Russia seems to be increasing the "tempo" of its military operations across a range of fields. Why is that...

Russia seems to be increasing the "tempo" of its military operations across a range of fields. Why is that? Not just the engine testing, but they've also launched 8 payloads since the end of May, several of which carried Russian military equipment/satellites. Is there a specific reason for this upshift?

There have also been several developments that haven't gotten a lot of western press, like the resurrection of Crimea's old shore-based anti-ship missile/tunnel network, or the revival of the Russian deep-space ground-based satellite dish monitoring system (including a Crimean station, too). Why the sudden burst of activity in summer 2019?

Attached: 2018-12-21-01_03_08-Window[1].jpg (1733x842, 377K)

Other urls found in this thread:

translate.yandex.com/translate?dir=auto&from=ru&lang=ru-en&to=en&ui=&url=https://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/122781/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

because either the Chinese, American baby boomers, butthurt belt, or European union of sodomites might try something so best to be ready

Weak, isolationist president after weak, isolationist president with either four more years of weak isolationism from the current president or another eight from whoever gets his job. The threat of American military power is the great counterweight to the dynamics of geopolitics. Putin believes, rightly so, that he can do pretty much anything since America has no sentiment for any military engagement and is headed by a president nobody respects.

Since 1945 the Russian became charged with two major responsibilities fighting and winning a conventional war and fighting and winning a nuclear war. Without effective nuclear deterrence the Russian military does not possess credible deterrence period. Since the USSR collapsed the US has been aggressively pursuing ABM technologies. It's obvious why they've been upping the tempo, have to make up for lost time.

>Weak, isolationist president after weak, isolationist president with either four more years of weak isolationism from the current president or another eight from whoever gets his job. The threat of American military power is the great counterweight to the dynamics of geopolitics. Putin believes, rightly so, that he can do pretty much anything since America has no sentiment for any military engagement and is headed by a president nobody respects.
This would be compelling if Donald wasn't the first President to defy the ABM treaty in retaliation for the Russian IBM programmes.

Pardon me I meant to say INF treaty.

It's a far cry from actual military involvement, which is the only thing Vlad really respects when it comes down to it. Trump may posture, bluff, and, yes, make a real move every once in a while, but everything Russia does is predicated upon the knowledge that the US sleeps.

Because one thing that hasn't changed from the days of the Soviet Union is that Russia must always maintain the outward appearance of strength. Russia's nuclear arsenal is the only thing keeping them relevant in geopolitics anymore so they rattle that nuclear saber every chance they get.

It is also more relevant in the recent breakdown of several Cold War arms treaties.

Trump has actually supplied lethal weaponry (the type that can actually kill those T-90s that somehow found their way in the rebels' hands) and has actually overseen the massacre of hundreds of Russian ''''''contractors''''''. I think that sent plenty of message of Putin.

Despots aren't afraid of American supplied arms to auxiliaries. If Assad survived it, anyone can survive it with friends in the right octaves. They're afraid of the actual military force we can muster. When they know there's not much anyone could do short of committing major atrocities in western Europe or North America that could convince the American public to stomach a new war. This gives Russia a huge amount of latitude to act like the slightly defunct world power it still is.

>Russia's nuclear arsenal is the only thing keeping them relevant in geopolitics
Their arsenal was always important to maintaining Russian sovereignty, but given the breakdown of their conventional forces, especially when it comes to implementing expensive, modern technology, nukes are more vital than ever.

It's highly defunct. It's strength comes from its supply base and ability to leverage its weapons exports to various rogue regimes and factions. Russia has really nothing to gain besides an empire it can no longer police against an adversary that no longer is remotely interested in containing a meth addled population in free fall. Russia will likely find a place in some alliance, and hold out for the next century until it recovers. That is why closing off the Northern European plane is so damn essential for them. Putin's Russia will probably collapse and form an alliance with some strong of EU countries to shwack Gemany again my guess.

The Peace Dividend from the end of the Cold War means that we have nothing (no maintenance, no replacement, for decades) and our completely worthless security establishment getting captured by the Ikhwan and carrying water for Muslim terrorists means that nobody in DC knows this.

>form an alliance with some strong of EU countries to shwack Gemany again
I think it's more likely that they work more closely with the Germans while Eastern Europe, stuck in the middle, looks for closer ties to the US. Russia's collapse means it no longer poses a major military threat to the Germans, and the two countries have been developing closer economic ties with each other, even after the invasion of Ukraine.

>Weak, isolationist president
are you talking about Trump?

You can't really argue that he's not the most isolationist president since WWII.

>overseen the massacre of hundreds of Russian ''''''contractors'''''
NEVER happened. Russians would have reciprocated by killing a lot of niggerspics.

>Russians would have reciprocated
That would end poorly. The Russian military is way too impotent to risk open conflict with the US. Putin's a fairly intelligent guy, so I'm sure he understands this.

right, because the US is so keen on starting a hot war with a nuclear power. the US can't even deal with Norks or Iranians let alone with Russians which can end the life on Earth.
you're a motherfucking retard. watch less CNN and other neocon shit. it's killed off most of your brain cells.

Why are you squealing, armatard?

>Russia's collapse means it no longer poses a major military threat to the Germans, and the two countries have been developing closer economic ties with each other, even after the invasion of Ukraine.
I would think it's the other way around. They Russians and the Germans may come into more direct confrontation without the US there to guarantee Eastern Europe.

If the US completely steps out, that's certainly a possibility, but with Germany's main foreign policy focus being closer ties to France, I don't think they really care all that much about Eastern Europe at the moment. If Russia starts pulling "totally organic regime changes" in Poland and the Baltics, that focus may well change, though.

My goodness I've never seen such shame less display of Russophilia in all my days.

One might hope that Poland can actually act as a Taiwan in the west. Small be exceedingly difficult to invade in timely fashion.

Because Russian Aggression is increasing at a record pace, emboldened by Obama handing them Syria and Ukraine on a silver platter. Russia will not stop at anything, they shredded the INF, are propping up the world terror state Iran, and are supporting Chinese operations in order to deny freedom of navigation to the free peoples of the world. America MUST prepare a robust response to Russia's wanton and insane aggression worldwide.

Poles are kind of angry at the US right now because the US government keeps demanding that Poland pay WWII "reparations" and hand over property to displaced Jews. This has actually become a major political issue in Polish-American relations, because Americans simply cannot let it go and get past the war.

Okay, John Bolton.

Since when was this a thing. Everything I've seen shows the US and Poland tightening defense ties.

The United States must reaffirm our commitment to containing Russian hostility, and at the same time we cannot waver in our support for Israel. Poland needs to get with the program. Russia is encroaching closer and closer to NATO, and have Poland in their crosshairs. If Poland wants to retain their sovereignty and freedom, that means doing the right thing, and fully participating in the global community. Holocaust denial is not the path forward for a free Poland.

begone boomer.

Russian rhetoric is constantly evolving, their latest attempt to divide America is playing on the insecurities of millennials and Gen-Xers, and encouraging a generational divide. Straight out of Rules for Radicals.

All Russia has is its military bluster, its economy is in the shitter and China has far outpaced it. Without seeming militarily threatening to the West, Russia has nothing and this depresses Russians;.

So they waste money on stupid wunderwaffe that will never be used

God wouldn't it be great if you weren't some shill and we actually were isolationist?

The problem is that people have been predicting the "imminent" collapse of Russia for about 25 years. People in the late-90's/early-2000's were predicting that Russia in 2020 would be a Bangladesh-tier non-entity and would have decommissioned its nukes by now due to lack of money, lost its launch capability, etc.

That hasn't happened yet, which means at least some predictions about Russia were far too pessimistic and simply wrong.

>Russian deep-space ground-based satellite dish monitoring system
isn't that the one that kills birds with EMF?

>pessimistic
>not optimistic
kinna giving yourself away there Ivan

Russia sucks. You can't wipe your ass without asking permission.

In america, as long as you got a wad of pocket change on ya, you can do whatever you want. Least till the money runs out.

>Comrade, I am requesting 2000 extra rolls of sandpaper for diarhea victims.
>Request Denied! (STAMP!)

russia is basically china's sidekick. they are boy robin to chinas master bruce.

everybody knows, you don't kill the villians sidekick. Thats how you get 'blood-spatter'd vengeance'.

Russia already collapsed in the ‘90s. Their nuclear deterrent will be the last thing they ever give up, due to its importance in maintaining their sovereignty.

all the best movies america makes are about kicking russia's asses. they are hilariously bad.

man, imagine america making movies about kicking little chinese people in the face and mowing them down en mass..

Get off our clay, you slant-eyed beaver.

>Red Dawn
>Hunt for the Red October
>bad movies

But it did nigger.

>freedom of navigation
feel free to navigate back to mexico, senior "open borders."

2 words for you.
Red Heat.
Its basically a gay porno with all the sex scenes taken out.

and its a good thing, too, cause Jim Belushi's in it.

I never claimed Russia was going to collapse. I said it's a shithole. And it certainly already is

as long as there is a west for russia to try and annoy the russians will never rise up and improve their lives

Come come civil war
cleanse the Georgetown grads and the Christian Zionists
Restore America to American foreign policy
Come come civil war

i mean think about what its like living in Russia.

To give you a sense of how primitive they are, culturally, right now, they are JUST NOW getting the N64..
****
(APPLAUSE)
****
(APPLAUSE)

The US has literally always had an expansionist foreign policy. Our 2nd war was against Muslim pirates in Morocco or some shit.

Because the truth is far less dramatic than an incoming WW3

Russia is weak economically compared to what Russians want to see, which is the hayday of the Soviet era

Chest thumping Nationalism, new military projects and limited but high profile modernization get public attention off the economy

Combine that with the fact that modernization of the armed forces was DESPERATELY needed for its own good
What everyone forgets is that the Kursk disaster was only a few months into Putin's leadership and clearly showed him how inept current structure where

Most of those Russian launches carry Chinese satellites. To hide Chinese growing hegemony.

I think Russia has been PUBG dropping airmen and equipment over Alaska and they are building a secret base some really strange signals coming from there.

Attached: 1553989560855.jpg (360x235, 36K)

>Russia seems to be increasing the "tempo" of its military operations across a range of fields. Why is that?

Internal jingoistic propagandizing to a serf population who live in poverty with short life expectancy.

>Russia is weak economically compared to what Russians want to see, which is the hayday of the Soviet eraChest thumping Nationalism, new military projects and limited but high profile modernization get public attention off the economy

This and

this

I don't think it's because we have them surrounded by military bases, it has to be something else.

Attached: nrussia-wants-war-us-bases-sarcastic-map.jpg (600x424, 66K)

Imagine being so weak that you can't stop your enemy from surrounding you with bases. Must suck. Also, since when do we have a base in Kazakhstan?

since the 90's

This. The Bear has finally woke to its purpose.

Russia didn't even reciprocate when Turkey shot down one of their fighter jets in broad daylight.

>Russia didn't even reciprocate when Turkey shot down one of their fighter jets in broad daylight.
They did. They gave Kurds manpads.

I feel like that was about as effective as giving the Syrians more missiles after they accidentally shot down that Russian plane.

Is there any proof that Russia even gave them manpads?

it was effective
>muh proofs
proof is that they didn't have them before, and then they got them after the incident. here's Igla.

Attached: 1550305475712.webm (854x480, 2M)

The US and all of Western Europe was supplying them with weapons to fight Assad/ISIS so the weapon could have easily come from them.

Igla has also been used in the Syrian civil war since 2012 so it could easily have been smuggled from there.

YPG didn't have manpads before then. The West never supplied manpads to anyone in that conflict (way too risky). Saudis/Qataris have been trying or years to give manpads to FSA/AlQaeda but CIA said no.

>Russia seems to be increasing the "tempo" of its military operations across a range of fields. Why is that?
Because we're still pushing for brinkmanship, thinking Russia will have to back down at one point, since they're weaker, because that's usually what weaker states do.

For example, if we're looking at the strategic value of these nuclear powered cruise missiles they've been testing and crashing lately, it perfectly reasonable why they're developing them. After pulling out of the anti ballistic missile treaty, (and even clearly pushing for breaking the treaty when it was in effect), they've realized they need to come up with something other than ICBMs, since their nuclear deterrent is pretty much their only deterrent. By threatening the efficiency of their ICBMs, they needed a new system, with comparable range, that isn't vulnerable to these anti ballistic missile systems.

According to the West, they stopped respecting the intermediate nuclear forces treaty long time ago, but this too can be explained by them feeling their nuclear deterrence was threatened by the West not respecting, and ultimately pulling out of the ABM-treaty.

Add in the need to appear strong to their public, or face a more radical opposition that's going to "make Russia great again", they really can't afford to back down. Their need to appear strong, not necessarily to the international community, but to their own people, means Russia can't go full Boris Yeltsin and back down from international pressure.

>Why the sudden burst of activity in summer 2019?
Because the EU has also had a sudden burst of activity lately. The EU army is in the works. Germany starts talking about getting aircraft carriers. Italy and France have consolidated their navies and ship production. The European global positioning system is reaching military operation in 2020-2021.

Remember that Ukraine in 2014 wasn't just the Russians trying to increase their sphere of influence. The EU is also to blame.

cont;

NATO members have committed to spending 2% of GDP on their armed forces, while the US is really not showing any signs of decreasing its spending. This at a point when Russia uses a small fraction of what NATO does on defense. An increase in their main threat means they really have to step up their game, even though they really can't afford it.

Then there's China. Which everyone seems to forget. It's not just NATO and now the EU, the Russians perceive as a threat. They also have China to deal with. They're competing for influence in Central Asia. The Chinese economical boom means China is starting to look like a power capable to project force regionally, which is a huge threat to Russia. They have more than twice the military budged of Russia, and it's increasing.

China is one of those countries that are bound for conflict in the future. Booming economy, sure. But there's also a booming wealth disparity, giving China a lot of angry poorer citizens. Chinese agriculture can't meet the demand, and they're soon dependent on imports from foreign countries. They're also pretty low on natural resources, which is why they're buying up all rare earth mineral land they can all over the world. Kazakhstan is one of those countries in Russia's sphere of influence where China really need to go for, to secure their energy and mineral demand.

The US is the only country capable of feeding the Chinese in a few years, so China really have to stay on their good side. They would much rather have a conflict with Russia, than the entire western world which not only can feed them, but also keep their entire industry alive.

Attached: China_Military_Budget_2012.png (1001x974, 59K)

>Russia uses a small fraction of what NATO does on defense
In terms of absolute dollars, yes, but when it comes to percent of GDP (a better measure of how much of an impact it has on the country's overall economy), Russia spends much more on its armed forces.

Attached: MilitarySpendingByGDP.png (1800x820, 230K)

Modernization, just that the old soviet satellites were long overdue for replacement and general work has been going on since 2008 so nothing new.

>they shredded the INF
If shredding the INF Treaty is such a major sin what does that say about Dubya pulling out of ABM in 2002?

Imagine making assurances of reconciliation and promises not to expand NATO into the former soviet sphere, only for the latter to happen in 1997 and 2004 despite the god father of containment saying that it was a bad move.

Russia's agriculture sector is actually one of its biggest successes in recent years. They've increased production a lot, and even developed things like a sizeable domestic beef industry for the first time in the modern era. A lot of that was initially due to EU sanctions over Ukraine, but now it's spreading into exports to countries like Egypt, Philippines, and... China.

Attached: 1560900141526[1].jpg (1558x1200, 397K)

Russia also has a low debt to GDP ratio and is continually building up its gold reserves.

>Imagine making assurances of reconciliation and promises not to expand NATO into the former soviet sphere, only for the latter to happen in 1997 and 2004 despite the god father of containment saying that it was a bad move.

The problem was the Russians thought that they would carry on as normal running corrupt gangster states like Belarus and fuck the population living in poverty. People did not want that in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, hungary, bulagia, Poland etc. They did not want a Russian impose puppet state that aided and abetted Russian speaking criminals. They did not ant to live in fear of dur hurr vatnik threats to roll tanks and rapists in. The problem was not NATO seeking to exapand, the problem was that the Russian state tried to keep a collar on half of eastern Europe and make them bow down and after 50 years of state police gummunism and kgb torture centres and meat rationing people had had enough. So maybe if RUSSIA had kept is bullshit bellicose orc slavery inside its borders all these nation would not have been screaming at NATOs door. Of course Russians think America has puppet governments in western Europe, but they don't. The EU which Russians shill like fuck against has actually been fucking brilliant for east Europe. Russians are getting poor east Europe is mostly doing very well thank you and Russia is screaming louder. Russia has not stopped threatening its neighbours for 30 years for throwing out the Russian speaking klepto oligarchies they installed as rulers. YOu know what Russia? Fuck you. You know you have fucked up when people would rather die than be ruled by anyone who speaks russian

>Weak, isolationist president after weak

This.

The election is coming sooner or later and things have been bad for Russia, Putin is not having a good time in the middle of all of this.

They need something to show to the people, even if it's imaginary projects or soon-to-be-cancelled type of things. This gives hope to people who otherwise see weakness in their leadership - but such is life in the poverty of Russia, you can never REALLY get things.

There's protests in the heart of Moscow, the inner circle of russian government arguing between themselves and lots of other stuff we don't note that much. It's a weak, hopeless country.

Attached: ryssägirl.jpg (600x315, 204K)

>Russia's agriculture sector
Have they cracked down on the cheese smuggling yet?

>So maybe if RUSSIA had kept is bullshit bellicose orc slavery inside its borders all these nation would not have been screaming at NATOs door.

This.

Maybe they made a loose deal about NATO not expanding.

But nobody made a deal about having to suffer from russian degeneracy one minute longer than they had to.

These are two different things and no deals have been broken whatsoever. Russia is to blame here, especially for their crimes against the people in other nations. In fact, russian criminal government was never prosecuted for their heinous crimes, this type of mistakes need to be fixed in modern days.

Attached: cbd3bcff.jpg (876x1016, 261K)

Yeah, given what's happened in Ukraine, I'm sure Poland and the Baltics would have had their own "little green men" incidents by now, had they not joined NATO.

>Russia also has a low debt to GDP ratio and is continually building up its gold reserves.

Russia has poverty level wages, collapsing infrastructure, low life expectancy, awful health care, mandatory conscription is a political police state who's ruler murders his rivals openly and sends people to poison them when they go live abroad. Russia can't even refine its low grade oil without western expertise and lives of exporting gas to the eru, which it the EU just said to thanks for a month, Russia would literally suffer a complete financial collapse. Its population are brainwashed drones all Russian language media is controlled by the klepto state with an iron fist and any protest will see you getting destroyed in some of the most brutal prisons imaginable. Its hiv rate is awful, its drug addicts and prostitution is endemic with even army conscripts getting pimped out as male prostitutes by their officers and the ruble is literally a joke and probably always will be. The only reason Russia does not have debt is because it defaulted on it and no one will lend it any more money. Most water supply outside major cities is from communal water pumps and carried in buckets, roads and bridges are falling apart (they were badly built by slave labour) and Russians collectively have done nothing other than sit and play victim after imposing shit on half of Europe for a generation. Russians are some of the most hated people alive. For good reasons. They are mindless serfs who cheer their shitty tsar everytime he rage quits and starts talking about starting a nuclear war. Russia has no future. None. Entirely because its populated by Russians, stalin having murdered anyone with an iq or a soul.

The only response you get from vatnikistan when you kill a truckload of their service”men” is a bunch angry squealing and an upturn in vatnik shillbots on the internet.

absolute spending is a way better metric for actual military power than percentage of GDP.

Russia has a shit GDP, compared to the West. And sure, they can pay their soldiers less, so they're more efficient in that way, but they're also less technologically advanced on the whole.

Congo spends 6.8% of their GDP on the armed forces, compared to Russia's 4.3%. Congo is not a military powerhouse. When NATO members currently at 1.5% goes up to 2%, it's a lot, since they have a way higher GDP than Russia.

this is true. But while the Russians have improved their agricultural sector, they're nowhere near the US when it comes to projecting food power.

oy vey. my post got shlomo mad

>Russians have improved their agricultural sector

They can't even supply basics like cheese and butter, bacon and quality red meat is a treat not an everyday thing see their 'synthetic cheese'. They may have impoved from where they were rationing and fake announcements about record harvests but in may ways they are still the same. The fact that they even try propagandising about inadequate food production improving marginally says a lot. Smuggling cheese is not a meme they do this and anyone in Russia with connections avoids conscription and live sin western Europe. They are fucking awful people.

That's it Russia is it? You're going to start jewposting? Fucking pathetic.

>muh jews
Putin is a Jew you stupid vatnik.

Attached: D3529CF8-27CF-4934-8985-DE838EAA338F.jpg (1733x1080, 134K)

lol'd. just keep telling yourself that, Shlomo.

>the vatnik recoils as the truth sinks deep

LOL :D

Your people get shredded by US air strikes, you work in a troll factory to afford life that is the standard in the west...

...are you coping well? Do you vomit in your mouth a little every time you type your instructed lies? You could have a proper life in the west, you realize this?

Think hard where all your trouble comes from. Not the west, not your own lack of trying, but the russian government and the degeneracy it has driven Russia into. You choose to support this.

Attached: 1545880137764.png (549x280, 186K)

And yet, Assad is still in power long after Hillary, Obama, Victoria Nuland, etc. said he "had to go." How did that happen?

Why? Maybe because Zio-NATO is getting more and more belligerent?

>all dat plebbit speak
kek... are you a Fed? Only feds are obsessed with russians.

Attached: 1565184803073.png (1544x2612, 279K)

He has Jewish blood and is so friendly with jews that he ignores when Israel gets a dozen of vatniks killed.

He isn’t above using the jew scapegoat to keep the serfs of vatnikistan in a perpetual state of butthurt though. As long as vatniks like you keep blaming EU, jews or the US for the inhuman conditions you have to live in, you won’t wise up to the fact that Putin and his bad of thieves robs vatnikistan blind and is the source of all the problems.

Of course vatniks being a race of literal slaves, their puny minds can’t comprehend this, that a life without a despots on your face is possible, so their fractured mind falls back on the butthurt that is hard coded into their reptilian brain.

Butthurt Belter and their delusions are hilarious. Some Russians were smuggling cheese and the butthurt Butthurt Belters are like: "Their entire agropecuary is falling apart!!! They are starving!!" lol...

Dude...even their tractors are achieving God-tier levels, stay mad Belt-er.

>running corrupt gangster
The only reason why you had the corrupt gangster state emerge in Russia in the 1990s was due to the Pro-Western Yeltsin taking the advice of American economic advisors.

>They did not ant to live in fear of dur hurr vatnik
Most Russians in the 1990s were rather Pro-American, so the modern depiction of a deluded pro-kremlin vatnik was largely non-existent back then.

>Russian state tried to keep a collar on half of eastern Europe
Yelstin continuing to remove his troops from the former Warsaw pact states and joining in on western lead partnership for peace (before it became apparent that it was actually NATO expansion) says otherwise

>There's protests in the heart of Moscow,
The only people in Russia that like the liberals are those living on Tverskaya street, who are the descendants of the nomeklatura and used their connections once the USSR collapsed to illegally benefit at the privatization of post-soviet economy via embezzlement.


>poverty level wages
Going by Purchasing power parity they're comparable to Poland

>collapsing infrastructure
Russia has been building modern roads in recent years, and not just outside of Moscow or Petersburg

>low life expectancy, awful health care
life expectancy have been increasing consitently since the Mid-2000s from 65 in 2004 to 73 in 2016. Most major cities are almost part with the west with life exppectancies in mid/upper 70s

> Its hiv rate is awful
its not 2001 anymore, the HIV out break was mostly confined to an insular population of drug dealers

> Russians collectively have done nothing other than sit and play victim after imposing shit on half of Europe
The bolsheviks regime was imposed on Russia by a tiny unpopular clique that never got anymore than 25% of the vote in 1917 hard to call that a collective discussion

>discussion
decissio

This is true if you see agriculture through an economist's lens.

But agriculture is more than economy. You could also see it through an agronomist's lens, which is how you need to see the US' agricultural power too. Then it's more about ability to project caloric force through trade, and protect themselves against sanctions.

This is why the US subsidize their farmers, it's more about protecting the force multiplier of agriculture, than it has to do with traditional markets. Russia has historically been vulnerable to this kind of power, since their most important agriculture was mainly in western Russia and eastern Ukraine, where the area was very vulnerable to droughts and wars.

And no, they're nowhere near of actually being an agricultural power, like the US, Australia, New Zealand or Canada. But they're improving on a pretty bad starting point. While other countries are effectively wrecking their own agriculture, and thereby their own self sustainability (Germany, France, Great Britain, Zimbabwe, South Africa and China).

All kinds of agricultural goods are smuggled to vatnikistan because the “produce” you can get from vatnikistani sources are so atrocious that they wouldn’t even be fit for a Western dog.
The vatniks themselves being little more than animals, deserve the slop vatnikistan tries to pass off as food.

Attached: 80898F69-FDB2-47A1-AD6F-53F8504FEB07.jpg (679x900, 113K)

"In the Crimea for 5 years in a 13-fold increase in the number of farms"

translate.yandex.com/translate?dir=auto&from=ru&lang=ru-en&to=en&ui=&url=https://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/122781/

Stay mad Belt-er and enjoy your chemical-ridden American beef.