>thinking anything good at all can ever happen
All hope does is make you suffer more.
Prove me wrong.
Thinking anything good at all can ever happen
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Obviously hope is the flip side of fear.
people like you are dangerous because you waste your life trying to suck people into your psychosis of despair
My wife let me sodomise her out of the blue. Don't tell me good things can't happen.
reasonable
OP, buckle up and engage with the world. dont be a bitch
You mean trying to tell people the truth, instead of fooling them into living
I hoped my mom wouldn't die of cancer, then she didn't and made almost a full recovery she has trouble breathing every now and then but aside from that she's fine (53 years old she is)
>don't be a bitch
Nice Appeal to Emotion, but saying that someone's a poopy pants if they believe in something isn't really an argument.
>I hoped my mom wouldn't die of cancer, then she didn't and made almost a full recovery
Well if you believe she survived because of your hoping then you've a bad case of 'correlation proves causation' my man.
Go back to cuckdit incel
Nice ad hominem, but I'm not an incel.
This is correct, how could i disprove it?
Hope is a false god, aspirations will make you strong.
Expectations are only set up to be broken. In my opinion, you shouldn't trust things to go well, in fact, you shouldn't trust in anything but yourself and what you can accomplish on your own.
>aspirations will make you strong
t. normie
>I disagree so this person is a normie.
You do realise this is literally what normies do, right?
They label something they don't like as "bad" and are biased towards it.
Wouldn't this make you the normie? I wonder, I wonder.
No, if you have aspirations that you believe or do attain you are a normie, plain and simple
These two things are not mutually exclusive and sure as hell aren't opposites.
Suffering is ultimately caused by Darwinian biological design. It should be theoretically possible to eliminate suffering with sufficiently advanced neuroengineering. Google The Hedonistic Imperative by David Pearce.
Do you think we will live to see the singularity?
Not really.
Normies are social creatures with very specific mindsets, and having aspirations, aka believing that you can accomplish something, does not make you a normie.
A lot of people on this board seem to think that just being a useless loser will make you a "robot", but that's bullshit.
Robots have moved past the need for social interaction, the need for validation of others. They live asocially and without others.
What you think a robot is, is a "failed normie", someone who constantly thinks of getting a gf and friends, someone who is involuntary isolated.
That's what an incel is, and robots are not incels.
Both those who have aspirations and those who want a gf/social interaction are normalscum, it's not a hard concept.
With the flaws of speculative execution coming to light, it seems the "exponential" tech growth that seemingly seems to have recently skyrocketed was a bit of a cheat.
There's still a lot of interesting things being done, mind you, but the growth may not be as exponential as some think.
Maybe if pic related figures out how to cure aging
Having aspirations does not make you a normie.
Caring about a gf and social interaction makes you one.
Not all robots have to be depressed shitbags, some can actually want to achieve things.
>some can actually want to achieve things.
Literally only normgroids would care about achieving something.
It is just as bad as wanting a gf or friends.
Your argument is literally just "No one can want things".
Do you even think for yourself?
You're just following another man's words, try actually being independent and not listening to everything another man says.
>You're just following another man's words
Why do you think this?
Tell me, do you think fembots are thing?
I have never encountered one so i don't know.
However, 99% of the women on this board are normalscum, as are most normal posters
Fair enough. How would you define what a robot is?
Abominable tier person, bottom 5% of humanity in most ways, no social interaction, over 25.
That's about it.
Would you consider someone who fits all other criteria but works a robot?
Probably only if it was an awful job, earning a lot of money is not compatible with a robot in my opinion.
Well that's a pretty difficult thing to measure. For example a waiter in America has much better prospects and much higher spending power than an engineer in my country.
Not really, an engineer in your country, wherever that may be, likely still lives a decent life and can pay for most things he wants
Not really. Around $100 a month after basic expenses.
But what will $100 get you in your country?
Not much. Things aren't that much cheaper here.
Where do you live with a pay disparity that large and the cost of living is similar?
Genuinely curious
The shit part of serbia
Because you're reciting the same things the quote above said.
Hmm.
This guy gets it.
You're a moron. Normies care about useless vapid shit. Doesn't mean robots can't care about other things.