How smart is r/banter?
How smart is r/banter?
F
lol
$70 worth of goods + $30 change = $100 x 2 = $200
F.
F
lol
based
c
C
Ill trust the jew
when it comes to money they know what they're talking about
This
The 100 was stolen so it was a loss. The 70 was a loss since the money used to buy it was stolen. The 30 change is a loss too since it came out of the register
stupid
Fucking hell when did Jow Forums get run over by retards
Im overthinking it and am now questioning the science of trading. Fucsake
$100 go bye bye
$70 of food go bye bye
$30 change go bye bye
100 + 70 + 30 = 200
He only lost $100. So the the lady stole $100 bought $70 worth of items and got 30 in change. The owner got the $100 bill back which means he only lost the $70(merchandise)+$30(change)
No wait. I think its C. The 100$ stolen money was returned anyway as payment so i dont think its a loss.
70$ item + 30$ change = 100
Answer is C
It says how much the owner lost. It'll include the money he lost and then gained afterwards.
100$.
70$ worth in goods and 30$ worth in money, since he didn't make a profit with that trade.
When counting the 100$ as a standalone loss and justpay attention to value leaving the shopowner, neglecting the fact that he got something back, 200$.
But this answer is false from a legal standpoint.
It cancels out
>how much did the owner lose??????
at the start he had $70 in goods and $100 in the register
at close he had no goods and $70 in the register
he lost $100
are morons
HAHHAHAHHAHAA YOU FELL FOR BAIT
IT WAS ALL A RAZZ
$30 plus added payment tax plus the worth of goods, but the worth of goods have to be priced at wholesale price. It will be lower than $70, and it can't be determined, because there is insufficient data, so A is the closest, but incorrect, answer.
$100 robbed
-100
$70 from goods are bought...
-100-70=-170
...paid with the same $100
-170+100=-70
owner gives her $30 of change from the bill
-70-30=-100
total = -100 dollars
the owner lost 100 dollars, the thief has the 100 dollars still but $70 are in products and the other $30 in cash
>tax
>wholesale price
The question said dont overthink.
(((-100)-70)-30)+100) = -100
Lose 100 dollar bill, gain 70 dollars back, but ultimately lose 70 dollars worth of goods plus that 30 dollars change.
It's C you fucking retards.
none because the owner probably bought that shirt for 40bux so 40+200= 240
A. 30$
G. That $100 was partially used to pay his rent. Now that he cannot afford to stay there, he will have to close his shop and declare bankruptcy.
Never trust (((ladies)))