Royal Navy

Attached: HMS Diamond Malta.jpg (2048x1365, 743K)

Attached: 1538430314216.jpg (2880x1920, 2.71M)

Attached: 35079112_1020207721471158_5323954813451370496_o.jpg (2048x1366, 352K)

Attached: e840a7c5e4719edb5bad631c34ba9e88.jpg (2048x1258, 509K)

Attached: imgID107594786.jpg.gallery.jpg (1200x811, 269K)

Attached: Type_23_Frigate_HMS_Monmouth_Sails_for_the_Middle_East_MOD_45152712.jpg (3000x1796, 1.7M)

Attached: RAF Chinooks on HMS Ocean 3_big.jpg (4065x1419, 804K)

Attached: HMS Edinburgh.jpg (3800x2410, 2.74M)

Attached: royal_navy.jpg.800x600_q96.png (800x420, 469K)

Something about that bow looks so menacing.

Attached: Royal Navy 2020.jpg (1600x980, 329K)

Attached: RN 2035, minus RFA.jpg (2412x1008, 227K)

Attached: 1455324789030.jpg (754x470, 266K)

Theres more than just the RFA missing from this by the way, most of the OPV's, all of the MCM & river craft

Attached: T45 Naval Gunfire.webm (640x360, 2.07M)

Attached: HMS Diamond Ops Room.jpg (1000x802, 245K)

Attached: Trenchant.jpg (2000x1482, 254K)

Attached: Seafire.jpg (2188x2513, 701K)

Attached: Apache_Helicopter_Takes_off_from_HMS_Ocean_During_Operation_Ellamy_MOD_45153052.jpg (3000x2000, 3.47M)

Attached: TheSunNeverSets.jpg (1200x750, 90K)

Attached: HMS Diamond Wildcat.jpg (960x686, 87K)

AESTHETIC

Attached: 34016831_1808170135896360_1716972636103245824_o.jpg (1938x1454, 360K)

The Royal Navy has SF minisubs?

Attached: HMS-Queen-Elizabeth-HMS-Dragon-1.jpg (1500x604, 205K)

The Ministry of Defence does not comment on matters involving Special forces or Submarines ;)

We're USSR tier levels of secrecy when it comes to these things. We only confirmed SIS (MI6) existed in 1992.

Attached: Astute with SBS dock.jpg (1600x1018, 306K)

OH CAN YOU SAYYYYYY

Attached: Dm0vPvIX0AIG6Jf.jpg (1024x786, 110K)

Attached: Dm61RHNW0AIWWO8.jpg (1080x1350, 132K)

One of these things has two towers

Attached: HMS_Queen_Elizabeth_New_York.jpg (1024x683, 72K)

Attached: HMS-Duncan-Celebrates-4th-B-Day-with-a-Bang.jpg (1200x803, 137K)

Everyone laughs but i bet it works

For a second I thought the carrier was the glass launching off

They sure do.

Attached: 1491364379413.png (1772x997, 2.94M)

Fucking finally. The US is getting tired of this “world police” bullshit. Now we can at least divide the labor evenly.

Attached: 1B921A7A-B649-47FB-9611-0435FE3A4E4B.jpg (591x516, 154K)

Its the Somalian conversion

Attached: Type 23 Channel.jpg (1601x1067, 144K)

Attached: giphy.gif (482x277, 3.87M)

Yes, this one

Attached: untitled.png (800x600, 557K)

Attached: HMS Rodney.jpg (3399x1961, 1.23M)

Attached: CSI Okinawa.gif (900x600, 903K)

Vanguard
Vigilant
Vengeance
Victorious

Attached: HMS Vengeance.jpg (3000x2253, 667K)

Here's hoping the Dreadnaught class goes something like;

Dreadnaught
Devastation
Destruction
Defiance

Attached: Successor-infographic.jpg (1200x849, 440K)

Attached: HMS QE, Somerset, Gibralter.jpg (1920x1132, 338K)

Attached: Type_26-1024x576-2.jpg (1024x576, 87K)

Attached: River Class.jpg (2203x1655, 2.34M)

Attached: 2016071321400740261.jpg (800x458, 211K)

Attached: RFA_Diligence_HMS_Ambush.jpg (1979x2473, 2.31M)

Attached: Type 26.jpg (2000x1011, 429K)

Attached: HMS Northumberland + Trafalgar class.jpg (1024x849, 168K)

Attached: 1441741141357.jpg (3000x2400, 976K)

Attached: 13235305_1100796069967107_7946465131025001345_o.jpg (2048x1331, 530K)

Here's the other end

Attached: Astute build rear.jpg (1024x779, 215K)

i loved when some royal navy sub commander leaked david cameron's letter of last resort

Attached: davicameron.jpg (1162x475, 123K)

Attached: 39096443_1090053044486625_8361879477919154176_o.jpg (2048x1291, 120K)

Thats me done dumping for now

Attached: HMS_Richmond_MOD_45155880.jpg (1947x2514, 2.23M)

reminder that they were going to have 12 T-45 and 13 Type-26s

Reminder that the cold war ended and the war on terror began.

reminder that UK's now a 3rd world shithole and is poorer than even the poorest US state and the UK simply cannot afford pointless military hardware to fight imaginary enemies.
UK will be embroiled in massive internal unrests and might even end up in an internal conflict.
Buying ships and carriers is a massive waste of money.

Attached: 1525477665453.jpg (851x630, 105K)

Nice pol posting incel. Stay stupid.

Thanks user. Good thread

the astute class alone could sink the entire US navy, mutt.

Came here to post this, it's obligatory in a Royal Navy thread.

Attached: 546734_400267883348298_360780940630326_1092917_582388911_n.jpg (720x478, 104K)

Attached: 1311291300807.jpg (1600x1143, 447K)

Attached: 1374357028132.jpg (1920x1440, 967K)

HMS Queen Elizabeth here. For a milk maid, HMS Belfast-neesama got really really big boobies. That's all.

Attached: Queen_Elizabeth.png (1931x1232, 1.28M)

Attached: 8746426217_f7d8801c83_b.jpg (1024x768, 277K)

Attached: 65s9qNW.jpg (1024x683, 221K)

BY DAWNS EARLY LIGHT

Attached: usa fleet.jpg (1280x720, 122K)

why are they in all white with masks?

Thank the queen I wasn't the only one. Or do I have to praise the prophet for you guys now?

>amerimutt banter

>incel posting

Attached: D1239B0A-D1BD-4D8D-AF0A-D2028C4D0E7F.jpg (960x846, 162K)

Looks like you're upset incel

Attached: 1290371911080.jpg (800x533, 102K)

That's a really nice ship. It's too bad you didn't use it to secure your borders. Now you're a fucking shitfight with no future.

SAD.

Why couldn't they afford EM catapults?

Is the QE not a nuclear ship or something?

Attached: Last-Resort-s01e01-last-resort-30859959-640-427.jpg (640x427, 41K)

Literally being exactly the picture he posted.

Why is the American anthem so damn catchy?

As an Ausfag I find myself singing it so damn often.

...I wish I was American :(

Too bad you guys are all missing part of your cocks tho.

Attached: 20841180_1997516240494137_7467488047205992973_n.jpg (638x960, 72K)

I think its shit, mainly due to all the people that try to "sing" it. Most of whom are just people warbling their voice because if they didn't people would realise that they can't hold a note.

Australia and NZ both have poo anthems though so I can see why you might look up to it.

Making them CATOBAR and nuclear would raise the cost to the extent where you can only have one carrier. A minor tactical gain is not worth the huge financial and strategic costs.

So it's not nuclear?

Fuck that's really, really embarrassing.

It's the anti-flash gear, so that if there is an explosion you are somewhat protected from flash burns.

The Mod studied power options for a long time and determined that nuclear was not worth the displacement, volume and money required because it provided minimal tactical advantage.

It's not the 1960's, we have marine gas turbines now that can meet all power requirements at a fraction of the cost.

Bong anthem is kind of shit too.

oi! you got a loiscence for that post m8
>4 San Antonio class
>4 Wasp class
>14 Los Angeles class
>12 Virginia class
>27 Arleigh Burke class
>10 Ticonderoga class
>4 Nimitz class
>1 Ford class
This is the number and class break down of active USN ships currently homeported to either CT, VA, FL or Spain right now (ie. Atlantic Ocean, US 6th fleet and 2nd fleet, exceeds the current number of ships in the RN by itself). Pacific fleet (3rd and 7th) have much more.

>48 USN ships currently simultaneously under construction of all classes across the US right now, 46 will be finished within 5 years
>39 future USN ships currently on order slated for future construction within the next 9 years
>300+ active ships across the fleets from 2020 onward, 340 active projected by mid to late 2030s

Attached: Valiant Shield 2006.jpg (4288x2848, 628K)

Attached: 1271434374215.jpg (997x1024, 216K)

It is, but as a bong and a scot I've never actually sung it, flower of Scotland is the tits though

Stop responding to the false flagging

I'd describe the emotion we feel as smug not embarsesed. We have two carriers instead of one, neither is a money hole that requires refueling and both have ultra modern systems inside allowing the ships to operate with a fraction of the crew of US carriers.

Hello again, here's a few more before i go out.

Attached: MQ170051032.jpg (1021x580, 152K)

Attached: 20247974_1504824742897569_8543288497866103153_o.jpg (2000x1200, 221K)

>neither is a money hole that requires refueling
The US supercarriers' reactors literally do not require nuclear fuel for 25-30 years straight. The only limiting factors are food, fuel for aviation, and munitions. US subs on the other hand can basically just fuck off for 3 months at a time and never need to surface once. Unlike the UK though the US has the money to splurge on building and maintaining 10 supercarriers and 10 conventional carriers.

Attached: 20286734_1505062042873839_8724679662982293031_o.jpg (1152x748, 45K)

Attached: 1284900788280.jpg (1419x1024, 181K)

>The US supercarriers' reactors literally do not require nuclear fuel for 25-30 years straight.

Which still means they need refueling. Meaning they spend years out of service. This is part of the reason why US carrier availability is so low, in reality they have 4 carriers.

>The only limiting factors are food, fuel for aviation, and munitions.

Which require weekly resupply from ships that are not nuclear powered. to be followed by escorts that are not nuclear powered.

>US subs on the other hand can basically just fuck off for 3 months at a time and never need to surface once.

What makes this unique to US nuclear subs and not anyone else's?

>Unlike the UK though the US has the money to splurge on building and maintaining 10 supercarriers and 10 conventional carriers.

At the expense of other areas - like having universal healthcare for all, something that the rest of the developed world just takes for granted.

I also fail to see why you're turning this into a UK v US argument?

Attached: UKCSG.jpg (1200x909, 138K)

Attached: DCwiQa4XgAEEEzN.jpg (1200x857, 124K)

Attached: DCwgmEEXgAAxE3a.jpg (1199x857, 143K)

Attached: 13762355184_d790d65482_b.jpg (1024x576, 224K)

Attached: Hermes.jpg (3413x2358, 926K)