I don't know, A kinda got a reason, give it to her why not

I don't know, A kinda got a reason, give it to her why not.

Attached: b.jpg (960x720, 152K)

I would give it to C just to trigger Bfags

also nice original thread

Child B because she made it and thus it belongs to her
This doesn't have much or any significance to my political leanings, though

Attached: Gakkou Gurashi 2.gif (500x281, 920K)

Children don't talk like that lol

Fuck all 3 i'm keeping it

>FUCK
>MARRY
>KILL

FUCK THIS THREAD OP

Give it to C because I hate women

B because she fucking made it

None of the above. I have no right to take it from child B in the first place so I wouldn't be giving it to anyone.

only rational person in this thread

It literally BELONGS to child B

B should sell it to A while C bitches for UBI

Why did they start fighting over a flute is the real question? If child B made it how did it end up in the position that everyone wanted it? Does that situation justify the other people's positions or diminish them?

I don't understand how child B isn't the only obvious answer

lol of course the man is the only one with the most shitty situation.

Attached: 1483135368381.gif (500x377, 896K)

C is the only male child
I choose C

Have you ever considered people think differently?

let them all fight to the death

>some people are stupid
correct

It's not a man, just a lesbian.

Child B is the answer because it's an obviously gross oversimplification of a complex problem.

found the Jow Forumsster

Becuase in this setting you're apparently a commie fuck who already stole it from child B and are trying to decide who to redistribute it to. They are only fighting becuase you made it belonging to child A or C rather than it's rightful owner an option by stealing it from her in the first place.

I like your solution the best, I think

Child A gets the flute. Anyone saying Child B isn't looking at the bigger picture. Child B shouldn't be making flutes if she doesn't intend to sell them or use them.

B is the owner of the flute, so it's her choice what to do with it. You're stealing it from her if you give it to A or C.

Came here to say thisHow the fuck can you just take something from someone who made it? Seriously how can you claim any kind of moral high ground when you advocate thievery?

Fucking americans, how is this even a question

If Child B made the flute then they are the owner. I don't have any right to give it to someone else because it isn't mine.

Child B, she made it, can do whatever she sees fit with it.

What if she wants to masturbate with it?

Go for it, I'd hope I can watch or receive a filming of it. Either way it's hers, so go crazy.

Keep it for myself because kids need to learn about how the world works

Child A, so that she can play the flute and drum up demand for flute sales for Child B

Child C because it is our moral imperative to redistribute property

>anyone who chooses anything but b

Attached: pinochet3.jpg (640x640, 60K)

Snap it in half and watch them cry

>dissemble the flute and make smaller flutes and sell it at an increase price.

C my comrades...

Child B cause we aren't commies

The flute was made to be played. That was the very purpose of its existence in the first place. If the flute is not used to produce music, than its existence will be illogical. The matters of who produced the tool, who earned it, who deserves it: all of those are vanities, they matter not. The materials, resources and time applied in the making of the tool is irrelevant. All that matters is its function, its purpose on this universe, its proper use. Therefore, the flute must go to the one who can properly utilize it. Any other choice is literally human subjectivity and is ultimately irrelevant when you analyze the fact: a flute exists. Therefore, it must be played.
With that I conclude that I would give the flute to A so we all could enjoy the music.

> Americans parroting stale anti communist propaganda
Colour me surprised

I agree. A will provide the most return.

I cannot give that which was never mine to begin with. The whole contrivance is bankrupt from the start. Let Child B negotiate the value of her potentially beautiful but dead work, and Child C bargain for an opportunity to learn a Skill. If Child A cannot make a compelling case for her own skill as a flute player to Child B, let her earn it with her strength. If they can't or won't learn to negotiate among themselves, then they'll have to learn the truth of the very poverty they put themselves in by not finding a way to use their resource wisely.

Filthy Statists

Kill A and C for attempting to violate the NAP.

Attached: 1477133624993.png (547x402, 66K)

And if it is an art piece? Y'know meant for decorative purposes.

Came here to post this, you are a gentleman and a scholar

Lol k, I'm gonna jump in and say A, because of Aristotle.

Aristotle suggested the idea of tell, which is an innate property, a "purpose", of sorts, for a given thing. Everything has a telos, a chair, a stream, a human, and in this case, a flute.

How do you determine telos? Simple, you pose a telologic question and the answer defines the telos. In this case, you might ask, "what is the purpose of a flute?" or phrased differently, "a good flute _____" and then you fill in the blank.

In this case, a good flute is one that produces good music, a good flute is played *well*.

To maximize the tells, we should give the flute to child A.

Attached: g7QG7JP1-YhXuejICeF--ydL-Sity1rQ9JIdJGxV6Xw.jpg (672x559, 32K)

Fuck it have a serious answer.

I'm gonna jump in and say A, because of Aristotle.

Aristotle suggested the idea of Telos, which is an innate property, a "purpose", of sorts, for a given thing. Everything has a telos, a chair, a stream, a human, and in this case, a flute.

How do you determine telos? Simple, you pose a telologic question and the answer defines the telos. In this case, you might ask, "what is the purpose of a flute?" or phrased differently, "a good flute _____" and then you fill in the blank.

In this case, a good flute is one that produces good music, a good flute is played *well*.

To maximize the telos, we should give the flute to child A.

Attached: kustIhKOmLfPfA92z4kLhewb3H-4YTTg3KIPpo3u8Ek.jpg (720x960, 94K)

>The flute was made to be played
No, it was made because the maker made it. It doesnt matter if the flute doesnt get played

Marxist theory of personal property suggested Child B should keep the flute.

Well, can you agree that there are flutes that could be considered better, or at least, more flute-like, than other flutes?

We make these internal judgements all the time. We choose to use pens that aren't square shaped or made of razor blades because they wouldn't be good pens.

Attached: g7QG7JP1-YhXuejICeF--ydL-Sity1rQ9JIdJGxV6Xw.jpg (672x559, 32K)

Id keep it. Laters losers

Attached: 153580b8.png (349x371, 110K)

Yes, but I dont see how that is relevant. The flute has no purpose it needs to fulfill. It is just a product. A potter doesnt NEED to fill her pots with something if the creation of the pots was the end goal. It would be wrong for a person to steal the potters' pots for the purpose of filling them with things

What anime is this iooooiiioiiorgi?

POLICE (original muted)

A is an arrogant cunt
C has no significant reason to recieve the flute

Go back to North Korea.

Yes it does, leftists would give it to C or A

This shouldn't make me laugh so hard but it does

>only people from Jow Forums are against communism
fucking kek

Calm down, B

A is fascism/national socialism
B is capitalism
C is communism

Under fascism/national socialism, B would get some form of compensation for making the flute for A though.

Under Capitalism, D, who owns the Kindergarten, would be entitled to 90% of the flutes value.

You were right when you said the pot doesn't need purpose and wrong when you mentioned thievery
It's the same thing; once something is, it can be protected or destroyed. Neither is the preferred because preference is from within you. On an outside scope, there is none. Should the universe implode, it would do nothing to protect itself and why should it? Because we live? No

Whats A then? I have no clue and have been trying to figure it out for ages

Utilitarianism
(seriously fucking original)

I think fascim or national socialism are as close as you can get, but nobody would really choose A without caveat as it would make B stop producing high quality flutes.

Sounds like the reason for planned obsolescence and why America no longer makes the reliable, durable products it was once known for
>Democracy is a mask

Which political ideology does this tie into the most?

People only say the other ones as poorly constructed b8 or as a joke.

How the fuck is a flute made by a blue-haired 6 year old going to improve Cs life immeasurably? Is it immeasurable because its 0?

Attached: 98f64371c6cca793f4e1815de5fa20d5.png (451x447, 300K)

If you choose B you are a socialist.

Attached: slide_6.jpg (960x720, 160K)

It's b's if she wants a to have it a can buy it.
Welcome to capitalism marxcucks

Attached: 1522964909043.jpg (700x455, 49K)

a

original commnt

Ahh, propaganda for capitalistic ideals.

How is A proficient with the instrument if they do not already have access to one? So, basically, A is scamming everyone to get another flute so they can fuck right off for being a Jew. B is smart enough to make flutes, and C is clearly a layabout, so they could probably come to some sort of factory line agreement between them to make more flutes, of which C gets one in payment.

Attached: 1524503401356.png (1029x994, 953K)

How about this

A, to maximize its productivity. BUT I compensate B with it. Make it a regular thing, so B manufactures flutes for talents like A for compensation. BUT A has to agree that she will play the flute regularly, competetively, and compensate 30 percent of the profit to me, who got her the flute

I think you're overthinking things, whoever makes the thing has the choice of where it goes. Therefore B can do what it likes with it.

I'm liberal and would give it to B. Fuck off with your "hurr durr leftist boogeyman would choose the wrong option" attitude, dumb underage Jow Forumstard.

fuck A
marry B
kill C

ez

B is productive
C is useless
A is talented

I mean, under a normal life circumstance its B but this is clearly about economic ideals regarding private property, wealth distribution and welfare. No way in hell a single flute would have a significant effect on the life of C

>all the fucking brainlets in this thread
say you're going to cut it into 3 pieces and give one to each
the child that protests the most ends up getting it

Child C deserves to starve and should never attain a flute . worthless ginger

B made it, so it gets it.
A is the second choice.
C can go fuck itself.

I want your phone because you're not using it to phone any friends therefore I should have it

Attached: 1527199110681.jpg (600x450, 463K)

orginaIIy Delet this

...Is this from the bible?

Break the flute into thirds.