How much .22lr will it take to survive?

How much .22lr will it take to survive?

Attached: 77445_ts.jpg (1155x1155, 112K)

All of the .22LR

Attached: 3480am180c.jpg (575x194, 35K)

semi-hourly reminder that the 86 GCA infringements prevent these majestic beasts from being free.

Attached: tippmann.jpg (1800x898, 234K)

No amount of 22lr will enable you to survive. Get a better round.

>How much .22LR
Yes.

What, for eating?
(Days you expect to live) x (minimum caloric intake per day) / (caloric value of rabbit or other small game) / (hit rate with your weapon)

>durr its just a pellet gun

Those haven't been manufactured in decade, bro...

Yes, because the NFA and Hughes Amendment killed the market for such things.

Wrong. Deer and big game will be hunted out within months of the collapse. Rabbits and squirrels will last forever. 22LR will keep you fed much longer.

Base hits win games, don't get fancy, kid.

Attached: bugs.jpg (480x360, 27K)

>kill 33 people

Attached: ChoSh.jpg (423x186, 12K)

Yeah, he did that with a glock 19.

Only 9 people died to Glock, 24 died to P22. Read the autopsy reports.

More.

Being cheap is great, being near impossible to reload sucks.

Why didn't he bang it out with the Zio-coppers?

No one gives a fuck about reloading if boogaloo actually comes you won't use even 500 rounds for years let alone need to reload more

That's a whole lot of assumption, starting with how you can supposedly keep your ammo stock dry and in your possession for years while being completely safe and have no interest trading part of it.

If even a 1000 rounds were enough then why would you even care about 22LR considering its main advantage is its low price?

> If even a 1000 rounds were enough then why would you even care about 22LR considering its main advantage is its low price?

22 has other advantages, such as being extremely lightweight, compact, relatively quiet, and great for small game.

Survive what?

lol if you can't see the tactical potential of a 22 you really don't belong on Jow Forums.

BOOM HEADSHOT

Attached: 1027358753.jpg (1000x541, 115K)

>.
That is a fortified position, that is not defended with 22LR.
22lr is not reliable, so unless you can take a position that can't be assaulted and needed the range a bow couldn't provide you wouldn't use 22lr.
The 22lr as money would never happen either.
AP would be money, AP explosive, would be money any military or rare useful round not in common use would be money.
But not 22lr.
Under one use case 22lr would be valuable and that is fleeing or putting distance between a harmful situation like an advancing army.
Then a light weapon with light ammo would be of you since you are on the move.
But even then you will not need more then a pocket full of rounds and may be better served with just a pistol and a pocket full of rounds.

You can buy a thousand rounds of good 22lr for like $50 if you watch for sales. There's no reason not to stock at least ten thousand, that's about the same investment you have in your survival gun or your survival optic, right? Work up from there, but 10k to start if you own a 22.
pound for pound, no other round provides the in potentia food calories of a box of 22lr in most climates. not even close.
lets get real. 22lr does not have much tactical value, aside from some very niche edge cases. 22lr is arguably the best round, but not for those reasons.

/Sci/ get out

>22 has other advantages, such as being extremely lightweight, compact, relatively quiet, and great for small game.
So is better ammo.