"guns are fun to shoot at the range and stuff but if you think they're for defending against 'tyranny' you're...

"guns are fun to shoot at the range and stuff but if you think they're for defending against 'tyranny' you're delusional"

Thoughts?

Attached: 50f5942399e91.image.jpg (800x625, 153K)

Other urls found in this thread:

thetruesize.com/
esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8053
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No

drones can't knock on doors

yet.....

Google "Vietnam War"

Attached: Tanks and drones.png (1103x654, 62K)

"Raughs in rice farmer"

Attached: Two_days_Viet_Cong_640-resize-1200x0-70.jpg (640x360, 42K)

better go back in time to 1776 and tell those nerds guns are just for plinking

"And just let drumpf put all those innocent people into concentration camps?"

that's fucking retarded, and the comic proves the point that we need less regulations on weapons in order to defend ourselves.

Attached: 1529013356889.jpg (1024x848, 227K)

Iraq
Afghanistan
Vietnam

Same stuff we bring up every time this same thread is posted.

someone get the screencap of the Japanese guy on Jow Forums explaining why you can't rule a country with just drones and tanks.
If no one finds it:
tldr: A police state needs its police to be armed to the teeth and the citizens to be unarmed because the citizens will always outnumber the police. A police state needs police and boots on the ground because you cant rule country with airpower and artillery. You can't rule through air power and artillery because drones cant guard streets, search homes, ect. They wont even be effective at resistance suppression because of collateral damage (no sane government would blow up its own infrastructure).

Timothy McVeigh and Ted Kaczynski didn't use guns and look how effective they were. Also how do you plan to get rid of DOLAN BLARMPF without guns? Drum circles at Trump Tower?

Yeah, small arms in the hand of civvies totally havent been a problem in any single conflict after ww2..

>Korea
>Vietnam
>Afghanistan
>Iraq
>Afghanistan again
>Syria
>Ukraine

Who did I forget?


High tech will never work after the initial invasion.

Attached: Napkin Math.png (1264x640, 128K)

"If the Trump administration started drone-bombing American citizens, you'd probably want a rifle, wouldn't you?"

>America is controlled by literal racist fascists
>let's have them take our guns

Attached: 1529525781771.png (584x652, 185K)

If guns are so useless at taking on the gubment, why bother trying to take them away?

And those countries are all far smaller than the US. Can you imagine the clusterfuck that it would be trying to secure the entire fucking country? Not fucking possible.

Attached: Size of USA vs Middle East.png (1205x923, 356K)

>that projection
apply yourself

Anyone got the screencap of the Jap schooling some idiot on how insurgency works and how the government wouldn't be blowing up its own infrastructure in the event of a rebellion?

For the children duh

thetruesize.com/

>annihilate suburban home with drone strike
>shrapnel shreds kids playing in the street
>70% chance of killing the people inside the next homes over
>everyone who knew them now probably despises the government and may become insurgents or spies
The only reason why we get away with this shit in the middle east is because no one cares. You can't go around bombing your own people and infrastructure without turning them against you and damaging your own capabilities.

Attached: 1502396406867.png (1136x640, 788K)

Bunch of goat fuckers did okay.

If the children want guns, they can buy them like everyone else.

Usually its not just one guy going off the grid in this situation. Its a whole bunch, some with the military some with the government itself. So you can imagine that drone being taken down from the inside.

Is that comic supposed to be anti-gun? That last panel directly supports his and any arguement for looser regs.

Attached: Think of the children.jpg (750x557, 72K)

Sage

Attached: Children crew served.jpg (640x487, 35K)

>implying the evil government won't use their intelligence service that has been figthing socialists guerrillas in all over the world since 1945
>Implying the big media won't denounce you as terrorists enemies of the free world and announce rewards to anybody who donates information and extreme punishment to anybody that helps you like free citizenship to any inmigrants that want to enlist and public shaming with getting fired from just giving the guerrilla a bottle of water
>implying

>not understanding that the only guerrillas that still stand on has been supplied by the soviet union in the past and eventually made deals with Narcos so they can keep playing war by protecting now Cartel territory

Attached: 1506992169144.png (872x886, 220K)

Better yet: "War on Terror". They even had drones in that one.

I gotcha friend

Attached: 1F2B792B-6477-4171-A17C-978B081F902C.jpg (640x650, 110K)

>Feed fake intel
>People already don't trust the media and that'll only be worse when people get blown the fuck up by MIL & LE

We're already seeing the government puss the fuck out whenever armed citizens gather. The closest thing we've seen to a Waco or Ruby Ridge since McVeigh has been the fucking Bundy Ranch.

These people's world view is so fundamentally different, its the same idea behind statements like " there's no such thing as a good guy with a gun" that you hear sometimes. They're incredibly sheltered.

>has been the fucking Bundy Ranch.
and look where they all are now

>"But muh Soviet funds!"
I wonder what shoes literally every country jealous of the US could fill.

If you don't see the cooling effect armed citizens had, then you're a fool.

IS THaT aN SBr???//????/??

esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8053
TL;DR: You can never confiscate all the guns in America

multiple b-52s were shot down in vietnam. They had telephone pole sized AA missiles.

Where do you think they got those? In an event of another American Civil War you will every nation that opposes the USA giving aid to any rebellion. You will also have to face the fact that not every commanding officer, no matter their rank, will be ok with bombing US citizens. I would bet the vast majority of US commanders would be against that.

Entire divisions would join the rebellion as well. Like, US carrier fleets would splinter.

Then you have to face the fact that if this were to happen the entire would would break down into ww3 and we would all be dead by Nuclear Fire within a month.

So... yeah.

>people don't trust the media
your friends ain't the whole people of America

It just take a few influencers to brainwash the young into hating you, and some news channel telling fake news about atrocities you never did to already spoil your reputation.

That's clearly an arm brace, bud.

>wanting to create a guerilla that fight for freedom of America
>Considering getting funded by Terrorists and Narcos

this is rednecks will always lose

Polls done on the subject are pretty clear. People just don't believe the media and, quite frankly, they don't have a track record of being trustworthy so they kinda deserve it.

Media ain't just TV you know
Internet is a thing now
And a bunch of fat redneck looking for war wanting to shoot people isn't something that is going to grab people affection.

I like how this is a comic drawn by some leftie loonie about an evil authoritarian government bombing its own citizens, his countrymen, and the point he's trying to convey is that you shouldn't resist.

Even has a cute "poof!" where the government murders his neighbor and he thinks thats good.

>implying the electrical grid would still be running

SHALL

Thanks
you are now hated by everyone because you left them out of electricity,
People would gladly look away the moment some of you get captured and got your balls twisted so many times until you talk were are your positions

Jesus man not the dog.

>And a bunch of fat redneck looking for war wanting to shoot people isn't something that is going to grab people affection.
Depends. under normal circumstances that would be true, but if the gov't actively tries to overstep their bounds with no subtlety, that redneck shooting gov't agents and spooks is going to be hailed as a hero of a revolution. That's why the gov't tries to silently take away our rights.

NOT

I love these comics and when leftists go this route. They are incorrect but inadvertently express their true desires, which iare basically every bad thing the right has ever been accused of.

I'm having a hard time finding the words, so maybe someone can help me out here: but doesn't it seem cowardly and self-defeating to argue that citizens should be disarmed because "lol a tyranny will just kill you anyway."

Iraq and afghanistan.
>not using this as an opportunity to spread propaganda that the gov did it to apply pressure to the citizens to turn over the *freedom fighters*
>who do you think they'll believe after the first few times big brother accidentally's the wrong house with a JDAM or GI Jim gets caught executing combat age males just because
Is this babby's first insurgency or something?

Drone pilots have families.

That by justifying the bombing of its own citizens they stand behind every atrocity the government has committed since independence because a group of people resisted

Attached: leftists.png (1200x1620, 152K)

what kind of situation that would never happen is that,the moment some politician start playing dictator it would get instantly hated by everyone independent of their beliefs

Now a government choosed by the people which media aids it by saying that we need guns regulations with a lot of both local and international pressure isn't a dictatorship. You clearly don't know or ever experienced what a true guerrilla vs government scenario is and the nightmare it implies.
Nobody helps the revolutionary and preffer to just look away, because it means choosing a side and putting your family and loved ones on risk and dragging them into war is not yours.

>but doesn't it seem cowardly and self-defeating
Yes and yes.
I've seen a bunch of sentiment along the lines of "Well with these baby concentration camps we are turning into Nazi Germany time to use those guns you stupid gun nuts". Holy living shit these people even bitch out then and want someone else to step in harms way to accomplish their dumbass goals.

Attached: laughing sluts.jpg (600x532, 40K)

>implying the average MUH AMENDMENT fag has the same endurance or will to battle than a fucking jungle gook
It's always amusing when you neckbeards compare yourself to the Vietcong.

The jungle gooks were malnourished farmers you dumbass.

And?

Yeah, the comic's argument, taken to its logical extreme is pretty much literally, "The Jews of Warsaw had it coming in 1943."

and you're a weak little soigoi beta male nogunz that will get curb stomped.

>implying
Stay mad, fatass.

Liberals are bystanders even in their own revenge fantasies.

Attached: US_civil_war_2.png (1158x1393, 137K)

Attached: US_civil_war.png (1802x905, 203K)

BE

Attached: us_infrastructure.png (1787x921, 143K)

t. drone

INFRINGED

Attached: us_civil_war_tom.png (1446x1437, 580K)

We have properly nourished farmers.

I once saw a guy claim Russia won't be a problem because even if they weren't afraid of the U.S., the U.S. would shut down its borders too well for Russia to get in. They also argued that the U.S. could also guard nearly all its infrastructure.
It actually kind of triggers me, I actually want to write a small paper on everything wrong with these statements, starting with the obliviousness to current events. People like this are allowed to vote.

I get a chuckle every time someone brings up the BUTCHU CANT FIGHT DEM DRONES
Doesn't even matter. Seriously, think about it just for one second.
Even if you get every NCO, every police officer, every single DHS and FBI and CIA agent, every goddamn swinging dick in the military - Air Force, Marines, you name it (which you can't, but lets go with it anyway), you get a whopping total of about 2 to 2.5 million members.
>DHS : 250k employees
>CIA : Estimated around 25k
>FBI : 35k sworn/unsworn members
>US Armed Forces : 1.5 million
>Police : 800k
How many people are in the US?
>313 million as per 2013
How many are gun owners?
>Between 40% and 55%
>Average it out to 155 million gun owners
How many are willing to rebel?
>Lets be generous
>Only 2% decide to rebel against a country that is actively attempting to murder them
>3.1 million people
That's not that much of a difference. I've always been told that you need a 3:1 ratio of troops to win any battle. But let's take a look at this. About how many insurgents are in Afghaniland right now?
>Estimates are around 75-100k
>We've been at war there for 13 years
>We've been steadily taking casualties
>We've been steadily abandoning the country because we can't accomplish our mission
>Against people armed with tech developed in the 50's

BUT MUH UAV'S
>Gotten a ton of civilians killed, no real military targets taken care of that the media has decided to make a stink about
>Only armed with maybe 8 missiles - 14 missile max capability
>It's a goddamn flying camera
BUT MUH INTEL
>Because that's worked out so well for the troops on the ground in funland
BUT MUH TANKS
>I'll take urban warfare for 600, Alex
M... MUH PLANES
>A-10 is going out of commission
>F-35 stepping into CAS role
>I'll take urban warfare for 800, Alex
>I'll take civilian shields for 1200
BUT MUH NAVY
>Coastlines
>Implying
Get fucking real. These people are only human - and even a 1% loss of forces on the side of the US govt is going to go into Vietnam 2.0, even moreso because it would be on US soil. They know this. The government is fucking horrified of it's people. As it fucking should be.

>"The chinese, russians, iranians and Israel are all narcos and terrorists!!1! Fucking rednecks REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
T. Pavelment ape

The 1st and 4th Amendments are more important then the 2nd for preventing tyranny yet no one seems to care about defending the 4th.

No dipshit look at the hollow arm brace. The question is, is my glock light switch for an airsoft gun or a real one?

Because all the gubment has to say is "TERRORISTS!!!11!!1" and the general public begs for a new, more comprehensive Patriot Act.

>no one seems to care about defending the 4th
Yeah, well the same neocons who sold us out on import regulations and machine guns introduced infringements to the 4th after everyone got scared of a few sandniggers, so there you go.

literal totalitarian propaganda

McNukes inc

Attached: 1476207490030.jpg (545x395, 32K)

Recreational chemical weapons

>implying israel would back american revolutionaries
m8 they literally only are able to exist because theyve hijacked our government to provide military support to them

>not realizing that the US military isn’t all a bunch of mindless drones
>Not realizing that a good chunk of them are going to raise some mighty big concerns about fighting US civilians
>Not realizing that large chunks of the military would likely revolt if it turned into a police state

Mercader strikes again...

I still think it's great that people are retarded enough to believe that drones will ever be used on citizens.

Attached: 1508377216760.jpg (800x800, 285K)

You know how the US Government has failed to destroy communist peasants in Vietnam and Korea, as well as Islamic fundamentalists in practically all of the middle east despite having all them sweet-ass toys?
Imagine that happening, but because this time it's in the United States itself, major cities are rationing electricity, food, clean water, petrol, and ammunition because the rednecks keep raiding Guard armories, blowing up key infrastructure nodes, and inciting riots.

I'm sure bombing my apartment block and killing 50 innocent people just to kill me will work wonders for the public's opinion of the government.

You're correct, civilians should be allowed to own arms powerful enough to repel the federal government.

I like how the cartoonist is so casual about negating Posse Comitatus and murdering American citizens on American soil using military weaponry.

I also like how most of the people who read it will likely agree with him.

Keep salting away ammo, folks.

You see user, the far left think the government should solve all of life's problems. They believe that people are not capable and should be controlled. If anyone disagrees with them they appeal to the authority to manage the situation. Where everyone has to live by their moral agendas.

They believe so zealously that their ways of life, that their morals, and their ideas are the objective good that anyone who opposes them is objectively bad and anything that happens to these bad people is for some kind of greater good. That they deserve anything bad that happens to them because they are bad people.

And anyone that reads this going "Yeah, fuck the left! Go right!" are missing the point as well. The world is all kinds of grey and everyone comes from different backgrounds, ideas, and experiences.

Large scale conflict and balkanization are inevitable.

>US was over 90% White 50 years ago
>US is close to 50% White today

cringe

Attached: IMG_20180612_073024_231.jpg (613x531, 57K)

>tfw we already have examples of rebel fighter pilots in the 21st century already.
See Libyan defectors and mercenary pilots along with those rebel Turkish coup F-16s that almost killed Erdogan and did bomb parliment.

Dont worry, America used to be 0% white.

There are ways of swinging the pendulum our way again, thanks to technology, genetic engineering, and socioeconomic circumstances.