Convince me global warming is a scam...

>Implying there isn't a multi-billion dollar industry that really needs a study that disproves global warming and would gladly fun a thousand studies if one could prove it.

Classic memeflag brainlet. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, liberals are correct about global warming and wrong about most other things.

>liberals are correct about global warming
incorrect!
if they were correct about it they would go after china, not america.

>liberals are correct

said no one ever

Science as stalled since the 50s, and stopped since the 80s

They are correct about its existence, but they are still fucking stupid in their approach. America is leading in greenhouse gas reduction, which is great. Liberals are perpetually pissed off about everything though, and they know they can't influence China, so they bitch at their fellow countrymen.

Only niggers don't care about the environment.

Have doubts? Then listen to the words of former United Nations climate official Ottmar Edenhofer:

"One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole," said Edenhofer, who co-chaired the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change working group on Mitigation of Climate Change from 2008 to 2015.

So what is the goal of environmental policy?

"We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy," said Edenhofer.

investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

climate propaganda is funded by the fucking Rockefellers

It's not a scam. The data tracks the models fairly well and we're already starting to feel the effects, which will mostly be negative for us. There is a cost to action, but it is dwarfed by the cost of inaction.

Humans are strategic thinkers who optimise for comfort and for whom self-delusion is an acceptable strategy.

Don't trust your brain. It's evolutionarily tailored to mislead you and "protect" you from truths that might change your behaviour to put you at a competitive disadvantage to your neighbours, even if such behaviour is necessary for your own survival in the long term.

The quote originates from this 2010 interview, written in German.

All the outlets using the Edenhofer quote have relied on Google Translate to tell them what Edenhofer might have said, as the original interview was in German.

A spokesperson for Edenhofer told me the quote was used “to imply that Prof. Edenhofer ‘admits’ that there is some kind of ‘hidden agenda’ behind climate policy.“

The spokesperson added: “Of course, this is not what he was saying. These quotes are taken out of context to be misused. The devaluation of fossil fuel reserves of course leads in a way to wealth redistribution — but this is rather a consequence of the necessity to stop using fossil fuels, and not the actual goal of climate policy.”

>literally relying on Google Translate as evidence

Was a liberal. Can confirm.

Sea level rise. It just keeps getting higher every year where I'm at.

>Use HAARP to control weather and natural disasters
>Make a climate change tax and ban the straws

Watch this. Even 9 minutes will show you how fucked up the "science" is

youtu.be/rEWoPzaDmOA

Source for any of this?
This just isn't true, pic related. Again, source? Hansens 1988 predictions were pretty accurate.

pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1988/1988_Hansen_ha02700w.pdf

This is only temperatures from a single icecore in Greenland, not global.

Attached: Hansen1988vsGISSthru2016.jpg (777x663, 205K)

Want to solve "global warming"? Kill niggers and plant trees

Attached: 1563832944710.gif (550x1600, 361K)

Well no, the entire continent of Africa puts out a tiny fraction of emissions.

Attached: ZynYWvcY6ffDNb--dtcsWslj10J_IasTftachrC3cTE.png (960x684, 168K)

>compare
That third step in your image is misleading. Compare to what? These studies can’t be reproduced.

Climate change is real, it is caused by pollution, shitty urban planning, irregular solar activity and geoengineering. But the carbon dioxide panic is stupid:

anthropogenic-carbon-dioxide-global-warming.net/index.htm

Translation?

Yeah, the niggers here too, solve overpopulation and global warming in one go. USA's niggerpopulation too.

Im not as worried about climate change as I am of the destruction of the environment in general. I.e using up resources way too fast, deforestation, etc. And I think that many eco-fascists think the same

You aren't making sense, even if all of Africa disappeared tomorrow, this wouldn't stop. The US and China together make up almost 50% of emissions, then it's India, Russia, Europe. Africa is not of any consequence.

>1 post by this ID
Wow, relly make u think

big question. u smrt enuf to answer niggur boi?

Attached: 1568464120124.jpg (600x679, 96K)

If you believe in climate change after you see this you are a dumb sheep. They spent 15 mil on WARTERFRONT property,

Attached: climatechangehoax.png (1190x1204, 1.45M)

"Bad" end
>gib gibs
>no
>dead

Other end
>gib gibs
>yes
>nigs x10
>gib gibs x10

>spend who's limited funds?
>memeflag

Snowballs chance in hell I'll get a serious reply. Global warming science is just the re branding term for "socialist " wealth redistribution now. Every once in a while the people running the scam actually let that little fact slip on camera. There are very real environmental issues. CO2 isn't one of them.

Attached: 1563634783295.jpg (460x259, 27K)

For those who want to believe that maybe Edenhofer just misspoke and doesn't really mean that, consider that a little more than five years ago he also said that "the next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world's resources will be negotiated."

CO2 emissions are .o4% of 1% of the atmosphere. Out of the 04%, less than 1% of the. 04% is man made.

Also, CO2 is needed to grow plants, it's good for growing, not toxic

Also, with hysteria we hear, we never hear what exactly they propose to do, other than to use hysteria to rule over lives and scare people so they gain power.

Is this another Google Translate "quote"? Should I even bother Googling it?

Pollution vs man made climate change

>memflaggot

reporterherald.com/2019/01/09/jim-cochran-climate-change-is-a-hoax-with-redistribution-of-wealth-as-the-goal/

climatedepot.com/2019/07/12/aocs-chief-of-staff-admits-green-new-deal-about-implementing-socialism-it-wasnt-originally-a-climate-thing-at-all-its-a-change-the-entire-economy-thing/

Note that the spokesperson doesn’t say that the translation is wrong only that they were “taken out of context”. Which is obvious spin.

Watch this video and be amazed how easy it is to change your mind
youtube.com/watch?v=BiKfWdXXfIs

climatedepot.com/2017/05/24/global-warming-is-not-about-the-science-un-admits-climate-change-policy-is-about-how-we-redistribute-the-worlds-wealth/

Where's the source, though? That's just a blogpost with no citations.

Hey, one quote at a time user. Don't try and distract from the issue under discussion.

Good thing the spokesperson also clarifies the actual context then, isn't it?

Replace “environmental groups” with “politicians”, “limited funds” with “unlimited tax dollars”, and “97% of scientists” with “the media”

The environmental groups are just fronts created by the politicians.

The 97% number was always a lie.

Does that take into account the methane from all the nigger and chink farts?

>Jim Cochran
Who?
>Loveland reporter opinion page
Who?

There are no sources here, just some guy writing to a newspaper opinion page and saying climate change is a hoax because I say it is.

newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/noel-sheppard/2010/11/18/un-ipcc-official-admits-we-redistribute-worlds-wealth-climate

That link doesn't refer to Cancun or contain Ottmar's supposed quote.

Global warming is not a scam. It has been going on for as long as the earth has excisted, and THIS all scientists agree.
The amount of human contribution, if any at all, IS highly debated among scientists.

Politicians and other people with an agenda mix those two together to confuse and scare people to make them more pliable to their demands

torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-failed-climate-policies-are-about-wealth-redistribution

>citing a webpage that doesn't exist
thegwpf.org/ipcc-news/1877-ipcc-official-climate-policy-is-redistributing-the-worlds-wealth.html
Interesting tactics.

last 5 years have been the hottest on record

That doesn't contain Ottmar's quote about Cancun.

What's your game user? Post every link and hope I go away?

You're a joke.

How much American economic development, and therefore environmental emissions goes towards propping up Africa’s artificially inflated population?

>exposing and combating liberal news bias
another opinion piece by some literal who

arizonadailyindependent.com/2015/03/06/top-un-official-admits-climate-change-is-about-transforming-world-economy/

You should. Maybe then you can shed the brainwashing of the NeoLuddite Doomsday Cult.

Do not forget to get rid of the wooden shoes.

Doesn't contain Ottmar's quote about Cancun.

You can keep posting forever if you want.

Okay, I'm curious. Where's the paper on this climate change theory? I have yet to see one. If there's such, is it peer reviewed?

Also concensus doesn't mean anything

about $20 billion of $19 trillion

GISS = PISS

Everything from methods to calculation and interpretation in GISS is garbage.

Didn't NASA just release a report stating that climate change is in no way human-made? Not that we should be sucking NASA's dick, as they are definitely liars most of the time. But I have to ask, why lie by saying it's NOT manmade?

Fun fact: the only way humanity can fuck the globe temperature is with a nuclear war that can create a nuclear winter.

independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/capitalism-un-scientists-preparing-end-fossil-fuels-warning-demise-a8523856.html

Global warming alarmism is how you take over the global economy. It is a power grab.

we have no idea what the global temperature ever was,
during your "medieval warm period" Baghdad was getting a foot of snow and the Tigris river was freezing over in the winter.

Doesn't contain Ottmar's Cancun quote.

For someone who is too smart to trust the Jews in the news you sure do seem to get literally all of your information from news sites.

Convince me it's not, retard.
>CO2
Historic data shows CO2 trails temperature changes, not causing/leading it

If it wasnt a scam they wouldnt be using obvious cons like Al Gore or Greta Thurnberg. You dont See these kind of media powered frauds advocating for cancer research, Alzheimer awareness or any other normal cause. Plus the ridiculous doomsday fearmongering, Just Google the headlines from ~15 years ago about how the planet would look like in 2020, when all the ice melts or sth. Its like one of these millenarian cults that predicted the Rapture five Times already

Attached: 1552149097218.jpg (415x600, 58K)

Interpreting the statement for us is not a clarification of context it’s spin, giving the actual full quote in German is what actual clarification of context looks like.
Why would you ever take statements of a politicians PR representative at face value?
When Trump’s spokesperson clarifies one of his goofball statements do you mindlessly accept it in the same way?

>anarchist
>asking Jow Forums for the "real facts"

yeah, no.

This graphic does not account for the indoctrination that goes on in schools that lead to these (((scientists))) using techniques to confirm their biases instead of challenging them. It has been successful.

Goverments and large companies fund most of the science. They expect a certain result for their money.

based frate

>giving the actual full quote in German is what actual clarification of context looks like.
Okay.

(EDENHOFER): Basically it's a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization. The climate summit in Cancun at the end of the month is not a climate conference, but one of the largest economic conferences since the Second World War. Why? Because we have 11,000 gigatons of carbon in the coal reserves in the soil under our feet - and we must emit only 400 gigatons in the atmosphere if we want to keep the 2-degree target. 11 000 to 400 - there is no getting around the fact that most of the fossil reserves must remain in the soil.

(NZZ AM SONNTAG): De facto, this means an expropriation of the countries with natural resources. This leads to a very different development from that which has been triggered by development policy.

(EDENHOFER): First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.

Go wild user.

How far back does the record go?

>"what is more likely"
>only one choice given

Attached: I_guess_SOME_people_are_into_that_sort_of_thing.gif (300x290, 1.74M)

Source?

This abomination is non mathematical - let alone scientific. Don't give a rat's about GW theory, but only literal mouth-breathers would look at a random collection of anecdotes with NO FUCKING Y AXIS VALUES AT ALL and feel it says anything meaningful. That shit is sjw shill-tier.

Just google how much economic aid the US gives to Africa

(((limited funds)))
What a wild fucking world you live in. Global charities are multi-million to multi-billion dollar businesses these days you based retard.

To know the true purpose of 'global warming' you must look at the 'solutions' developed.

>To conspire
If their paycheck depends upon adding the theory as premise for the research they want to undertake, then that's the outcome.
>97%
Of 77 scientist that were used for that sample

It has been talked about for decades with many prophecies coming and going about the end of the world. They eventually changed the name to 'Climate Change' to keep the fear among the people.

If you're the scientist who disproves climate change you'd win a Nobel Prize, user.

Learn to read
Hanseri's predictions to the US congress in 1988
UAH Monthly mean lower troposphere temperature anomalies

>Look at this Dollar Store discount ghetto-assed graphic I made up, full of half truths and lies of omission!
>Convince me it's wrong.
Yeah no.. you can fuck off with your shitty bait.
Believe what you want - I don't care.
Just don't ask me to buy into your delusions.

So how are people misinterpreting that statement then?

Climate change is real, man made climate change is bullsht. Why would the Obamas buy multi million dollar property in Marthas Vineyard if they thought there was any chance of something happening.

Africa benefits from more than just direct economic aid, it also buys products.

Redistribution is a result of climate policy, not the goal of it.

Consensus is not science.
I can find 100 idiots who think the world is flat, and will go on record saying so.
Don't mean it's true...

>Of 77 scientist that were used for that sample
There are several papers showing the same thing, and no its not just 77 scientists used for samples. I have no idea were this meme came from.

iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002

pnas.org/content/107/27/12107.abstract

agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2009EO030002

>Redistribution is a result of climate policy, not the goal of it.
Horse shit.
The goal has ALWAYS been a shakedown of first world nations - GibsMuhDats for the 3rd world shitholes.
Saying otherwise is a breath-taking level of self-delusion or outright lying your ass off.