Has had nuclear submarines for decades

>has had nuclear submarines for decades
>refuses to use nuclear carriers

What the fuck is their problem?

Attached: UK-flag-union-jack-1024x683.jpg (1024x683, 38K)

Other urls found in this thread:

uk.reuters.com/article/nuclearpower-britain-china/update-2-china-designed-uk-nuclear-reactor-plan-clears-second-assessment-stage-idUKL8N1XQ4A1
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Attached: 1552101529294.jpg (961x703, 45K)

Britain possesses no local nuclear reactor production knowledge. Why do you think they have to source all of their nuclear reactors from China? They lack the facilities, the industrial capacity, and the institutional knowhow.

uk.reuters.com/article/nuclearpower-britain-china/update-2-china-designed-uk-nuclear-reactor-plan-clears-second-assessment-stage-idUKL8N1XQ4A1

They should unironically buy Chinese carriers from now on.

That's like asking why they scrapped every last veteran battleship after wwii. They're always broke

Because submarine reactors are not the same thing as carrier reactors.
And yet it produces its own submarine reactors, refine Uranium for warheads etc.

That's also not Chinese reactor technology. It is French.

Poverty, mostly.

>Kingdom of Great Britain (1707-1800)
>nuclear submarines for decades
fuck, the rebels got lucky they didn't get glassed right off the bat

Attached: 1457217754239-k.jpg (625x833, 120K)

>why doesn't this small nation spend exorbitant amounts of money on useless equipment that will do nothing for decades and eventually just get sold to Brazil or something when there are no serious enemy threats
>inb4
>muh chinese
Yeah, like the Chinese are going to get into a fight with the people supporting their entire economy by buying their cheap shitty consumer goods.
>muh russians
literally who, the USSR at it's peak didn't even do jack shit, only reason Ivan is in Ukraine because literally no once gives a fuck about Ukraine.

They need to use suez canal to go from europe to asia, which doesnt allow nuclear powered vessels.

>Britain possesses no local nuclear reactor production knowledge.

Maybe learn before you speak

You fucking idiot

Attached: v4nWsBIBSzCqDP1AMa9U7kKVh8zFR_9HkHpsXt-GmjU.jpg (960x639, 76K)

Not at all true. I rode a nimitz through the suez not long ago

>5th-7th largest GDP
>poverty
There's better words to describe military funding than that.

^This

>muh gpd
chinese tier argument

Ok, how about this, we invented the first world.

>implying you'd get any (You)s with balanced, well informed comments
You rabid fucking shitcock.

>greater cost
>greater demand on recruitment
>less available facilities
>banned from certain ports/territorial waters
>pain in the arse waste wise if sunk

Do you know the difference between a decade and a century?
Here's a hint; you're a retard.

Kek
Based vexillology poster.

I think you’re the retard for not knowing the difference between the UK flag and the one in the OP.

What country are we talking about?

Sounds super gay

Attached: image.png (522x712, 376K)

can't believe it's already summer, make sure to pay closer attention in history class class next year and look at flags a little closer

Well xe's in the navy, so...

>if you have alot of money, and your country is particularly wealthy, your country can be described as in poverty

in your fentanyl tainted smooth-brain, is poverty defined by how poor you /feel/ some other nation is?

Attached: 1557166938070.png (551x550, 471K)

>china-designed-uk-nuclear-reactor-plan-clears-second-assessment-stage

>Western nation purchasing reactors from China
Why are anglos such third worlders?

I am actually of the britbong persuasion, and upon closer examination, it appears as though OP's flag is incorrect, you are quite right, and that joke went soaring straight the fuck over my head.