Jow Forums gets BTFO in a thread

>Jow Forums gets BTFO in a thread
>Jow Forums ignores thread to be pruned
Pathetic.

Attached: file.png (1330x400, 99K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/227337500/#227337500
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-results-september-15-17-2019
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>here's a law that restricts freedom of speech
>who cares about the 1st amendment

jews were a mistake.

YouTube can censor all they want. The problem is they have a monopoly and sites like bitchute are being banned by governments

Nobody is forcing you to use YouTube though you retard.

>Be Youtuber
>Been coasting on free youtube bux.
>Youtube severely limits how much it pays out
>Then it stop paying out until you reach X amount
>Then it stops paying out if you dare engage in fair use of existing media
>Then it stops paying out if you have any opinion Coke doesn't agree with
>But its okay because you set up a patreon and your established following will support you
>JK, the new Algorithm will manually push you to the bottom of a search if you have any opinions Coke doesn't like
>Oh unless you're a check mark then you're verified and go straight to the top!

Imagine what its going to be like when the Youtube bubble finally bursts and this swath of people who never developed any marketable skills are jobless and demanding Mcdonals should pay way more because its the only job they can get

Attached: 1406678918870.gif (300x199, 1.78M)

(((JewTube))) is gonna fade soon anyways

>in good faith
the platforms do it to socially engineer people towards communistic ideals. this is not "in good faith"

Too long didn't read

>Oh gawd Jow Forums, this law proves your opinion is wrong
lol

You'd have to show that that is true and then show in court that that doesn't go against their first amendment right and doesn't go against the Communications Decency Act.

how are you going to show that you are banning legal speech "in good faith" in court?

People, like you, is why we can't have any discussion on this board anymore.

>open to the public
>censor free speech

jesus christ.
why the fuck are you allowed to use this site?
you should be banned without appeal.
your opinion is opposite of mine.

Well, right-wing politics align with what the majority of YouTube users consider objectionable.

>any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or USER considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected;

So, Youtube is fully acting within their legal limits. All they need is to show that their users object against right-wing policies and they can ban any right-wing channel.

>right-wing politics align with what the majority of YouTube users consider objectionable.
LMAOOOOOOOOO you lost this thread already pinko retard

enjoy the antitrust and resultant firing squad

Attached: 1562728658989.png (782x758, 127K)

>posting at all

>I was in an argument in a lefty
No, no they weren't. This is literally a terrible and old tactic to deflect suspicion off oneself when making an argument. The fact that you are shilling it just proves that. You made a thread for attention and were afraid of being blown the fuck out, so you made an obviously fake assertion that it wasn't -you- who is making the argument. Fuck off back to your hole.

Be careful when fashioning a weapon against someone. THey may just wrest it from your grip and use it against you.

By US law, that is exactly what YouTube can do.
>whether or not such material is constitutionally protected;

It's not like I don't want that to change, but YouTube's actions are a result of overall leftist shift. It's a symptom.

Just pull a survey of YouTube users. I am talking US law.
Pretty much Republicans added that to ban porn off online platforms and quarantine it, but they dug their own graves like that.

porn in public is an obscenity, saying nigger is not
must be humiliating getting schooled on your own laws by a bong

Then BTFO.
YouTube is acting legally. Sure, these laws need to change, but they are legally okay rn even if they decide to ban everyone slightly right-wing.

This will require either changing laws or shifting the entirety of the public's opinions rightward.

Meh, doesn't change much.
Maybe they wanted to cover porn loopholes like "educaitonal material" or "erotic art" which does not fall under porn by law.

I use youtube.
Faggots offend me.
So I can have them censored.
But we both know they won't be.
Because you're a disingenuous prick.
And so are your arguments.
If any law goes against the constitution it de facto shouldn't be followed, nor does it need to be.

look at any youtube comments section. the whole site is right wing as fuck. not that your little "questionnaire" idea gets you out of hot water for censoring legal speech in bad faith to influence an election

the entire staff of google should be executed

nudity = obscenity in public

WOn't happen because America is soon to be nonwhite and whites are really the only demographic that votes right, and even then, it's probably 60/40

If you have your own site, you can definitely do that. YouTube is not obliged to do that if it personally offends you, unless you convince them.
If we really want this law changed or removed, we need to bring it to the supreme court and convince them. Local courts are mostly pozzed.

wow you really fit in with us far right nazis, ADL shitstain

> not that your little "questionnaire" idea gets you out of hot water for censoring legal speech
YouTube would have to do that itself, and it can completely and legally remove legal speech, from the act:
>whether or not such material is constitutionally protected;

lol your scared m8 the anti trust is coming and this is why you guys keep posting about this

>in good faith
censoring legal speech to socially engineer the youth towards communism and to influence an election in favor of the democrats is not in good faith. the supreme court will find the same

>nudity = obscenity in public
Refer to Miller v. California:
>“taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in sex; portrays, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and, taken as a whole, does not have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.”

>california
soon to be removed from the union

You "BTFO" yourself by shilling it. If it had merit it would be worth arguing. But as it stands it's a claim made in a screenshot with no sources and no legal standing.

...

What I am saying is that this influence is not formed by YouTube only or even exclusively rather it is a shift in the general population that induced that behavior.

That's not an argument.
>archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/227337500/#227337500
Here is the act's text in full.
>law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

>the overwhelmingly right wing audience of youtube wanted legal speech to be censored!!!
jesus christ you are finished

Attached: 9.jpg (780x620, 133K)

Then trump wouldent of won m8 and have a higher approval rating than Obama’s right now

>the overwhelmingly right-wing audience of youtube
You can't even prove that. YouTube changed its community guidelines mostly because of journalist harassment, but they are legally fine with doing that with current laws.

look at comments sections and like ratios on globohomo lamestream fake news

>Imagine what its going to be like when the Youtube bubble finally bursts and this swath of people who never developed any marketable skills are jobless and demanding Mcdonals should pay way more because its the only job they can get

Imagine what its like waiting for the Youtube bubble to finally burst and never developing any marketable skills, being jobless and demanding Mcdonals to pay way more because its the only job you can get

SEE Now your back pedaling

Again they are right wing the comments section of any video and the top independent channels prove it

The public themselves are pretty right wing as we speak m8 see

>45%
Only slightly higher than Obama around the same time.
>foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-results-september-15-17-2019

...

They are a monopoly you tard

Attached: Trust Buster.jpg (381x480, 82K)

YES higher m8
That is a swing in the complete opposite direction currently the public’s polled opinion

They're probably better off than all the people posting on Jow Forums saying "I don't need a job, I just have to live on autismbux and wait for the civil war"

YouTube would have to send its own query into the matter. If you go to James Charles channel or any general Vevo channel, most are leftists.

Again they are minority in followers to the overall makeup of YouTube

Don't underestimate the Boomer vote.

Attached: file.png (960x1101, 114K)