Which one is best?

Javelin...U.S.A.

Attached: 565467.jpg (268x188, 6K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Lij45RbAMnc
youtube.com/watch?v=a2goq_pr25E
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

SPIKE israel

Attached: f0205060_548bed015e4c5.jpg (600x400, 56K)

Type 01 japan

Attached: type_01_lmat_by_ddmurasame-d6jx53o.jpg (1280x855, 221K)

red arrow china

Attached: ctqxufvebagfprh2.jpg (960x540, 97K)

Ion cannon

Attached: Jawa_ionblaster.jpg (850x850, 162K)

ray bolt korea

youtube.com/watch?v=Lij45RbAMnc

Attached: 201126625_1280.jpg (1280x720, 148K)

Best in what metric? What about price per performance? Do you include kills? Or do you just base it on On paper performance as provided by the manufacturer? Americans do over estimate what they put on their brochures so they can sell it at an absurdly higher price.

to think all this missile technology is not enough against a bunch of cave dwellers

I like this onecause it looks the most portable

>Americans do over estimate what they put on their brochures
It's the opposite, US shit underplays for security concerns, it's market is locked in. It's the reds who overestimate to get their 3rd world bucks.

It's how you get, for example, the 1000+mm after ERA penetratation of the HJ-12 from China. Ignoreing how fallacious that is coming from a guided man portable weapon, it's not even a relevant metric for a top attack munition.

But their market sees bigger, bigger is clearly better, so they get the sale.

excellent spacing

RPG7 Sobiet unibon

Attached: Spurdo.jpg (1600x900, 105K)

Exquisite punctuation.

Attached: China_s_HJ-10_NLOS_and_Mounted_ATGM_demo.webm (360x240, 2.98M)

>MITL guidence on a missile
Is this the cold war?

Fiber Optic cable allows the shooter to fire and accurately steer that missile behind a hill.

Similiar to Israel's Spike.

youtube.com/watch?v=a2goq_pr25E

Attached: 20100710101528336.gif (460x323, 13K)

Meanwhile, US systems like the TOW and Javelin still need the operator to expose himself to the enemy to get a lock on. Modern battle tanks see the IR signature of the shooter and fire automatically against the ATGM operator.

Would never happen with the Chinese, who are behind mountains and control their suicide-drone like missile in a lofted and non-straight trajectory.

I am aware. E/O guided rounds have been basically phased out of US inventory or used as a backup guidence method due to inherent problems when used when you don't have total confidence in what and where you are shooting, aka wartime conditions.

If you are shooting NLOS, you have a spotter, and if you have a spotter, he can do the targeting. Otherwise with drift and human error you get blue on blues/green.

See
Somebody is spotting regardless, otherwise you get a ton of wasted missiles, or worse, a ton of friendly casualties.

Nobody is going to use a missile to scout. Can't hit what you don't know about.

It's just like with artillery then. You need a spotter who calls the shots.

Still, such a system provides much better survivability for your ATGM carriers and gunners.
Spotters can be well camoflaged and maintain low IR signature while observing and calling the missiles.
A big fat and mostly immobile ATGM carrier or tripod launcher is much more endangered when faced with an advanced enemy.

Not to mention, the AFT-10 comes with Fire and Forget and LOS-only modes as well. The carrier can also designate its own targets behind cover with the telescopic mast.

Attached: 36130388562_5213091261_o.jpg (1536x1108, 236K)

>You need a spotter who calls the shots.
Then the spotter can target designate, either with a laser or GPS.

By having MITL guidence you are giving the chucklefuck behind the stick the keys and letting him fuck up. Happened in the gulf war plenty of times against targets that were properly designated, but the user still engaged the wrong vehicles.

Then it's just a normal ATGM carrier.

What modern militarys do is have the munition go to the designated firezone and either ride a laser in (copperhead) or self target (JASSM).

The missiles can also self-target. The operator can cut the optical cable anytime in flight and let the ImIR seeker seek its own target.

The AFT-10 is literally a suicide drone tethered on an optical cable for fine-tuning of the impact point. It can perfectly be used like a Javelin in fire and forget mode, while the carrier is driving or doing shoot and scoot.

Konkurs... People that actually fight on Earth
>because it's actually used unlike your "favorite" ATGM

Attached: konkurs.jpg (220x148, 7K)

>The missile can also self target.
So then why have an operator at all?

>fine-tuning of the impact point.
Nah, because such guidence method does not allow fine tuning beyond hitting vehicles (operators are always trained to hit the vehicle center mass, the missile is large enough to kill), which tells me the Chinese does not trust its ATR. Otherwise, if it did, there would be no reason to even have the operator in the first place.

And also, the carrier doesnt need to expose itself even in LOS mode, since the telescopic mast is doing the designation, while the missiles are capable of LOAL.

But using a spotter who is giving out Beidou satellite coordinates of enemy tanks is better. The ImIR seeker provides enough contrast and resolution that even a rookie can see a tank formation at 10km.

Attached: AFT-10 NLOS Missile 2.jpg (2048x1634, 478K)

See

See the Spike: You can literally see the fine tuning at 3:00 onwards.
It is literally for target impact point fine tuning and emergency breaking the missile to prevent FF.

Man in the Loop guidance with an unjammable optical cable connection is literally the best way to snipe moving targets with ground based assets.

Arguing against it just because the US lacks such weapons (it has cancelled the Netfire XM-501) doenst mean that this system isnt superior in any way. You literally get a steerable and lock-on-after-launch variant of the Javelin, that also has the significant advantage of non-exposure of the operator and a Friendly Fire prevention mechanism.

Attached: NLOS-LS-ConOps.jpg (711x435, 49K)

Also, the carrier has the advantage that it can enable multiple missiles to be guided by operators simultanously. Each missile can go after different targets, each with a human operator behind the console and each of those destroy targets with high accuracy against their weak-points near simultaniously.

Attached: 36130389022_4cde0c80a1_o.jpg (1536x1092, 262K)

>get btfo
>n-nice spacing

China also produces a variant that basically makes this concept into a guided anti tank MRLS.
A few of those trucks can literally destroy and entire tank battalion with relatively few munitions wasted.

Attached: CM501G NLOS.jpg (510x768, 58K)

>You can literally see the fine tuning at 3:00 onwards.
There is litterally no reason to fine tune if you have good ATR. A computer will hit a target far more often, especially if it is moving, than a human will.

>Netfire
Was canceled for a reason. Humans suck at hitting things on the move with MITL missile guidence. Good at static targets but why even bother when other options are available with static targets.

A far, far superior option is ATR. Friendly fire is caused by MITL guidence because history shows you can't indent on terminal, and by the time you see it(last half second) it's too late.

With ATR if a friendly is hit its due to poor scouting. With MITL if a friendly it's hit its due to poor scouting or poor gunnery. MITL adds complication. Hence why the DOD has phased it out, and discarded weapons that use it.

CM-501 is unrelated to the AFT-10, so is the 502 even though it is conceptually simular.

>Ion cannon
Shit the middle east is getting serious with their terrorism

You can kill a bunch more tanks with submunitions. Seems like a waste of payload desu, if killing bats is the name of the game. There is way more to a heavy bat than just tanks, no matter the nation.

>You literally get a steerable and lock-on-after-launch variant of the Javelin
Sounds terrible. Why would I want to do any of this with a Javelin? I want to shoot and scoot, not play with my dick killing a target I already know I want dead.

>Arguing against it just because the US lacks such weapons
US has plenty of experience with such weapons, you are arguing on a platform of ignorance.

Russian 9K111 FAGOT best ATGM

Attached: 9M111_AT-4_Spigot.jpg (417x408, 90K)

Damn sand people

>SMLE ion blaster

Was this the one that took out 2 Ukrainian Helicopters in Donbass?

>sand people
Nah, those are Tusken Raiders. The Jawas are sand Jews.