If nonlethal self defense was perfected, why shouldn’t lethal self-defense be banned?

If nonlethal self defense was perfected, why shouldn’t lethal self-defense be banned?

Attached: D5027172-728C-4A3B-AB8A-6523ED541D24.jpg (640x560, 59K)

Non lethal self defense can't be perfected, it's a pipe dream like socialist utopias

Because it will never be perfected when methheads charge you.

>Prisons fill up
>Taxpayers get fucked over
no

Because nothing in the history of anything has ever been perfected.

ethnic erogonous purification of the decetralized melanie population shekle shekle Jow Forumspol/

Debating impossible hypothetical scenarios is retarded, user.

Attached: worn out shoe.jpg (480x302, 13K)

No such term as non-lethal
The correct term is less lethal.

You shut that whore mouth of yours

Attached: M1911A1.png (1530x958, 1.39M)

>less than 10 rounds of capacity
>firing 45mm AARP
>Prone to failures to feed, especially when using non round-nosed ammunition

Come on user. 1911's are great. I own one and love the fuck out of it. There's still some things they do very well compared to modern handguns, but they also have a lot of deficiencies. Calling them perfect is retarded.

because some people need to die

What if we tried REAL communism this time?

Hey I have one of those

Attached: 874525845.jpg (900x606, 382K)

Is it original or a repro? If the former, how's the trigger?

Maybe there will never be such thing as perfect nonlethal self defense but it’s feasible that something more effective than bullets in stopping threats will be developed someday

you will be even more poor.

I support non-lethal self-defense which is why I carry 9mm.

>why shouldn’t lethal self-defense be banned?
Because bans don't actually achieve anything. They don't work.

This theoretical wonder-weapon and its ammo would likely be very expensive, alienating all the not-super-rich bumpkins who buy guns to protect their wee farms. It'd be a product reserved for the more loaded police departments and the wealthy. I'm not sure if you knew, but the vast majority of the world's population is neither of those things.

Attached: 9mm.gif (320x170, 2.9M)

I love the idea of a gun you can shoot someone with and instantly knock them unconscious with no permanent damage. It's like a perfect high speed roofie!

Because some people deserve death, and it's immoral to give them less as punishment.

Attached: 1560919330921.png (738x499, 394K)

I have a A1 repro
actually had another, but it was so fucked up I never fired it and colt sent me another

Attached: get some forty five.gif (240x103, 1.59M)

it's beautiful

Did you even read your post before you hit submit?
because what you said sounds absolutely fucking stupid kid.

In order to overthrow a tyrannical government as provided by the 2A.

But otherwise I'd agree, lethal weapons can be owned but not brought into public, where nonlethal is acceptable cc.

If something is more effective at stopping threats than bullets, I can guaran-fucking-tee you it's also gonna hurt a shit ton more than bullets.

Attached: 1559766813136.gif (500x375, 1.61M)

Because it shouldn’t be a crime to put down a violent negroe.

Because some people need to die.

There will never be a more effective threat neutralizer than killing something dead. Don't let the luxuries of suburban get to you.

I doubt it

NL self defense can't be perfected. Even if it could, a free and lethal population is eugenic.

If we're at the point someone has to shoot you it means all bets are off to begin with

>Non lethal self defense can't be perfected

Fucking lol, what the fuck ? There's sixty million ways to perfect non lethal self defense tools.