Its amazing how many people get this wrong

Nolan Davis
Nolan Davis

Its amazing how many people get this wrong. Do you know the answer?

Attached: 966.png (12 KB, 401x401)

Mason Howard
Mason Howard

50/50
its not like the other three flips influence the fourth one.

Isaiah Murphy
Isaiah Murphy

well it depends if it lands on heads the first, second, third, or fourh time.

t. retard

Thomas Reyes
Thomas Reyes

the probability of getting 4 heads in a row is 1/16

Caleb Lewis
Caleb Lewis

False. It can land on the edge. Also if it lands where you cant see it then you must assume it is simultaneously heads, tails, and edge.

Gabriel Ward
Gabriel Ward

Take that shit to
//boards.4channel.org/sci/
Math is for niggers and faggots

Chase Phillips
Chase Phillips

There are 16 possibilities.

X = Heads
O = Tails

XXXX (1)

OXXX (2)
XOXX (3)
XXOX (4)
XXXO (5)

XXOO (6)
XOXO (7)
XOOX (8)
OOXX (9)
OXOX (10)
OXXO (11)

XOOO (12)
OXOO (13)
OOXO (14)
OOOX (15)

OOOO (16)

There are 16 possibilities, and so the chances are 1/16.

Tyler Powell
Tyler Powell

but how is the last flip affected by the previous ones

Christopher Thompson
Christopher Thompson

But we're talking about the last flip only. So X = heads, O = tails
Possibilities are
XXXX
XXXO
50/50

Josiah Russell
Josiah Russell

You have no idea how horribly wrong you are.

Benjamin Lopez
Benjamin Lopez

stop with these thread

David Hall
David Hall

Get a load of this retard. Never made it to junior year of high school did ya champ?

Jordan Diaz
Jordan Diaz

if you start from the beginning and flip 4 times, the probability is exactly 1/16

you already flipped it three times

John James
John James

Y'all need to learn that when a conditional statistics problem shows up on an imageboard it's always Bayesian.

P(A|B) = P(B|A)*P(A)/P(B) = 1 * .0625 / .125 = .5

Attached: zhn1VhmWqOkewJyngHBJZ5E-BgKvcDhqW3V5R5T1NQc.jpg (55 KB, 511x767)

Jonathan Garcia
Jonathan Garcia

The correct answer is 1/2. No need to praise me

Attached: genius.png (117 KB, 680x788)

Joseph Ward
Joseph Ward

This isn't math, it's one of those stupid questions like escaping a room with a table. The probability is 100% because it lands on heads each time.

Brayden Clark
Brayden Clark

for someone so educated you sure do have a shit taste in waifu

Attached: rinburninghouse.jpg (52 KB, 499x374)

Anthony Stewart
Anthony Stewart

not this again

5/7

Ayden Sanders
Ayden Sanders

wait this guy is onto something
explain room with a table too btw.

Carter Barnes
Carter Barnes

The statement either contradicts itself (3 times, no fourth time) or its 1/2 because its a fucking coin nigger, thats how they work

Mason Rivera
Mason Rivera

At least she can participate in a high five

Charles Adams
Charles Adams

3/3 flips are heads.
100% probability of heads.
Any other answer is factually wrong.

Kayden Collins
Kayden Collins

I hope this is bait, nobody can be that illiterate

Parker Cox
Parker Cox

Listen here, fucko. I dropped out of high school and don't even know what Bayesian is. I think its an asian from the San Francisco Bay Area.

Dylan Rogers
Dylan Rogers

This. According to previous observations the only educated conclusion possible is that it will land heads 100%.

Ian Roberts
Ian Roberts

All right here's your riddle

You're in a room with no doors or windows. Just a mirror and a table.

Jonathan Lee
Jonathan Lee

cum on the table while looking at myself in the mirror.

Lucas Hall
Lucas Hall

Please tell me you're shitting me. You dont unironically believe the chance is 100% do you? I think its pretty safe to assume its a normal head/tails coin

Attached: 1543595591288.jpg (130 KB, 739x673)

Tyler Davis
Tyler Davis

Do you have any proof that the coin even has a tails side?

Jacob Williams
Jacob Williams

Hmm, if I were in that situation, I'd look in the mirror, then at the wall and back at the mirror to see what I saw, then use the saw to cut the table in half and join the two halves to make a whole, and lastly put the "hole" on the wall and climb out.

Robert Nguyen
Robert Nguyen

Jesus fuck, you're all fucking retarded.

It's another conditional probability question.

A = all four flips are heads
B = first 3 flips are heads

P(A|B) = probability of all four heads given that the first 3 flips were heads <- what' we're trying to find
P(B|A) = probability of the first 3 flips being heads given that all four flips were heads <- obviously this is just equal to 1.
P(A) = probability that all four flips are heads = 1/16 = .0625 (since there are 16 possible head/tails combinations on four coin flips, and this occurs only once)
P(B) = probability that the first 3 flips are heads = 2/16 = .125 (since you can have HHHT but also HHHH)

Plug this all into Bayes and you get:
P(A|B) = P(B|A) * P(A) / P(B) = (1 * .0625) / .125 = 0.5

Attached: brainmuscles.png (144 KB, 1200x992)

Kevin Cruz
Kevin Cruz

The probability of heads in this circumstance is 100%. That doesn't mean if you flip the coin it will
be heads again, probability is just a means to guess the future.

Ian Myers
Ian Myers

If the question asks what the probability of ONE coin flip is, then the answer is 1/2.

However, the question is more like, what's the probability of flipping the same coin FOUR times, and getting it heads, all four times.

Camden Miller
Camden Miller

Always fucking hated that "riddle". It's just total nonsense that no one would ever actually guess without having heard it before.

Zachary Mitchell
Zachary Mitchell

You could have skipped the Bayesian method if you understood that prior coin flips have no impact on the final coin flip and applied that knowledge. Of course it's 50-50, you overly educated twip

Luis White
Luis White

the question is too vague. if it is asking the probability of it landing on heads 4 times in a row, the answer is 1/16. if asking for just the 4th toss, then 1/2 retard

Leo Richardson
Leo Richardson

or you could say just its 1/2 because one flip is not logically dependent on the others

Elijah Nelson
Elijah Nelson

post some vague ass probability question
have a bunch of autismos fight over who's right
truly evil

Elijah Sanders
Elijah Sanders

I dont understand how its vague. Its not asking for the chance of 4 in a row. Its asking for the chance of the last flip to be heads, which is 50%.

Oliver Sullivan
Oliver Sullivan

what is the probability of landing on heads a fourth time
its a stupid trick question that could be interpreted either way.

Jaxon Myers
Jaxon Myers

It really isn't user, you're just unfamiliar with the way statistics textbooks word things. It is very explicit and its interpretation is singular.

Owen Carter
Owen Carter

what are you doing here then mr. big brain

Benjamin Jones
Benjamin Jones

The OP question isnt vague. pic related is an example of a problem with no clear answer

Attached: 5352r2r.png (3 KB, 401x401)

Jeremiah Foster
Jeremiah Foster

Other than statistics? Just getting drunk and hanging out in some feels threads.

Did you expect to find people who weren't interested in stats in a stats thread?

It's 9. You could get an answer of 1 if you put the 2(1+2) term in the denominator, but you didn't, so it's 9.

Grayson Foster
Grayson Foster

It's 2 -- PEMDAS dammit.

Gabriel Rivera
Gabriel Rivera

This.

The history of the coin does not impact future probabilities. It's always 50:50

Christopher Sullivan
Christopher Sullivan

The answer is 1 though. In PEMDAS multiplication/ division happen at the same time from right to left and subtraction/addition happen at the same time from right to left.

Nathan Phillips
Nathan Phillips

first you add 1+2 obviously
then because 3 in still in parentheses, you do 2 *3
then 6/6 = 1

Oliver Jenkins
Oliver Jenkins

right to left
wut? When do you ever parse an equation right to left? It doesn't matter anyway, because division is non-commutative, so if you want that result you have to format your equation appropriately, i.e. put the 2(1+2) in the denominator.

then because 3 in still in parentheses, you do 2 *3
That's where you're wrong. Once the 3 has been obtained the parentheses goes away, it's already been dealt with.

Your argument would mean that it equals 1, dumbass

Brayden Reyes
Brayden Reyes

You thought you did something here huh

Attached: 4A812191-0AED-41E1-BBF4-0749C821607D.jpg (269 KB, 750x663)

Oliver Russell
Oliver Russell

The answer is one.

Six objects, divided by two groups, made up of one object plus two objects. That's three objects per group, and two groups is six objects.

Six divided by six is one.

Logan Young
Logan Young

Six objects, divided by two, multiplied by 1+2 equals 9. If you wanted to put your sentiment into an equation, you would need to structure it with you two groups in the denominator. Since that is not the case, you can not assume that it is one object divided by two groups.

Jaxon Jackson
Jaxon Jackson

literally this entire fucking thread

Attached: 4dfa05c2-e903-4c98-bce9-1797dd5a6f54.png (8 KB, 363x364)

Camden Martin
Camden Martin

that would be (6/2)x(1+2)

Nolan Williams
Nolan Williams

Yeah, quick question op. who fucking cares?

Charles Myers
Charles Myers

literal autism jh

Thomas Perry
Thomas Perry

gamblers fallacy you nignogs

Alexander Gonzalez
Alexander Gonzalez

Coin flips are independent events. So, assuming that we are dealing with a 2 sided coin, the answer is 50%.

Nathan Scott
Nathan Scott

welI, you got me there.

Attached: aev87c9156001.jpg (58 KB, 800x621)

Aiden Perez
Aiden Perez

0%, you only flip it three times, so it can't land a fourth time.

Jeremiah Ramirez
Jeremiah Ramirez

Daily reminder that probability only works with large data sets.
It is a junk sciene to predict any one event.
Out of 10,000 flips patterns emerge, but you cant say /anything/ about any one flip

Easton Roberts
Easton Roberts

holy shit user what a fucking genius

Attached: 1488667996667.png (34 KB, 500x590)

Jace Morgan
Jace Morgan

This question is (I assume on purpose) worded ambiguously so you can realistically come to both 1/2 and 1/16 as the conclusion.

Julian Hall
Julian Hall

Depends on what viewpoint we're talking about here. If its already happened 3 times in a row, and we're just talking about the 4th time, then yes, it would be 50/50. But if we haven't flipped any coins or anything yet it would be a 1/16 chance of that happening.

Jason Cox
Jason Cox

Dont go near a Casino

Oliver Lewis
Oliver Lewis

This is a trick question. The question is worded in a way that it can be interpreted as
a) what is the chance of getting heads when you flip a coin
b)what is the chance of getting heads 4 times in a row

Therefore 1/2 and 1/16 are both right

/thread

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit