>In Russia, presented a new aircraft carrier project "Manatee"
>At the International Naval Salon in St. Petersburg, the Nevskoye Design Bureau (PKB) presented the aircraft carrier Project 11430E “Lamantin”.
>According to TASS, the layout of the ship is placed on the PKB stand in the pavilion of the marine saloon.
>In the project description it is said that this aircraft carrier is designed to support the basing and combat use of the air group, which includes shipboard aircraft of various types.
>It is noted that "Manatee" is equipped with a springboard, two electromagnetic catapults, four arresting gears.
>As part of the air group can be up to 60 aircraft, as well as provides for the basing of up to 10 UAVs.
>Earlier, the head of the Krylov State Research Center Pavel Filippov spoke about the concept of a new Russian non-nuclear aircraft carrier.
>The military analyst, the captain of the 1st rank of the reserve, Vasily Dandykin, in an interview with FAN, evaluated this concept.
>Russian design bureau unveils nuclear-powered aircraft carrier project at naval show
>The aircraft carrier will displace 80,000-90,000 tonnes, feature a maximum length of 350 meters, have sea endurance of about 120 days and will be capable of developing a speed of about 30 knots
>ST. PETERSBURG, July 10. /TASS/. The Nevskoye Design Bureau (part of Russia’s United Shipbuilding Corporation) unveiled the newest Project 11430E ‘Lamantin’ nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. Its mockup was shown on the design bureau’s display stand at the St. Petersburg international maritime defense show.
>The ‘Lamantin’ aircraft carrier is designated to provide for the deployment and the combat use of an air task force that comprises various types of shipborne aircraft capable of employing weapons and armament against air, sea (submarine and surface) forces, and also land troops and ground installations of an enemy in the oceanic, maritime and coastal waters, and also to ensure naval groups’ combat sustainability and provide cover for amphibious assault troops and their landing force against strikes and attacks by enemy air-launched weapons," the project’s description says.
>According to the materials presented on the Nevskoye Design Bureau’s display stand, the aircraft carrier that will get a nuclear-powered propulsion unit will displace 80,000-90,000 tonnes, feature a maximum length of 350 meters, have sea endurance of about 120 days and will be capable of developing a speed of about 30 knots. The aircraft carrier will have a crew of 2,800 and its air task force will comprise 800 personnel. The carrier will have a service life of over 50 years.
Do they introduce a new CV project every decade? Seems like the Soviets/Russians have been "about to build a full size carrier" since the late 80's, but the projects never go anywhere.
Lol have to face some ships that mostly cannot travel under their own power or go further than 100 nm without killing their own crew. Stocked with inferior aircraft in every way, and manned by subhumans.
Jason Cook
nobody cares, it will never be produced.
Gavin Price
It is and yes they do
Colton Miller
>400 m horizontal slipway 100 to 150000 ton DWT workplace (or slightly more) , two 60 m 300 - 560 ton gantry cranes , one 1200 ton >400 m drydock 100 x 20 x 400 , vessel up to 150000 ton DWT or some more , workplace with one or two 1200 - 2000 m gantry crane (goliath) (drydock in construction, 2018 - ) 5 - 6 workshops >one floating dock (more if needed), one closed (roof) floating dock project planned
yeah but just imagined if nobody ever responded to these threads or the mods actually deleted and banned this fart huffer on sight.
Ian Cooper
>docks are easy to build
They had to purchase them last time, so evidently not.
Leo Gonzalez
The problem, of course, is that Jow Forums is full of autists and incredibly easy to troll. I'd wager that at least 75% of people "shilling" for Russia and China are just Americans and Euros who enjoy seeing how this board reacts to their bullshit.
Lincoln Garcia
>Muh cold war era ships are modern!!! .t seething butthurt amerishart
Most Russian ships are modern ships and would easily destroy amerishart outdated equipment.
Then they would just samefag, circlejerk and drag this things to every other thread. The point of ignoring it and it will just go away are like 6 years gone.
Aaron Carter
So basically a pic related, except disappearing money involved.
A lot of people like to shit on Russia here on Jow Forums but you have to admit, they're vastly superior in scale model building compared to their NATO counterparts.
>its just trolls, am i right, so could you please stop doing anything while we shill for tussia, pretty please? we will call you easiest board to troll otherwise
Lucas Ward
They probaly ordered it in China, also they still have to steal CGI from the west.
Anthony Long
Because NATO models aren't for propaganda purposes.
It just gets annoying. People will continue to waste time posting rebuttals to anons pretending to be uneducated Russian jingoists, and the quality of conversation on this board will drop to Jow Forums-tier stupidity.
Brayden Parker
To talk to the spirits of their dead submariners
Anthony Brown
Russia doesn’t build stuff over 2,000t anymore just river boats and corvettes
I was referring to the Northern and Black Sea fleet's lack of a large mobile dock, that and large displacement vessels need to travel across the world to use this plant whenever they need an overhaul or a refit.
Fucking why? Why does the Russian Federation even needs a carrier, they are the ultimate force projection ships why the hell does the Russian navy even wants them
You know, a tug carrying VTOL/STOVL fighters on a barge could actually be a clever way to discreetly distribute forces in a non-permissive environment. Sorta like how the English carried those Harriers on a cargo ship during The Falklands.
>implying it offically aint 4 different models, which is actually just the one which has been remodeled and the saved money has gone to some corrupt russian general.
William Cooper
Western lies. Is 4++ gen model with radar-absorbent balsa wood. Just as good.
Robert Thompson
kek
Nathaniel Adams
>ramp
Ian Bennett
>Double negatives are two negative words used in the same sentence. Using two negatives turns the thought or sentence into a positive one. Double negatives are not encouraged in English because they are poor grammar and they can be confusing.