For me, it's the Trijicon MRO

Are you my nigger? Because nobody else on the market at that price point offers that much parallax and blue tint value.Who the fuck wants a 1.25 magnified dot that you should be shooting both eyes open.

I have an MRO and no problems. I don't go to /arg/ so I don't care about their out of date criticism.

>I have an MRO and no problems
That's actually wrong as you have an MRO.

Attached: Super MaRiO bros.png (709x473, 278K)

Keep telling yourself that sweetie.

Doesn't look cool unless you get that cantilever mount. I say that as someone who has one on a Scalar mount.

lmao the red dot with the most parallax, worst glass and worst peripheral

Best looking rifles out there.

eokek said the same thing and hand a cuckcard not guaranteeing it. ACOGS and RMRs are the only good thing trijicon makes. MRO is shit.

best looking single shot piston ARs

>looks cool
lol

Attached: super mro bros.jpg (750x600, 46K)

I'd just buy a used Aimpoint T1/T2 off Barfcom with a quality QD mount like a Larue or Bobro, and call it done. Picked up my T1 for about $425 shipped.

Their Accupoints and HD pistol sights are good, too.

Get an Elxan #nopoors

>best looking single shot piston ARs

What slander is this now?

accupoints are too dim

multiple friends with PWS uppers and two of them don’t cycle on any lower on any setting, and the other one shoots 10” groups from a lead sled.
best part is that PWS has never responded to any of their emails or calls

Cool meme redditbro

I always love these unsubstantiated deals people get around here.

Let me guess you got a G19 gen5 LNIB for 350, and a Leupold Mk6 for 1500?

I think i’m going to get an MRO because aimpoints look like overpriced sig romeos, and i’m not a complete retard and can get a cheek weld so i’m not too worried about parallax

RMR and Accupoint/powers are both superior.

MRO is a solid choice. It gets a lot of hate from the hive mind here. I doubt any of the haters in this thread have ever owned or handled one.

worst parallax error out of all $300+ red dots, 10 fucking inches at 100 yards

b-but its fine!

Attached: trijicope.jpg (633x758, 160K)

It's pure fucking garbage.
The parallax it worse than my vortex venoms, it's fucking embarassing. Anyone who actually defends it is a poorfag and it's probably their only optic.
>b-b-but they fixed it!
no they fucking didn't, my serial number is 120000+

Attached: 20190716_204630.jpg (4032x2966, 2.43M)

I thought it was 89000, or was that the paralax issue?

I've shot one. It was okay.
I don't see any compelling reason to get one when the Aimpoint PRO exists.

That's too bad, I have one of their .308 guns and it eats anything I feed it and does ~0.6 moa with decent (not shit but not match grade either) ammo. Running a can on it is fucking tremendous, just swab the barrel and she's clean as a whistle even after shooting suppressed all day. PWS even put it together for me out of two other guns because the combo I want was out of stock. I'd get one for a SHTF 5.56 gun but for that role I'm going DI for greater parts compatibility.

Honestly at this point if Jow Forums hates something I'm instantly interested in it.

yeah, you are right. 89k and above

>no they fucking didnt, my serial number is 120000+

nah, you just got ripped off by Schlomo. I have a 130k+ and it has zero magnification

pic related, straight from Trijicons website.

Attached: MROfix.png (812x149, 12K)

Well damn dude a smart man like yourself should consider an I.O. AK and a new R51 then.

I'm not talking about magnification you illiterate retard, I'm talking about parallax.

It’s a shit optic. I have 2.

They never fixed the parallax error, it's something else.

>Myth #1 It's magnified
The current production hasn't been magnified for years. See the FAQ on Trijicon's own website. It stopped around the 89,000 serial number range Source: trijicon.com/na_en/support/faq_MRO.php

>Myth #2 It's made in China
"Made in USA" is printed on the side of the red dot. When people repeat that the MRO is made in China, they fail a very easy intelligence test. Source: Just look at one.

>Myth #3 It's blue tinted
Yes, but the current production is a lot less blue than the original ones. Current production is also not much more blue than the T1, PRO or any of the Holosun or Primary Arms products, and these people don't constantly bring those up. Yes, the T2 has really clear glass. Peopel forget that Aimpoint improved upon the T1's slight blue tint to get it that clear in the second generation. Comparative pictures of the two generations of MRO production can be found here: alloutdoor.com/2017/11/08/trijicon-mro-version-1-5/

>Myth #4 They suffer from debilitating parallax shift
There is some parallax shift with any red dot, including the Aimpoint T2. It's just very minimal with the better red dots. With the T2, parallax shift is around 1-1.5 MOA. With the T1, on the other hand, parallax shift is closer to 8-9 MOA. The PRO, by the way, has as much as 6-7 MOA parallax shift. So when people cite 12 MOA parallax shift for the early production MRO's, without giving this kind of context, it's deliberately disingenuous. Source: greeneyetactical.com/2017/07/27/comparative-study-of-red-dot-sight-parallax/

Strange thing is that people here recommend the PRO and T1, despite the blue tint and significant parallax shift. Why? Because those aspects don't actually matter in real life use.

>they fixed it.
The cry of the eternal MROfag.

Attached: thefateofMROseverywhere.png (1597x625, 58K)

>tfw classes recommend, but don't make mandatory an MRO
>bought a PRO after hearing the stories from Jow Forums
Dodged a bullet.

Attached: 13373-DEFAULT-l.jpg (900x600, 183K)

Sounds too absurd to be true.

>trijicons false promise of fixing an issue
>third party opinions
>facts

sure thing retard.

Did you even read your own fucking source you little shill?
The mro has fucking 16 inches of horizontal deviation and 9 inches of vertical at 100 yards while the pro has 4 and 3.
And literally nobody recommends a t1 since the t2 exists.

>why? Because those aspects dont actually matter in real life use

Exactly. I guarantee you parallax of an MRO has had ZERO impact on anyone while shooting it in real life. Including this rambling neckbeard

The PRO is heavy, narrow, has worse battery life, not much better(still bad) parallax shift, takes up so much space on the receiver that it’s difficult to fit a magnifier behind it and has a lot more shit hanging off of it to obscure the field of view. There’s a reason why it’s a budget option in the Aimpoint catalog.

>t-t-the aimpoint pro is just as bad I swear
ohonononono

Attached: report20graphics-all20testing20summary20charts-6.jfif.jpg (621x174, 41K)

>I don’t believe the people who actually designed and make it
>I don’t believe an independent third party
So you are basically a conceited little shit who can’t be reasoned with? GOT IT.

>literally every single red dot outperforms it in parallax
>like omg it doesn't even matter ok, stop paying attention to the single most important facet of a red dot

Post your optics.

Has there ever been a time when you are shooting an MRO and looking through it from the side trying to hit a target at 100 yards? Seriously...has there?

>inches
>MOA

Why don’t you educate yourself on basic shooting concepts before making an ass of yourself trying to lecture other people, you stupid shit.

the moa column is literally in the source you blind cunt

Way worse than an Eotech

fascinating that this has evolved into its own thread

And? It's also smaller and has better battery life, we're shitting on the MRO here.

Post your groups.

>n/a
>n/a
>n/a

disregarded

MRO is excellent, my man.

Yes, because I actually shoot my guns and handload for them. Now post your fucking optics.
post your guns

Attached: 20190705_190123.jpg (4032x3024, 3.14M)

Do you also believe that everything written in the Bible really happened?

it's shit my man

I don’t see groups. I don’t think you actually shoot. That is why you think this moderate amount of parallax matters so much when it does not.

I was about to put in money on an MRO but my friend told me not to thanks to it's epic style parallax error. Looks like I saved a headache or a few.

I'm sure the PRO and CompM4 they tested were outliers and a larger sample size would have revealed a 12+ MOA average parallax error on par with the MRO.
Keep on coping on, sweaty.

i don't see guns OR optics from you, going to assume you don't own any weapons

If it really were a shit optic and you bought it twice then that would make you an idiot. Why should I listen to an idiot about anything??

where's your groups and your mro?

>fell for the magnifier meme
>complains about FOV on a red dot
Oof.

Post your groups friendo.

No, you havent. Stop larping on the internet

>and handload for them
what does this have to do with literally anything?

>post your fucking optics

Attached: ScalarworksMRO.jpg (640x480, 65K)

Because I know that pictures of my guns and optics don’t change the facts about the MRO, which can be independently verified. However, since you invoked this standard, I expected you to unhypocritically post your own guns, since of course you take your own advice and post your guns whenever you talk guns.

Unfortunately for your credibility, that concept backfired when you turned out to be a hypocrite. “Do as I say not as I do” has never convinced anybody. Time you learned that.

>got the scalarworks mount
jesus it's one disaster after another

Nah, stuff like that is universally understood to be garbage with Jow Forums's input. I'm talking about Idon'tlikethingfagging that exists on here for the express purpose of trying to fit into some perceived elite group of people that apparently treat their Guci gear like a classic car, showing it off and not much else.

>Strange thing is that people here recommend the PRO and T1, despite the blue tint and significant parallax shift. Why?
Because they're both cheaper and have less parallax error.

tfw i fell for the magnifier meme back in 2013 with an exps2 / vortex vmx-3t. Blows even eocuck dot way up at 100 yards would much rather have a variable 1-4/1-6 scope with a close to 0 parallax at 1x.

they're independently verified to be shit
Where's your standards now?

Confirmed noguns.

You have a very low IQ. I gave you a chance to save yourself and lost your guns and groups, but you didn’t take it.

t. noguns, no optics, nogroups, nodata

You’re absolutely seething, huh? So funny to watch you project your insecurities.

I also have 2 T2s. You should listen because I own...pretty much everything.

i'm still waiting for your guns, optics, groups or data

lmao I would LOVE to hear what you think is wrong with Scalarworks mounts. PLEASE tell me.

what's wrong with scalarworks?

>MRO
youtube.com/watch?v=dq1PoqvtQbQ

Jow Forums told me to hate them. Like the MRO.

>asks him to post optics
>he posts his optic
>now insulting the mount its on instead

never change Jow Forums

>Anyone who actually defends it is a poorfag and it's probably their only optic.

>post your optics
>posts his only optic

And that’s why no one posts their guns. There is exactly nothing in it for me to go take a picture of my guns and post it when all I know will happen is heaps of verbal abuse. The whole thing hinges on the assumption that I’m really insecure as a gun owner or something, which I’m not.

It’s appeasement for very, very low IQ people who are unable to assess evidence for a logical argument on their own and are too embarrassed of their incompetence to have any kind of humility or integrity of character.

>And that’s why no one posts their guns. There is exactly nothing in it for me to go take a picture of my guns and post it when all I know will happen is heaps of verbal abuse.
>being this much of a crybaby
here. Roast me daddy.

Attached: green.jpg (3024x4025, 2.79M)

like yourself? when the data from your own source empirically proved that the MRO has the worst parallax error out of all red dots tested?
Please by all means address this instead of resorting to passive aggressive insults.

>asks him to post optics
you stupid blind nigger

Watch him be a hypocrite and try to insult your handguard or some shit.