George Orwell on Incels, nearly 100 years ago

Orwell, who was obliged by need to spend a few months more or less homeless, was acquainted personally with the way of life of a London "tramp" in the early 20th century. Down and Out in Paris and London was published in 1931, in which he recounts many of the difficulties and degradation suffered by the desperately poor. His observations on 'inceldom' are quite psychologically astute, and I've reproduced them here. Probably you'll find a lot of agreement with his words:

>"The second great evil of a Tramp's life - it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second - is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating. Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among the destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is entirely male. The following figures, publishes by the L.C.C. from a night census taken February 13th, 1931, will show the relative numbers of destitute men and destitute women:

>(Figures from shelters, churches, casual wards, and hostels follow)

1/2

Attached: YyBSdyC.jpg (1242x2208, 155K)

>It will be seen from these figures that at the charity level men outnumber women by something like ten to one. The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above - even a very little above - are as far out of reach as the moon. The reasons are not worth discussing, but there is little doubt that women never, or hardly ever, condescend to men who are much poorer than themselves. A tramp, therefore, is a celibate from the moment when he takes to the road. Having no hope at all of securing a wife, a mistress, or any kind of woman except - very rarely when he can raise a few shillings - a prostitute. It is obvious what the results of this must be: homosexuality, for instance, and the occasional rape cases.

>But deeper than these is the degradation worked in a man who knows that he is not even considered fit for marriage. The sexual impulse, not to put it any higher, is a fundamental impulse, and starvation of it can be almost as demoralizing as physical hunger. The evil of poverty is not so much that it makes a man suffer as that it rots him physically and spiritually. And there can be no doubt that sexual starvation contributes to the rotting process. Cut off from the whole race of women, a tramp finds himself degraded to the rank of a cripple or a lunatic. No humiliation could do more damage to a man's self-respect."

>be poor
>also be insane
Just fuck my life up forever eternally dog

I think celibacy is just one component of life as a completely disenfranchised person, as many of us have become

You can improve yourself.

Attached: 1487479579910.png (1142x1735, 238K)

Hush, incels didn't exist in 1931. That was the age when everyone could find a good wife. I've read enough between here and Jow Forums to know this to be truth.

I will read this later tonight, as I only have so much time to read all this in one sitting.

>disenfranchised person
disenfranchised male*

the much less common disenfranchised female isn't celibate, or at the very least isn't voluntarily considering the hordes of disenfranchised guys who would see her as the perfect waifu

Yes yes, I am heavily delusional so I know this shit already
Doesn't help when you're handicapped by things you cannot control

this guy is talking about literal bums not getting women which is obvious
we're talking about normal below average men not being able to get women

In the modern world where women can provide for their own and pussy's worth is inflated, the "below average male" might as well be a bum

This is really interesting stuff. In Orwell's time, women mostly didn't work, and instead were expected to find a good husband to take care of them; this meant that the main thing they looked for in a man was that he was able to give her financial security. While men would gladly take a companion of a lower class to provide for, women dated, primarily, to improve their social status.

With women joining the market en masse after the 60's, the social structure as a whole started to change. Not only were women now able to provide for themselves, with the sudden increase in manpower, work became devalued as well, which means that workers were being paid much less for doing the same thing as before, and the males lost a lot of economic power. Now, both the man and the woman would have to work to keep the same kind of lifestyle the man would be able to provide by himself back in the 50's. It's funny to think that this is still pushed as some kind of "liberation" for women by feminists, considering that, effectively, they only traded being a slave to their husbands to being a slave to their bosses. Yeah, nothing spells freedom like being a wagekek - It's well known that this "revolution" was financed by the capitalists themselves.

Anyway, what happens now is that women's economic power has been consistently increasing, while the men's is decreasing. The higher social standing means that women get to be very picky: as they no longer have to worry about finding a good husband early in life to provide for her, they will just fuck around with the most attractive males they can find until they decide to settle down. Even then, however, they will still NOT "date down" economically - their husbands have to not only be attractive, but they also must be at least as successful as them.

Cont. because I'm autistic and wrote too much shit.

Attached: bee.jpg (960x925, 104K)

thanks anons
:::::::::i hate this fucking board sometimes:::::::::

Well, what about the young male who doesn't have good looks, but also has an ever decreasing economic power and social standing? He probably won't get to fuck around or experience love in his teens and 20's because he isn't attractive to women, who will consistently have better options than him, and at the same time he will have a hard time finding a wife later in his life, because he lacks economic power.

Of course, being rejected by women through your entire life has a powerful effect on the psyche, and it appears to be leading those males to feel alienated from society, which makes them care even less about working and improving their status. Why bother with going to college and then finding one of the increasingly rare good jobs when you are lonely and have no one to provide for? It's quite a nasty vicious circle. What interests me the most, though, is how this problem is being widely ignored by society. Our world has changed forever, and while normies will celebrate that women are more "free", they refuse to admit that such big changes have negative consequences, too.

This means that these young men feel invisible, isolating them even further. And you know what happens when people feel like they are invisible? Either they become incresingly depressed and drop out of society as a whole, or they force their voice to be heard the only way they can find: through violence. This problem is going to become a very big dealin the next few decades, mark my words.

Attached: consensual sex.jpg (500x464, 37K)

I don't really have anything to add but I thought your reply deserved at least one (you) before the thread 404'd

In what fantasy world do you live in? Any male can get women. It's easier than ever in modern society.

Neets are neets by choice. Don't blame anyone but yourself.

Where were neets even mentioned?

Sure. How do I easily get a girl? By being myself?

I was literally about to fap but I stopped. Damn.

Try retention for a month or so man. It's hard as fuck to get there because we're all addicted to porn, and we're bored half the day, but start trying to do it, and I can promise you that you'll see some real benefits.

This is a common distribution between men and women. It's mirrored almost identically in IQ distribution. On aggregate men and women have Identical IQs, but when you consider the distribution men are in much higher numbers on either extreme where women tend to stack up in the middle. This is the inverse of the male CEO phenomenon.

lol but iq has been TOTALLY DEBUNKED xDDD

my sociology professor said so lol

>studying sociology
Does it have to do with muh privilege?
IQ is still widely recognized through most fields of psychology and neuroscience field. Sociology tends to veer toward deconstructionist.

man, I thought writing /s after obviously sarcastic comments was retarded, but I guess those low-IQ redditards have to communicate with each other.

In my experience you can never underestimate the stupid on this site.

Orwell is talking about homeless people, not incels you exceptional individual.

Actually read it... What do you think "incel" stands for?

He talks about how relationships with women are almost a requirement for sanity.

This not true at all. Men can be losers but women can't, should tell you everything you need to know about what dating is like for some of us.

>more or less calls homeless involuntarily celibate because their male to female ratio is 10-1 and no women above them will date them
>this can't be abstracted to include a wider range of undesirable men in a world where sex with hot guys is a swipe away for most females and women all have jobs and don't need providers
Incelibacy is an epidemic

I ain't reading all that shit faggot
Get a hobby

2 paragraphs user... I read the entire book yesterday.

Before i read are you taking the side of whores or young men

Tinder, dating sites, bars. Brothels.

Why are you lying? Tranny or jew agenda?

What? Just fucking read it.

Not unless you tell me who's side your on first.
Slutty pieces of shit or men pick one.

Men obviously. I'm posting here.

I love how normies project when their feelings are touched

Denial is all you have.

Quality post, op. Seriously. Orwells description is accurate.

>Even then, however, they will still NOT "date down" economically - their husbands have to not only be attractive, but they also must be at least as successful as them.
The rest was spot on but this part is 100% wrong as much as I hate to say it
t. poor Brad

It's a proven fact that women generally don't date down economical hierarchies.

The most compelling argument for nofap.
Aside from religious allegories, this is solid advice. I'm especially intrigued by the mention of transexuals and crossdressers. Based.

Either your girlfriend is way less attractive than you're wiling to admit or your earning potential has a high chance of growing significantly in future

Prove it. Women don't often date poorer guys simply because men have more money and get paid more.

Says the kissless virgin neet, with his vast expertise on women.

Below a certain age it doesn't really matter dude. I'm a huge loser and I've dated attractive women, but I'm 26 and a student. I had a hot as fuck girlfriend when I was 19. If you're like 35+ though you better have a career, or just bang 18 year olds who don't know any better. Roasties your age will be mad, so they'll attempt to villify you because they hate younger women.

Ah, so it's the first then ;)

>It is obvious what the results of this must be: homosexuality, for instance, and the occasional rape cases.
Desperation doesn't turn you gay unless you lived in a closet.

I don't understand what you just wrote, dude.

So we're all just a bunch of internet tramps?

Attached: image.jpg (500x500, 290K)

>not redpilled on the holocaust.

Noporn and lessfap are legit though

Millions of people died in WW2, is I believe what he's referring to. He uses Hitler as a positive example for what semen retention can do. I'm sure he's redpilled on the holohoax.

>No humiliation could do more damage to a man's self-respect
Fuck man. I now know why some specific failures still rest on my consciousness.

Attached: A03AF89D-5BED-48A2-AFED-9E5F283698AF.jpg (500x375, 36K)

fuck off faggot and die

tI, so I originally, dr

How do you explain prison gays then?

This is why no one takes you seriously.

Source should be down and out in Paris and London

This picture is original. Do you have more? That ass is out of this world.

>On aggregate men and women have Identical IQs
No they don't. Women have a lower IQ, unsurprising considering their smaller brains.
>men are in much higher numbers on either extreme where women tend to stack up in the middle
Wrong. That's a lie made up by roasties to cope with their inferiority. The truth is that at the level of mental retardation women and men are almost equal in numbers, while there are always more men at any level of intelligence higher than that.

See here , same rule applies (you already got the answe)

Nothing happens by choice. "Blame" is a myth.

>thinks women can be losers
>closest female equivalent is repulsed by male loser
>also thinks they are are everything wrong with the world so it's not just a lack of attraction they genuinely see themselves above robots
It's so deeply ingrained in their psychology that they are valuable that women even when fancying themselves an outsider can't even fathom herself as one of the actual losers of society. She instead prefers to consider robots less than human so she can continue to believe her own larp.

Good post, well constructed, would reccomend to a friend

Who is this girl ? Orignanonpeperoni

>or they force their voice to be heard the only way they can find: through violence
beta uprising now

Attached: 1527069579528.png (600x570, 504K)

Lol occult bs.

you shouldnt have even told him, next time let him rot in his own ignorance if he refuses to read something on the side he agrees with just because he doesnt already know they agree with him

Nice projections, as always

>be an atheist fedora tipper
>play MMOs and rot away in your mom's basement your entire life
>play pretend but not really about your dick
>own the world banks, own hollywood, own countries

Even if you aren't looking at these extremes, truly successful people all have some religious or occult practices in their life. Literally all of them.

good bread, user. i had no idea he felt this way.

Attached: 1522152572525.png (1100x950, 177K)

Thanks a lot OP, I always assumed something like this was always true and you gave me some much needed citation.

I've reached the same conclusions my friend, this will only get worse as time goes on and more men come to the same conclusion. It just started

All the banks and especially Hollywood are run by hardcore secularists, they're only Jews by name to benefit from nepotism.
Lots of leaders have religious convictions sure, but they're real religions and not your middle school LARP shit