Gungrabber intelligence

But then who do we give our guns to?

>The readers/listeners don't question it either because they for some reason believe that it must be 100% true if it came from a big enough source.
Those are called normies. Normies will believe any bullshit if a big enough socially acceptable source provides it. Culture wars are initially fought with 5% of the population going against the other 5% of the population trying to influence the other 90% of the population. This is why memes are so damn important

... What?

This.
My boomer grandparents are a fine example of this. They pretty much think that if it's on TV / newspaper / etc, it is the absolute truth.
The whole idea of internet scams is completely foreign to them.

What about a possessed gun?

Still need someone to aim.

This is why nobody should own a ghost gun

Based.

I f*ckin knew it!

Our children

Imagine having a ghost spotter on your rifle.
>Hit low
>Hit left
>Completely miss
>"Wow user my grandma could shoot better than you and she died before guns were even invented"

Call the SCP foundation. They can deal with sentient objects fairly well

>user, your cabinet is too humid
>I can FEEL the wood swelling

Wholesome as fuck.

Attached: 1555764694160.gif (235x240, 2.05M)

>Is that brass case?
>Holy shit finally
>I hate that steel garbage
>Oh it's bimetal
>Well at least it's better than Tula

Based and reproductivepilled

They're being wrong on purpose.

Football mum thread?

Attached: Screenshot_2014-04-17-10-46-57.png (720x1280, 219K)

Football/soccer moms are the worst

you can reason with the first three
it's just more difficult for the second and third options

>no archive
Kill yourself shill

They wouldn't consider it a pistol even because Gungrabbers are too retarded to even check what laws are even in place.

Boomer tier

You can, but they're more useful to you if you have the conversation in public.
The more steadfastly against civilian firearm ownership they are, the more humiliating it becomes for them.

Attached: Women benefit the most from guns.jpg (993x1024, 101K)

Make a better one, then.

Attached: gun control is about control.jpg (450x432, 43K)

humiliating someone generally speaking doesn't convert them to your side because you're making it personal
you want to reason with them, not harden them in opposition
it makes further arguments pointless because then they're opposing you because you were mean to them

Thats basically a quick rundown of every fake soccer mom thread ever lol.

No u, and don't conflate size of round with the ballistic potential of said round next time, it's ooga booga tier muh dick logic that leads people to genuinely believe that .45 ACP is a man stopper but 5.56 was designed to wound.

Humiliation is the only way to go, leftist can very rarely be reasoned with, but if you destroy them with actual facts they crumble like a leaf.

Social stigma is the only thing these people are taught to fear anymore.

yes, you win the argument, but then that person goes home and rants about how pro-gunners are all meanies and will continue to vote antigun for the rest of their life because you hurt their feelings
we only win the long game by converting people to our side, no matter how childish they are mentally

>Person is stereotypical soccer mom who thinks anyone who has ever held a gun is a monster
Odds are, you'll never convert her. She's too far gone for it to be worthwhile.
If you have fence-sitters within listening distance and the person who wants firearm prohibition is a lunatic, you look the more stable/reasoned person because you are. One convert vs potentially dozens in one shot.
People who know that they can't argue against you generally just sheepishly stay away from you after.
If it's someone you truly care for, then yeah, having small discussions about it over time is important. Being fair, be honest and be understanding.
I know people who would never kill someone to defend themselves, but if someone tried to hurt their family, they would.

Attached: 2nd Amendment Feminism.jpg (597x600, 84K)

Less and less people bother to do their research and just barely skim the headline and first few sentences of an article. They think that just because CNN, CBS, Fox, or some other big news company said so it must be true, because to them they can’t lie at all as they already appealed to their aimed audiences’ pre existing bias in the first place. So random journalist Selfimportant McFuckle can say the most pants on head retarded mess about firearms possible, but the grabber normies who already think guns are the spawn of Lucifer himself who also don’t bother doing ANY kind of research about them since they’re just that bad will eat up McFuckles article like breakfast. This can be traced directly to the boomers who lived an extremely pampered life most people who have ever existed could only dream of while also having complete trust in things like government and the news, something that just isn’t possible today unless you’re brainwashed or a legitimate moron. The issue is that some people are just simply too far gone to have an actual discussion that doesn’t resort to pointless bickering and whataboutism, and not Jow Forums level where it is mostly just some jackass trying to piss people off for the lulz. If you would like you can read up on Yuri Bezmenov and how all of this nonsense is by design.

5.56x45:
>M855A1
>62 gr
>3,100 fps
>1,371 ft-lbs

.577 Tyrannosaur
>750 gr
>2,480 fps
>10,240 ft-lbs

Nearly 7.5 times more powerful.
youtube.com/watch?v=wrImp-ek3bI

god that fucking nigger spat on my boy's grave with that episode

Attached: file.png (771x434, 363K)

>you can reason with the first three
easier said than done, especially when they think shushing you means they win

>We surround you and scream so loud you can't hear your own thoughts, therefore we win!

Attached: Socialism who would win.png (1024x768, 700K)

the more an individual knows about firearms legislation the less they approve of additional restrictions and vice versa

Ok nigger, that's fine, but just posting pictures of how big the round is next to coins gives the impression that bigger = better to an uneducated reader (which is who the picture is directed at)

I give benefit of the doubt that they're intelligent enough to look up a wiki.
If you don't like the meme, don't use it. The point remains that claiming the AR-15 is somehow TOO POWERFUL when the entire point of intermediary rounds is to be LESS POWERFUL is hilariously wrong.

Attached: CNN Bump stock.webm (1280x720, 1.68M)

I don't think it's saying bigger = better.

it's not easy and it's not a given, but it's something you can try to do help our situation
and yes, even if you don't convert that person, you can convert the other people who are listening in
don't poison the pool by being condescending or personally combative or pointing out that they're stupid (even if they are)

?

That webm, top kek

lewd

Using children for a political/social message regardless of what side ur on is pretty gross imo

Agreed

Wanting children actually defended
vs
Dancing in their blood to infringe on the rights of others

Attached: Teachers can be armed.png (828x613, 188K)

Fuck Michael Crichton is my favorite author

Its wrong to use a party that is unable to represent itself to make an argument for or against them. That'd be like talking about partitioning Europe but inviting no Europeans to discuss it

Exactly this. Except the 5% fighting against us has all the billions and we have all the memes.

Attached: Love both their kids and guns.jpg (620x465, 75K)

Why can't you guys make a coherent argument without gunsplaining?

Autism

I mean yeah it's effective argumentation but really it seems like a nuclear option as it's impossible to argue against without coming off as insane. If someone says do you want more kids to die either for or against guns saying anything but no will make you look crazy to normies who you should aim to win over

>those feet
just imagine the smell, bois

Attached: 1559460161534.webm (480x360, 952K)

What's gunsplaining? Is it like mansplaining where the only criticism of the argument is who made it?

>gunsplaining
Still haven't gotten anyone to say that to me in person, but it's pretty hilarious that they'd put a premium against knowing wtf you're talking about.

Attached: Gunsplaining.png (1140x1546, 292K)

Im suspicous since its breitbart they probably took an out of context or overall dumb phrase and blew it out of proportion this isnt something im gonna foam at the mouth over

A classic

youtube.com/watch?v=iJmFEv6BHM0

lmfao thats actually deliberate misrepresentation

Yooo is that dude about to send some 50BMG without earpro?

This shit fucking blows my mind
It's terrifying just how ignorant people are about firearms
They don't even know what theyre banning

If my gun had a ghost living in it, i would make it feel my wood swelling every night

Bigger scoop: tnt more powerful than party popper

This.

It's not making a subjective argument to say women are more on par with men with guns around rather than trying to swangalang a big ass fucking sword around in hopes you don't get parryed or tired before killing your obviously stronger assailant. 80 year old 90lb grandma can fend off a 300lb linebacker with a .357 magnum.

Problem is that the fourth commonly pretends to be the other three.

>The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.

Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying. Gradually I began to hate them.

And yet the only reason why they are unable to represent themselves is because the government says so. Funny how that works.

I'M SAYING I WANT TO FUCK A HAUNTED GUN

I mean in all seriousness do you want literal children in politics? I know we already have manchildren running around as evidenced by the March for our lives but do you really want kids voting?

>Not wanting to fuck a haunted house
What are you, gay?

>do you really want kids voting?
A hell of a lot more than I want the people voting who use them as a bludgeon to terrify people and get them to stop thinking as their rights are stripped away one-by-one.

>This just in:
>hunting rifles more powerful than standard military issue rifles

I can't wait. Literally, I cut the cable cord back in 2005 and I don't know why you all keep shoving this shit down my throat. Stop giving them money, stop paying for cable TV. Stop.

yesssssir

Attached: 1552862126900.jpg (1280x853, 81K)

no

Your stories were the creepiest yet the best, Papa Serling!

Attached: Becky.jpg (895x893, 109K)

The post was merely restating his point. He's correct.

It can't be worse than the lunatics we're allowing on the soapbox today. And when you think about it, some of those people technically do have the same amount of mental facilities as an actual child.

Yikes

Ah yes, the classic starship trooper technique of putting the buttstock between your shoulder and bicep and just squeeze the trigger till there’s no ammo left.

>SUPPRESSING FIIIIIIIIIRE!

Good thing nobody does!

ITT, what kind of personality would your gun have if it was possessed?
C308
>Bossy mixed Spanish Moor girl
>Plays hard, doesn't care about getting dirty
>Flakey especially when PTR is brought up
>Everyone talks shit about her but she's pretty cool
>"Wow user how'd you miss that? No need to answer, I already know it's not you but me. Please don't get mad."
>"Is that PMC bronze? user you spoil me"

Based CBS informing casuals that quickscopes beat handguns every time. Pistol fags btfo

Wow very cool retard

Goddamn that webm

Attached: 1557699383522.gif (167x167, 801K)

Attached: gun grabbers.webm (330x600, 1.66M)

>breitbart.com

Attached: come on now.jpg (217x245, 23K)

What's this? An Asian man being assaulted by a large number of bees?

A large influx of bees ought to put a stop to that!

Attached: dr bees.jpg (1280x720, 49K)

The situation has only been made worse with the addition of yet more bees!

Attached: ay dios mio.jpg (1157x673, 210K)

Wow. It's almost like different calibers have differing levels of stopping power. I'm shocked. Quality journalism, CBS.