Russia has finally found a buyer for its weapons! And it's, uh

Russia has finally found a buyer for its weapons! And it's, uh...

Huh.

Attached: Screenshot_20190510-083156.png (2048x1903, 1.23M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/OchyYnlHTdo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-140_ATACMS
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-17_Elbrus
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTR-23_Oka
tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/4305705
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

so we dont test our missiles?oh.. huh

Here we go again.

Wtf was the point of your post? Literal nonsense.

Forgot link:
youtu.be/OchyYnlHTdo

>Russia has finally found a buyer for its weapons
>finally
Are you retarded? They're like the second largest weapons exporter on the planet.

lmao

Hope they enjoy their 60'd technology missile

The south korean missile also looks like an iskander.

>Hope they enjoy their 60'd technology missile
You mean the same technology that takes astronauts to ISS?

SpaceX is taking over that role.

Because all of them are based on Scarab which is based on Scud. DRPK had Scads legally and Scarabs illegally.

Let's see. Here's an American 90s tactical ballistic missile:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-140_ATACMS
It has 300 km range and Mach 3 speed.
Here's a Russian 60s tactical ballistic missile:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-17_Elbrus
It has 300 km range and Mach 5 speed.
But wait, there's more. Here's a Russian 70s tactical ballistic missile:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTR-23_Oka
It has 500 km range and Mach 10 speed.
Boy oh boy, looks like the US wished it had a Russian "60s technology missile".

Attached: Hyunmoo-2 & Iskander.jpg (797x715, 50K)

Shut up vatnik

>all of them are based on Scarab which is based on Scud
Scarab is not based on Scud, retard. Scud, Scarab and Spider/Stone are three completely fucking separate designs.

Attached: b91f8abd2bdc7f7d20d1f51eb7b.gif (3000x1252, 746K)

Your butthurt only makes my penis harder.

Attached: Scud-family.jpg (1158x410, 69K)

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTR-23_Oka
Comparing small rockets shot from multipurpose rocket veichles to big rockets fired from purpose built rocket launchers is pretty stupid.

to

Attached: 9k720 iskander-m (4).jpg (1400x828, 479K)

I'm comparing tactical ballistic missiles.

Attached: 9k714 oka.jpg (600x400, 72K)

Iskander isn't even ballistic, it's aeroballistic, quasiballistic or whatever.

It just means that the missile is controllable through the entirety of the trajectory, specifically performing evading maneuvers. It's still a tactical ballistic missile. And Oka is not Iskander. Iskander is based o Oka and is a further development of that specific design, but it's not the same missile.

Attached: 9k720 iskander-m.jpg (1200x800, 154K)

Russia has been selling NK their old weapons and defective shit for decades meow

Attached: su-25 swag.jpg (1300x880, 226K)

based meow poster
back to /r9gay/ with you

Oops
Forgot to turn my super troopers plugin off

based frog poster.

Yeah. Since Russia can’t seem to develop Angara into a usable platform, and Proton is too dangerous to even fly anymore.

You think the guy in the foreground has AIDS?

>Tactical fringe on the ejection seat headrest
Why?

>A literal nuke logo on the nose.

It's not ballistic because it doesn't have an apogee. It plateaus when it reaches a certain height, it does not leave the atmosphere. It's not a fucking ballistic missile.

That’s standard in Russian aircraft. It denotes the EM hazard from the radar as opposed to ionizing radiation like one would expect from the trefoil symbol.

It does have an apogee, the apogee is just lower than the Karman line. It follows a primarily ballistic trajectory with some deviations. Aside from just being pedantic, it is very much a ballistic missile.

stop talking like a boomer

No shit? All Norkies have been doing is elongating fucking SCUD missiles.

>The ballistic missile, gaining a height of over 100 km, struck the disguised headquarters and training camp of conditional fighters
tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/4305705
I don't understand what are you trying to prove. I didn't even compare it to Iskander, I compared it to R-17 and OTR-23.

>Knows enough to incorrectly use the word apogee
>Doesn’t know the definitions of apogee, ballistic, or “leaving the atmosphere”
If you throw a baseball in the air, it has a fucking apogee. Don’t be a retard.

>300% larger missile has 50% more range

>60s Russian tactical ballistic missile is faster, has more range and larger payload than 90s American tactical ballistic missile
Ftfy, cry more. What's also fun is that only 00s Block 4A achieved better CEP than 70s SS-21 Scarab which is considered a frontline working horse rather than a high-end system like Scud, Spider and Stone.

you dumb?

Tbh it doesn't appear to be standard because for some reason for instance MiG-31 doesn't have it. But yeah, that's the EM radiation sign, because these things will turn your head into a fucking boiled egg if you stand in front of them when they're on.

Attached: mig-31bm with r-37 & r-73 (1).jpg (1280x891, 213K)

Gotta eject with style.

ok vlad.

I like it how there are actual legit arguments to defend American missile industry here, but you are so ignorant you don't even know what to say except for this obnoxious damage control of a post.

Attached: 15p645 rsd-10 pioneer launch (1).jpg (497x679, 54K)