Squats for huge legs >Becomes 2 inches shorter >Can't get laid because now manlet

>Squats for huge legs >Becomes 2 inches shorter >Can't get laid because now manlet

Attached: LybAUZy.jpg (691x800, 98K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qG2HwH1JkAI
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

if you were 2 inches away from being a manlet then you were always a manlet

>pussy pad
>squatting less than 1 pl8

Pathetic

>plbbfffffrrrt

Attached: 1536469993666.png (500x735, 532K)

>6'1
>now 5'11

>squats 45kg

The cut off is 6'2, champ

>6'1"
lol

>t. actual manlets trying to bring normal height people to their level
Keep barking down there little ''men''

P(6'2"): (base case)
>6'2" - 2" = 6'0"
>(6'0" < 6'2") -> 6'0" is manlet
>(6'2" - 2" = 6'0") ∈ manlets -> 6'2" ∈ manlets
P(i+1"):
>(i+1") - 2" = i-1"
>i ∈ manlets -> i-1" ∈ manlets

Therefore, every single height makes you a manlet. Q.E.D.

So that's what home gyms are for.

keep reaching manlet. i know youre used to it by now

Attached: B76C2953-1CA5-45AE-8F78-1A69BF1B5DBC.jpg (1823x608, 246K)

Johnny is that you?

>∈
Shut up nerd.

>∈
vs.
>writing "belongs to the set of" every time
Kill yourself

Ontario
n
t
a
r
I
o

All I have to do to disprove this is give a counter example.
P(6'4"):
>6'4" - 2" = 6'2"
>(6'2" < 6'4") -> 6'2" is not manlet
>(6'4" - 2" = 6'2") ∉ manlets

Attached: 1544085964335.jpg (240x210, 6K)

But the base case already establishes that 6'2" is manlet based on the formula provided
Any height above 6'2" can be reduced into a expression of the base case

Is nobody going to question OP's claim of losing height from squatting

NOFAP IS MAKING ME LOSE MY MIND FUCK AAAAAAAAA

I don't see her face, but for some reason, i can't help to think that she is asian.

I was thinking about this, and let me elaborate
Let's say we wish to prove 6'5" is a manlet; given the base case proven 6'2" is manlet, let's start from there
6'3":
>6'3" - 2" = 6'1"
>(6'1" < 6'2") -> 6'3" is manlet
6'4":
>6'4" - 2" = 6'2"
>(6'2" < 6'3") -> 6'4" is manlet
6'5":
>6'5" - 2" = 6'3"
>(6'3" < 6'4") -> 6'5" is manlet

Base case need not be 6'2"; should *any* manlet cutoff exist, 's theory implies *everybody* is a manlet

youtube.com/watch?v=qG2HwH1JkAI

Can you imagine squatting and a massive shit slamming out, that would be funny.

Attached: images (13).jpg (739x415, 25K)

Do squats actually make you shorter? I'm already a 5'9.5 manlet, and just started programming squats again after not doing them for years because of a torn ACL. My legs are already big as fuck, losing a cm or 2 isn't worth it for fucking squats.

Do squats really make you permantly shorter?

the majority of people are manlets and they seem to be getting laid just fine

>all that muscle
>no ass