Could a double barrel .22 revolver be a good concealed carry gun?

Could a double barrel .22 revolver be a good concealed carry gun?
>two rings of six .22 chambers, one inside the other, can fit in J frame cylinder
>6 trigger pulls, 2 bullets each shot
>similar damage and recoil to .32 ACP, but cheaper ammo
>could also just flick an extension on the hammer or something so it shoots one at a time
>no worries about misfires
Pic kinda related.

Attached: ruger-lcr-22-revolver.jpg (600x600, 40K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.imgur.com/a/vt2Qz
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>.22

Unless it had two physical triggers in place that would technically be a machine fun under ATFudds

Although. 2 interlocking cog/like cylinders.

>Thiccc

If you're up to do some gunsmithing you could combine 2 frames with individual barrels and make it so that one wheel in the center aligns with the 2 barrels. 2 trigger mechanisms means not a machine gun.

Y not 3 at once?

Attached: IMG_6408.jpg (800x450, 62K)

Nah, volley guns are legal.
No, just one cylinder with a bunch of holes.
No, wrong.
See above.
I'm not a big guy

That actually doesn't sound that unpractical or that bad. I don't think that's legal because it's something like 1 shot per trigger pull so you'd have to have 2 triggers and that'd suck.

Attached: 999129838383882828919023512.jpg (755x504, 68K)

there's no legal issue with firing multiple barrels with one pull of the trigger, that ain't a machine gun

"Any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger"

ATF disagrees with you.

2 barrels.

>it's an user knows nothing but acts like he does thread
www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/01/17/standard-manufacturing-volley-fire-pistol-shot-2017/

Double barrel revolver?
Dafuq is that?

> thinks double barreled shotguns are machine guns

Yes

Attached: Pistola-doble-cañon-450x339.jpg (220x166, 6K)

hey dingus, learn to keep your mouth shut so you don't sound like a retard

no, .22lr is anemic

that uses two triggers, hay zoos

But there aren't any double barrel shotguns that can fire two shots via a single trigger pull, because that would legally be a machine gun.

an under/over design
not sxs like you’re thinking

You're going to get banned for posting under age 18.

Wrong.

Attached: DefinitelyAMachineGun.jpg (669x565, 40K)

But two of them are about as effective as one .32 ACP.
No u

m.imgur.com/a/vt2Qz
Question 16 is very relevant

>tfw you'll never own a 3 barrel AR with a binary trigger.

Has 2 triggers. It is basically two 1911s stuck together.

Attached: Screen-shot-2012-03-12-at-1.01.37-PM.png (1133x710, 474K)

this, handled and shipped a few

Attached: 7173460C-520D-4FF4-829F-3690773E0EEA.jpg (1019x561, 86K)

Now that I look into this gun more apparently both hammers drop together when either trigger is pulled. They would have to. Since the gun shares a single slide the gun would start to cycle whenever the first round fired. If the other hammer hit a moment later you could get out of battery detonation which is dangerous. Either that or if the 2nd hammer didn't drop at all it would just eject a live round out of the 2nd chamber.

I'm still curious what the ATF thinks of this gun.

.32 auto is also anemic
.38 special is the way to go for small-frame snubnose guns

I like .357 snubnose just because it gives you the freedom to shoot .38, .38 +P, and .357. And the .357 snubnose is only a tiny bit bigger than a .38.

They approved it,
The triggers are separate but the Sears and hammers are linked.

It's probably such a novelty and so impractical that the ATF doesn't care. It's just something a collector with too much money is going to buy as a conversation piece and maybe shot with some friends for some laughs.

But it does set an interesting legal precedent for a gun like OP's concept that would usually be considered a machinegun. But when has the ATF ever been logical or consistent?

They've literally always been consistent for volley guns. They even say you could like 3 ar15s together to fire at once.

The point is there's a niche market for .32s, limited by ammo availability and cost. There's also a niche for normal .22s, and they'd want a higher capacity/more powerful version.