Are there seriously people on this board that deny evolution?

Evolution is as sound as you can get for a "theory" - there is no competing explanation for the natural world in any possible capacity

Maybe because it started to be able to produce web then it started using it to get place easier then started to block it's home off from smaller predators then by doing that it started catching prey and the best one at it thrived producing more well less efficient does off more. While other species where also evolving

Attached: 1569111184080.jpg (1386x560, 148K)

>there is no competing explanation for the natural world in any possible capacity
Ya, that's because the concept is so vague that it's literally a tautology. Good job being a fucking retard and swallowing a literal circular argument.

>I CAN FEEL IT
>COOMIN IN THE AIR AT NIGHT
>OHHHHH WHOOOO

Darwin basically went on a exotic dinning booze cruze.

It's not vague, it's completely sound. DNA evidence, the kind we've only known about since the 60s, solidifies it in the most concrete way possible. Good luck trying to pin genetics, biology, paleontology, and biophysics as tautology.

Wait animals come from plants?

>he doesn't see how narrowing down the origins of life via evolution only reinforces creationism
evolution supports creationism just as much as it doesn't.

Yes. We're getting retards and untermensch to tie their ideas to their IPs.
>Muh monkey ancestors
Couldn't even read a paragraph of a book.

>you're just descended from apes, goy
>stop having ideas about human dignity, goy
>there's no point to existence, goy
>don't you care about science, goy?
>btw there are 58 genders, goy
>also simultaneously no genders and gender is fluid, goy
>t. scientist
cool, thanks for the info. Next you'll tell me that (((journalists))) are objective and only care about the facts.

>evolution going back billions of years supports all life being created 6000 years ago
ayy lmao

>taking the bible literally
That was your first mistake. Religion is too malleable to be disproved. The fact that fools like you continue to try just shows you're too ignorant to see the futility in the attempt.

Why is it that Christcucks apply the most stringent requirements and standards on evolutionists when picking apart their arguments (while deciding beforehand what they're going to believe so any arguments are pointless) yet are able to suspend any semblance of logic or prudence when it comes to believing that a bearded man on a cloud put the universe together like a lego set?

Yes, people who put more value in the scientific method and observable phenomenon may not have all the answers, but the fact is that they've learned magnitudes more through these methods in 300 years than in 1500 years of orthodoxy.

Religion could have a play as a social science, something to maintain healthy morals and social relationships, but trying to use desert mythology to explain the questions of natural processes is just asking to be btfo.

Attached: 156310803154786.jpg (518x592, 17K)

Shit man your post just debunked evolution
We've got your nobel prize ready for ya

kek :DDDDD

Attached: 1569111906765.jpg (1386x560, 158K)

Evolution goes against everything creationism embodies

Jesus Once again asks are you ready to believe?

youtube.com/watch?v=h6fcK_fRYaI

I'm right here. I can tap you on the shoulder and ring your physics engine like a gong when you're ready to talk.

Attached: jesus.jpg (531x710, 290K)

Cause theyre dumb... and they want to desperately cling onto their incorrect religious beliefs throguh a combination of wishful thinking and cognitive dissonamce.

>it's always fucking amerikeks making these shitty threads
Need to improve my filter game.

I noticed that humans were lumped all into one. Niggers and non aryan phenotypes are hominoids where as anything above slavic is a human/ person. Just because they can make hybrid offspring with people does not make them human.

It literally doesn't, which is why religion quite easily adapted to the concept of evolution
>God started it!
The existence of a beginning point in the evolution of life can easily be used as evidence for a higher power. You've only moved a slight inch in the miles of distance you still need to cover to disprove god.

The task of proving the nonexistence of a higher power is insurmountable. Stop wasting your time, and spend it on something that is provable.

Yep.
They're called leftists.

Attached: race,IQ,and Income (1).jpg (911x623, 75K)

Black on white cuck porn proves that we are now de-evolving and I’m sure Darwin would agree on that

>Religion is too malleable to be disproved.
Religion is too nebuluous to be proved.

The existence of religion is self evident to it having a purpose. The fact that religiousless societies inevitably form some religious-like belief structure is indicative of a higher function.

Attached: TheBowBreaks.jpg (1920x1080, 1.37M)

"You've only moved a slight inch in the miles of distance you still need to cover to disprove god."
as if God needs to be disproved? retard. go prove he exists first???
and just because we don't know the very origins doesn't mean it's pointless to look for them. that's how science works

>referring to God as "him"
Why do you even think god is a singular being capable of being referred to?
God is a concept, you absolute fool. Stop comparing it to Santa Claus. It's this ignorance that shows atheist for the children they are.

God is synonymous with origin and purpose. People want to have a purpose, so a purpose is found. Religion is usually the product of this purpose being found.
Why is that so hard for you coomers to understand?
How can you pretend to be capable of having this discussion when you deny this very basic need of the human psyche?

>latest mass extinction
>only a section of reptiles "removed"
really makes ya think.

Attached: 1544304312703.jpg (480x200, 19K)

Just as the cumbrain needs his porn to merely exist.

So does the christcuck need his imaginey skydaddy.

Attached: 1568746961792.jpg (599x495, 82K)

+
Beyond the interesting similarity.
Evolution is fact checked by fossils. Any denier is probably a religiously dogmatized NPC.

God created evolution.

>he doesn't have an instinctual curiosity to his origins and purpose
>he thinks I'm religious
atheist really are a lower form of life, it seems.

>self evident
No it's not.
>he fact that religiousless societies inevitably form some religious-like belief structure is indicative of a higher function
No, it's indicative of humanities need for something greater. We are so pathetic we NEED a god to blaim it on. Perhaps we should stop blaming god and take responsibility for our own actions. I can do anything then repent is awful.

Cunt, given standardized rates of mutation, the earth is not old enough (as measured by geologists) to allow for evolution to be real.
Do you even fucking science?

Attached: image.jpg (720x720, 77K)

>his rationalization for this need for origin and purpose is to describe humanity as pathetic
You expose yourself in your attempt to refute the thought.

Never underestimate a Theist's mental gymnastics to deny anything that debunks their faith. You've got people trying to push this meme that nasa footage is all fake because they want the world to be flat.

>Muh 6000

nice red herring retard. go prove God exists then you can start crying about evolution "disproving" him

Atheists are also religious I'd say.
They do /believe/ in the inexistence of an unproven negative.

Where's the missing link?
How did the eye evolve naturally?
Why do the scientific consensus is so strong armed in favor of evolution yet they deny race realism?
Evolution is politics, not science, faggot.

>coom brain is still having trouble moving past the concept of God not actually being a singular entity
This is pathetic. I'm trying to engage you on a real discussion about religion's place in society, yet all you can do is regurgitate the same shit you posted before.

I thought atheist were capable of having an intellectual conversation? Isn't that what you pride yourself on?

What are you even talking about, faggot?
I said geological age, not 6000.

Attached: 1558460396762.jpg (475x409, 34K)

all simulated crap

christcuck spotted with shitty arguments.

>Where's the missing link?
Propose a theory with equal or more evidence that what evolution suggests and I will hear it. As it stands now, evoluton has a mountain of evidence and creationism has absolute zero.
>How did the eye evolve naturally?
Do some research about the eye before spouting off. Its an abomination of tangled meat, sitting upside down then re-procressing the images to be right side up. It is not at all the work of a creator, and if it was, he'd be an awful creator.
>Why do the scientific consensus is so strong armed in favor of evolution yet they deny race realism?
Because your jew on a stick created a weak culture in the white world.
>Evolution is politics, not science, faggot.
Its 2019 friend, everything is politics.

Attached: 1568166174270.png (960x960, 670K)

>Raging
Are you actually interested in the answers to your questions?
>Eye
youtube.com/watch?v=2X1iwLqM2t0
>missing link
futurism.com/there-is-no-missing-link-in-evolution
Race (oversimplified based on skin colour which would have us group together Ethiopians and African American slave descendents), no. Genetics, yes.

yes, me

Making tangled mess on ground to trap crawling animals.
Making tangled mess on air to catch jumping/flying animals.
Making slightly less tangled mess that has more integrity.
(you are here) Making organized web that is highest integrity and efficiency.

wrong.

Attached: mike-stoklasa-58819d732624a.jpg (720x983, 84K)

they've simply moved the goal post and claim "B-BUT MUH GAWD CANNUT BE DISPROVEN CHECKMATE NIGGUZ" .

Good thing Darwin isn't the be all end all of evolutionary knowledge.

You know how I know this is fake? Moss comes after Ferns. Wrong. Plants and algae would be nonvascular first.

Explain how one "nothing" comes together with another "nothing" to make something??? I'll wait.....

Evolution can easily be construed as evidence for creationism. But you seem more interested in the politics of this argument, instead of the actual science behind it.

>Doesn't argue, just cooms

Nice try.

Attached: 1569008614272.png (878x740, 117K)

Going against the scientific method marvelously proves my point.

Here a well deserved You

They never moved the goalpost, because that has always been the deal.
Everything that is, was created by God. If evolution is real, then it too must be created by God.
If these people are so stupid, why do you have such difficulty using their rationalization to show your point?

REM LEZARRRRRRRRRRRR

REM LEZARRRARRRRRRRRRR

Attached: rem-lezar.gif (240x184, 617K)

(you)

The evolution that is taught in school is a lie.

Bible is Word

lmaoing at you posting a debunked argument in favor of the evolution of the eye. You even ad libbed it. It's fucking ironic how you mock a theological book yet you are so adamanant to parrot whatever they tell you it's "scientific" without questioning.
So you don't have a missing link? Gotcha.
>muh dead jew on a stick
Classical fallacious parroting from le epic atheist
>Everything is politics
Poor deflection.

BTW
>Having the photoreceptors at the back of the retina is not a design constraint, it is a design feature. The idea that the vertebrate eye, like a traditional front-illuminated camera, might have been improved somehow if it had only been able to orient its wiring behind the photoreceptor layer, like a cephalopod, is folly.

>Are there seriously people on this board that deny evolution?

Yep.

Good thing it's just an artistic rendering of phylogeny and the left-right orientation has no bearing on primitive vs. more advanced.

IF evolution is real......then where are all the flying type humans and fish type humans, and plant type humans, and reptile types??? I'll wait.....

you literally waltz in here and say that evolution is a tool to disprove "god" when there's literally no proof of "god" in any capacity in the first place on top of using reddit-tier memes kys

That's not very smart, leaf.

Do better.

>muh 100% evidence based on the science
First of all you sound really religious.

Second, not believing in a (((scientific))) theory doesn't make you a denier, if you had anything but pilpul to argue with you'd realize that. The burden of proof is on you, and since evolution is fundamentally unprovable given our lifespans and the timescale neccessary, you seem to have a bizarre obsession with proving something that cannot be proved.

If you knew how lenses and focal points worked you wouldn't think it weird that the brain "knows" to invert the image. Unless you want two lenses (waste of energy and no selective pressure for it since one works just fine) flipping the image is the only way to make a single lensed eye works.

see

Fine, source?

You reworded what I said. Leaving now. I don't talk to idiots.

Why?

Well according to OP......everything evolved from bacteria. Graph shows this.
SO WHERE ARE MY WINGS AND GILLS!

youtube.com/watch?v=8yKc21YZU5Y

Attached: 7e5c47bb722d1c150b593e5d8558ab2757dc6f7404843fec9cded882e61d217a.jpg (1125x2310, 552K)

The Bible says man was made by God from the clay or dust of the Earth. Humans share 50% of their DNA with bananas.

our existence is the proof of god, as well as the significance the concept holds in nearly every human society. The reason evolution is so important to atheist is because it is suppose to be the evidence that god didn't create man. Unfortunately for atheist, evolution makes no such implication.

Are you so sheltered in your belief that you can't take someone challenging it? It's sad that you shut yourself away from criticism with such anger.

If anything we are all Devolving!

My proof.......LOOK AROUND!

yes. im a life scientist. you aren't. please provide at least one example of an experiment with positive and negative controls demonstrating macroevolution.

Attached: evolution_childrens_book_annabelle_aiden.jpg (1280x640, 231K)

Plants are eukayotes, we share a very distant common ancestor.

>Explain how a bug evolves from not making a web at all to making one well enough to catch prey
Cave glow worms are a good example of how you can catch prey without having a web first. They literally just tangle mucus threads from the ceiling like the barnicles from half-life and that's how they feed.

Ah yes, Dawkins.
The masterful scientist who doesn't mind in correlating 2 civilizations thousands of years appart and then purposely giving false information just to poorly say "every religion has it's own jesus/Noah's ark/etc."
An assyrioloist read his latest book and called his shit on it hard.
Also, I already told you that the evolution of the eye being "full of mistakes" is false and showed you an excerpt that's not from last century. Keep treating Dawkins as a can do no wrong messiah though, really helps with your argument against religion!

>Good thing it's made up shit
Exactly.

Except for the inability to test or make predictions based on the ((((theory))))
Here's the real problem: if evolution or abiogenesis were true, we'd be caked with non-replicating, failes "attempts" of nature to create DNA.
The idea that it got DNA right the first and only time it ever created a trillion-protein-long double helix "sentence" is goofy. We should see false DNA in every pond drop and popping out of every living cell.

You run away because you accidentally exposed your belief system while trying to imply that religion isn't indicative of a basic psychological need for a belief system.

But go ahead and call me an idiot, you monkey.

How is that 'well deserved'?

Present. Evolution is a Satanic lie and anyone who believe it is an idiot

Isn't the a large portion of the religious people here on this board that believes that Jesus was literally the son of God?