Why are gun controllers so violent? Is it their history of murder and oppressing people?

Forgive me for having enough confidence in our general argument that I feel we don't need to reduce theirs to strawmen to succeed. It's clear you don't feel the same.

you're too smart for this place, user. run before it consumes you.

They want you broke, dead, your children raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny

It's not a strawman. You'll get it one day and you won't believe how you could be so naive

It's not a strawman. They want your guns because they want you gone. Stop being so naive.

Attached: john-morse-recall-colorado.jpg (359x261, 52K)

People who think others can't be trusted to own weapons are almost universally doing so for one of two reasons:
1. Ignorance. They don't personally feel a need for weapons and aren't knowledgeable about such things so they tend to be won over by the emotion based arguments of the second category. These people are usually made obvious by a willingness to change their opinions based on what they see as the facts of the matter, as their concern is based on how guns are actually being used instead of what they feel they should be used for.

2. Projection. They wish violence on others who don't agree with them, the only reason they would want weapons is to carry out that violence themselves and they can't possibly take any other reasoning seriously. These people make themselves known by a complete lack of care for inconvenient facts, proclaiming that they just "feel/know guns are bad" in the face of them, and will frequently openly wish violence on others.
Core gun grabbers are almost universally of the second variety as the emotional impetus it provides is a huge motivator to actually act, whereas the first group is largely apathetic unless riled up as they're largely concerned with other matters. What most of the second group don't realise themselves is that deep down their urge to disarm people doesn't come from a need to remove weapons from people they project as being as impulsive as they are, but rather from a deep seated caveman level urge to disarm those they wish to victimize. This is made clear by what firearms they wish to take(or feel "bad" about), and from whom.

It's a wet dream of the proletariat rising up and taking power. Most pro 2A people are just interested in defending themselves. But the idea of hundreds of roof Koreans standing in their way gets the apoplectic.

Right now, the socialists feel like they are out of power. In the event that they gain control of the gov't, they will calm down.

Socialists in power don't calm down. That's when the confiscations, gulags, and crack downs begin.

>The woman was asked to leave, but was not arrested.

Why do lefties get away with shit that would get right wingers immediately arrested?

Has it occurred to anyone this person might have been trying to be cheeky?

Capitalists do the same

This.

Name a single socialist country that values private firearms ownership.

Again, neither do capitalist/free market nations so what's your point.

*most

>he says this on an American board to mostly Americans who can relatively easily get firearms

You're kind of an idiot if you think that. People like that having been threatening you for years and for some reason you don't take them seriously.

Attached: dab.jpg (737x959, 90K)

Obviously closing her legs wasn't an option either, try to space the fuckers out next time.

Spot on. Any liberal I've ever talked to about guns can't wrap their minds around the idea of ever owning them for any reason other then slaughtering people. It's what makes me hesitate to even try to convince them otherwise.

Because a lot of the time people who are against something are that way cos theyre projecting their own insecurities about said thing on other people. Most people who are anti firearm ownership know deep down that they are immature or have issues controlling their emotions or whatever and that they should not be allowed near firearms, and they project these feelings onto others to make themselves feel better. Ive seen it in most of the antis i know personally.

>I will take your guns after killing you with guns because guns cause violence.

good luck with that.......also are ya gonna kill us with what? remember, we have guns.....

Attached: 1544665115844.jpg (590x775, 104K)

Facebook tier post you nigger try harder

Watch this and you will understand:
youtube.com/watch?v=U9s-L5MbjpM&t=2589s

Attached: nEgkBR9[1].jpg (719x848, 87K)

they're not interested in common sense or statistics, they either have irrational fear or hatred ,often both.

>she's white
I just don't understand how someone can be so absolutely stupid. Does she really believe that because she was some sort of "ally" in the genocide of white people that she'll be excused for the same thing millions would be murdered for? She ought to read up on historical genocide and revolution.

>pic
Nani the fuck

Cops are dumb

(modern)liberalism is mental illnesses and was ever really functional when opposition of it was bounded with same religion

Mostly emotionally unbalanced and uncaring about events beyond the superficial, the ones actively trying to disarm people are the narcissists. The base reasons that people want guns banned or controlled rests solely with them being scared of them, plain and simple. If you try to explain self defense to them, self-governance or anything other than the immediately obvious you’ll draw a blank stare from them because they’re fucking retarded (just like 99% of topics).

Most people can taught and will understand these arguments if they opened up their brainbox to anything beyond the immediate talking tube, but few people seem willing or able to due to the programming and daily reinforced propaganda.

>100% of mass shootings have been committed by gun owners
>0% of mass shootings have been committed by gun grabbers

Attached: Blank+_446d301ecaf5587761368f9e20372abc.jpg (502x454, 55K)

don't knw lol
they seem to have no problem with subjugating others
where they differ is that they want to do so without effort of blame

Attached: quote-arms-discourage-and-keep-the-invader-and-plunderer-in-awe-and-preserve-order-in-the-world-as-w (850x400, 67K)

Leftists project, the reason anti-gun activists are anti-gun in the first place is because they do not trust themselves to be able to own a gun and not use it on every person that cuts them off on the freeway or on themselves when they wake up in the morning and the realization that they are a complete waste of oxygen sinks in. If they can't be trusted, they assume no one else can be trusted. The fact that they are irrational, unstable people that overcompensate for this by declaring their way of life to be the one and only moral choice in an amoral universe begets their desire to control others and thus to control arms. Basically, Ted Kaczynski nailed it.

>that nose

>because they do not trust themselves to be able to own a gun and not use it on every person
bill Cosby had expressed this line of reasoning
perhaps a reflection of an impulsive nature
>tfw people shit talk the constitution and get all reductive on it
>but then fail to review its context or the attitude of its authors

Attached: quote-it-will-be-found-an-unjust-and-unwise-jealousy-to-deprive-a-man-of-his-natural-liberty-upon-th (850x400, 51K)

That's actually not correct, and interestingly those categories are not mutually exclusive. Turns out grabbers, like all authoritarians, think rules should apply to others but not themselves.

What are you talking about you stupid shit

> what is Waco

Attached: image.jpg (480x360, 57K)

Joke’s on them. I’m armed, they’re not.

Rules for radicals: hold your enemies to their own standards

>calls her an anti-gun activist right in the headline
>"it was unclear if she was a member of any of the anti-gun groups present"
I hate journalists so god damn much

>D-CO
Pls send help. I don't wanna be California

like I said, most. but as per internet rules, since I missed out on one word everyone will play daft. not that any of you losers provide consequence to my life.

>t. journalist
Honestly bro just kys. Fucking propagandist

deleted my post because of a typo.

suck my dick. you probably watch "propaganda" that strokes your worldview regardless of what it is. gargle buckshot

She's probably a kike

The second that the left began to posture themselves as the new moral majority they became susceptible to this strategy for the first time and it drives them fucking nuts.

not true, several mass shootings have been committed by people who did not own guns but "grabbed" them from gun owners, including the 2009 Winnenden school massacre in Germany, and Sandy Hook

I'll answer your question, faggot
>Would you rather live in a society in which there is no chance of gun ownership or a society in which there is a chance of gun ownership, if you fight for it
The latter, every time, you communist faggot. Firearms rights can be expanded under a legislative process. Brazil is loosening it's gun regulations, Czech Republic recently enacted a constitutional right to bear arms. Fuck you, make like your comrades and go starve to death.

you didn't answer my question, you just spouted off words like a bitch and smiled as you clicked Post.

Your point was: Most capitalist societies don't value gun ownership, so they are not better than socialist societies (none of which respect private gun ownership). I gave you two examples of capitalist societies expanding gun rights ownership, one (Brazil) after decades of strict regulation. However, you are a commie bitch faggot and are incapable of acquiescing on this or any other point that shows a flaw in your shitty system, so you have chosen to deflect instead. I always smile when I post, you dumb commie faggot, because I'm not starving to death in a communist shithole.

Italy is also expanding gun rights too.

>if I saw you open carrying I'd take the gun from you and shoot you with it!

I have literally nothing to contribute to the discussion.

Attached: Level4BA.jpg (780x585, 175K)

Tweeting death threats =/= being racist in private

>socialist country that values private firearms ownership
None. Because socialism devolves into totalitarianism very rapidly.

Attached: MarxGunControl.jpg (975x499, 192K)

This. I don't get why so many people don't understand this. You can't win by holding your principles to the insane left, force them to be held to their own and watch them crumble.

I mean, murdering pro-gun politicians is probably the best way to get gun control laws passed since the rest of the legislature will be scared shitless.

Attached: gun control is for kikes.jpg (554x1199, 66K)

TWO whole examples.

Switzerland? Estonia?

universal conscription doesn’t count retard

Bullies want to be able to torment and abuse their victims without fear of reprisal. This doesn't change as people grow up. In highschool, half my class was harassing some kid until he ran out of the room crying. Everyone laughed until I commented that "One of these days he is going to show up with a rifle and we will all deserve it: you lot for tormenting him and the rest of us for not stopping you." This shut people up for about three seconds before the class launched into a gun control debate, everyone who had been bullying the guy saying how guns need to be banned for public safety. When you see someone arguing in favor of gun control, they have done something that has them fearing that someone wants to kill them.

Howd he strap the babies on his back?

He sewed the pockets on, put the babies in the pockets then wore the clothes

>most mass shootings were committed by registered democrats