Which site has smarter people than Jow Forums?

poor losers who work shit jobs have no time

successful people use social media all the time

Any site, even shit like 9gag is probably smarter

Reddit only thinks it is smart.

Quora (mostly)

lainchan, maybe?

Gabriel is so much better, I don't understand.

all except buzzfeed.

Bet you can't even understand Rick and Morty's humor

>Which site has smarter people than Jow Forums?
grindr

Attached: 1460231279323.jpg (1000x1000, 127K)

>Quora
>every answer is either shit from an Indian or thinly veiled content marketing

tbqh this site is probably one of the most intelligent out on the web. You just need to have the mental "filter" to weed out the normies, and you'll find some exceptionally clever people here.

>low iq boards

>Jow Forums
>/tv/
>/fa/
>/vg/

>high iq boards

>/his/
>/sci/
>/lit/
>almost every board that encourages OC artwork
>/a/

>mixed bag
>Jow Forums
>Jow Forums
>porn boards
>Jow Forums

>High IQ
>/a/
>/lit/
What
>Low IQ
>/vg/
The
>Mixed bag
>Jow Forums
Fuck

Attached: 15269813553561.gif (500x281, 428K)

>porn boards

I can't remember a time when I found something of note on a porn board.

>mixed bag
>porn boards
You need an iq of at least 150 to post on /d/

reddit com/r/rickandmorty

Bodybuilding.com and autoadmit.com

When you dive into threads with only 3 images and hundreds of comments, you'll find some of the most profound reflections surrounding the beauty of life's small pleasures.

bb.com fucking sucks now.

>/a/
>high iq board

Attached: 1525200686674.jpg (600x375, 26K)

Ok then just go to autoadmit instead

I honestly don't know. Most discussion oriented websites seem to be a mixed bag now.

Attached: bigboye.jpg (700x525, 177K)

literally everything that can think thinks that it's smart though

Work the Wikipedia hustle. You've spent enough time browsing threads that you can probably read a couple of articles in succession.

When an idea pops into your head just go and search it. It could be a historical figure you're heard of but don't know much about, a scientific principle which you used to know but now you're hazing on, it could be a celebrity that you just want to know more about.

Read the article then tabs, tabs and more tabs. Anytime you see a link that you want to know more about open in a new tab and save it for later, do that for all the articles you read then once you hit a dead end go back to all the tabs you have open and find the next best article to read.

You can literally spend hours on that site and your power level will increase immensely. Someone will say something in conversation will remind you of something you read and you can talk about how it applies.

There's articles on movies, history, science, philosophy, technology, geographic locations, sporting events, websites, politicians, celebrities. If it exists there's a Wikipedia article on in.

Bonam fortunam! Good Luck!

Reddit takes itself way too seriously. At the end of the day, their goal is imaginary internet points, not actual intellectual discussion.

dont defend reddit Mr.autocorect phone poster that probably uses reddit

Github?
What else did you expect?

Wikipedian culture is so fucking weird and autistic looking at it as an outsider. Like fuck man what the hell are those "golden barnstars" supposed to stand for and why do people feel the need to tag themselves (ex:"this wikipedian believes Israel should be annexed into India"). Humor in that culture seems very reddit-like but like it's still stuck in those pre-mobile internet days (hard to explain, but usually consists of inside-jokes and Grandpa-tier image macros) but I figure that's due to the older age of fhe average wikipedian. Besides most wikipedians mainly do small stuff like correct grammar and copyright stuff. In spite of all of those complaints wikipedia seems to function well with the only faults I see with it is the fact that complicated subjects are usually at the mercy of being explained by some arrogant undergrad student with lots of errors (usually stuff in the humanities) these also being prone to self-promotion that goes unchecked due to niche subject matters

The point of wikifags tagging themselves with their beliefs is so when they edit an article and you backcheck which motherfucker did it and you see it was them, you'll know what their bias is as to determine if their edit is coming from a poorly biased position.

All of the sites, desu. This is the Interbutts though, it's not like you really should've expected intense and reasoned debate and intellectual rigor at 4chins. To be fair though, we do have a reasonable amount of all of the above. Which never fails to be surprising.

As if those with certain agendas to push are going to tag themselves with some tag-shit (most of the tags I see includes insignificant humour stuff like left-handness) for obivious red-flags. Besides wikipedia already has a way with dealing with controversial subjects and IIRC it is with only letting "experienced" users edit.

I would also like to nominate urbanbaby.com along with youbemom.com

Unironically these sites have more rigor and depth than Rationalwiki or the subbreddits of /Bad(subject) (badhistory, badphilosophy, badeconomics etc)

Ate chan

None.
Jow Forums is the most intelligent website on the entire internet.

Attached: too intelligent.png (1280x1483, 41K)

>/lit/
>/sci/
>high iq
If you lurked these boards you would realize that /lit/ is full of pretentious druggies and /sci/ of frustrated college students

Sadly unironically this. There's no more intelligent site on the net that I know of.

The sites I've been on with higher IQs than Jow Forums have been small forums dedicated to professionals who give eachother advice on uber-nerdy things.

I really doubt Jow Forums is more than like ~105IQ on average it's not that intellectual.

Rw please kill yourself

I mean I argue with people on /lit/ and I regularly am proved a pseud, humiliated, and start holding back the tears and I'm 121IQ. This is largely a result of them simply knowing literature way better than me while I'm still a newb but it's still humiliating. I go back there in the desperate hope I will one day I will prove I'm less of a pseud than the average /lit/ user.

I think /lit/ is pretty smart. Haven't been on /sci/ much.

Attached: 706a1a056c364590ecb1ebb84406a99b.jpg (472x475, 28K)

If you want to find smarter people in their subject area you are better off with old school forums.

>121 IQ
user, I have bad news... you're not going to make it. Best you can hope for is middle management, and you'll be out of your depth the entire time. Just give up.

Attached: 1321722596295.png (440x553, 386K)

I don't think being intelligent is a good thing these days, I think it just makes you be able to have deeper observations about the shit that makes you depressed and anxious. Seems to be higher IQ people are mostly cucks who serve others and don't reproduce but are smug about it while 80IQ nigger chads have 10 children. High IQ people are also just an existential threat to the human race, they are responsible for the development of all the really nasty WMDs.

Still part of me does like to challenge and prove myself among smart people and I keep getting bootyblasted by /lit/ calling me out EVERY TIME I misinterpret something I read.

Attached: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTXdRhvLPkaykdlN4Y-i4hjTsX3saNePnZ02TkyR_oa2TW13Dbk.jpg (250x201, 9K)

>I don't think being intelligent is a good thing these days,
Lucky you that you'll never suffer that terrible fate, then. Protip: there are infinite ways to interpret any text, so you literally CAN'T interpret it incorrectly. You're being played by second year humanities students, dumbass.

Attached: 1321723279592.jpg (600x800, 339K)

22chan org
Very intellectual

>Protip: there are infinite ways to interpret any text, so you literally CAN'T interpret it incorrectly.

Oh sweet jesus you're more of a brainlet than I am you postmodernist pseud.

There ARE infinite ways to interpret a text. There AREN'T infinite GOOD ways to interpret a text. Doesn't mean your BAD interpretation is wrong, though.

Interpret your life this way: you're letting anonymous strangers on the internet shame you because you don't view some shitty book the same way they all do, even though it has literally no impact on your life whatsoever and they're all certified faggots. You're even worse than they are.

No, I'm having them point out my interpretation of things like words loosely translated to English are contradicted by how the word is used elsewhere in the text. My ability to understand semantics is quite poor. I can just be wrong. Then after discussing how I'm wrong on /lit/ I learn to be less wrong and interpret the text more accurately.

Being told you're wrong and a faggot is good for you, you sound like a dipshit pseudointellectual.

whats that chan?

It was made by some user here. He hast bothered to promote it so its already dead