Bernie Sanders 2020 Assault Weapons Ban

>Gun Show Loophole
Why do they keep bringing this up? Gun Shows always have a table for background checks run by local police because most of the vendors there are licensed dealers and are still required by law to have a check done before completing a sale.

But... he didn't actually write that... did he?
That's just a photoshop... right?

I mean, they really haven't changed anything. It's always
>orange man bad.

So what now Democrat voting gun owners. Every candidate on that side are against guns and you are all hypocrites.

>white
>jew
pick one.

>what do I think
He doesnt have half a chance in hell of winning, and it will be fun to watch the dems go for each other's throats in a year
>whats our plan
Point and laugh.

He supported a ban on the online sale of handguns
Are you purposely doing this?

I gave up on voting. It’s meaningless. I focus on shooting and my other hobbies until the end of my days. 2016 was too big of a letdown to ride this hoaxcoaster of unfulfilled promises again

This. You have globalist, corparatist authoritarians with some boilerplate leftist trappings on the one side, and globalist, corparatist authoritarians with some boilerplate civnat and "conservative" trappings on the other.

Neither serves your interests. Republicans may assume a weak pro-gun stance simply because the democrats hold the opposite stance, or possibly vice-versa, but very few of them actually care.

See: republicans holding all branches of the government for like two years and doing absolutely nothing helpful.

>what's our plan for 2020?
Vote for President Cheeto.
>BUT MUH BUMP STOCKS
Do you want an 8-1 Supreme Court conservative majority? Because I do, and it's the only way to permanently stop this bullshit.

Attached: pick a side 2.jpg (1167x1169, 194K)

No I'm actually asking if that's a real twitter post by him

>Split the Democrat vote between centrists and moderates voting for the sponsored candidate while the socialists vote for Bernie
>Trump wins again
What a great surprise. Glad he did it last time and glad he is stupid enough to do it again.

Why do they always talk about going after the NRA? it's not the big boogeyman they think it is and if anything it solidifies pro gunners and moderates who are gun politics literate against them.

I don't think it is, but it may as well be real.

honestly I think he's pandering to the mainstream democrats who attack him over petty shit because they literally have nothing else to attack him on.

Sad to see him throwing away a lot of his principles in order to attack in this direction, perhaps he learned the wrong lesson from 2016.

Who do you think they'd rather have promoted via the two party mentality when people support them to "own the libs", GOA or NRA?

because i can vote third party and split the vote and let democrats win or vote republican and get constitutionalist SC picks, even if policy is shit for both i can have the judicial branch slapping down the more heinous shit both try to get away with.

2016 was hilarious. What did you want?

This is brain dead. The ultimate redpill is realizing that voting for the oppisite side to speed things along will work. Brain dead retards who barley start to form polictical thoughts in college or after starting a family will no care when trump says " go after guns first" but their little brain dead brains get real upset when Fox news tells them Sanders said it. Vote for the fucking liberal.opppaotipn already and wake the non voting but thinking populous up.

Jews are smarter versions of whites

He supported an AWB in the 2016 race as well. The only thing that's changed is he made a million bucks for writing a book about how bad it is to be a millionaire and useful idiots still fall for the "principled Bernie" meme

gas yourself newfaggot

eh, if it's not a real post shame on OP... as far as bernie's stance on guns, he's almost always seemed to "not really give a shit" about banning guns given that his home state is (or was at least) fairly pro-gun for the northeast..

>(or understands that even if it supposedly offered benefits there's too many downsides when it comes the costs in terms of political capital and general freedom that there's simply better things to do instead of banning guns.)

if anything I think trump is more likely to ban guns given that he's a new york boomer who's a bit of a blustering idiot, just wait for a shooting to happen in-between his firing of the GOP's-tard-wrangler-of-the-month and you'll see.

I thought it was pretty funny too. I enjoyed it. Anyone who takes presidential politics seriously is a complete brainlet. The president was a reality TV star; this all just entertainment.

>he's almost always seemed to "not really give a shit" about banning guns
pic related is a real tweet. Can we just let the "Bernie doesn't want to ban guns" meme die already?

Attached: Untitled.png (593x171, 18K)

This. Trump is an entertainer, I voted for entertainment, and I got it.

>no date
>no link
Congrats, you've fallen for propaganda.

Also off-topic thread is off-topic.

>Caucasian skin and white hair, yep looks like a stereotypical mongolian to me

it would have been written by his handlers

His state just cucked out with bipartian support. He has supported awb before sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-votes-for-background-checks-assault-weapons-ban. So fuck you cucks for voting for your faggot or even have an inkling of supporting him. Also fuck Trump, he's a gun grabbing kike too. Only Ron and Rand Paul have been consistent on gun rights.

God i hope Ted win's the Republican nomination over Orange Man

Attached: punished ted.jpg (886x633, 56K)

The supreme Court is not partisan for your wishes stop being retarded. The last trump pick me rape scandalmcgee is ok record saying he sent think full aitos and concealed carry are unconstitutional
FUCk DRUMPF AMD HIS PICKS I'D RATHER HAVE A DEM WHO MAKES THE SUPREME COURT INVALID

Unlikely, he's hated by everyone.

A future where America didn't cede global influence to the PRC, enrich their domestic oligarchs, and destabilize the economy.

is this real or not

>I'm going to throw away the potential votes of millions of single-issue voters to appease people who would vote for me anyway

Why are dems so bad at politics?

and what would AWB2 be like?, it would turn out just like AWB1 did and expire, or get basically shot down in congress.

he's pandering to the mainstream/centerist dems (which I picture as suburban roasties) who hate him because he's focusing on banks and major financial institutions as a target and not their feel-good liberalism.

The record you want to pay more attention to is the shit he does/did before elections.
Obama only ever adopted populist rhetoric when it came time to campaign, his pre-presidency is full of fucking neoliberal/clintonite shit.. while Hillary is the same sort of milquetoast 3rd-way-er that she's been since at least the mid 1990's.

My point is that Bernie is moving towards the "Center" or "right" of his party from the "left/populist"-side, which is a far better direction to be moving from since when push comes to shove he's likely to cut loose those centerist/right-ist positions before surrendering his left/populist projects.

Obvi

Why are you engaging in a disinformation campaign?

but he's so COOL

Attached: 1498653958960.jpg (500x436, 28K)

All memes aside you fags needs to get your friends and family to vote in 2020 or we are getting an Assault Weapon Ban and full on socialism. It will get really fucking ugly.

Attached: 1501992228548.png (1017x1162, 270K)

The only politician I'd actually support would be Rand Paul, but I guess I'll go Trump for the lolz

Right, he redeemed himself as of recent, but seriously no one in either political party likes him much. If he does win, he's not that great against the left candidate imo.

Attached: GoodGoy.png (472x726, 676K)

An AWB and full retard socialism would be the best thing that could happen for the right.

for the same reason the GOP is bad at politics.
they're schizophrenic in terms of who they see as their base and what they see their jobs as.

again, gas yourself if you are stupid enough to think some old socialist jew that never had a job actually supports people owning guns you 5D chess fucking retard

Not when the world economy is in full meltdown and we are having to eat rats to survive like Venezuela my guy

Attached: 1443739000761.jpg (566x480, 54K)

Who were you expecting to win to allow that to happen?

Being a legislator is a job.

same as every election
vote third party

>assault weapon ban is all that matters
voting because of one single issue is for braindead morons

Even IF you'd vote for that issue and that person would get elected, there's still a chance he'd backpedal and not give a fuck anyways.

The dude couch surfed until he was in his mid 40's. Bernie was literally kicked out of a commune for being too lazy and writing crappy erotica about women who want to be raped all day.

Attached: 1503825621113.jpg (480x362, 28K)

Literally any of the other mainstream candidates. Well, the Republicans would still try to enrich themselves, but we wouldn't be the global laughingstock we are now.

It wouldn't get that far. The Dems would self implode with someone like AOC at the helm and the right would stop bickering amongst themselves about relatively inconsequential shit and galvanize before it got that bad.

eh, perhaps AWBII would be a benefit for the right, but "full retard socialism"
(IE social democratic programs that fucking shitholes like leafland and Austrailia, (not to mention fucking Cuba) can somehow manage) would probably not be as problematic as many would assume.

I'm not seeing the problem here.

How big of a topic is gun control actually for the dems?
At least to me it appears to be actually a rather very secondary topic.

Maintaining the constitution and allowing the ability to remove tyranny if it arises is LITERALLY the only issue that matters. Also socialism has always and will always fail. If you do not think that Bernie would snatch every semi auto out there if he has the chance then you are delusional or a shitty troll.

Attached: 1498958696619.png (666x666, 797K)

That "single issue" is a civil right. If you're willing to compromise your natural rights then you deserve slavery.

Fuck you, I don't give a fuck about everything else because they are social norms and will change in due time. Gun rights will erode into obscurity. You are on Jow Forums gun rights is the only thing you should give a damn about and if not, then get the fuck out.

>implying bernie is gonna take the nomination as the democratic candidate

Next dem who runs for president is gonna be a minority, a woman, or both. Bernie checks neither of those two fetish boxes for the DNC and it doesn't seem like those retards have learned their lesson yet when it comes to running solely on identity politics.

>gun show loophole

W E W L A D
E
W
L
A
D

Leftists really believe this is a thing and it makes me laugh every time I see it.

It will happen either way as we continue to transition to a Latin American shithole, it's better for us if it happens sooner rather than later.

>gun rights are the only thing you should give a damn about
>on a site intended for weebs to fap about katanas and swords and shit
i don't think so tim

Yes it would. This is what they have been moving towards as a final goal for decades. If they go full socialism then we are fucked. They will take over the economy and flood the nation with so many migrants that they will never lose an election again. Vote.

Attached: 1455243357675.gif (160x240, 676K)

Look at the last mid term and all those states that were pretty okay with gun rights. Washington, Oregon and even Florida is getting fucked thanks to the Democrats and cuck Republicans (like usual).

>not wanting to eat rats

Attached: 205100_20170330164113_1.png (1920x1080, 2.06M)

I've actually been to Cuba. Trust me, socialism is pretty problematic, especially for people who are as used to comfort as Americans are.

Attached: 1542263042493.gif (666x716, 1.72M)

Get off Jow Forums, Ted.

>Bernie is only out there to violate the constitution for REASONS
>I don't know how to use the word LITERALLY
>Bernie wants to (and can) implement true socialism
>Bernie is only out to get muh guns
>Hyperboles and disinformation are the best arguments available.
You are LITERALLY braindead, the same as left wing NPCs, except right wing.

since when are jews not a minority
are you antisemitic?

to be fair, in a democracy of uninformed citizens truth isn't exactly a highly touted goal

Okay the same Democratic party that is in favor of social justice policy that embraces the UN resolution that bars Japan creative freedom of that weeb shit you love (as I do too).

>implying it was erotica.
have you actually bothered to look into this? It was an essay about how degenerate, sexually-repressed, and alienated americans were that there were women who fantasized about that shit.

regardless Bernie has said it was silly crap he wrote for a magazine when he was younger.

>my impression is it's the kind of thing a student might write at 10pm after smoking a bunch and thinking he's being deep.

>What is a slippery slope argument
>What is an argument based upon facts
I never said i dont care about gunrights, but I care about other rights too. There is more in the world than just guns, ya know

Every single Dem candidate so far has mentioned an AWB, including the only "good" Dem, Tulsi Gabbard. I hope the faggots on Jow Forumsliberalgunowners are crying right now.

You fucking trust the US government to run those programs efficiently. Christ.

The socialist fringe of the Democrats is ripping them apart. You're actually an idiot is you think the US is going to turn into Venezuela in 2020.

I can't even imagine the revolting creature that would find Ted Cruz to be cool...

They did. Trump support was mostly on social media and they have effectively banned his biggest proponents. Thats what all the russian bot bullshit is about

democrats mostly see "gun rights" as a wedge issue to beat republicans over the head with.

when push comes to shove I'm not sure there's any more thought to it than "we're blue team and they're red team, let's do something that pisses them off and beat our chest".

there's progun leftist but the very notion of making pro-gun-rights a bipartisan affair seems to trigger people here.

And those issues will be resolved in due time like every social ill. Gun rights won't be a thing anymore if it's been taken away. This is retarded.

You're one of those "is a civil right REALLY worth insisting upon?" faggots that Scalia specifically called out. YES IT IS FUCKING WORTH INSISTING UPON AS MUCH AND AS OFTEN AS WE NEED TO!

>I never said i dont care about gunrights, but I care about other rights too. There is more in the world than just guns, ya know
Britain gave up their guns now they're an Orwellian police state. The only right that really matters is guns or self-defense in general. Every other right and law relies on guns to be enforced.

I didn't make a slippery slope argument or any argument at all really. I just stated that you should be in chains for being willing to compromise natural rights. You simply don't deserve any of them if you're willing to give up some.

>All gun issues will be resolved in due time like every social ill. Other rights wont be a thing anymore if it's been taken away. This is retarded.

I never said its not worth insisting on, but there's plenty more things worth it to also insist on. Based on ALL of them you should vote, not just because one.
Never mind that you risk being baited by a candidate anyways, weakening his stance once elected.

This idea has been on my mind for a few months now. If anyone truly wanted change, then voting for the most extreme candidate opposite their leanings could help solidify their own ideological group.

>since when are jews not a minority

Whether Bernie is a son of Abraham or not doesn't really matter. Every democrat who was shilling for Hilldawg a few years ago kept parroting the same old "we don't need another old white man as president" crap when it was between her and him. Dems see him as an old white man, and as far as I can tell they still seem to have a hard on for winning diversity points for their presidential candidates