You faggots should read A.T. Mahan, then Rules of the Game, then Sun Tsu, then The Prince.
Whether it is objectively true or not, it is a subjective given that the nation with the most dominant navy is the most dominant nation. The reason for this is twofold; power projection, which any brainlet can comprehend, and, more importantly, the fact that a dirt simple navy takes a minimum of a decade to build, another decade to train, and a third decade to refine... and that's just to play the game. If you want to win, that takes a century. The US is notable because it did it in 40 years, but they used the Not Get Attacked Ever cheat code in WWII, thereby shaving off 60 years. They were the only country with a functioning navy + 0 debt in 1945.
And about this "carriers are obsolete" meme. As someone pointed out, China is hell-bent on building them, to which some cock mongler replied that that was for after the war with the US, to which any man with half a brain would have to wonder about the logic of that.
Second, but more importantly, China has come up with a groundbreaking iterative model (not innovative, mind you) of permanent aircraft carriers, AKA the Spratley Islands. This fits the chink mindset. They aren't colonizers by nature. They do not project power, they condense it. Their iterative model only works for Taipei, Tokyo, and Washington, and only so long as women and faggots and coloreds are making the strategic decisions.
And, finally, I dare you midwits to try and read this: worldview.stratfor.com/article/geopolitics-united-states-part-1-inevitable-empire
Attached: Screenshot_20190216-005820~3.png (580x519, 393K)