How smart is r/banter?

How smart is r/banter?

Attached: 1505362021084.jpg (480x480, 51K)

F

lol

$70 worth of goods + $30 change = $100 x 2 = $200
F.

F

lol

based

c

C

Ill trust the jew
when it comes to money they know what they're talking about

This

The 100 was stolen so it was a loss. The 70 was a loss since the money used to buy it was stolen. The 30 change is a loss too since it came out of the register

stupid

Attached: 1524781321510.gif (596x446, 338K)

Fucking hell when did Jow Forums get run over by retards

Attached: 1524250377074.jpg (419x480, 32K)

Im overthinking it and am now questioning the science of trading. Fucsake

$100 go bye bye
$70 of food go bye bye
$30 change go bye bye

100 + 70 + 30 = 200

He only lost $100. So the the lady stole $100 bought $70 worth of items and got 30 in change. The owner got the $100 bill back which means he only lost the $70(merchandise)+$30(change)

No wait. I think its C. The 100$ stolen money was returned anyway as payment so i dont think its a loss.
70$ item + 30$ change = 100

Answer is C

It says how much the owner lost. It'll include the money he lost and then gained afterwards.

100$.
70$ worth in goods and 30$ worth in money, since he didn't make a profit with that trade.

When counting the 100$ as a standalone loss and justpay attention to value leaving the shopowner, neglecting the fact that he got something back, 200$.
But this answer is false from a legal standpoint.

It cancels out

>how much did the owner lose??????
at the start he had $70 in goods and $100 in the register
at close he had no goods and $70 in the register
he lost $100
are morons

HAHHAHAHHAHAA YOU FELL FOR BAIT

IT WAS ALL A RAZZ

$30 plus added payment tax plus the worth of goods, but the worth of goods have to be priced at wholesale price. It will be lower than $70, and it can't be determined, because there is insufficient data, so A is the closest, but incorrect, answer.

$100 robbed
-100
$70 from goods are bought...
-100-70=-170
...paid with the same $100
-170+100=-70
owner gives her $30 of change from the bill
-70-30=-100
total = -100 dollars
the owner lost 100 dollars, the thief has the 100 dollars still but $70 are in products and the other $30 in cash

>tax
>wholesale price
The question said dont overthink.

(((-100)-70)-30)+100) = -100

Lose 100 dollar bill, gain 70 dollars back, but ultimately lose 70 dollars worth of goods plus that 30 dollars change.
It's C you fucking retards.

none because the owner probably bought that shirt for 40bux so 40+200= 240

A. 30$

G. That $100 was partially used to pay his rent. Now that he cannot afford to stay there, he will have to close his shop and declare bankruptcy.

Never trust (((ladies)))