9/11 Violates Laws of Physics

>Brazilian that claims to knows physics and understands thermal expansion in engineering structures

jesusridingadinosaur.jpg

exactly shlomo.

watch the video and you will understand how it's impossible for it to fall nearly at freefall speed.

So the bottom floors that weren't on fire suddenly couldn't hold the weight why?
It's obviously a controlled demolition to anyone who looks at it and thinks about it for more than 2 seconds. Add in the buildings were about to be condemned over asbestos and you've got yourself the greatest jewish lighting of all time

Attached: wtc34.jpg (700x467, 165K)

You couldn't plant explosives ahead of time, and then start the collapse where the planes did damage, as we saw. No way you could target a floor with a passenger jet, twice, IMO.
And you probably couldn't plant explosives after the jet hits, a floor below the damage, twice.
I think it is what it is. Twenty years in, and niggers can only tell me what it wasn't, but not what it was.

But peeple /// saw it on TV///

>of course only 15 floors would weight the same as the other 90 added!
Blanka, you are retarded.

>not understanding how buildings work.
>not understanding that buildings are designed to hold up a certain amount of weight.
>not realizing buildings aren’t designed to withstand forces well beyond their failing point.
>not realizing that 15 floors falling has more force than 15 floors being supported.
>not realizing that no building is designed to withstand thousands of tons of material smashing down on top of a weakened structure.
>not realizing the twin towers needed the exterior shell to hold the building together. Or that when that external shell broke, the structural integrity of the entire building was fucked.
This is why everyone thinks you people are fucking morons.

Why do you all ignore the fact that building 7 was missing nearly an entire corner of its structure from Tower 2 smashing into it?

Attached: FA3ED754-88CA-4717-9F11-EBE84F8AFFCE.jpg (724x570, 84K)

Shut up, Jew.

Yes it would have, all fireproofing on the floors where the planes hit was completely stripped off from the impact.

It was missiles disguised as planes. Once you account for remote guidance tech all your questions are answered. They placed explosives ahead of time and then placed missiles exactly where they needed to to sell the jetfuel melted steel beams story to the common moron.

yes it would fall to one side not implode user

Since when is differing weights a factor of building strength? The building is only designed to withstand so much force. When that force is exceed, the building fails. When the support system that holds the building together is structurally compromises and the building experiences forces greater than it could with a structurally sound support system, it’s going to fail.
Do you idiots really think that if you dropped a 15 story building on top of any skyscraper it would survive?

If V is freefall speed, how is V/2 also freefall speed? Is V = 0? Are you saying the towers are still standing?

really makes you think, huh

Attached: 23423453.jpg (720x440, 79K)

Maybe because 7 fell in free fall not toppled over starting with that corner.
Also all the none WTC buildings next to it stood up just fine. Almost as if they only wanted to get rid of certain well insured buildings that were soon to be declared uninhabitable due to asbestos.

>When someone without autism enters the thread

Because it didn't collapse towards that obviously weakened point but instead fell down symetrically and as proven by the UAF study the only way for it happen was complete faiure of all the members at the same time.

Buildings can't melt other buildings. If a building crashes into another one, it's a standoff. Newton proved you couldn't break one egg against another.

>nearly at free fall speeds
Oh really? Then why are things falling faster than those floors? See all that debris below the main part that is falling?Are they falling faster than gravity is pulling them?

Attached: 33CD00E9-6378-478C-8285-50AA03E21532.jpg (396x600, 11K)

Of course. KISS

Umm because no building is designed to withstand a 15 story building falling on top of it. Regardless of whether it was damaged or not in the first place.

keep it simple stupid ?

Every building over 15 stories in NYC would deflect a 15 story building being dropped on it. I can buy a total loss but I ain't buying a controlled demolition style implosion that only takes down buildings owned by Lucky Larry. Should have fallen off to the side and left 40-60 floors standing.

19 yr old here, im pretty sure WTC never even existed. My whole family dpesnt know anyone killed by it

then why did it free fall instead of collapsing falling in the direction of that corner?

The thing about Physics, is reality often yells FUCK YOU to theoretical scientists. You hit the right angle and weight distribution you can land a car on it's front bumper. When you're dealing with 15 fucking floors metal, destabilized from being hit by 439 metric tonnes traveling over 700mph, physics starts grinning like a grade school boy peeping the girls locker room.

Attached: larryTN.jpg (192x259, 16K)

Unless it was already design to support that weight? The pancake theory pretty ridiculous. Why not demolish buildings by just blowing them up half way up and let gravity do the rest? Because it wouldn't work.

Tell that to a woman

That’s not what happened at all. The part that was damaged bowed outwards on all sides due to the steel trusses losing their strength and becoming plastic (no I don’t mean actual plastic, the use of plastic here is a term used to describe solids that aren’t solid but also not a liquid yet). Once the outer skeleton lost its support from the inside the weight of the floors above caused it to fail and fall roughly straight down. Although it didn’t really fall straight down. Parts of the tower were found thousands of feet away.

Ever seen an avalanche, morons?

Good rebuttal. You’ve changed my mind

>Heeb-rock typing
Not today Gene. Some day you and (((Space Ace))) will pay.

Now do building 7 lmfao

ever played Jenga?
failure at at some point of a structure at a cross section, even at a height, can cause a cause a cascading effect of failure

Go back to r*ddit you colossal faggot.

Hot steel will sustain more impact force. But hold less tension or pressure.

Do you know the definition of implode? Because even in the loosest terms, they did not implode. The way the towers failed, the exterior skeleton shearing off, is what caused the to fall roughly straight down. However, tower 2 actually ride lean before completely failing.
Does pic related look like it fell straight? Or does it look like on side started falling first?

Attached: A46FD4D3-9231-40C7-BBE6-5C64F01DD7A2.jpg (480x326, 40K)

Da fuq was that drivel supposed to mean?

Attached: 1568229931087.jpg (899x653, 488K)

Makes us think what? That a b-25 (which is much smaller than a 767) going 150 knots is comparable to a 767 going 500 knots?

Learn to read you illiterate pavement ape

ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
They built a model that has yet to be called faulty. Do you guys believe in science when it proves you wrong?

i put a 5 pound hammer on your head your fine. I drop on your head from 10 ft you die

_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _

Attached: tumblr_n6xdcrndDd1rjdsv0o1_500.gif (500x371, 865K)

Wow... so you think our government killed 3000 people and made countless others sick just to get rid of some buildings that were going to be uninhabitable? What the fuck is wrong with you?

>The structure of the towers was the same every floor.
No, the s t e e l b e a m s got thinner as they went up, I don't remember the numbers but the difference was substantial. It only reinforces the pic's point though.

Yeah I'm sure the people who designed a 100 story office building in the wealthiest city on earth just forgot about the potential added weight of elevator motors and desk chairs

Jet fuel can burn at close to 800 Celsius I believe. That is not hot enough to melt it as is often pointed out but it still reduces the strength of the material. Impact forces apply a large amount of stress to a material in a short amount of time which can cause failure.

Attached: 937581B7-EBB1-46B3-AC3C-F1EB0973BBCE.png (687x386, 63K)

Not if I have a hammer hat, or am made of hammers, dumb fuck. Physics more, kike.

user, briefly I worked in the Airframe and Powerplant (aviation) field. I can tell you:
>Wings MUST be flexible. They are not attached by hardpoints, but soft points.

Wings hold the fuel, by design, they snap off at a preset ppsi in order to reduce fire and explosive potential.

Hard points like those are attached to CRUISE MISSILES, which behave, in every way, like what hit the towers.

>>The Boeing Instructor Pilot Assn could not replicate the flight paths in 500 tries.
One got it....almost.

Cruise missiles can replicate that flight path, easily

OK. If anyone believes this (pic related), you're a total fucking retard.

>what is a collision

>15 floors break one floor
>16 floors break one floor
>17 floors break one floor
>18 floors break one floor

9/11 shit is a lame psyop to detract from actual good theories

Attached: 1566306160243.png (484x440, 474K)

Dig this. If you add air, you can melt steel with wood. I shit you not.

Towers are designed to collapse like that instead of toppling over and crushing everything in their wake. The shock of that one floor collapsing set off a cascade of strategically placed crumple zones.

No planes, it was CGI.

15 extra heavy floors just flew over my house.

Attached: 9-11 Jumpers.png (1420x118, 13K)

How many people do you think your government killed in the Iraq war immediately following 9/11? Hint: Over 1 million.

>our government
I don't know about you but I'm not a kike.

>what is structual integrity

your mum violates my pants

Because there is a constant gravitational force applied to everything

kek

So vortex of fresh air fed the fires even throughout the building? Wouldn't a corner collapse first?

skyscrapers have elevators all throughout, not single shafts going all the way from top to bottom and the equipment was on technical floors at roughly one third and two thirds of the buildings' height
so: no, what you wrote doesn't make sense in the slightest

Attached: wtc-elevators.gif (200x500, 11K)

No the official story violates laws of physics.

911 report and their models were full of BS. The three towers were brought down by controlled demolition. The firefighters know.
youtu.be/HLW0_wCYyqY
youtu.be/sNriYvuNmu8
youtu.be/l_Kmyo8KLTM

Http://www.ae911truth.org/
TRUMP knew Truth on 911, maybe he can do something about it.

youtube.com/watch?v=gNodh9OlTrQ

youtube.com/watch?v=flnhdhxVR6g

youtube.com/watch?v=aoYXihwcp8c

youtube.com/watch?v=j-7bxI_XOoQ

The destruction of WTC was an occult ritual.
>the Twin Towers represented Boaz and Jachin, the columns at the entrance to the Temple of Solomon
>Boaz and Jachin represent the two key energies: ying and yang, male and female, strength and beauty, north and south, up and down (duality - like the Star of David)
>WTC builder, Rockefeller, says the buildings are the perfect combination of "utility and beauty"; he also owns Jerusalem museum housing remains from Temple of Solomon
>Luciferianism predicts/wants a new age of transhumanism; Kaballah and freemasonry believe one attains perfection by mastering and combining male and female energies
>Twin Towers destroyed in consciousness altering event at start of millenium to usher in this new era of transhumanism
>Replaced by Freedom Tower where both towers are combined, one up and one down, like a Star of David
>2001: Space Odyssey is about man's evolution to transhumanism - he touches the black monolith and transcends human form to a space baby
>9/11 happened in 2001, next to the Millenium hotel designed to look like the black monolith
>madrid bombing was 911 days after 9/11
>sept 11 is the first day of the coptic calendar, first month is named after Thoth
>2001 was the start of the new millenium not 2000 (there was no year zero)
>33 years from groundbreaking to destruction pentagon groundbreaking sept 11 1941

Fuck kikes

𒀭𓆏𒀭

CGI hides the missiles on film. Eye witnesses saw funny looking missiles and believed them to be planes because that's what they we're told. Fool a few thousand real witnesses and add in the millions of people who lie about witnessing it and anyone who thought they saw missiles won't dare to speak up.

the only thing i don't know, is how they they say they fell at freefall speed?
because you can't see them falling, it's obscured by dust

>waco

This.

Modern science is just kike linguistics. Semetic semantics.

QM bs

youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc

Electricity Eric Dollard

youtube.com/watch?v=TttHkDRuyZw

Gravity & Black Holes

youtube.com/watch?v=wRsGPq77X0Q

Gubbermint spends more on hypothetical space biology than mushrooms

youtube.com/watch?v=XI5frPV58tY

TRUMP knew Truth on 911

youtube.com/watch?v=gNodh9OlTrQ

youtube.com/watch?v=flnhdhxVR6g

youtube.com/watch?v=aoYXihwcp8c

youtube.com/watch?v=j-7bxI_XOoQ

GLOBAL HOAXING

youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU

youtube.com/watch?v=ExgKJpJyDXQ

youtube.com/watch?v=tbAgl7w_Vws

takeourworldback.com/zionistcrimes.htm

mostdamagingwikileaks.com

Http://www.ae911truth.org/

Psychiatric Drugs: Create Violence & Suicide - cchrint.org
cchrint.org/pdfs/violence-report.pdf

Money system
youtu.be/EC0G7pY4wRE

youtu.be/wgazsNiu3BA

READ JULIAN JAYNES CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE BICAMERAL MIND
youtu.be/ruZoc0F5h_0
youtu.be/eWO4HmaX6iA
youtu.be/lyu7v7nWzfo

>Wouldn't a corner collapse first?
Apparently not.

OP is a moron and does not have any understanding of physics, gravity, or even common sense.

Attached: embarrassing.jpg (1262x592, 157K)

If that happened then the building can't collapse in freefall you dumb kike. If the process even took .02 seconds per floor it would show in the end time of the collapse.

It's not highschool level--highschool physics lessons are pathetically insufficient to analyze the most basic of situations--the image is incoherent, and the critical dimensional unit is work, not energy.

Furthermore having "not enough" of inertia would INCREASE the likelihood that the tower collapses, not decrease it.

Free fall does not mean “no resistance”. It means “no net resistance”. Collapsing beams still clinging to the walls functioned as levers. So there were three forces at work on Building 7 during its collapse, and the sum of these three forces varied with time: the constant downward force of gravity, the variable upward force of residual structural resistance, and variable leveraged downward forces due to connections to other parts of the building. The leveraging forces may have briefly accelerated parts of Building 7 at greater than 1G, and in fact the NIST Report shows very slightly faster than free-fall for a second or so, though that could just be the margin of error.

Oh the irony.

The 2nd tower that was hit, was the first one to fall because it was hit at a point lower causing the support to give out faster causing it to collapse first. It's pretty obvious that the buildings fell because of the impact and resulting fires

Jet fuel burned up in the explosion. It didn't continue to heat up the beams. Normal office fire heat was present after the jet fuel burned up. Also, the firefighters got to the floors with the fire and said an hour they could put it out over the radio. 10 mins later the entire tower collapsed, instantly, symmetrically, into it's own footprint...

No, to justify intervention in the ME, probably, the CIA could have been thinking "we need to assert ourselves their more," but the civilian populace would never go along with invading the entire middle east so "let's knock down some buildings" then the Iraq war and Afghan war happened, and both turned out to be completely useless as THE ONE F*CKING MUSLIM COUNTRY THAT HID HIM WAS OUR ALLY PAKISTAN, AND THE ONE MUSLIM COUNTRY WITH NUKES! Did the CIA not see any alternative to trying to capture Osama quietly, and if not, why?

This is more stupid shit. The towers were designed to withstand a plane crash.

Shut the fuck up kike he mentioned nothing about speed or size. A plane = a plane, fucking strawman retard

Oh it didn’t? Why’s it titled then in this pic?

Attached: 9DA54731-B303-4485-AE56-1123C8F776C7.jpg (480x326, 83K)

He was talking about #7. Also fake pic try again KIKE

thats not wtc7 retard

The ME has vital resources to international economic trade, and of importance. Oil, minerals, and metals, what more could a Glownigger want.