial, vague, and unprovable like "emotional distress"
Imagine being such worthless fucking parents (or a judge/news network) that a bunch of randoms want to bring attention to your son's death and investigate it, be it true or false or misled, and the only thing you can think of is how to make some cash and prevent them from doing it. Granted they're just saying it's possible, maybe, but they'll probably end up doing it once the DNC or some assorted kike offers to do it for "free."
>The Riches claimed to suffer symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder and social anxiety disorder, and Mary Rich said she no longer feels comfortable in public. that's what clinton death threats do to you. it's absolutely clownish how they spin this on trump.
Justin Williams
When he was killed I was in the sort of "that's weird" camp. But ever since the Ebstein thing of paper sheets, broken neck, no cameras etc. I started to wonder if maybe I wasn't the idiot.
Who, Zion Don, complicit with Jewish schemes? Say it ain't so!
Kevin Cook
Ah, but see - the lawsuit is based on information that is known and public. All private information that is considered secret and locked up to protect "national interest" can and will never be brought forth for court use. that in itself tells us everything we need to fucking know. its under lock in key to protect national security
Caleb Gutierrez
Bump
Brandon Clark
The claim that the data transfer rates were “too ebin fast” is false. The Russians were the hackers.
Lincoln Long
John Podesta had him killed using hitmen from SEIU
Kevin Peterson
Why though? Fox can't possibly lose in this case. What's the point?
